The Russians and the 2016 Election PT III

Page 6 of 11 Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 5, 6, 7 ... 9, 10, 11  Next

View previous topic View next topic Go down

Re: The Russians and the 2016 Election PT III

Post by The_Dude on 2017-04-07, 14:59

Lol
avatar
The_Dude
Pet Troll
Pet Troll

Posts : 7171
Join date : 2014-04-23

Back to top Go down

Re: The Russians and the 2016 Election PT III

Post by LooseGoose on 2017-04-07, 15:57

DWags wrote:How on earth does this somehow give that pussy grabber absolution if he conspired with the Russians during the election?

Get over the pussy jealousy.

and the operative word is IF - so far it's all bullshit and no proof. Anyone in the know says it didn't happen.

So get over that too.

_________________
All bowls matter.
avatar
LooseGoose
Geronte
Geronte

Posts : 34711
Join date : 2014-04-18
Age : 97
Location : Up North

Back to top Go down

Re: The Russians and the 2016 Election PT III

Post by Watch Out Pylon! on 2017-04-07, 16:04

LooseGoose wrote:
DWags wrote:How on earth does this somehow give that pussy grabber absolution if he conspired with the Russians during the election?

Get over the pussy jealousy.

and the operative word is IF - so far it's all bullshit and no proof. Anyone in the know says it didn't happen.

So get over that too.

Kind of like the Obama "wiretapping" claim?
avatar
Watch Out Pylon!
Geronte
Geronte

Posts : 12374
Join date : 2014-04-30

Back to top Go down

Re: The Russians and the 2016 Election PT III

Post by NigelUno on 2017-04-07, 16:12

LooseGoose wrote:
DWags wrote:How on earth does this somehow give that pussy grabber absolution if he conspired with the Russians during the election?

Get over the pussy jealousy.

and the operative word is IF - so far it's all bullshit and no proof. Anyone in the know says it didn't happen.

So get over that too.

Huh. I thought the FBI was investigating it. Are they in the know? Did they say it didn't happen?
avatar
NigelUno
Geronte
Geronte

Posts : 19851
Join date : 2014-04-16

Back to top Go down

Re: The Russians and the 2016 Election PT III

Post by GRR Spartan on 2017-04-07, 16:50

Goosechev gonna be Goosechev

Which is the same way Putin and Trump handle things.
Its FAKE NEWS and/or its over so forget about it.
avatar
GRR Spartan
Geronte
Geronte

Posts : 6102
Join date : 2014-04-25

Back to top Go down

Re: The Russians and the 2016 Election PT III

Post by LooseGoose on 2017-04-07, 17:05

Watch Out Pylon! wrote:
LooseGoose wrote:

Get over the pussy jealousy.

and the operative word is IF - so far it's all bullshit and no proof. Anyone in the know says it didn't happen.

So get over that too.

Kind of like the Obama "wiretapping" claim?

That happened.....

11. What Barry Did To Trump Is a TEXTBOOK Definition of 'Wiretapping'

Yes, Trump was 100% correct when he accused Obama of "tapping his wires." Feel free to argue with an actual MIT textbook if you don’t believe it:

Wiretapping is the traditional term for interception of telephone conversations. This should not be taken too literally. The word is no longer restricted to communications traveling by wire, and contemporary wiretaps are more commonly placed on radio links [ed. cell phones] or inside telephone offices. The meaning has also broadened in that the thing being tapped need no longer be a telephone call in the classic sense; it may be some other form of electronic communication, such as a fax or data.


Compared with the more precise but more general phrase "communications interception," the word "wiretapping" has two connotations. Much the stronger of these is that a wiretap is aimed at a particular target, in sharp contrast to the "vacuum cleaner" interception widely practiced by national intelligence agencies. The weaker connotation is that it is being done by the police.

--

Obama weaponized the IRS against his political opponents, those everyday, powerless Americans in the Tea Party.

Obama weaponized the Department of Justice against the media, even though the media adored him.

And now, perfectly in keeping with The Chicago Barry we all know and loath, like the leader of a Banana Republic, he weaponized state surveillance against his political opposition.

_________________
All bowls matter.
avatar
LooseGoose
Geronte
Geronte

Posts : 34711
Join date : 2014-04-18
Age : 97
Location : Up North

Back to top Go down

Re: The Russians and the 2016 Election PT III

Post by LooseGoose on 2017-04-07, 17:06

And now....after months of accusing Trump of being in the thrall of Russia....the NYT is worried he's pissed them off.

