tOfficial Astronomy Thread
Page 3 of 4 • 1, 2, 3, 4
Re: tOfficial Astronomy Thread
What, anyone can sent shit to the moon now?
We should have claimed the moon U.S. property when we had a chance.
We should have claimed the moon U.S. property when we had a chance.
Floyd Robertson- Geronte
- Posts : 20562
Join date : 2014-04-15
Location : Rolling Hills
Re: tOfficial Astronomy Thread
I guess the flag we planted doesn't mean shit these days.

Watch Out Pylon!- Geronte
- Posts : 20530
Join date : 2014-04-30
Re: tOfficial Astronomy Thread
Watch Out Pylon! wrote:I guess the flag we planted doesn't mean shit these days.![]()
Thanks, Trump.
Floyd Robertson- Geronte
- Posts : 20562
Join date : 2014-04-15
Location : Rolling Hills
Floyd Robertson- Geronte
- Posts : 20562
Join date : 2014-04-15
Location : Rolling Hills
Re: tOfficial Astronomy Thread
I've got maybe 40 years left on this planet. Hopefully shit doesn't go too sideways in that time.
Watch Out Pylon!- Geronte
- Posts : 20530
Join date : 2014-04-30
Re: tOfficial Astronomy Thread
The Space Treaty signed in 1960-something, prevented that, and continues to prevent countries from claiming celestial objects. I know your post was tongue in cheek, but just mentioning it.Floyd Robertson wrote:What, anyone can sent shit to the moon now?
We should have claimed the moon U.S. property when we had a chance.
Besides, anything that we do outside of the low earth orbit, should be on behalf of all earthlings. I mean, people always talk about Martians, Kryptonians, etc. No one talks about what portion of Mars or Krypton they're from. They banded together as a single people for the whole planet, and we must as well if we are ever to fight off those attempting to be our alien overlords.
MiamiSpartan- Geronte
- Posts : 5136
Join date : 2014-04-16
Location : Miami, FL
Re: tOfficial Astronomy Thread
I was reading an interesting article on space junk recently. We're making a mess up there, and eventually it could severely interfere with satellite activity. Why are we such fucks?
Space Debris and Human Spacecraft
There are more than 20,000 pieces of debris larger than a softball orbiting the Earth. They travel at speeds up to 17,500 mph, fast enough for a relatively small piece of orbital debris to damage a satellite or a spacecraft. There are 500,000 pieces of debris the size of a marble or larger. There are many millions of pieces of debris that are so small they can’t be tracked.
Space Debris and Human Spacecraft
Rocinante- Geronte
- Posts : 16965
Join date : 2014-04-21
Location : East Lansing, MI
Re: tOfficial Astronomy Thread
That's one of the added issues with people blowing up satellites like India just did. If there became a war of countries shooting down each others' satellites, it would increase the debris like crazy. 1 blown up satellite becomes hundreds of pieces of debris.Rocinante wrote:I was reading an interesting article on space junk recently. We're making a mess up there, and eventually it could severely interfere with satellite activity. Why are we such fucks?There are more than 20,000 pieces of debris larger than a softball orbiting the Earth. They travel at speeds up to 17,500 mph, fast enough for a relatively small piece of orbital debris to damage a satellite or a spacecraft. There are 500,000 pieces of debris the size of a marble or larger. There are many millions of pieces of debris that are so small they can’t be tracked.
Space Debris and Human Spacecraft
I thought I heard that space debris would be one of the things that the new Space Force would be tasked with improving.
MiamiSpartan- Geronte
- Posts : 5136
Join date : 2014-04-16
Location : Miami, FL
Re: tOfficial Astronomy Thread
India shaktis the world!
tGreenWay- Geronte
- Posts : 35035
Join date : 2014-04-18
Location : East Lansing
Re: tOfficial Astronomy Thread
MiamiSpartan wrote:That's one of the added issues with people blowing up satellites like India just did. If there became a war of countries shooting down each others' satellites, it would increase the debris like crazy. 1 blown up satellite becomes hundreds of pieces of debris.Rocinante wrote:I was reading an interesting article on space junk recently. We're making a mess up there, and eventually it could severely interfere with satellite activity. Why are we such fucks?
Space Debris and Human Spacecraft
I thought I heard that space debris would be one of the things that the new Space Force would be tasked with improving.
OK. Now I have to post this surprisingly catchy tune.
