Re: The Supreme Court

by **Travis of the Cosmos** Mon 1 Jul 2024 - 17:32

You gotta stop editing posts.

And you have hardly been polite.

by **Cameron** Mon 1 Jul 2024 - 17:36

Trapper Gus wrote:Gosh darn it Travis, responding to me without absorbing what I've said is a new level of stupidity from you.

Trapper Gus wrote:
I have been polite and factual replying to you.

So polite...

Is there anyone less self aware? Not just on tBin or tSwill, but in the entire world?

by **Trapper Gus** Mon 1 Jul 2024 - 17:41

Travis of the Cosmos wrote:You gotta stop editing posts.

And you have hardly been polite.

The first comment was in line with how you sometimes respond to me, nothing more.

As to editing posts, okay, you didn't see my full response, so that's on me...

by **Trapper Gus** Mon 1 Jul 2024 - 17:57

Travis of the Cosmos wrote:
Trapper Gus wrote:

And I told you I don't watch it, which I don't, yet you continue with your charade. I get TM or Zurn doing that, I expect better from a MOD.

I suggest you look in a mirror regarding your comment.
I just saw that you edited your post after I replied to it, which I never would have seen as I had clearly already read it. Why would I have seen your edit trappy?

Regardless I don’t really believe you since your first post was about what talking heads are saying to you and the edit came after you were told that cable news is worthless.

You’re a silly goose trapper

Didn't see this post and responded to your second post.

As to my edit, your post wasn't up when I started it, so we posted past each other on that one...I get that, we think differently about posting and time, also I am a slow typer using one thumb on a phone.

by **Trapper Gus** Mon 1 Jul 2024 - 18:01

Cameron wrote:
Trapper Gus wrote:Gosh darn it Travis, responding to me without absorbing what I've said is a new level of stupidity from you.

Trapper Gus wrote:
I have been polite and factual replying to you.

So polite...

Is there anyone less self aware? Not just on tBin or tSwill, but in the entire world?

In this case I assumed Travis had read my edited post while he assumed that was all I was going to say. It took him another post to go back and read my full post, so my exsaperation, and his, were a misunderstanding of what each other knew.

BTW, polite on a message board, yes I am editing again, is to reply in the same tone as the poster with whom the conversation is with, technically that is called mirroring.

by TravelinMan Mon 1 Jul 2024 - 19:14

DWags wrote:
TravelinMan wrote:

I repeat: what a weird obsession.

Getting banned on a board and needing to comeback with another screen name? Yeah. Obsession? IDK. Insanity? More likely.

How does that shoe fit?

I think you’re strangely obsessed about this topic.

by TravelinMan Mon 1 Jul 2024 - 19:16

Travis of the Cosmos wrote:
Trapper Gus wrote:

Does a MOD have to ban himself for trolling?
I’ll discuss it on the secret board that no one else can see where we have dossiers on all posters just in case they act out

I KNEW it! The Supreme Court - Page 6 502811600

by TravelinMan Mon 1 Jul 2024 - 20:03

Didn’t Biden just last week say we needed to respect the decisions of the courts?

Maybe his pudding brain forgot that.

by sεяεηιτλ Mon 1 Jul 2024 - 20:12

https://www.reddit.com/r/IdiotsInCars/comments/13ddier/two_idiots_fighting_in_traffic/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=web3x&utm_name=web3xcss&utm_term=1&utm_content=share_button

and

https://www.reddit.com/r/dashcams/comments/1dlg17g/when_two_idiots_meet/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=web3x&utm_name=web3xcss&utm_term=1&utm_content=share_button

by **DWags** Tue 2 Jul 2024 - 20:54

Just like a couple of posters on this board. Fucking liars. It’s a shitty world that’s coming to us.