LMAO

Syria Strike Puts U.S. Relationship With Russia at Risk

_________________
All bowls matter.
avatar
LooseGoose
Geronte
Geronte

Posts : 34711
Join date : 2014-04-18
Age : 97
Location : Up North

Back to top Go down

Re: The Russians and the 2016 Election PT III

Post by LooseGoose on 2017-04-07, 17:08

Give it time boys...when all this shit washes out I'll be laughing at you.

Trump didn't collude with Russia.

Obama spied on his political opponents and YOU seem to be supporting that.


_________________
All bowls matter.
avatar
LooseGoose
Geronte
Geronte

Posts : 34711
Join date : 2014-04-18
Age : 97
Location : Up North

Back to top Go down

Re: The Russians and the 2016 Election PT III

Post by DWags on 2017-04-07, 17:15

LooseGoose wrote:
DWags wrote:How on earth does this somehow give that pussy grabber absolution if he conspired with the Russians during the election?

Get over the pussy jealousy.

and the operative word is IF - so far it's all bullshit and no proof. Anyone in the know says it didn't happen.

So get over that too.

Only a crass fool would think a man with two daughters is "jealous" of a man who brags about assaulting women. Sorry goose, you and Dude have to understand the difference between being jealous of a sexual assaulter and having respect for women. At this point, you just don't.

The FBI thinks differently than your right wing American Hamas. Putin has the man in place that he wanted. He didn't want HRC. He understands that it will need to look like Russia was provoked and one side in the election couldn't be provoked into doing anything rash. He's a chess master, I hope Trump is up to the task, or at least has surrounded himself with people who are.

_________________
avatar
DWags
Geronte
Geronte

Posts : 23636
Join date : 2014-04-21
Age : 56
Location : Right here

Back to top Go down

Re: The Russians and the 2016 Election PT III

Post by NigelUno on 2017-04-07, 17:16

LooseGoose wrote:Give it time boys...when all this shit washes out I'll be laughing at you.

Trump didn't collude with Russia.

Obama spied on his political opponents and YOU seem to be supporting that.


Trump publicly asked for Russia to hack.  Out loud.  He asked Russia to hack.  Russia hacked.

That's not collusion?  I mean...is that semantics?  Does it have to be in secret for there to be collusion?  

He asked Russia to hack.  They did.

And you're fine with that.

You're fine with a presidential candidate asking Russia to hack to help him win. That's what he did. And you're fine with it.

avatar
NigelUno
Geronte
Geronte

Posts : 19851
Join date : 2014-04-16

Back to top Go down

Re: The Russians and the 2016 Election PT III

Post by LooseGoose on 2017-04-08, 09:41

Blah, blah, blah, blah....they had hacked all of the DNC's shit long before.   And sad as it was for Hills that's not hacking the election.   But grasp at straws as your Russian theory vanishes.

For one thing, stepping aside on the Russia inquiry isn’t as big of a deal now as it might have been months ago. That’s because the Russia investigation isn’t really going anywhere. On March 9, BuzzFeed reported that Democrats on the committee are worried that their base is expecting dramatic results that simply won’t be coming.

Even some Democrats on the Intelligence Committee now quietly admit, after several briefings and preliminary inquiries, they don’t expect to find evidence of active, informed collusion between the Trump campaign and known Russian intelligence operatives, though investigators have only just begun reviewing raw intelligence. Among the Intelligence Committee’s rank and file, there’s a tangible frustration over what one official called “wildly inflated” expectations surrounding the panel’s fledgling investigation.

“The Russia narrative has been a sensational marketing effort, but the investigation won’t live up to the hype,” Michael Sainato writes. Glenn Greenwald of the Intercept has a good rundown of the problems caused by Democrats hyping Russian conspiracy theories.

_________________
All bowls matter.
avatar
LooseGoose
Geronte
Geronte

Posts : 34711
Join date : 2014-04-18
Age : 97
Location : Up North

Back to top Go down

Re: The Russians and the 2016 Election PT III

Post by NigelUno on 2017-04-08, 09:48

LooseGoose wrote:Blah, blah, blah, blah....they had hacked all of the DNC's shit long before.   And sad as it was for Hills that's not hacking the election.   But grasp at straws as your Russian theory vanishes.

For one thing, stepping aside on the Russia inquiry isn’t as big of a deal now as it might have been months ago. That’s because the Russia investigation isn’t really going anywhere. On March 9, BuzzFeed reported that Democrats on the committee are worried that their base is expecting dramatic results that simply won’t be coming.

Even some Democrats on the Intelligence Committee now quietly admit, after several briefings and preliminary inquiries, they don’t expect to find evidence of active, informed collusion between the Trump campaign and known Russian intelligence operatives, though investigators have only just begun reviewing raw intelligence. Among the Intelligence Committee’s rank and file, there’s a tangible frustration over what one official called “wildly inflated” expectations surrounding the panel’s fledgling investigation.