Rocinante- Geronte
- Posts : 16965
Join date : 2014-04-21
Location : East Lansing, MI
Re: tOfficial Astronomy Thread
The first picture of a black hole is supposed to be released Wednesday. Well, not OF the black hole itself, because that would be impossible, but of the event horizon and areas around it. Pretty cool global effort, to position radio telescopes in various countries to create an array that effectively makes it an earth-sized telescope, which is necessary in size to capture what they're trying to capture.
Either that, or the big announcement will be to say that they found nothing, and it will be the nerd version of Al Capone's vault.
https://www.space.com/event-horizon-telescope-black-hole-announcement-coming-soon.html
Either that, or the big announcement will be to say that they found nothing, and it will be the nerd version of Al Capone's vault.
https://www.space.com/event-horizon-telescope-black-hole-announcement-coming-soon.html
MiamiSpartan- Geronte
- Posts : 5136
Join date : 2014-04-16
Location : Miami, FL
Re: tOfficial Astronomy Thread
I like stars.
tGreenWay- Geronte
- Posts : 35035
Join date : 2014-04-18
Location : East Lansing
Re: tOfficial Astronomy Thread
[tw]1115965269392920576[/tw]
Floyd Robertson- Geronte
- Posts : 20562
Join date : 2014-04-15
Location : Rolling Hills
Re: tOfficial Astronomy Thread
Light obtains the fastest speed in the known universe.
This black hole exists in a galaxy 50 million light years away.
This means it would take light 50 million years to travel from that galaxy to ours.
How the fuck do we have these pictures?
This black hole exists in a galaxy 50 million light years away.
This means it would take light 50 million years to travel from that galaxy to ours.
How the fuck do we have these pictures?
Clarett's Folly- Geronte
- Posts : 4026
Join date : 2014-04-18
Re: tOfficial Astronomy Thread
Sterling Heights was right! That's a golden butt hole.
DWags- Geronte
- Posts : 34474
Join date : 2014-04-21
Age : 58
Location : Right here
Re: tOfficial Astronomy Thread
Clarett's Folly wrote:Light obtains the fastest speed in the known universe.
This black hole exists in a galaxy 50 million light years away.
This means it would take light 50 million years to travel from that galaxy to ours.
How the fuck do we have these pictures?
It's also 6.5 BILLION times the size of our sun, which I think qualifies it as bigger than the Big Hole in AA.
Floyd Robertson- Geronte
- Posts : 20562
Join date : 2014-04-15
Location : Rolling Hills
Re: tOfficial Astronomy Thread
Clarett's Folly wrote:Light obtains the fastest speed in the known universe.
This black hole exists in a galaxy 50 million light years away.
This means it would take light 50 million years to travel from that galaxy to ours.
How the fuck do we have these pictures?
I think that just means the images we have are 50 million years old.
Cameron- Geronte
- Posts : 5872
Join date : 2014-04-16
Age : 31
Location : Michigan
Re: tOfficial Astronomy Thread
Cameron wrote:Clarett's Folly wrote:Light obtains the fastest speed in the known universe.
This black hole exists in a galaxy 50 million light years away.
This means it would take light 50 million years to travel from that galaxy to ours.
How the fuck do we have these pictures?
I think that just means the images we have are 50 million years old.
No, because 50 million would be if we were looking at it from earth. We're peering at least 3 or 4 million light years out, so it's more like 46 million years old.

Rocinante- Geronte
- Posts : 16965
Join date : 2014-04-21
Location : East Lansing, MI
Re: tOfficial Astronomy Thread
No, we don't peer out, we only receive light that reaches us. The light that the image shows is 50 million years old (55, actually). Our eyes and our instruments are only receivers of data.Rocinante wrote:Cameron wrote:
I think that just means the images we have are 50 million years old.
No, because 50 million would be if we were looking at it from earth. We're peering at least 3 or 4 million light years out, so it's more like 46 million years old.
Similarly, if in this M87 galaxy, there is a life form with a powerful enough telescope to see the earth, then right now, looking through that telescope, they would be watching the first modern birds coming into existence about 11 million years after the Dinosaurs went extinct.
So to answer CF's question, we have these pictures that we took now, but the events taking place in it happened 55 million years ago.
MiamiSpartan- Geronte
- Posts : 5136
Join date : 2014-04-16
Location : Miami, FL
Re: tOfficial Astronomy Thread
MiamiSpartan wrote:No, we don't peer out, we only receive light that reaches us. The light that the image shows is 50 million years old (55, actually). Our eyes and our instruments are only receivers of data.Rocinante wrote:
No, because 50 million would be if we were looking at it from earth. We're peering at least 3 or 4 million light years out, so it's more like 46 million years old.
