Bump when these numbers move
+23
steveschneider
WhiteBoyHatcher
AvgMSUJoe
msugolfguy
Heat Miser
Robert J Sakimano
Rocinante
Other Teams Pursuing That
DWags
NigelUno
Watch Out Pylon!
GRR Spartan
Travis of the Cosmos
Dendrobates
tGreenWay
Turtleneck
Frank Ricard
kingstonlake
InTenSity
Cameron
CheesySpartan
AnomanderRake
Floyd Robertson
27 posters
Page 1 of 25
Page 1 of 25 • 1, 2, 3 ... 13 ... 25
DWags- Geronte
- Posts : 52896
Join date : 2014-04-21
Age : 63
Location : Right here
Re: Bump when these numbers move
Bump for Dow hitting 20,000 for the 1st time ever.
We'll have to see if it closes over 20,000.
We'll have to see if it closes over 20,000.
Floyd Robertson- Geronte
- Posts : 29979
Join date : 2014-04-15
Location : Rolling Hills Alcoholic Rehabilitation Center: Where They Don't Beat You or Anything
Re: Bump when these numbers move
Floyd Robertson wrote:Bump for Dow hitting 20,000 for the 1st time ever.
We'll have to see if it closes over 20,000.
I'm old enough to remember it in the hundreds.
DWags- Geronte
- Posts : 52896
Join date : 2014-04-21
Age : 63
Location : Right here
Re: Bump when these numbers move
I know it's your thread Wags......but keep these numbers here too.
Jake Tapper @jaketapper 1h1 hour ago
U.S. economy slowed in the fourth quarter to 1.9%. For all of 2016, growth was 1.6%, weakest since 2011.
Jake Tapper @jaketapper 1h1 hour ago
U.S. economy slowed in the fourth quarter to 1.9%. For all of 2016, growth was 1.6%, weakest since 2011.
Guest- Guest
Re: Bump when these numbers move
Fair enough. we'll see those numbers as well.
DWags- Geronte
- Posts : 52896
Join date : 2014-04-21
Age : 63
Location : Right here
Re: Bump when these numbers move
Any numbers bad will be Obama's fault according to the Mio stringer and his sources
GRR Spartan- Geronte
- Posts : 11338
Join date : 2014-04-25
Re: Bump when these numbers move
GRR Spartan wrote:Any numbers bad will be Obama's fault according to the Mio stringer and his sources
lol. I fully expect a recession soon and have been saying that for over a year along with the caveat that it wouldn't be Hillary's or Trump's fault. Simply that we were due to have one.
Guest- Guest
Re: Bump when these numbers move
DWags wrote:
The fill your tanks quick thread seems to have vanished...but the numbers have moved.
Michigan gas prices drop about nine cents
According to AAA, the current statewide average has decreased for the third consecutive week making the average about $2.19 per gallon. However, this price is about 50 cents more than this same time last year.
Of the areas surveyed by AAA, the lowest average price can be found in the Flint area for the fourth week in a row for about $2.05 a gallon. The highest price can be found in the Marquette area for the third week in a row where it's about $2.48 a gallon.
Guest- Guest
Re: Bump when these numbers move
134,000,000 people banned from entering the "Land of the Free.. Home of the Brave"..
Robert J Sakimano- Geronte
- Posts : 52544
Join date : 2014-04-15
Age : 55
Re: Bump when these numbers move
Robert J Sakimano wrote:134,000,000 people banned from entering the "Land of the Free.. Home of the Brave"..
Whatever you say.
Guest- Guest
Re: Bump when these numbers move
PAUL KRUGMAN ON ELECTION NIGHT: “If the question is when markets will recover, a first-pass answer is never.”
Today: “There is no denying the fact that the markets have absolutely been blowing up since the election! In fact this is one of the biggest rallies since the Taft Administration. The DOW is up over 13% and the other markets are also up double digits!”
Today: “There is no denying the fact that the markets have absolutely been blowing up since the election! In fact this is one of the biggest rallies since the Taft Administration. The DOW is up over 13% and the other markets are also up double digits!”
Guest- Guest
Re: Bump when these numbers move
^ Nice. Good to see the Obama administration's policies are paying off in the markets.