[tw]1808146859640144362?s=46&t=o_-92Ldle66XHQBlJVUMFQ[/tw]

by sεяεηιτλ Tue 2 Jul 2024 - 20:57

This belongs here too and the trial thread. the SCOTUS decision also is likely going to get Trump off on his hush money trial because prosecutors used a single form he filled out in 2018 as evidence. Between that and hope hicks testimony, Trump lawyers are of course all over this shit. They've created a fucking king and it makes me want to throw up. our country is now unrecognizable.

https://www.businessinsider.com/piece-of-evidence-can-now-scuttle-trump-hush-money-conviction-2024-7

by sεяεηιτλ Tue 2 Jul 2024 - 21:11

the more i read about the fall out from this decision, the more i want to throw up. I have to stop for my health.

Democrats are utterly ball-less and utterly powerless to do anything here. They're too busy taking the moral high ground and doing nothing. Right now they should be taking project 2025, remove all the religious crap and run full steam ahead with that plan. Let's see what the republicans do then. perhaps it forces some ethical legislation and other things that look like the united states of america, instead of this banana kingdom we have now.

by Green money Tue 2 Jul 2024 - 22:27

DWags wrote:Just like a couple of posters on this board. Fucking liars. It’s a shitty world that’s coming to us. I'm just here for the meltdown. First Biden shots his pants and then the Scotus throws water on the dems. Boo hoo.

[tw]1808146859640144362?s=46&t=o_-92Ldle66XHQBlJVUMFQ[/tw]

by **DWags** Wed 3 Jul 2024 - 13:13

I honestly feel there are two or three posters on here who, somehow really don’t understand the changes that are coming to our country if that maniac is elected. Like in someway it won’t affect them

by **kingstonlake** Wed 3 Jul 2024 - 13:16

DWags wrote:I honestly feel there are two or three posters on here who, somehow really don’t understand the changes that are coming to our country if that maniac is elected. Like in someway it won’t affect them

It’s more about who it will hurt more, for them.

by **DWags** Wed 3 Jul 2024 - 13:45

kingstonlake wrote:
DWags wrote:I honestly feel there are two or three posters on here who, somehow really don’t understand the changes that are coming to our country if that maniac is elected. Like in someway it won’t affect them

It’s more about who it will hurt more, for them.

Oh, I get that. We saw that in 1930s Germany.. By the time those dumbasses figured it out, it was way too late and they are eating out of garbage cans. Excuse my hyperbole, and I don’t think it will get that bad, But I can see it really turning south. I think people on this board., My respect the women in their life or maybe they don’t have women in their life, Threat by gay people or minorities too. But I’m telling you, the storm is coming we don’t keep that maniac out of office

by Green money Wed 3 Jul 2024 - 13:56

I love the fear mongering of you guys. Trump has you scared sh%%%. Very entertaining the group think here. And I thought the RCMB was liberal....

by **Travis of the Cosmos** Wed 3 Jul 2024 - 14:00

If you thought rcmb was liberal then you’re a fucking idiot.

by **DWags** Wed 3 Jul 2024 - 15:12

Green money wrote:I love the fear mongering of you guys. Trump has you scared sh%%%. Very entertaining the group think here. And I thought the RCMB was liberal....

When in your life, have you ever heard of a person running for the president of the United States Use the term military tribunal? I can’t help you if you refuse to see

by Zurn Wed 3 Jul 2024 - 15:59

DWags wrote:I honestly feel there are two or three posters on here who, somehow really don’t understand the changes that are coming to our country if that maniac is elected. Like in someway it won’t affect them

Here's the thing. He already was president for four years and the country survived just fine.

by **Jake from State Farm** Wed 3 Jul 2024 - 16:01

Zurn wrote:
DWags wrote:I honestly feel there are two or three posters on here who, somehow really don’t understand the changes that are coming to our country if that maniac is elected. Like in someway it won’t affect them

Here's the thing. He already was president for four years and the country survived just fine.

Tell that to the people with COVID that didn't make it out of a hospital alive.

by AvgMSUJoe Wed 3 Jul 2024 - 16:01

Zurn wrote:
DWags wrote:I honestly feel there are two or three posters on here who, somehow really don’t understand the changes that are coming to our country if that maniac is elected. Like in someway it won’t affect them

Here's the thing. He already was president for four years and the country survived just fine.