Similarly, if in this M87 galaxy, there is a life form with a powerful enough telescope to see the earth, then right now, looking through that telescope, they would be watching the first modern birds coming into existence about 11 million years after the Dinosaurs went extinct.
So to answer CF's question, we have these pictures that we took now, but the events taking place in it happened 55 million years ago.
You don’t science much, do you, bro.
Rocinante- Geronte
- Posts : 16965
Join date : 2014-04-21
Location : East Lansing, MI
Re: tOfficial Astronomy Thread
I'd still prefer getting sucked in to the black hole than going to a game in the Big Hole.Floyd Robertson wrote:Clarett's Folly wrote:Light obtains the fastest speed in the known universe.
This black hole exists in a galaxy 50 million light years away.
This means it would take light 50 million years to travel from that galaxy to ours.
How the fuck do we have these pictures?
It's also 6.5 BILLION times the size of our sun, which I think qualifies it as bigger than the Big Hole in AA.
MiamiSpartan- Geronte
- Posts : 5136
Join date : 2014-04-16
Location : Miami, FL
Re: tOfficial Astronomy Thread
Obviously more than you.Rocinante wrote:MiamiSpartan wrote:
No, we don't peer out, we only receive light that reaches us. The light that the image shows is 50 million years old (55, actually). Our eyes and our instruments are only receivers of data.
Similarly, if in this M87 galaxy, there is a life form with a powerful enough telescope to see the earth, then right now, looking through that telescope, they would be watching the first modern birds coming into existence about 11 million years after the Dinosaurs went extinct.
So to answer CF's question, we have these pictures that we took now, but the events taking place in it happened 55 million years ago.
You don’t science much, do you, bro.
MiamiSpartan- Geronte
- Posts : 5136
Join date : 2014-04-16
Location : Miami, FL
Re: tOfficial Astronomy Thread
MiamiSpartan wrote:Obviously more than you.Rocinante wrote:
You don’t science much, do you, bro.
Obviously not, since you don’t even know about the peer out hypothesis.
Rocinante- Geronte
- Posts : 16965
Join date : 2014-04-21
Location : East Lansing, MI
Re: tOfficial Astronomy Thread
A little reading material for Roc on how sight and observing the Universe works. We are constantly looking back in time. As you're reading this, Aliens could have opened up a worm hole and sucked our sun away...and you'd be none the wiser, experiencing all the light of day, for more than 8 minutes.
https://www.universetoday.com/119226/how-far-back-are-we-looking-in-time/
Edit: I see now you're being sarcastic. I've been 10%'d.
https://www.universetoday.com/119226/how-far-back-are-we-looking-in-time/
Edit: I see now you're being sarcastic. I've been 10%'d.
MiamiSpartan- Geronte
- Posts : 5136
Join date : 2014-04-16
Location : Miami, FL
Re: tOfficial Astronomy Thread
Love you buddy!
Rocinante- Geronte
- Posts : 16965
Join date : 2014-04-21
Location : East Lansing, MI
Re: tOfficial Astronomy Thread
Don’t know much about astronomy...
Can one of you smart people ELI5 why you’re speaking in terms of length of time rather than distance, since even a knot head like me knows a light year is a measure of distance, not time.
Thanks a pantsful.
Can one of you smart people ELI5 why you’re speaking in terms of length of time rather than distance, since even a knot head like me knows a light year is a measure of distance, not time.
Thanks a pantsful.
tGreenWay- Geronte
- Posts : 35035
Join date : 2014-04-18
Location : East Lansing
Re: tOfficial Astronomy Thread
Space Anus?DWags wrote:Sterling Heights was right! That's a golden butt hole.

The Pantry- Geronte
- Posts : 11961
Join date : 2014-04-16
Location : Troy
Re: tOfficial Astronomy Thread
tGreenWay wrote:Don’t know much about astronomy...
Can one of you smart people ELI5 why you’re speaking in terms of length of time rather than distance, since even a knot head like me knows a light year is a measure of distance, not time.
Thanks a pantsful.
A lightyear measures the distance light travels in one year. When referencing lightyears for anything other than light, only the distance is really relevant (as the amount of time will vary based on speed). For light itself, it is essentially also a measure of time (as light always travels at a constant speed).
Cameron- Geronte
- Posts : 5872
Join date : 2014-04-16
Age : 31
Location : Michigan
Re: tOfficial Astronomy Thread
Ok, GreenWay, this black hole is almost 17 million parsecs away (yes, I had to google that). Does that make more sense to you? No, and not to me either, because no one other than some PhD scientists knows what the fuck a parsec really is (and it ain't the same as used in Star Wars). Light years is used instead of parsecs in common language so that us somewhat regular folk can kind of grasp the distance.tGreenWay wrote:Don’t know much about astronomy...
Can one of you smart people ELI5 why you’re speaking in terms of length of time rather than distance, since even a knot head like me knows a light year is a measure of distance, not time.
Thanks a pantsful.
To expand on what Cameron was saying, there was talk of time because when we see something that is 1 light year away, we are seeing that object as it was one year ago (since light/sight takes 1 year to travel the distance of 1 light year). Space (distance) and time are effectively one and the same. In fact, when you look at your wife, sitting one meter away, you are not seeing her as she is, but as she was a tiny fraction of a second ago. We are always viewing the past.
Ok, that all sounded really geeky.
MiamiSpartan- Geronte
- Posts : 5136
Join date : 2014-04-16
Location : Miami, FL
Re: tOfficial Astronomy Thread
Well, they can TRY, but....Floyd Robertson wrote:What, anyone can sent shit to the moon now?
We should have claimed the moon U.S. property when we had a chance.
[tw]1116432569204035585[/tw]
MiamiSpartan- Geronte
- Posts : 5136
Join date : 2014-04-16
Location : Miami, FL
Re: tOfficial Astronomy Thread
MiamiSpartan wrote:Well, they can TRY, but....Floyd Robertson wrote:What, anyone can sent shit to the moon now?
We should have claimed the moon U.S. property when we had a chance.
[tw]1116432569204035585[/tw]
I forgot all about that. Probably a lot of wailing in Jerusalem tonight.
Floyd Robertson- Geronte
- Posts : 20562
Join date : 2014-04-15
Location : Rolling Hills
Re: tOfficial Astronomy Thread
This thing is designed to one day launch rockets from the air.
[tw]1117187866671616001[/tw]
The planes name is Roc.
[tw]1117187866671616001[/tw]
The planes name is Roc.
Floyd Robertson- Geronte
- Posts : 20562
Join date : 2014-04-15
Location : Rolling Hills
Re: tOfficial Astronomy Thread
Seems like it would be disorienting to pilot the Roc from a cockpit on one side. Why not put it in the center?
tGreenWay- Geronte
- Posts : 35035
Join date : 2014-04-18
Location : East Lansing
Re: tOfficial Astronomy Thread
Just because you get disoriented changing sides of the couch, doesn't mean this matters to trained, professional pilots. Besides, the rocket thingy goes in the middle.tGreenWay wrote:Seems like it would be disorienting to pilot the Roc from a cockpit on one side. Why not put it in the center?
I.B. Fine- Geronte
- Posts : 4822
Join date : 2014-05-07
Location : Giant turd on a stick, Thanks B
Re: tOfficial Astronomy Thread
Obviously because that's where the payload will be.tGreenWay wrote:Seems like it would be disorienting to pilot the Roc from a cockpit on one side. Why not put it in the center?
Do you drive your car sitting on the center console?
The Pantry- Geronte
- Posts : 11961
Join date : 2014-04-16
Location : Troy
Re: tOfficial Astronomy Thread
[quote="I.B. Fine"]
I don’t recall asking either of you pinheads for some attitude.
Just because you get disoriented changing sides of the couch, doesn't mean this matters to trained, professional pilots. Besides, the rocket thingy goes in the middle.tGreenWay wrote:Seems like it would be disorienting to pilot the Roc from a cockpit on one side. Why not put it in the center?
The Pantry wrote:Obviously because that's where the payload will be.
Do you drive your car sitting on the center console?

tGreenWay- Geronte
- Posts : 35035
Join date : 2014-04-18
Location : East Lansing
Re: tOfficial Astronomy Thread
Yeah bitch. I’ll launch my rocket into your wives.
Rocinante- Geronte
- Posts : 16965
Join date : 2014-04-21
Location : East Lansing, MI
Re: tOfficial Astronomy Thread
Piloting from either side takes some getting used to...You always learn on the left and then captain on the left. You learn to teach on the right and be first officer on the right.
PS Left side is better
PS Left side is better
pulling69- Geronte
- Posts : 2738
Join date : 2014-04-20
Age : 42
Location : KIAD
Page 3 of 4 • 1, 2, 3, 4
Page 3 of 4
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
|
|