AnomanderRake- Spartiate
- Posts : 1085
Join date : 2015-07-21
Re: Bump when these numbers move
3 terror attacks the media refuses to cover: Atlanta, Bowling Green, Sweden
Robert J Sakimano- Geronte
- Posts : 52544
Join date : 2014-04-15
Age : 55
Re: Bump when these numbers move
The Dow seemed to do OK under Obama.
NigelUno- Geronte
- Posts : 35697
Join date : 2014-04-16
Re: Bump when these numbers move
NigelUno wrote:The Dow seemed to do OK under Obama.
Starting in 2008, under Obama, the Federal Reserve dumped tons of money into the bond market. That killed rates and along with it any interest in bonds. Investors focused on stocks and thus you had your bull market.
CheesySpartan- Spartiate
- Posts : 2534
Join date : 2014-05-16
Location : SwillinatI Ch33sySpartan
Re: Bump when these numbers move
fake news.NigelUno wrote:The Dow seemed to do OK under Obama.
Robert J Sakimano- Geronte
- Posts : 52544
Join date : 2014-04-15
Age : 55
Re: Bump when these numbers move
I don't know what any of this means but I never liked that colored boy from Kenya.CheesySpartan wrote:NigelUno wrote:The Dow seemed to do OK under Obama.
Starting in 2008, under Obama, the Federal Reserve dumped tons of money into the bond market. That killed rates and along with it any interest in bonds. Investors focused on stocks and thus you had your bull market.
Robert J Sakimano- Geronte
- Posts : 52544
Join date : 2014-04-15
Age : 55
Re: Bump when these numbers move
Robert J Sakimano wrote:I don't know what any of this means but I never liked that colored boy from Kenya.CheesySpartan wrote:
Starting in 2008, under Obama, the Federal Reserve dumped tons of money into the bond market. That killed rates and along with it any interest in bonds. Investors focused on stocks and thus you had your bull market.
Of course you do Bob. I was just explaining how it happened not just who it happened under.
CheesySpartan- Spartiate
- Posts : 2534
Join date : 2014-05-16
Location : SwillinatI Ch33sySpartan
Re: Bump when these numbers move
- I honestly have no clue about markets, money, financial stuff - not my area of expertise.. it's like a foreign language to me.CheesySpartan wrote:Robert J Sakimano wrote:I don't know what any of this means but I never liked that colored boy from Kenya.
Of course you do Bob. I was just explaining how it happened not just who it happened under.
Robert J Sakimano- Geronte
- Posts : 52544
Join date : 2014-04-15
Age : 55
Re: Bump when these numbers move
Por supuesto que sí Bob!Robert J Sakimano wrote:- I honestly have no clue about markets, money, financial stuff - not my area of expertise.. it's like a foreign language to me.CheesySpartan wrote:
Of course you do Bob. I was just explaining how it happened not just who it happened under.
CheesySpartan- Spartiate
- Posts : 2534
Join date : 2014-05-16
Location : SwillinatI Ch33sySpartan
Re: Bump when these numbers move
I don't speak Kenyan.CheesySpartan wrote:Por supuesto que sí Bob!Robert J Sakimano wrote:
- I honestly have no clue about markets, money, financial stuff - not my area of expertise.. it's like a foreign language to me.
Robert J Sakimano- Geronte
- Posts : 52544
Join date : 2014-04-15
Age : 55
Re: Bump when these numbers move
Robert J Sakimano wrote:I don't speak Kenyan.CheesySpartan wrote:
Por supuesto que sí Bob!
Its Spanish Bob
CheesySpartan- Spartiate
- Posts : 2534
Join date : 2014-05-16
Location : SwillinatI Ch33sySpartan
Re: Bump when these numbers move
Spanish??CheesySpartan wrote:Robert J Sakimano wrote:I don't speak Kenyan.
Its Spanish Bob
#BuildTheWall
Robert J Sakimano- Geronte
- Posts : 52544
Join date : 2014-04-15
Age : 55
Re: Bump when these numbers move
Robert J Sakimano wrote:Spanish??CheesySpartan wrote:
Its Spanish Bob
#BuildTheWall
"Prisa ahora, presidente rápido Trump dice Bob"
CheesySpartan- Spartiate
- Posts : 2534
Join date : 2014-05-16
Location : SwillinatI Ch33sySpartan
Re: Bump when these numbers move
ummm "bring President Trump some whores.. fast"?CheesySpartan wrote:Robert J Sakimano wrote: Spanish??