“The Russia narrative has been a sensational marketing effort, but the investigation won’t live up to the hype,” Michael Sainato writes. Glenn Greenwald of the Intercept has a good rundown of the problems caused by Democrats hyping Russian conspiracy theories.

So you admit the Russians hacked (after Trump asked them to) in an effort to influence the election.

And you're cool with that because your guy (the "asshole") won.

I think we're done here.
avatar
NigelUno
Geronte
Geronte

Posts : 19851
Join date : 2014-04-16

Back to top Go down

Re: The Russians and the 2016 Election PT III

Post by LooseGoose on 2017-04-08, 09:56

NigelUno wrote:
LooseGoose wrote:Blah, blah, blah, blah....they had hacked all of the DNC's shit long before.   And sad as it was for Hills that's not hacking the election.   But grasp at straws as your Russian theory vanishes.


So you admit the Russians hacked (after Trump asked them to) in an effort to influence the election.

And you're cool with that because your guy (the "asshole") won.

I think we're done here.

"long before" is what I said you stupid ass. Twist as you may, the whole Russian thing is a flop and a failure just like most Liberal theories.

_________________
All bowls matter.
avatar
LooseGoose
Geronte
Geronte

Posts : 34711
Join date : 2014-04-18
Age : 97
Location : Up North

Back to top Go down

Re: The Russians and the 2016 Election PT III

Post by NigelUno on 2017-04-08, 10:02

LooseGoose wrote:
NigelUno wrote:

So you admit the Russians hacked (after Trump asked them to) in an effort to influence the election.

And you're cool with that because your guy (the "asshole") won.

I think we're done here.

"long before" is what I said you stupid ass. Twist as you may, the whole Russian thing is a flop and a failure just like most Liberal theories.

Are you saying the Russians hacked before Trump asked them to? But he knew that they did and was asking them to hack some more?

Doesn't that make it worse?

It's not a theory that Russia influenced the election.

But, again...you're OK with that because your guy won.

Do you think all of Trump's contacts with Russia are above board? Do you think he does business with some shady Russian guys that have ties to Putin? Why won't he release his tax returns?

Why are you defending a guy who you called an "asshole"?

avatar
NigelUno
Geronte
Geronte

Posts : 19851
Join date : 2014-04-16

Back to top Go down

Re: The Russians and the 2016 Election PT III

Post by Cameron on 2017-04-08, 12:00

LooseGoose wrote:
Watch Out Pylon! wrote:

Kind of like the Obama "wiretapping" claim?

That happened.....

11. What Barry Did To Trump Is a TEXTBOOK Definition of 'Wiretapping'

Yes, Trump was 100% correct when he accused Obama of "tapping his wires." Feel free to argue with an actual MIT textbook if you don’t believe it:

Wiretapping is the traditional term for interception of telephone conversations. This should not be taken too literally. The word is no longer restricted to communications traveling by wire, and contemporary wiretaps are more commonly placed on radio links [ed. cell phones] or inside telephone offices. The meaning has also broadened in that the thing being tapped need no longer be a telephone call in the classic sense; it may be some other form of electronic communication, such as a fax or data.


Compared with the more precise but more general phrase "communications interception," the word "wiretapping" has two connotations. Much the stronger of these is that a wiretap is aimed at a particular target, in sharp contrast to the "vacuum cleaner" interception widely practiced by national intelligence agencies. The weaker connotation is that it is being done by the police.

--

Obama weaponized the IRS against his political opponents, those everyday, powerless Americans in the Tea Party.

Obama weaponized the Department of Justice against the media, even though the media adored him.

And now, perfectly in keeping with The Chicago Barry we all know and loath, like the leader of a Banana Republic, he weaponized state surveillance against his political opposition.

LooseGoose wrote:Blah, blah, blah, blah....they had hacked all of the DNC's shit long before.   And sad as it was for Hills that's not hacking the election.   But grasp at straws as your Russian theory vanishes.

For one thing, stepping aside on the Russia inquiry isn’t as big of a deal now as it might have been months ago. That’s because the Russia investigation isn’t really going anywhere. On March 9, BuzzFeed reported that Democrats on the committee are worried that their base is expecting dramatic results that simply won’t be coming.

Even some Democrats on the Intelligence Committee now quietly admit, after several briefings and preliminary inquiries, they don’t expect to find evidence of active, informed collusion between the Trump campaign and known Russian intelligence operatives, though investigators have only just begun reviewing raw intelligence. Among the Intelligence Committee’s rank and file, there’s a tangible frustration over what one official called “wildly inflated” expectations surrounding the panel’s fledgling investigation.

