My solution to the NK problem

My suggestion is a hard line stance. A stance that could possibly get other nations to tell the NK, " look fuck wad, you've pushed and pushed, now there's a push back. Game over, were not risking lives because you wanna play crazy dictator and detonate nukes and lob missles. It's one thing to dump them in the China Sea. It's another to fly them over sovereign nations and us territories. Knock it off". I'll ask you again. How long are you willing to watch missles flying overhead and hope they're not armed. Forever? History is littered with crazy fucks who've done really really dumb shit.

Why do you think he's a "crazy fuck" Kingston? And why do missiles flying overhead terrify you? And also I wouldn't suppose to know what we're "hoping" and what we "know" re: arming. Our intelligence is a lot more complete than what we have access to as message board posters. Just noting that we don't have all the facts here. Maybe it's that maybe it's something else. But we're not dealing with a full deck.

Your hardline stance could kill a hell of a lot of people unnecessarily. Basically you want what amounts to the no fly zones we had in Iraq for decades. Worked out great.

Buncha damned worrywarts.....all is well.

LooseGoose wrote:Buncha damned worrywarts.....all is well.

Nobel laureate Dennis Rodman has a nice ring to it.

tGreenWay wrote:

LooseGoose wrote:Buncha damned worrywarts.....all is well.

Nobel laureate Dennis Rodman has a nice ring to it.

Honest to god, think about those two and Trump and realize they have literally hundreds of millions of people's lives in their hands and step back and ask yourself, "how in the fuck did we get here?"