The "at least give Trump a little credit" thread.

[Guest]

Maybe corrupt isn't so bad after all........

[Guest]

They sure love him in Israel, no wonder the Dems hate him.

[Watch Out Pylon!]

Hi Goose,

Why do you make shit up about your post being altered and accuse me of doing it?

[Guest]

Hi Goose,
Why do you make shit up about your post being altered and accuse me of doing it?

Hi honey.

Please provide a link to the message where I name you as the culprit?

If you are unable to do so your post would seem to fall under "lie".

[kingstonlake]

Hi Goose,
Why do you make shit up about your post being altered and accuse me of doing it?

Hi honey.

Please provide a link to the message where I name you as the culprit?

If you are unable to do so your post would seem to fall under "lie".

Well, to be fair, he's the only mod you named directly as the person you suspect as being involved. So......

[Watch Out Pylon!]

Hi Goose,
Why do you make shit up about your post being altered and accuse me of doing it?

Hi honey.

Please provide a link to the message where I name you as the culprit?

If you are unable to do so your post would seem to fall under "lie".

1) Someone altered at least one of my posts. I didn't search for more because one is enough.

Lol I answered. You're the mod with powers not me. I suspect it involved you though I don't know that.

Spoiler alert: No you didn't. Lie #1.

Spin it however you want. You threw my name into some conspiracy that didn't happen. That's another lie. Just keep doing whatever you want to do dude. You are what you are. Pretty pathetic.

[Guest]

Suspecting you were involved isn't naming you as the culprit.   Twisting it your way doesn't make it true.  So I grade that as: FAIL.


RE:Kingston:   There are others with power to alter posts.   Think the Deep Swill.

[kingstonlake]

Suspecting you were involved isn't naming you as the culprit.   Twisting it your way doesn't make it true.  So I grade that as: FAIL.


RE:Kingston:   There are others with power to alter posts.   Think the Deep Swill.

Well you took the initiative to name only one. It's clear who you thought did it. I mean c'mon dude. At least have the guts to say you thought he did it. Playing semantics just to protect yourself if you're wrong is kinda weak. It's ok if you're wrong. I'm wrong 12 times before noon every day.

[Guest]

Suspecting you were involved isn't naming you as the culprit.   Twisting it your way doesn't make it true.  So I grade that as: FAIL.


RE:Kingston:   There are others with power to alter posts.   Think the Deep Swill.

Well you took the initiative to name only one. It's clear who you thought did it. I mean c'mon dude. At least have the guts to say you thought he did it. Playing semantics just to protect yourself if you're wrong is kinda weak. It's ok if you're wrong. I'm wrong 12 times before noon every day.

My point is that I'm not sure who did it. I named him as someone I suspected to be involved I think that's pretty fair.

Either way I'm stunned by the obsession with some about why I'm not posting there. Christ every time I post there it's like I prodded a pool of piranhas, it's rather tiring. There won't be a word from them when the elections don't go their way and once again they find themselves in the minority of Americans, even as they're the veto proof majority in the Swill.

Christ I was completely opposed to Trump in the primaries and would much rather a more acceptable man were President but I can certainly give him credit for the good things he has done. They're incapable of even than. Kind of funny when they mock UMObsession on one board while indulging in Trump Obsession on another.

[kingstonlake]

Well you took the initiative to name only one. It's clear who you thought did it. I mean c'mon dude. At least have the guts to say you thought he did it. Playing semantics just to protect yourself if you're wrong is kinda weak. It's ok if you're wrong. I'm wrong 12 times before noon every day.

My point is that I'm not sure who did it. I named him as someone I suspected to be involved I think that's pretty fair.

Either way I'm stunned by the obsession with some about why I'm not posting there. Christ every time I post there it's like I prodded a pool of piranhas, it's rather tiring. There won't be a word from them when the elections don't go their way and once again they find themselves in the minority of Americans, even as they're the veto proof majority in the Swill.

Christ I was completely opposed to Trump in the primaries and would much rather a more acceptable man were President but I can certainly give him credit for the good things he has done. They're incapable of even than. Kind of funny when they mock UMObsession on one board while indulging in Trump Obsession on another.