“The Russia narrative has been a sensational marketing effort, but the investigation won’t live up to the hype,” Michael Sainato writes. Glenn Greenwald of the Intercept has a good rundown of the problems caused by Democrats hyping Russian conspiracy theories.

When you quote long chunks of text, and especially when you present them as somehow authoritative, I would appreciate it if you would source those quotes. I'm sure you have the links, just C+P those along with the quote. It annoys me to have to ask, and it seems like something you do kind of a lot.
avatar
Cameron
Geronte
Geronte

Posts : 3385
Join date : 2014-04-16
Age : 29
Location : Michigan

Back to top Go down

Re: The Russians and the 2016 Election PT III

Post by LooseGoose on 2017-04-08, 17:20

Cameron wrote:
LooseGoose wrote:

That happened.....



LooseGoose wrote:Blah, blah, blah, blah....they had hacked all of the DNC's shit long before.   And sad as it was for Hills that's not hacking the election.   But grasp at straws as your Russian theory vanishes.



When you quote long chunks of text, and especially when you present them as somehow authoritative, I would appreciate it if you would source those quotes. I'm sure you have the links, just C+P those along with the quote. It annoys me to have to ask, and it seems like something you do kind of a lot.

I would be willing to wager that I link to the sources of my quotes more than the average here. there was a link in the 1st one when copied I don't know why it didn't carry over.



https://thefederalist.com/2017/04/07/sorry-democrats-the-obama-spying-scandal-isnt-going-away/

http://www.dailywire.com/news/15179/cover-11-things-media-wont-tell-you-about-obama-john-nolte#

And a link to the MIT textbook.
https://books.google.com/books?id=nMY8yHaTQi4C&pg=PA173&lpg=PA173&dq=the+word+is+no+longer+restricted+to+communication+traveling+by+wire&source=bl&ots=DR1XFWAnbh&sig=ZQR-yI_wUbcjHFuE0ITtG58hQP4&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwjysfSYvOzSAhWJjlQKHZGqCCAQ6AEIGjAA#v=one



_________________
All bowls matter.
avatar
LooseGoose
Geronte
Geronte

Posts : 34711
Join date : 2014-04-18
Age : 97
Location : Up North

Back to top Go down

Re: The Russians and the 2016 Election PT III

Post by Cameron on 2017-04-08, 22:27

LooseGoose wrote:
Cameron wrote:



When you quote long chunks of text, and especially when you present them as somehow authoritative, I would appreciate it if you would source those quotes. I'm sure you have the links, just C+P those along with the quote. It annoys me to have to ask, and it seems like something you do kind of a lot.

I would be willing to wager that I link to the sources of my quotes more than the average here. there was a link in the 1st one when copied I don't know why it didn't carry over.



https://thefederalist.com/2017/04/07/sorry-democrats-the-obama-spying-scandal-isnt-going-away/

http://www.dailywire.com/news/15179/cover-11-things-media-wont-tell-you-about-obama-john-nolte#

And a link to the MIT textbook.
https://books.google.com/books?id=nMY8yHaTQi4C&pg=PA173&lpg=PA173&dq=the+word+is+no+longer+restricted+to+communication+traveling+by+wire&source=bl&ots=DR1XFWAnbh&sig=ZQR-yI_wUbcjHFuE0ITtG58hQP4&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwjysfSYvOzSAhWJjlQKHZGqCCAQ6AEIGjAA#v=one



Thank you.
avatar
Cameron
Geronte
Geronte

Posts : 3385
Join date : 2014-04-16
Age : 29
Location : Michigan

Back to top Go down

Re: The Russians and the 2016 Election PT III

Post by GRR Spartan on 2017-04-09, 16:14

Putin has got his base in Tartus with a 49 year lease signed in January.
Even Trump's trusted advisors know that that's not going away.

True believers like Goosechev want us to believe one launch of 59 cruise missiles along with giving Russia less than an hour advance notice is Trump showing he has no ties to Russia.

More GOP/"conservative BS from Goosechev.

Incredibly we have no reports of any Russian onsite losing their lives and no reportes on how many fixed wing aircraft.

But now Trump is tough? Ever think Putin is in an even better position to threaten Trump with enough info to out him?
avatar
GRR Spartan
Geronte
Geronte

Posts : 6102
Join date : 2014-04-25

Back to top Go down

Re: The Russians and the 2016 Election PT III

Post by Watch Out Pylon! on 2017-04-13, 09:26

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2017/04/12/trump-says-russia-relations-may-be-at-all-time-low-praises-tillerson-trip.html

Are we talking post USSR breakup here? If not then the Cuban Missile Crisis says hello.
avatar
Watch Out Pylon!
Geronte
Geronte

Posts : 12374
Join date : 2014-04-30

Back to top Go down

Re: The Russians and the 2016 Election PT III

Post by NigelUno on 2017-04-13, 09:35

Watch Out Pylon! wrote:http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2017/04/12/trump-says-russia-relations-may-be-at-all-time-low-praises-tillerson-trip.html

Are we talking post USSR breakup here? If not then the Cuban Missile Crisis says hello.