Barely, you shithead... Pence folds, we have no democracy left.

by Zurn Wed 3 Jul 2024 - 16:02

Green money wrote:I love the fear mongering of you guys. Trump has you scared sh%%%. Very entertaining the group think here. And I thought the RCMB was liberal....

The liberal outrage over this is as funny as it was predictable.

Especially when you realize that it was the democrat special prosecutor Jack Smith who asked the SCOTUS to expedite the ruling.

The ruling was correct. If not why couldn't some rogue Republican prosecutor in Hicksville charge Obama with murder for droning innocent American citizens to death?

by Zurn Wed 3 Jul 2024 - 16:09

AvgMSUJoe wrote:
Zurn wrote:

Here's the thing. He already was president for four years and the country survived just fine.
Barely, you shithead... Pence folds, we have no democracy left.

It is clear to all that the Electoral College Act of 1887 deems the VP to be a presider over the process and gives him no authority to change electors. This question has been addressed in courts with all of the lawsuits claiming otherwise being dismissed.

If Pence "folded" this issue would have been swatted away by multiple courts and Biden would still be president.

by **GRR Spartan** Wed 3 Jul 2024 - 16:10

Zurn's job is to see Trump elected again.

He's been part of Trump's 5th column since he was posting under other names and on other boards.

I see Zurn is a terrorist mole looking help in the completion of the semi-peaceful overthrow of The United States.

by Zurn Wed 3 Jul 2024 - 16:16

GRR Spartan wrote:Zurn's job is to see Trump elected again.

He's been part of Trump's 5th column since he was posting under other names and on other boards.

I see Zurn is a terrorist mole looking help in the completion of the semi-peaceful overthrow of The United States.



by Rick Saunders Wed 3 Jul 2024 - 16:17

Zurn wrote:
AvgMSUJoe wrote:
Barely, you shithead... Pence folds, we have no democracy left.

It is clear to all that the Electoral College Act of 1887 deems the VP to be a presider over the process and gives him no authority to change electors. This question has been addressed in courts with all of the lawsuits claiming otherwise being dismissed.

If Pence "folded" this issue would have been swatted away by multiple courts and Biden would still be president.

We don't know what would have happened. But there were plenty in congress who would have supported the move and a decision might have been up to the SC. We just don't know. What we do know is that if you believe that is so clear-cut, then Donald Trump did not "preserve, protect, and defend the constitution of the United States" and neither did senate repubiicans who voted not to uphold his impeachment and declare him unfit for office.

by Zurn Wed 3 Jul 2024 - 16:23

Rick Saunders wrote:
Zurn wrote:

It is clear to all that the Electoral College Act of 1887 deems the VP to be a presider over the process and gives him no authority to change electors. This question has been addressed in courts with all of the lawsuits claiming otherwise being dismissed.

If Pence "folded" this issue would have been swatted away by multiple courts and Biden would still be president.

We don't know what would have happened.

We do know what would have happened. Those exact claims were made in lawsuits filed by Trump which were promptly thrown out. Doubtful that the SCOTUS would have even taken the case on appeal given the specific wording of the Electoral College Act.

by Green money Wed 3 Jul 2024 - 16:28

But, but mean tweets, Lol.

by Rick Saunders Wed 3 Jul 2024 - 16:30

Zurn wrote:
Rick Saunders wrote:

We don't know what would have happened.

We do know what would have happened. Those exact claims were made in lawsuits filed by Trump which were promptly thrown out. Doubtful that the SCOTUS would have even taken the case on appeal given the specific wording of the Electoral College Act.

Fine. Ergo: What we do know is that if you believe that is so clear-cut, then Donald Trump did not "preserve, protect, and defend the constitution of the United States" and neither did senate republicans who voted not to uphold his impeachment and declare him unfit for office.

You get the last word if you want it.

by **DWags** Wed 3 Jul 2024 - 16:37

Zurn wrote:
DWags wrote:I honestly feel there are two or three posters on here who, somehow really don’t understand the changes that are coming to our country if that maniac is elected. Like in someway it won’t affect them

Here's the thing. He already was president for four years and the country survived just fine.

Really? You’re now lying to yourself. We had safeguards and some heroic people that choose to save our democracy You must’ve had your head up your ass or in the sand on January 6

I can’t believe how you listen to your own lies and believe them You are a liar

by **GRR Spartan** Wed 3 Jul 2024 - 20:29

Zen is here to troll and stir the pot. Nothing else.

A faux patriot like his candidate Trump. Both interested in a 2025 America where the GOP holds an absolute majority in the US Senate and the SCOTUS never has to lose its lifetime appointments since the majority passed their loyalty tests.

But Trump, the GOP and members of the 5th column call themselves “conservatives”

by **DWags** Wed 3 Jul 2024 - 20:37

GRR Spartan wrote:Zen is here to troll and stir the pot. Nothing else.

A faux patriot like his candidate Trump. Both interested in a 2025 America where the GOP holds an absolute majority in the US Senate and the SCOTUS never has to lose its lifetime appointments since the majority passed their loyalty tests.

But Trump, the GOP and members of the 5th column call themselves “conservatives”

I won’t stop calling him what he is. He’s a perfect example of the Trump cult. He lies and pretends he’s someone he’s not. He will never, not once admit who he is because he’s a coward and a liar.

by **GRR Spartan** Wed 3 Jul 2024 - 21:56

Green money wrote:I love the fear mongering of you guys. Trump has you scared sh%%%. Very entertaining the group think here. And I thought the RCMB was liberal....

Sounds like you've got your Brown Shirt pressed and boots polished.

Have you applied to be on any tribunals that will be trying people who opposed Trump's Jan 6 2021 coup as well?

The again I might be too harsh and you are truly oblivious recent 21st Century Russian history and pre WW2 German history.

Can't fix willful ignorance.

by **Jake from State Farm** Fri 5 Jul 2024 - 8:12

There's a saying that absolute power corrupts absolutely. If someone is already absolutely corrupted doesn't it just intensify the corruption? And why cannot the six idiots of the supreme court see that?

by Green money Fri 5 Jul 2024 - 8:21

Jake from State Farm wrote:There's a saying that absolute power corrupts absolutely. If someone is already absolutely corrupted doesn't it just intensify the corruption? And why cannot the six idiots of the supreme court see that?

why are 6 justices idiots? You don't agree with them since they don't bend over for corrupt Joe?

by **DWags** Fri 5 Jul 2024 - 8:49

Jake from State Farm wrote:There's a saying that absolute power corrupts absolutely. If someone is already absolutely corrupted doesn't it just intensify the corruption? And why cannot the six idiots of the supreme court see that?

Of the morons on that side, I’d say 40% see it and want it that way 40% are just too stupid to see it and are absorbed by the cult, and 20% are just pure evil racist bigots who hope absolute power in his hands eliminates people of color uppity women and homosexuals

by Zurn Fri 5 Jul 2024 - 8:54

DWags wrote:
Jake from State Farm wrote:There's a saying that absolute power corrupts absolutely. If someone is already absolutely corrupted doesn't it just intensify the corruption? And why cannot the six idiots of the supreme court see that?

Of the morons on that side, I’d say 40% see it and want it that way 40% are just too stupid to see it and are absorbed by the cult, and 20% are just pure evil racist bigots who hope absolute power in his hands eliminates people of color uppity women and homosexuals

One political mantra that always proves true is that conservatives think liberals are just people with bad ideas but liberals think conservatives are bad people.

by **Cameron** Fri 5 Jul 2024 - 8:58

Oh yes, no conservative ever accused any liberal of being a bad person with nefarious motives. You are so right.

by **DWags** Fri 5 Jul 2024 - 9:06

Zurn wrote:
DWags wrote:

Of the morons on that side, I’d say 40% see it and want it that way 40% are just too stupid to see it and are absorbed by the cult, and 20% are just pure evil racist bigots who hope absolute power in his hands eliminates people of color uppity women and homosexuals

One political mantra that always proves true is that conservatives think liberals are just people with bad ideas but liberals think conservatives are bad people.

I never think people with different ideas are bad people. I do think liars are bad people.

by Sponsored content