Let's be honest Goose. You can say you preferred someone else. If that's the case, I'm assuming it's because you consider yourself a "conservative". A god fearing, family oriented, family values, man. That being said, Trump is so far gone from anything that conservatives hold close to them it's ridiculous. He was the anti Obama candidate with alot of bigotry sprinkled in during the campaign. It's as plain as the nose on your face. Yet you defend him at every turn. You're no better than the people you claim to abhore. You sold out. Just like you claim Dems sold out who support Clinton.

[Watch Out Pylon!]

Well you took the initiative to name only one. It's clear who you thought did it. I mean c'mon dude. At least have the guts to say you thought he did it. Playing semantics just to protect yourself if you're wrong is kinda weak. It's ok if you're wrong. I'm wrong 12 times before noon every day.

My point is that I'm not sure who did it.   I named him as someone I suspected to be involved I think that's pretty fair.

Either way I'm stunned by the obsession with some about why I'm not posting there.   Christ every time I post there it's like I prodded a pool of piranhas, it's rather tiring.    There won't be a word from them when the elections don't go their way and once again they find themselves in the minority of Americans, even as they're the veto proof majority in the Swill.  

Christ I was completely opposed to Trump in the primaries and would much rather a more acceptable man were President but I can certainly give him credit for the good things he has done.   They're incapable of even than.   Kind of funny when they mock UMObsession on one board while indulging in Trump Obsession on another.

Like I said before, I don't care where you post or what you post about. That isn't what this is about. This is about you making up a story about a post that was edited and then blaming me for it. You can't even say what board it was on. What is so fucking difficult to point that out?

In short, I don't believe a word you say and I think you just wanted an excuse to leave.

[Guest]

My point is that I'm not sure who did it. I named him as someone I suspected to be involved I think that's pretty fair.

Either way I'm stunned by the obsession with some about why I'm not posting there. Christ every time I post there it's like I prodded a pool of piranhas, it's rather tiring. There won't be a word from them when the elections don't go their way and once again they find themselves in the minority of Americans, even as they're the veto proof majority in the Swill.

Christ I was completely opposed to Trump in the primaries and would much rather a more acceptable man were President but I can certainly give him credit for the good things he has done. They're incapable of even than. Kind of funny when they mock UMObsession on one board while indulging in Trump Obsession on another.

Let's be honest Goose. You can say you preferred someone else. If that's the case, I'm assuming it's because you consider yourself a "conservative". A god fearing, family oriented, family values, man. That being said, Trump is so far gone from anything that conservatives hold close to them it's ridiculous. He was the anti Obama candidate with alot of bigotry sprinkled in during the campaign. It's as plain as the nose on your face. Yet you defend him at every turn. You're no better than the people you claim to abhore. You sold out. Just like you claim Dems sold out who support Clinton.

Please give examples of where he's politically been the anti-conservative?

Personally you seem to be confusing evangelicals and conservatives. Evangelical is a religious belief, Conservatism is a political belief, one can easily be one and not the other. Frankly as long as he's keeping campaign promises and doing conservative things politically I don't care how many strippers he fucked in the past.

Strangely Dems want to moralize about this after enduring the 90s with them rationalizing that they didn't care how many women Bill Clinton raped as long as they agreed with him politically. It's rich that somehow they think Trump's supposed adultery is worse that Clinton's multiple rapes.

And please stop with the stupid fucking racism crutch. I forget the exact number but 20% sticks in my head....the number of Trump voters that voted TWICE for President Obama, are you seriously arguing that those people all of sudden turned racist? NO - they dumped Hillary's ass. Had she gotten 1/2 of those voters she would have won.

[Guest]

You're no better than the people you claim to abhore. You sold out. Just like you claim Dems sold out who support Clinton.

So you're equating Trump fucking a stripper and committing adultery to RAPE?

OK.

And thanks for joining Python in calling me a liar. Once again interesting that those on your side believe that only you can make honest arguments, anyone that opposes you MUST be lying.

[Guest]

In short, I don't believe a word you say and I think you just wanted an excuse to leave.

In shorter - I don't GAF what you think.

LMAO @ you thinking I need an excuse to leave a message board, what kind of moron believes that?

[kingstonlake]

Let's be honest Goose. You can say you preferred someone else. If that's the case, I'm assuming it's because you consider yourself a "conservative". A god fearing, family oriented, family values, man. That being said, Trump is so far gone from anything that conservatives hold close to them it's ridiculous. He was the anti Obama candidate with alot of bigotry sprinkled in during the campaign. It's as plain as the nose on your face. Yet you defend him at every turn. You're no better than the people you claim to abhore. You sold out. Just like you claim Dems sold out who support Clinton.

Please give examples of where he's politically been the anti-conservative?

Personally you seem to be confusing evangelicals and conservatives. Evangelical is a religious belief, Conservatism is a political belief, one can easily be one and not the other. Frankly as long as he's keeping campaign promises and doing conservative things politically I don't care how many strippers he fucked in the past.

Strangely Dems want to moralize about this after enduring the 90s with them rationalizing that they didn't care how many women Bill Clinton raped as long as they agreed with him politically. It's rich that somehow they think Trump's supposed adultery is worse that Clinton's multiple rapes.

And please stop with the stupid fucking racism crutch. I forget the exact number but 20% sticks in my head....the number of Trump voters that voted TWICE for President Obama, are you seriously arguing that those people all of sudden turned racist? NO - they dumped Hillary's ass. Had she gotten 1/2 of those voters she would have won.

And this is why you tie anti abortion views with your political political standards?

And yes, Trump is a racist.

[kingstonlake]

You're no better than the people you claim to abhore. You sold out. Just like you claim Dems sold out who support Clinton.

So you're equating Trump fucking a stripper and committing adultery to RAPE?

OK.

And thanks for joining Python in calling me a liar. Once again interesting that those on your side believe that only you can make honest arguments, anyone that opposes you MUST be lying.

Lighten up. I didn't say you were a liar. I said you are what you hate.

[Guest]

Please give examples of where he's politically been the anti-conservative?

Personally you seem to be confusing evangelicals and conservatives. Evangelical is a religious belief, Conservatism is a political belief, one can easily be one and not the other. Frankly as long as he's keeping campaign promises and doing conservative things politically I don't care how many strippers he fucked in the past.

Strangely Dems want to moralize about this after enduring the 90s with them rationalizing that they didn't care how many women Bill Clinton raped as long as they agreed with him politically. It's rich that somehow they think Trump's supposed adultery is worse that Clinton's multiple rapes.

And please stop with the stupid fucking racism crutch. I forget the exact number but 20% sticks in my head....the number of Trump voters that voted TWICE for President Obama, are you seriously arguing that those people all of sudden turned racist? NO - they dumped Hillary's ass. Had she gotten 1/2 of those voters she would have won.

And this is why you tie anti abortion views with your political political standards?

And yes, Trump is a racist.

Yes, being pro life is a conservative stance. It has nothing to do with religion.

Trump's a lot of shitty things - I really don't think he's any more racist than any other mid70s man.

And again it's always amusing to me how selective progressives are in their racist accusations and outrage. The most segregated schools in America are in the deepest heart of Blue America. Don't believe me? Check New York City. Haven't seen much outrage over that.

[Watch Out Pylon!]

In short, I don't believe a word you say and I think you just wanted an excuse to leave.

In shorter - I don't GAF what you think.

LMAO @ you thinking I need an excuse to leave a message board, what kind of moron believes that?

You're an odd person Goose. It seems like you would be the exact type of person that needs to fabricate an excuse to leave a board.

Why don't you drop the charade and come clean on making this stuff up. Or you can answer a simple question. I doubt you'll even acknowledge it because you have some sort of chemical imbalance that doesn't allow you to respond to questions when you've been caught in a lie. That's what I think.

What post was altered? Point it out. Let's look into it.

[Guest]

Let's be honest Goose. You can say you preferred someone else.

I guess I was misinterpreting your call for "honesty" in contrast to what you believe I was posting.

[kingstonlake]

In shorter - I don't GAF what you think.

LMAO @ you thinking I need an excuse to leave a message board, what kind of moron believes that?

You're an odd person Goose. It seems like you would be the exact type of person that needs to fabricate an excuse to leave a board.

Why don't you drop the charade and come clean on making this stuff up. Or you can answer a simple question. I doubt you'll even acknowledge it because you have some sort of chemical imbalance that doesn't allow you to respond to questions when you've been caught in a lie. That's what I think.

What post was altered? Point it out. Let's look into it.

I am actually curious if a post was altered or not.

[Guest]

And again - in the heart of progressive NYC:

Surest Way to Face Marijuana Charges in New York: Be Black or Hispanic

Amazing what hypocrites the Dems are, they talk a good game but don't walk it.

The police explanation that more black and Hispanic people are arrested on marijuana charges because complaints are high in their neighborhoods doesn’t hold up to scrutiny.

There are many ways to be arrested on marijuana charges, but one pattern has remained true through years of piecemeal policy changes in New York: The primary targets are black and Hispanic people.

Across the city, black people were arrested on low-level marijuana charges at eight times the rate of white, non-Hispanic people over the past three years, The New York Times found. Hispanic people were arrested at five times the rate of white people. In Manhattan, the gap is even starker: Black people there were arrested at 15 times the rate of white people.

[Watch Out Pylon!]

You're an odd person Goose. It seems like you would be the exact type of person that needs to fabricate an excuse to leave a board.

Why don't you drop the charade and come clean on making this stuff up. Or you can answer a simple question. I doubt you'll even acknowledge it because you have some sort of chemical imbalance that doesn't allow you to respond to questions when you've been caught in a lie. That's what I think.

What post was altered? Point it out. Let's look into it.

I am actually curious if a post was altered or not.

Honestly me too. It's kind of my job, but it's fucking impossible dealing with this bullshit. Then the accusations come with nothing to back it up. Fucking stupefying really.

[kingstonlake]

And again - in the heart of progressive NYC:

Surest Way to Face Marijuana Charges in New York: Be Black or Hispanic

Amazing what hypocrites the Dems are, they talk a good game but don't walk it.

The police explanation that more black and Hispanic people are arrested on marijuana charges because complaints are high in their neighborhoods doesn’t hold up to scrutiny.

There are many ways to be arrested on marijuana charges, but one pattern has remained true through years of piecemeal policy changes in New York: The primary targets are black and Hispanic people.

Across the city, black people were arrested on low-level marijuana charges at eight times the rate of white, non-Hispanic people over the past three years, The New York Times found. Hispanic people were arrested at five times the rate of white people. In Manhattan, the gap is even starker: Black people there were arrested at 15 times the rate of white people.

I appreciate the link that shows Trump voters (cops) are racists. Goose, why do you think Trump voters (cops) are targeting blacks and Hispanics?

[Robert J Sakimano]

I've always given the racist, bigoted sexual predator credit for finally exposing religious people for what they are.

[Robert J Sakimano]

Oh - and sweet mainstream media graphic, Goose.

[Guest]

And again - in the heart of progressive NYC:

Surest Way to Face Marijuana Charges in New York: Be Black or Hispanic

Amazing what hypocrites the Dems are, they talk a good game but don't walk it.

I appreciate the link that shows Trump voters (cops) are racists. Goose, why do you think Trump voters (cops) are targeting blacks and Hispanics?

KL? Let me know how many Trump voters are in this crowd? You seem to know them all very well.





Strange how your average NYC voter is all for integration until it comes to their kid's school.

[kingstonlake]

I appreciate the link that shows Trump voters (cops) are racists. Goose, why do you think Trump voters (cops) are targeting blacks and Hispanics?

KL? Let me know how many Trump voters are in this crowd? You seem to know them all very well.





Strange how your average NYC voter is all for integration until it comes to their kid's school.

I will not give your post a moment's consideration until you respond to your own post citing blacks and Hispanics bring arrested at a higher rate than whites all the while blaming "progressive" New York. Again, why do you think cops arrest minorities at a higher rate than whites? I'm sure you know who their union endorsed for president. You know the same guy who told them not to nice to them. So again, why are Trump supporters being racist?