"all time low" seems to be hyperbole, but what is he going to do to change relations?

avatar
NigelUno
Geronte
Geronte

Posts : 19851
Join date : 2014-04-16

Back to top Go down

Re: The Russians and the 2016 Election PT III

Post by DWags on 2017-04-13, 10:18

GRR Spartan wrote:Putin has got his base in Tartus with a 49 year lease signed in January.  
Even Trump's trusted advisors know that that's not going away.  

True believers like Goosechev want us to believe one launch of 59 cruise missiles along with giving Russia less than an hour advance notice is Trump showing he has no ties to Russia.

More GOP/"conservative BS from Goosechev.  

Incredibly we have no reports of any Russian onsite losing their lives and no reportes on how many fixed wing aircraft.

But now Trump is tough?  Ever think Putin is in an even better position to threaten Trump with enough info to out him?

I don't care if we go to war with Russia.(well of course I do...)   If the Trump team was implicit in dealing with and using Russia, I want to know.  If they weren't I want to know, then we'll all move on.  Get this off the table so Trump can be President.  The whole Nixon thing just got tiring.   He spent too much time dealing with that shit.  Trump doesn't need distractions, get this done with, do it ASAP, lets move on to Tax Cuts and Health Care.  Oh, and building the wall. We have to build that wall.   It makes me feel better here.

_________________
avatar
DWags
Geronte
Geronte

Posts : 23636
Join date : 2014-04-21
Age : 56
Location : Right here

Back to top Go down

Re: The Russians and the 2016 Election PT III

Post by steveschneider on 2017-04-13, 10:24

DWags wrote:
GRR Spartan wrote:Putin has got his base in Tartus with a 49 year lease signed in January.  
Even Trump's trusted advisors know that that's not going away.  

True believers like Goosechev want us to believe one launch of 59 cruise missiles along with giving Russia less than an hour advance notice is Trump showing he has no ties to Russia.

More GOP/"conservative BS from Goosechev.  

Incredibly we have no reports of any Russian onsite losing their lives and no reportes on how many fixed wing aircraft.

But now Trump is tough?  Ever think Putin is in an even better position to threaten Trump with enough info to out him?

I don't care if we go to war with Russia.(well of course I do...)   If the Trump team was implicit in dealing with and using Russia, I want to know.  If they weren't I want to know, then we'll all move on.  Get this off the table so Trump can be President.  The whole Nixon thing just got tiring.   He spent too much time dealing with that shit.  Trump doesn't need distractions, get this done with, do it ASAP, lets move on to Tax Cuts and Health Care.  Oh, and building the wall. We have to build that wall.   It makes me feel better here.

And labeling China a currency manipulator lol!
avatar
steveschneider
Geronte
Geronte

Posts : 12081
Join date : 2014-05-02

Back to top Go down

Re: The Russians and the 2016 Election PT III

Post by GRR Spartan on 2017-04-13, 10:44

We don't have a good relationship with Russia
China doesn't manipulate currency
NATO is no longer obsolete

And I was eating this beautiful piece of chocolate cake when we launched cruise missiles into Iraq errr Syria.


Last edited by GRR Spartan on 2017-04-13, 11:24; edited 1 time in total
avatar
GRR Spartan
Geronte
Geronte

Posts : 6102
Join date : 2014-04-25

Back to top Go down

Re: The Russians and the 2016 Election PT III

Post by DWags on 2017-04-13, 10:53

GRR Spartan wrote:

And I was eating this beautiful piece of chocolate cake when we launched cruise missiles into Iraq errr Syria.

meh, whats the diff?? Both muslim brown people. as long as we got some of em

_________________
avatar
DWags
Geronte
Geronte

Posts : 23636
Join date : 2014-04-21
Age : 56
Location : Right here

Back to top Go down

Re: The Russians and the 2016 Election PT III

Post by NigelUno on 2017-04-13, 10:54

GRR Spartan wrote:We don't have a good relationship with Russia
China doesn't manipulate currency
NATO is no longer obsolete

And I was eating this beautiful piece of chocolate cake when we launched cruise missiles into Iraq errr Syria.