#BuildTheWall
"Prisa ahora, presidente rápido Trump dice Bob"
Robert J Sakimano- Geronte
- Posts : 52544
Join date : 2014-04-15
Age : 55
Re: Bump when these numbers move
Robert J Sakimano wrote:ummm "bring President Trump some whores.. fast"?CheesySpartan wrote:
"Prisa ahora, presidente rápido Trump dice Bob"
Something like that...
CheesySpartan- Spartiate
- Posts : 2534
Join date : 2014-05-16
Location : SwillinatI Ch33sySpartan
Re: Bump when these numbers move
#MakeAmericaWhiteAgainCheesySpartan wrote:Robert J Sakimano wrote:ummm "bring President Trump some whores.. fast"?
Something like that...
Robert J Sakimano- Geronte
- Posts : 52544
Join date : 2014-04-15
Age : 55
Re: Bump when these numbers move
The day President Trump took office, January 20, the national debt was $19,947,304,555,212.49 – what we usually would write as $19.9 trillion. The last day the debt was totaled by the Treasury Department on Friday, February 23, it was $19,913,901,120,188.15. No need to break out the calculators – that’s $33,403,435,024.34 less than on Inauguration Day, or what we would usually refer to as $33 billion.
Guest- Guest
Re: Bump when these numbers move
LooseGoose wrote:The day President Trump took office, January 20, the national debt was $19,947,304,555,212.49 – what we usually would write as $19.9 trillion. The last day the debt was totaled by the Treasury Department on Friday, February 23, it was $19,913,901,120,188.15. No need to break out the calculators – that’s $33,403,435,024.34 less than on Inauguration Day, or what we would usually refer to as $33 billion.
Wait I thought he inherited a mess and Obama was the worst President ever? Are we now suggesting Obama and his administration were pretty good at budgeting and Trump is benefiting from Obama's and Congress' work?
AnomanderRake- Spartiate
- Posts : 1085
Join date : 2015-07-21
Re: Bump when these numbers move
AnomanderRake wrote:LooseGoose wrote:
Wait I thought he inherited a mess and Obama was the worst President ever? Are we now suggesting Obama and his administration were pretty good at budgeting and Trump is benefiting from Obama's and Congress' work?
Why are you crediting Obama with the $$ Trump saved?
Guest- Guest
Re: Bump when these numbers move
LooseGoose wrote:AnomanderRake wrote:
Wait I thought he inherited a mess and Obama was the worst President ever? Are we now suggesting Obama and his administration were pretty good at budgeting and Trump is benefiting from Obama's and Congress' work?
Why are you crediting Obama with the $$ Trump saved?
Because Trump's administration hasn't done shit to impact the budget yet. But he did just request $54 billion in additional funding for the military so we can kiss our $30 billion goodbye.
AnomanderRake- Spartiate
- Posts : 1085
Join date : 2015-07-21
Re: Bump when these numbers move
AnomanderRake wrote:LooseGoose wrote:
Why are you crediting Obama with the $$ Trump saved?
Because Trump's administration hasn't done shit to impact the budget yet. But he did just request $54 billion in additional funding for the military so we can kiss our $30 billion goodbye.
So to clarify do you put the '09 stimulus on Bush or Obama?
Guest- Guest
Re: Bump when these numbers move
LooseGoose wrote:AnomanderRake wrote:
Because Trump's administration hasn't done shit to impact the budget yet. But he did just request $54 billion in additional funding for the military so we can kiss our $30 billion goodbye.
So to clarify do you put the '09 stimulus on Bush or Obama?
Other Teams Pursuing That- Geronte
- Posts : 36472
Join date : 2014-04-18
Re: Bump when these numbers move
LooseGoose wrote:AnomanderRake wrote:
Because Trump's administration hasn't done shit to impact the budget yet. But he did just request $54 billion in additional funding for the military so we can kiss our $30 billion goodbye.
So to clarify do you put the '09 stimulus on Bush or Obama?
The Stimulus package was mostly drafted into law by Democrats in Congress and signed into law by President Obama. Nearly every republican voted against it so the stimulus package for all its benefits and shortcomings falls on the democratic party, though I recall they did make some concessions to republicans, I can't remember what those concessions were but I'm sure it had something to do with taxes on the wealthy.
AnomanderRake- Spartiate
- Posts : 1085
Join date : 2015-07-21
Re: Bump when these numbers move
LooseGoose wrote:AnomanderRake wrote:
Because Trump's administration hasn't done shit to impact the budget yet. But he did just request $54 billion in additional funding for the military so we can kiss our $30 billion goodbye.
So to clarify do you put the '09 stimulus on Bush or Obama?
Can you clarify what Trump has done to lower the deficit?
Be specific. Thanks.
NigelUno- Geronte
- Posts : 35697
Join date : 2014-04-16
Re: Bump when these numbers move
NigelUno wrote:LooseGoose wrote:
So to clarify do you put the '09 stimulus on Bush or Obama?
Can you clarify what Trump has done to lower the deficit?
Be specific. Thanks.
Nigel I have really been enjoying your posts lately. 10/10 Trumpster trolling, keep it up buddy.
AnomanderRake- Spartiate
- Posts : 1085
Join date : 2015-07-21
Re: Bump when these numbers move
AnomanderRake wrote:LooseGoose wrote:
So to clarify do you put the '09 stimulus on Bush or Obama?
The Stimulus package was mostly drafted into law by Democrats in Congress and signed into law by President Obama. Nearly every republican voted against it so the stimulus package for all its benefits and shortcomings falls on the democratic party, though I recall they did make some concessions to republicans, I can't remember what those concessions were but I'm sure it had something to do with taxes on the wealthy.
That's a pretty accurate description although I don't know about the tax part, I'd have to research that. I do know this - when partisan websites like TPM and Kos calculate the "Bush deficits" vs the "Obama deficits" they lay the '09 budget which was modified to include the Stimulus on Bush since it was originally his budget. Most news orgs go along with that, which is pure bullshit.
Guest- Guest
Re: Bump when these numbers move
LooseGoose wrote:AnomanderRake wrote:
The Stimulus package was mostly drafted into law by Democrats in Congress and signed into law by President Obama. Nearly every republican voted against it so the stimulus package for all its benefits and shortcomings falls on the democratic party, though I recall they did make some concessions to republicans, I can't remember what those concessions were but I'm sure it had something to do with taxes on the wealthy.
That's a pretty accurate description although I don't know about the tax part, I'd have to research that. I do know this - when partisan websites like TPM and Kos calculate the "Bush deficits" vs the "Obama deficits" they lay the '09 budget which was modified to include the Stimulus on Bush since it was originally his budget. Most news orgs go along with that, which is pure bullshit.
Yeah I've seen that. Budgets are way over-attributed to Presidents just because they sign them. The reality is that budgets are done by Congress and whichever party has control of congress will control the vast majority of budget decisions at that time. The President is more or less forced to approve a budget at some point, even if they're not 100% on board with it.
Usually this results in the winning party being able to do whatever they want with the budget at least until mid-term elections.
AnomanderRake- Spartiate
- Posts : 1085
Join date : 2015-07-21
Re: Bump when these numbers move
+298,000 jobs in February according to ADP. 100,000 more than anticipated.
Too bad people won't be able to enjoy their new jobs as the world goes to hell.
Too bad people won't be able to enjoy their new jobs as the world goes to hell.
Guest- Guest
Re: Bump when these numbers move
U.S. Consumer Comfort Just Reached Its Highest Level in a Decade
You wouldn't know it by the continual panic in here.....
You wouldn't know it by the continual panic in here.....
Key Points
Consumer comfort index rose to 50.6 in the period ended March 5, the highest since March 2007, from 49.8
Measure has exceeded 50 just six times since April 2002
Gauge of economy advanced to 48.2, the highest since August 2001, from 46.8
Buying-climate measure rose to 44.5, the strongest reading since April 2002, from 43.7
Index of personal finances was little changed at 58.9 versus 59
Guest- Guest
Page 1 of 25 • 1, 2, 3 ... 13 ... 25
Similar topics
» Bump when these numbers move
» Where should I move to?
» I move to ban Turtleneck
» Flex on the move again
» Big Ten Commish on the move?
» Where should I move to?
» I move to ban Turtleneck
» Flex on the move again
» Big Ten Commish on the move?
Page 1 of 25
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum