Go Badgers!!! I'm rooting for the Badgers tonight!!!
+5
The_Dude
duffy munn
DWags
Turtleneck
NigelUno
9 posters
Page 1 of 1
NigelUno- Geronte
- Posts : 34305
Join date : 2014-04-16
Re: Go Badgers!!! I'm rooting for the Badgers tonight!!!
Stop ruining the board, Nigel.
Turtleneck- Geronte
- Posts : 42442
Join date : 2014-04-22
Re: Go Badgers!!! I'm rooting for the Badgers tonight!!!
Better dead than red.
DWags- Geronte
- Posts : 49785
Join date : 2014-04-21
Age : 62
Location : Right here
Re: Go Badgers!!! I'm rooting for the Badgers tonight!!!
Anyone not rooting for my Badgers is a moran.
duffy munn- Geronte
- Posts : 8763
Join date : 2014-04-19
Location : east lansing
Re: Go Badgers!!! I'm rooting for the Badgers tonight!!!
duffy munn wrote:Anyone not rooting for my Badgers is a moran.
That Nigel guy has a cool name.
Nigel.
NigelUno- Geronte
- Posts : 34305
Join date : 2014-04-16
Re: Go Badgers!!! I'm rooting for the Badgers tonight!!!
Fuck you and fuck the vadgers
The_Dude- Pet Troll
- Posts : 7163
Join date : 2014-04-23
Re: Go Badgers!!! I'm rooting for the Badgers tonight!!!
Nice windmill dunk
Nordic- Geronte
- Posts : 19953
Join date : 2014-05-08
Watch Out Pylon!- Geronte
- Posts : 23330
Join date : 2014-04-30
Re: Go Badgers!!! I'm rooting for the Badgers tonight!!!
Choke yourself Iowa
The_Dude- Pet Troll
- Posts : 7163
Join date : 2014-04-23
Re: Go Badgers!!! I'm rooting for the Badgers tonight!!!
Greg Gard has earned the job.
duffy munn- Geronte
- Posts : 8763
Join date : 2014-04-19
Location : east lansing
Re: Go Badgers!!! I'm rooting for the Badgers tonight!!!
This thread was a success.
NigelUno- Geronte
- Posts : 34305
Join date : 2014-04-16
Re: Go Badgers!!! I'm rooting for the Badgers tonight!!!
NigelUno wrote:This thread was a success.
Does MSU win the tie breaker vs Wisky?
The_Dude- Pet Troll
- Posts : 7163
Join date : 2014-04-23
Re: Go Badgers!!! I'm rooting for the Badgers tonight!!!
The_Dude wrote:NigelUno wrote:This thread was a success.
Does MSU win the tie breaker vs Wisky?
IV. In case of a tie for any place finish in the regular-season standings, the following tie-breaking procedure shall be followed in order to seed teams in the tournament bracket:
A. Two-team tie:
1. Results of head-to-head competition during the regular-season.
2. Each team's record vs. the team occupying the highest position in the final regular-season standings (or in the case of a tie for the championship, the next highest position in the regular-season standings), continuing down through the standings until one team gains an advantage.
a. When arriving at another pair of tied teams while comparing records, use each team's record against the collective tied teams as a group (prior to their own tie-breaking procedures), rather than the performance against the individual tied teams.
b. When comparing records against a single team or a group of teams, the higher winning percentage shall prevail, even if the number of games played against the team or group are unequal (i.e., 2-0 is better than 3-1, but 2-0 is not better than 1-0).
3. Won-loss percentage of all Division I opponents.
4. Coin toss conducted by the Commissioner or designee.
B. Multiple team tie:
1. Results of head-to-head competition during the regular-season. a. When comparing records against the tied teams, the team with the higher winning percentage shall prevail, even if the number of games played against the team or group are unequal (i.e., 2-0 is better than 3-1, but 2-0 is not better than 1-0).
b. After the top team among the tied teams is determined, the second team is ranked by its record among the original tied teams, not the head-to-head record vs. the remaining team(s).
2. If the remaining teams are still tied, then each tied team's record shall be compared to the team occupying the highest position in the final regular-season standings, continuing down through the standings until one team gains an advantage.
a. When arriving at another pair of tied teams while comparing records, use each team's record against the collective tied teams as a group (prior to their own tie-breaking procedures), rather than the performance against the individual tied teams.
b. When comparing records against a single team or group of teams, the higher winning percentage shall prevail, even if the number of games played against the team or group are unequal (i.e., 2-0 is better than 3-1, but 2-0 is not better than 1-0).
3. Won-loss percentage of Division I opponents.
4. Coin toss conducted by Commissioner or designee.
NigelUno- Geronte
- Posts : 34305
Join date : 2014-04-16
Re: Go Badgers!!! I'm rooting for the Badgers tonight!!!
The_Dude wrote:Fuck you and fuck the vadgers
Butthurt UM fan.
Death Roe- Geronte
- Posts : 12899
Join date : 2014-04-18
Location : Thread Master Totally Serious
Re: Go Badgers!!! I'm rooting for the Badgers tonight!!!
This looks like the football tiebreaker rules.NigelUno wrote:The_Dude wrote:
Does MSU win the tie breaker vs Wisky?
IV. In case of a tie for any place finish in the regular-season standings, the following tie-breaking procedure shall be followed in order to seed teams in the tournament bracket:
A. Two-team tie:
1. Results of head-to-head competition during the regular-season.
2. Each team's record vs. the team occupying the highest position in the final regular-season standings (or in the case of a tie for the championship, the next highest position in the regular-season standings), continuing down through the standings until one team gains an advantage.
a. When arriving at another pair of tied teams while comparing records, use each team's record against the collective tied teams as a group (prior to their own tie-breaking procedures), rather than the performance against the individual tied teams.
b. When comparing records against a single team or a group of teams, the higher winning percentage shall prevail, even if the number of games played against the team or group are unequal (i.e., 2-0 is better than 3-1, but 2-0 is not better than 1-0).
3. Won-loss percentage of all Division I opponents.
4. Coin toss conducted by the Commissioner or designee.
B. Multiple team tie:
1. Results of head-to-head competition during the regular-season. a. When comparing records against the tied teams, the team with the higher winning percentage shall prevail, even if the number of games played against the team or group are unequal (i.e., 2-0 is better than 3-1, but 2-0 is not better than 1-0).
b. After the top team among the tied teams is determined, the second team is ranked by its record among the original tied teams, not the head-to-head record vs. the remaining team(s).
2. If the remaining teams are still tied, then each tied team's record shall be compared to the team occupying the highest position in the final regular-season standings, continuing down through the standings until one team gains an advantage.
a. When arriving at another pair of tied teams while comparing records, use each team's record against the collective tied teams as a group (prior to their own tie-breaking procedures), rather than the performance against the individual tied teams.
b. When comparing records against a single team or group of teams, the higher winning percentage shall prevail, even if the number of games played against the team or group are unequal (i.e., 2-0 is better than 3-1, but 2-0 is not better than 1-0).
3. Won-loss percentage of Division I opponents.
4. Coin toss conducted by Commissioner or designee.
InTenSity- Geronte
- Posts : 15969
Join date : 2014-04-18
Age : 47
Location : Kendall
Similar topics
» Who are you rooting for/betting on tonight in the CFP Natty?
» Badgers? We don't need no stinkin' badgers! MSU@Wiscy ESPN2 5pm MST/7pm EST
» Badgers? We don’t need no stinking Badgers!
» Who are we rooting for? ND-FSU
» I'm rooting for the heat
» Badgers? We don't need no stinkin' badgers! MSU@Wiscy ESPN2 5pm MST/7pm EST
» Badgers? We don’t need no stinking Badgers!
» Who are we rooting for? ND-FSU
» I'm rooting for the heat
Page 1 of 1
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
|
|