Let them eat cake.

avatar
NigelUno
Geronte
Geronte

Posts : 19851
Join date : 2014-04-16

Back to top Go down

Re: The Russians and the 2016 Election PT III

Post by GRR Spartan on 2017-04-13, 11:25

GRR Spartan wrote:We don't have a good relationship with Russia
China doesn't manipulate currency
NATO is no longer obsolete

And I was eating this beautiful piece of chocolate cake when we launched cruise missiles into Iraq errr Syria.

Update:
Trump now tweeting cooler heads will prevail and the US and Russia will get along.

that's a second 180.
avatar
GRR Spartan
Geronte
Geronte

Posts : 6102
Join date : 2014-04-25

Back to top Go down

Re: The Russians and the 2016 Election PT III

Post by LooseGoose on 2017-04-19, 12:06

Update:

The CIA started all of these false rumors to help Hills. Dems not worried about spies interfering to help her.

Confirmed: John Brennan Colluded With Foreign Spies to Defeat Trump

An article in the Guardian last week provides more confirmation that John Brennan was the American progenitor of political espionage aimed at defeating Donald Trump. One side did collude with foreign powers to tip the election — Hillary’s.

Seeking to retain his position as CIA director under Hillary, Brennan teamed up with British spies and Estonian spies to cripple Trump’s candidacy. He used their phony intelligence as a pretext for a multi-agency investigation into Trump, which led the FBI to probe a computer server connected to Trump Tower and gave cover to Susan Rice, among other Hillary supporters, to spy on Trump and his people.

John Brennan’s CIA operated like a branch office of the Hillary campaign, leaking out mentions of this bogus investigation to the press in the hopes of inflicting maximum political damage on Trump. An official in the intelligence community tells TAS that Brennan’s retinue of political radicals didn’t even bother to hide their activism, decorating offices with “Hillary for president cups” and other campaign paraphernalia.

A supporter of the American Communist Party at the height of the Cold War, Brennan brought into the CIA a raft of subversives and gave them plum positions from which to gather and leak political espionage on Trump. He bastardized standards so that these left-wing activists could burrow in and take career positions. Under the patina of that phony professionalism, they could then present their politicized judgments as “non-partisan.”

The Guardian story is written in a style designed to flatter its sources (they are cast as high-minded whistleblowers), but the upshot of it is devastating for them, nonetheless, and explains why all the criminal leaks against Trump first originated in the British press. According to the story, Brennan got his anti-Trump tips primarily from British spies but also Estonian spies and others. The story confirms that the seed of the espionage into Trump was planted by Estonia. The BBC’s Paul Wood reported last year that the intelligence agency of an unnamed Baltic State had tipped Brennan off in April 2016 to a conversation purporting to show that the Kremlin was funneling cash into the Trump campaign.

Any other CIA director would have disregarded such a flaky tip, recognizing that Estonia was eager to see Trump lose (its officials had bought into Hillary’s propaganda that Trump was going to pull out of NATO and leave Baltic countries exposed to Putin). But Brennan opportunistically seized on it, as he later that summer seized on the half-baked intelligence of British spy agencies (also full of officials who wanted to see Trump lose).

_________________
All bowls matter.
avatar
LooseGoose
Geronte
Geronte

Posts : 34711
Join date : 2014-04-18
Age : 97
Location : Up North

Back to top Go down

Re: The Russians and the 2016 Election PT III

Post by Robert J Sakimano on 2017-04-19, 12:13

Goosechev with the mainstream media link..
avatar
Robert J Sakimano
Geronte
Geronte

Posts : 24341
Join date : 2014-04-15

Back to top Go down

Re: The Russians and the 2016 Election PT III

Post by LooseGoose on 2017-04-19, 12:24

Robert J Sakimano wrote:Goosechev with the mainstream media link..

Links to the Guardian of London. Sorry that the story damages your pinko overlords.

_________________
All bowls matter.
avatar
LooseGoose
Geronte
Geronte

Posts : 34711
Join date : 2014-04-18
Age : 97
Location : Up North

Back to top Go down

Re: The Russians and the 2016 Election PT III

Post by Robert J Sakimano on 2017-04-19, 12:25

LooseGoose wrote:
Robert J Sakimano wrote:Goosechev with the mainstream media link..

Links to the Guardian of London. Sorry that the story damages your pinko overlords.
with a history of maintaining an email account, I never did trust her.

avatar
Robert J Sakimano
Geronte
Geronte

Posts : 24341
Join date : 2014-04-15

Back to top Go down

Re: The Russians and the 2016 Election PT III

Post by MiamiSpartan on 2017-04-19, 13:45

LooseGoose wrote:
Robert J Sakimano wrote:Goosechev with the mainstream media link..  