[Guest]

I appreciate the link that shows Trump voters (cops) are racists. Goose, why do you think Trump voters (cops) are targeting blacks and Hispanics?

Because the people they work for demand it.


Now I'll wait for you to answer my question.

[kingstonlake]

I appreciate the link that shows Trump voters (cops) are racists. Goose, why do you think Trump voters (cops) are targeting blacks and Hispanics?

Because the people they work for demand it.


Now I'll wait for you to answer my question.

Source?

[kingstonlake]

I appreciate the link that shows Trump voters (cops) are racists. Goose, why do you think Trump voters (cops) are targeting blacks and Hispanics?

Because the people they work for demand it.


Now I'll wait for you to answer my question.

I guess you could start by asking why Bloomberg (R) instituted the policy of choice. In retrospect don't you think that was really dumb?

[Guest]

Because the people they work for demand it.


Now I'll wait for you to answer my question.

Source?

As usual, I must answer while you and your cohorts dodge.

None of you have answered how those that switched from Obama to Trump magically became racists...and yes they tipped the election unless you want to call your beloved New York Times fake news.

Also while on the subject of racists you may be right about them causing Clinton to lose, only in a way you're not imagining. Black turnout was way down, had blacks turned out and voted for Hillary as they did for Obama she would have won. Exit question on that one: Are those blacks racists because they turned out and voted for Obama but not for the white woman?

A link to a NYT article on the Obama/Trump flippers.

The Obama-Trump Voters Are Real. Here’s What They Think.

There are questions and details still up for debate: whether Democrats can win back these voters, and how to think about and frame the decline in black turnout. But postelection surveys, pre-election surveys, voter file data and the actual results all support the main story: The voters who switched from President Obama to Mr. Trump were decisive.

Yet some still remain skeptical. A recent article in The Washington Post by Dana Milbank, “There’s No Such Thing as a Trump Democrat,” is the latest example. It argues, based on data from the Democracy Fund Voter Study Group, that there wasn’t an unusual defection of Democratic voters in 2016. The study found that 9.2 percent of Obama voters flipped to support Mr. Trump — a hair lower than the estimates from other surveys.

But the study also supports the conclusion about the pivotal nature of the Obama-Trump vote.

[kingstonlake]

Source?

As usual, I must answer while you and your cohorts dodge.

None of you have answered how those that switched from Obama to Trump magically became racists...and yes they tipped the election unless you want to call your beloved New York Times fake news.

Also while on the subject of racists you may be right about them causing Clinton to lose, only in a way you're not imagining. Black turnout was way down, had blacks turned out and voted for Hillary as they did for Obama she would have won. Exit question on that one: Are those blacks racists because they turned out and voted for Obama but not for the white woman?

A link to a NYT article on the Obama/Trump flippers.

The Obama-Trump Voters Are Real. Here’s What They Think.

There are questions and details still up for debate: whether Democrats can win back these voters, and how to think about and frame the decline in black turnout. But postelection surveys, pre-election surveys, voter file data and the actual results all support the main story: The voters who switched from President Obama to Mr. Trump were decisive.

Yet some still remain skeptical. A recent article in The Washington Post by Dana Milbank, “There’s No Such Thing as a Trump Democrat,” is the latest example. It argues, based on data from the Democracy Fund Voter Study Group, that there wasn’t an unusual defection of Democratic voters in 2016. The study found that 9.2 percent of Obama voters flipped to support Mr. Trump — a hair lower than the estimates from other surveys.

But the study also supports the conclusion about the pivotal nature of the Obama-Trump vote.

That's a great read. Now back to the subject you brought up......

Why do you think an organization that supported Trump is arresting minorities at a higher rate than whites? You brought up this "problem" and blamed progressive NYC. Now that we've narrowed down a population of 8.5 million "progressive" people to 45,000 people with the actual power to arrest civilians, who's organization supported Trump, why are they acting in a racist manner?

[Guest]

As usual, I must answer while you and your cohorts dodge.

None of you have answered how those that switched from Obama to Trump magically became racists...and yes they tipped the election unless you want to call your beloved New York Times fake news.

Also while on the subject of racists you may be right about them causing Clinton to lose, only in a way you're not imagining.  Black turnout was way down, had blacks turned out and voted for Hillary as they did for Obama she would have won.   Exit question on that one:   Are those blacks racists because they turned out and voted for Obama but not for the white woman?

A link to a NYT article on the Obama/Trump flippers.

The Obama-Trump Voters Are Real. Here’s What They Think.

That's a great read.  Now back to the subject you brought up......

Why do you think an organization that supported Trump is arresting minorities at a higher rate than whites?  You brought up this "problem" and blamed progressive NYC.  Now that we've narrowed down a population of 8.5 million "progressive" people to 45,000 people with the actual power to arrest civilians, who's organization supported Trump, why are they acting in a racist manner?

I answered very clearly.   Since no one has been fired or punished for this it's obvious they're doing exactly what their bosses demand.  Keeping Manhattan as snow white as possible.   And you asked who the bosses are, you know the answer to that.   The people that live there that the upper ranks of the police force and the politicians must answer to.   IF the people that lived there were truly upset over this ethnic cleansing it would have been stopped decades ago.

[kingstonlake]

That's a great read.  Now back to the subject you brought up......

Why do you think an organization that supported Trump is arresting minorities at a higher rate than whites?  You brought up this "problem" and blamed progressive NYC.  Now that we've narrowed down a population of 8.5 million "progressive" people to 45,000 people with the actual power to arrest civilians, who's organization supported Trump, why are they acting in a racist manner?

I answered very clearly.   Since no one has been fired or punished for this it's obvious they're doing exactly what their bosses demand.  Keeping Manhattan as snow white as possible.   And you asked who the bosses are, you know the answer to that.   The people that live there that the upper ranks of the police force and the politicians must answer to.   IF the people that lived there were truly upset over this ethnic cleansing it would have been stopped decades ago.

I'm quite sure you know how ridiculous that sounds. It's akin to saying Trump says racist things, says a judge can't be unbaised because of his race, because it's what his voters want.

Are you ready to go there with this logic?

[Guest]

I answered very clearly.   Since no one has been fired or punished for this it's obvious they're doing exactly what their bosses demand.  Keeping Manhattan as snow white as possible.   And you asked who the bosses are, you know the answer to that.   The people that live there that the upper ranks of the police force and the politicians must answer to.   IF the people that lived there were truly upset over this ethnic cleansing it would have been stopped decades ago.

I'm quite sure you know how ridiculous that sounds. It's akin to saying Trump says racist things, says a judge can't be unbaised because of his race, because it's what his voters want.

Are you ready to go there with this logic?

I don't think it ridiculous at all.

If your bosses don't like your work, they ask you to change then fire you if you don't change.

The racism in arrests in NYC has been going on for decades if the direct bosses up the chain to the Mayor weren't happy they would have been demanding change or firing people long ago.

The ridiculous part is you sincerely believing that these racist cops are 100% Trump voters. That's absurd.

Your citation of a union endorsement is weak soup and you know it, the unions in MI make recommendations to their members but no sane person thinks this means that 100% of the members follow the recommendation.

[kingstonlake]

I'm quite sure you know how ridiculous that sounds. It's akin to saying Trump says racist things, says a judge can't be unbaised because of his race, because it's what his voters want.

Are you ready to go there with this logic?

I don't think it ridiculous at all.

If your bosses don't like your work, they ask you to change then fire you if you don't change.

The racism in arrests in NYC has been going on for decades if the direct bosses up the chain to the Mayor weren't happy they would have been demanding change or firing people long ago.

The ridiculous part is you sincerely believing that these racist cops are 100% Trump voters. That's absurd.

Your citation of a union endorsement is weak soup and you know it, the unions in MI make recommendations to their members but no sane person thinks this means that 100% of the members follow the recommendation.

Do you remember the video of trump talking in front of New York City police officers and the raucous Applause he got? I can post it if you want

[Robert J Sakimano]

Source?

As usual, I must answer while you and your cohorts dodge.

None of you have answered how those that switched from Obama to Trump magically became racists...and yes they tipped the election unless you want to call your beloved New York Times fake news.

Also while on the subject of racists you may be right about them causing Clinton to lose, only in a way you're not imagining. Black turnout was way down, had blacks turned out and voted for Hillary as they did for Obama she would have won. Exit question on that one: Are those blacks racists because they turned out and voted for Obama but not for the white woman?

A link to a NYT article on the Obama/Trump flippers.

The Obama-Trump Voters Are Real. Here’s What They Think.

There are questions and details still up for debate: whether Democrats can win back these voters, and how to think about and frame the decline in black turnout. But postelection surveys, pre-election surveys, voter file data and the actual results all support the main story: The voters who switched from President Obama to Mr. Trump were decisive.

Yet some still remain skeptical. A recent article in The Washington Post by Dana Milbank, “There’s No Such Thing as a Trump Democrat,” is the latest example. It argues, based on data from the Democracy Fund Voter Study Group, that there wasn’t an unusual defection of Democratic voters in 2016. The study found that 9.2 percent of Obama voters flipped to support Mr. Trump — a hair lower than the estimates from other surveys.

But the study also supports the conclusion about the pivotal nature of the Obama-Trump vote.

thanks for the mainstream media link

[Guest]

I don't think it ridiculous at all.

If your bosses don't like your work, they ask you to change then fire you if you don't change.

The racism in arrests in NYC has been going on for decades if the direct bosses up the chain to the Mayor weren't happy they would have been demanding change or firing people long ago.

The ridiculous part is you sincerely believing that these racist cops are 100% Trump voters. That's absurd.

Your citation of a union endorsement is weak soup and you know it, the unions in MI make recommendations to their members but no sane person thinks this means that 100% of the members follow the recommendation.

Do you remember the video of trump talking in front of New York City police officers and the raucous Applause he got? I can post it if you want

So because some members of a group are for Trump then all are? And therefore all members of that group are racists?

Then again you could read this and see that the bosses have decided now that it's public they better slow down...

Manhattan DA says he’ll stop prosecuting pot possession

NEW YORK (AP) — Faced with fresh evidence of the racial disparity in marijuana enforcement across New York City, Manhattan’s district attorney said Tuesday he will largely stop prosecuting people for possessing or smoking marijuana.

The move by District Attorney Cyrus Vance Jr. came the same day that Mayor Bill de Blasio promised that the city’s police department would overhaul its marijuana enforcement policies in the next 30 days. Brooklyn’s district attorney also said he would scale back prosecutions.


“We must and we will end unnecessary arrests and end disparity in enforcement,” de Blasio said at a conference of the Center for American Progress in Washington, D.C

Hmm...let's see....the Manhattan DA, the Brooklyn DA and the Mayor have decided to alter their behavior, why it's almost as if they were encouraging these arrests. Now cue KL coming and telling me Vance & deBlasio are rabid Trump supporters.

[kingstonlake]

That's great! I'm glad that City officials are finally standing up to the Trump supporters who are arresting Hispanics and blacks disproportionately

[Robert J Sakimano]

Do you remember the video of trump talking in front of New York City police officers and the raucous Applause he got? I can post it if you want

So because some members of a group are for Trump then all are? And therefore all members of that group are racists?

Then again you could read this and see that the bosses have decided now that it's public they better slow down...

Manhattan DA says he’ll stop prosecuting pot possession

NEW YORK (AP) — Faced with fresh evidence of the racial disparity in marijuana enforcement across New York City, Manhattan’s district attorney said Tuesday he will largely stop prosecuting people for possessing or smoking marijuana.

The move by District Attorney Cyrus Vance Jr. came the same day that Mayor Bill de Blasio promised that the city’s police department would overhaul its marijuana enforcement policies in the next 30 days. Brooklyn’s district attorney also said he would scale back prosecutions.


“We must and we will end unnecessary arrests and end disparity in enforcement,” de Blasio said at a conference of the Center for American Progress in Washington, D.C

Hmm...let's see....the Manhattan DA, the Brooklyn DA and the Mayor have decided to alter their behavior, why it's almost as if they were encouraging these arrests. Now cue KL coming and telling me Vance & deBlasio are rabid Trump supporters.

thanks for the mainstream media link.

[Sponsored content]