Links to the Guardian of London.   Sorry that the story damages your pinko overlords.
You didn't read the Guardian article, did you?  Because it says pretty much none of what that article that you posted claims.  Your article takes one or two things from the Guardian about the British letting Brennan know what they've found, and then takes a massive leap to everything else that they claim with no sources, quotes, or attributions.
avatar
MiamiSpartan
Geronte
Geronte

Posts : 2524
Join date : 2014-04-16
Location : Miami, FL

Back to top Go down

Re: The Russians and the 2016 Election PT III

Post by Robert J Sakimano on 2017-04-19, 13:56

MiamiSpartan wrote:
LooseGoose wrote:

Links to the Guardian of London.   Sorry that the story damages your pinko overlords.
You didn't read the Guardian article, did you?  Because it says pretty much none of what that article that you posted claims.  Your article takes one or two things from the Guardian about the British letting Brennan know what they've found, and then takes a massive leap to everything else that they claim with no sources, quotes, or attributions.
you're not going to try to argue facts with Goosechev are you?

avatar
Robert J Sakimano
Geronte
Geronte

Posts : 24341
Join date : 2014-04-15

Back to top Go down

Re: The Russians and the 2016 Election PT III

Post by LooseGoose on 2017-04-19, 14:28

MiamiSpartan wrote:
LooseGoose wrote:

Links to the Guardian of London.   Sorry that the story damages your pinko overlords.
You didn't read the Guardian article, did you?  Because it says pretty much none of what that article that you posted claims.  Your article takes one or two things from the Guardian about the British letting Brennan know what they've found, and then takes a massive leap to everything else that they claim with no sources, quotes, or attributions.

British papers use more coded terms because of their libel laws. when you see Brennan frog marched you'll know the truth of it.

_________________
All bowls matter.
avatar
LooseGoose
Geronte
Geronte

Posts : 34711
Join date : 2014-04-18
Age : 97
Location : Up North

Back to top Go down

Re: The Russians and the 2016 Election PT III

Post by MiamiSpartan on 2017-04-19, 14:49

LooseGoose wrote:
MiamiSpartan wrote:
You didn't read the Guardian article, did you?  Because it says pretty much none of what that article that you posted claims.  Your article takes one or two things from the Guardian about the British letting Brennan know what they've found, and then takes a massive leap to everything else that they claim with no sources, quotes, or attributions.

British papers use more coded terms because of their libel laws. when you see Brennan frog marched you'll know the truth of it.
You can't be serious? I read quite a lot of British papers every day (sports/soccer related content), and they throw so much lying BS out there, it's astounding. Things you would NEVER see in a US paper, unless it's running next to articles about aliens and Bat Boy. One thing that the British press can never be accused of is being too careful on their claims.

avatar
MiamiSpartan
Geronte
Geronte

Posts : 2524
Join date : 2014-04-16
Location : Miami, FL

Back to top Go down

Re: The Russians and the 2016 Election PT III

Post by GRR Spartan on 2017-04-19, 15:45

LooseGoose wrote:Update:

The CIA started all of these false rumors to help Hills. Dems not worried about spies interfering to help her.

Confirmed: John Brennan Colluded With Foreign Spies to Defeat Trump

An article in the Guardian last week provides more confirmation that John Brennan was the American progenitor of political espionage aimed at defeating Donald Trump. One side did collude with foreign powers to tip the election — Hillary’s.

Seeking to retain his position as CIA director under Hillary, Brennan teamed up with British spies and Estonian spies to cripple Trump’s candidacy. He used their phony intelligence as a pretext for a multi-agency investigation into Trump, which led the FBI to probe a computer server connected to Trump Tower and gave cover to Susan Rice, among other Hillary supporters, to spy on Trump and his people.

John Brennan’s CIA operated like a branch office of the Hillary campaign, leaking out mentions of this bogus investigation to the press in the hopes of inflicting maximum political damage on Trump. An official in the intelligence community tells TAS that Brennan’s retinue of political radicals didn’t even bother to hide their activism, decorating offices with “Hillary for president cups” and other campaign paraphernalia.

A supporter of the American Communist Party at the height of the Cold War, Brennan brought into the CIA a raft of subversives and gave them plum positions from which to gather and leak political espionage on Trump. He bastardized standards so that these left-wing activists could burrow in and take career positions. Under the patina of that phony professionalism, they could then present their politicized judgments as “non-partisan.”

The Guardian story is written in a style designed to flatter its sources (they are cast as high-minded whistleblowers), but the upshot of it is devastating for them, nonetheless, and explains why all the criminal leaks against Trump first originated in the British press. According to the story, Brennan got his anti-Trump tips primarily from British spies but also Estonian spies and others. The story confirms that the seed of the espionage into Trump was planted by Estonia. The BBC’s Paul Wood reported last year that the intelligence agency of an unnamed Baltic State had tipped Brennan off in April 2016 to a conversation purporting to show that the Kremlin was funneling cash into the Trump campaign.

Any other CIA director would have disregarded such a flaky tip, recognizing that Estonia was eager to see Trump lose (its officials had bought into Hillary’s propaganda that Trump was going to pull out of NATO and leave Baltic countries exposed to Putin). But Brennan opportunistically seized on it, as he later that summer seized on the half-baked intelligence of British spy agencies (also full of officials who wanted to see Trump lose).

More FAKE NEWS from Goosechev
avatar
GRR Spartan
Geronte
Geronte

Posts : 6102
Join date : 2014-04-25

Back to top Go down

Re: The Russians and the 2016 Election PT III

Post by Watch Out Pylon! on 2017-04-19, 15:54

LooseGoose wrote:
MiamiSpartan wrote:
You didn't read the Guardian article, did you?  Because it says pretty much none of what that article that you posted claims.  Your article takes one or two things from the Guardian about the British letting Brennan know what they've found, and then takes a massive leap to everything else that they claim with no sources, quotes, or attributions.

British papers use more coded terms because of their libel laws. when you see Brennan frog marched you'll know the truth of it.

Is this national "make up a ton of bullshit" day?
avatar
Watch Out Pylon!
Geronte
Geronte

Posts : 12374
Join date : 2014-04-30

Back to top Go down

Re: The Russians and the 2016 Election PT III

Post by LooseGoose on 2017-04-19, 18:11

MiamiSpartan wrote:
LooseGoose wrote:

British papers use more coded terms because of their libel laws. when you see Brennan frog marched you'll know the truth of it.
You can't be serious? I read quite a lot of British papers every day (sports/soccer related content), and they throw so much lying BS out there, it's astounding. Things you would NEVER see in a US paper, unless it's running next to articles about aliens and Bat Boy. One thing that the British press can never be accused of is being too careful on their claims.


Well you're provably wrong since they just were.

_________________
All bowls matter.
avatar
LooseGoose
Geronte
Geronte

Posts : 34711
Join date : 2014-04-18
Age : 97
Location : Up North

Back to top Go down

Re: The Russians and the 2016 Election PT III

Post by MiamiSpartan on 2017-04-20, 12:40

LooseGoose wrote:
MiamiSpartan wrote:
You can't be serious? I read quite a lot of British papers every day (sports/soccer related content), and they throw so much lying BS out there, it's astounding. Things you would NEVER see in a US paper, unless it's running next to articles about aliens and Bat Boy. One thing that the British press can never be accused of is being too careful on their claims.


Well you're provably wrong since they just were.
Just were what? Accused of being too careful? You mean accused by you? Maybe I should have said that they're never accused of being too careful by anyone who reads them regularly. Either way, you know what I meant, and playing semantics doesn't change the point.
avatar
MiamiSpartan
Geronte
Geronte

Posts : 2524
Join date : 2014-04-16
Location : Miami, FL

Back to top Go down

Re: The Russians and the 2016 Election PT III

Post by LooseGoose on 2017-04-20, 14:01

MiamiSpartan wrote:
LooseGoose wrote:

Well you're provably wrong since they just were.
Just were what? Accused of being too careful? You mean accused by you? Maybe I should have said that they're never accused of being too careful by anyone who reads them regularly. Either way, you know what I meant, and playing semantics doesn't change the point.

By me. I was horsing around a bit. Not you but some others have gotten so fucking hostile over this crap that it's verging on scary.

_________________
All bowls matter.
avatar
LooseGoose
Geronte
Geronte

Posts : 34711
Join date : 2014-04-18
Age : 97
Location : Up North

Back to top Go down

Re: The Russians and the 2016 Election PT III

Post by Rocinante on 2017-04-21, 11:48

I'm sure the leaked info about Exxon applying for a waiver to sanctions against Russia have nothing to do with the election, and certainly nothing to do with the private meeting that Tillerson had with Putin in Russia a week ago.

Tom Clancy couldn't write more brazen villains.

_________________
It's only a matter of time before this thing blows up in our faces.
avatar
Rocinante
Geronte
Geronte

Posts : 12003
Join date : 2014-04-21
Location : East Lansing, MI

Back to top Go down

Re: The Russians and the 2016 Election PT III

Post by Sponsored content


Sponsored content


Back to top Go down

Page 6 of 11 Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 5, 6, 7 ... 9, 10, 11  Next

View previous topic View next topic Back to top


 
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum