Guys, guys... you have to read the comments on this article.

by **Rocinante** Tue 14 Jun 2016 - 16:45

We are all in there... it's creepy.

Please post comments and name the swill poster that posted it.

http://gawker.com/crazed-greenwich-village-gunman-also-off-duty-nypd-offi-1781972403?utm_campaign=socialflow_gawker_facebook&utm_source=gawker_facebook&utm_medium=socialflow

by **tGreenWay** Tue 14 Jun 2016 - 16:51

I don't have to do shit. You're not the boss of me.

by **Turtleneck** Tue 14 Jun 2016 - 16:57

I do not understand what you're saying. Do you mean we are all mentioned? Where? Do you mean our posting styles are all represented in those comments? Because I am not reading all of that just so I can say "that Dave guy that commented is our Bob Sak."

by **Rocinante** Tue 14 Jun 2016 - 16:59

tGreenWay wrote:I don't have to do shit. You're not the boss of me.

tGreenWay wrote:This is a remarkably stupid comment, even with what usually gets posted around here.

by **Rocinante** Tue 14 Jun 2016 - 17:00

Turtleneck wrote:I do not understand what you're saying. Do you mean we are all mentioned? Where? Do you mean our posting styles are all represented in those comments? Because I am not reading all of that just so I can say "that Dave guy that commented is our Bob Sak."

Turtleneck wrote:How would any modern society survive without a police force? I won’t deny our current forces have serious issues, but having no force is insanity.

by **Rocinante** Tue 14 Jun 2016 - 17:01

Xsanguine wrote:The invention of modern police - as in active patrols among the populace of armed men to keep the people in their place - is relatively new. For most of our history we had a process where someone brought a complaint to the court, the court ordered an investigation of the complaint, then they ordered officers of the court to arrest someone. In many places the sheriff could be summoned and take people into custody if the court was unavailable, but that is a very different scenario than active patrol looking for “trouble” and policing, which is by design meant to keep people in line, not to serve or protect.

by **Turtleneck** Tue 14 Jun 2016 - 17:02

Where are you seeing all of that? Also, to whoever wrote that dumbass comment, I would prefer no police. Get it right please.

by **Rocinante** Tue 14 Jun 2016 - 17:05

OTPT wrote:Just don’t bother dude. Just let crazy be crazy and move on.

by **Rocinante** Tue 14 Jun 2016 - 17:06

Bob Sakimano wrote:“an armed society is a polite society”.
Unless you have a gun, then you can do whatever you want. Threaten bicyclists, shoot cars playing music too loud, even chase down kids walking home from the convenience store.

by **Turtleneck** Tue 14 Jun 2016 - 17:07

Rocinante wrote:
OTPT wrote:Just don’t bother dude. Just let crazy be crazy and move on.

Did you post the right link? None of that is in the comments of the article I am looking at (about a off duty cop waving his gun around).

by **Rocinante** Tue 14 Jun 2016 - 17:08

Steven Bee wrote:That is why you pack heat yourself, legally of course.

If you don’t, you are a darwin award waiting to happen.

by **Rocinante** Tue 14 Jun 2016 - 17:08

Turtleneck wrote:
Rocinante wrote:

Did you post the right link? None of that is in the comments of the article I am looking at (about a off duty cop waving his gun around).

Yes you Luddite.

by **Turtleneck** Tue 14 Jun 2016 - 17:09

Rocinante wrote:
Turtleneck wrote:

Did you post the right link? None of that is in the comments of the article I am looking at (about a off duty cop waving his gun around).

Yes you Luddite.

I expanded all the replies, but do not see any of this. You're making it up.

by **Rocinante** Tue 14 Jun 2016 - 17:10

TN argues with X wrote:I asked HOW a society would function without a police force. You propose this utopic vision where nobody does anything wrong as a counterpoint to the need for police, but reality does nothing to support you. What modern society has a court system with no police? Even the officers of the court are police by any definition, so your utopic vision STILL predicates on the need for a police force in a reduced capacity. The Sherrif is also a police force, also in a reduced capacity.

by **Turtleneck** Tue 14 Jun 2016 - 17:14

None of that is there. Screenshot or it didn't happen, bro.

by **Rocinante** Tue 14 Jun 2016 - 17:15

LooseGoose wrote:A series of poor decisions on both sides. Obviously drawing a weapon is inexcusable, and hopefully jail time beckons for that one. However the cyclists ought not to have begun attacking the car either, no matter how godawfully fucking stupid driving in a cycle lane is. We’re trying to get cyclists all into those so we can get them off the roads proper, leave the cycle lanes alone so they go to them. Cyclists, when a car driver does do something stupid like that, take a picture and report them not try and damage the car by striking it because that starts a process of escalation, people with guns...just are you fucking stupid? If the cyclist starts attacking the car, take a video of them and report them instead, keep the gun in a locked travel case.

by **Rocinante** Tue 14 Jun 2016 - 17:17

Me wrote:

by **Turtleneck** Tue 14 Jun 2016 - 17:24

That comment is not attributed to Rochinante. Since you have an account maybe only you can see the comments (since you're the one writing them).

by **Rocinante** Tue 14 Jun 2016 - 17:26

Turtleneck wrote:That comment is not attributed to Rochinante. Since you have an account maybe only you can see the comments (since you're the one writing them).

You are a dummy, dummy.

by **Turtleneck** Tue 14 Jun 2016 - 17:31

Then explain it to me. How do you unlock these comments? I clicked to look at all the pending comments in addition to those already posted/approved. None of those names appeared.

by **Turtleneck** Tue 14 Jun 2016 - 17:34

theunseenone>Skipperton
6/14/16 3:28pm
How would any modern society survive without a police force? I won’t deny our current forces have serious issues, but having no force is insanity.

Skipperton> theunseenone
6/14/16 3:32pm
The invention of modern police - as in active patrols among the populace of armed men to keep the people in their place - is relatively new. For most of our history we had a process where someone brought a complaint to the court, the court ordered an investigation of the complaint, then they ordered officers of the court to arrest someone. In many places the sheriff could be summoned and take people into custody if the court was unavailable, but that is a very different scenario than active patrol looking for “trouble” and policing, which is by design meant to keep people in line, not to serve or protect.

So it is just as I asked much earlier. You read all these - for whatever reason I have no fucking idea - and then said "hey, that sounds like X and that is OTPT." And you call me weird?

by **tGreenWay** Tue 14 Jun 2016 - 17:51

Rocinante wrote:
Bob Sakimano wrote:“an armed society is a polite society”.
Unless you have a gun, then you can do whatever you want. Threaten bicyclists, shoot cars playing music too loud, even chase down kids walking home from the convenience store.

Assigning Bob a quote that the nutjob Alan Cropsey frequently cited opens the door for Mr. Sakimano to sue your ass, Roc.

by **tGreenWay** Tue 14 Jun 2016 - 17:52

Turtleneck wrote:Where are you seeing all of that? Also, to whoever wrote that dumbass comment, I would prefer no police. Get it right please.

Do you really think you can survive this board with no police?

by **Rocinante** Tue 14 Jun 2016 - 18:00

Turtleneck wrote:
theunseenone>Skipperton
6/14/16 3:28pm
How would any modern society survive without a police force? I won’t deny our current forces have serious issues, but having no force is insanity.

Skipperton> theunseenone
6/14/16 3:32pm
The invention of modern police - as in active patrols among the populace of armed men to keep the people in their place - is relatively new. For most of our history we had a process where someone brought a complaint to the court, the court ordered an investigation of the complaint, then they ordered officers of the court to arrest someone. In many places the sheriff could be summoned and take people into custody if the court was unavailable, but that is a very different scenario than active patrol looking for “trouble” and policing, which is by design meant to keep people in line, not to serve or protect.

So it is just as I asked much earlier. You read all these - for whatever reason I have no fucking idea - and then said "hey, that sounds like X and that is OTPT." And you call me weird?

Guys, guys... you have to read the comments on this article. 1f1ec

Guys, guys... you have to read the comments on this article. 1f1f4

Guys, guys... you have to read the comments on this article. 1f1e9

Guys, guys... you have to read the comments on this article. 1f1ef

Guys, guys... you have to read the comments on this article. 1f1e7

Guys, guys... you have to read the comments on this article. 1f1f9

Guys, guys... you have to read the comments on this article. 1f1fa

Guys, guys... you have to read the comments on this article. 1f1f7

Guys, guys... you have to read the comments on this article. 1f1f1

Guys, guys... you have to read the comments on this article. 1f1ea

Guys, guys... you have to read the comments on this article. 1f1f3

Guys, guys... you have to read the comments on this article. 1f1e8

Guys, guys... you have to read the comments on this article. 1f1f0

Guys, guys... you have to read the comments on this article. 1f1fe

Guys, guys... you have to read the comments on this article. 1f1eb

Guys, guys... you have to read the comments on this article. 1f1ee

by **Turtleneck** Tue 14 Jun 2016 - 18:08

Rocinante wrote:
Turtleneck wrote:

So it is just as I asked much earlier. You read all these - for whatever reason I have no fucking idea - and then said "hey, that sounds like X and that is OTPT." And you call me weird?

I asked you in the third post, dumbass. Furthermore, who the fuck reads comments...and then assigns them to posters from an Internet message board? I guess you do. Stop trying to get around the weirdo factor.

by **Rocinante** Tue 14 Jun 2016 - 18:17

Turtleneck wrote:
Rocinante wrote:

I asked you in the third post, dumbass. Furthermore, who the fuck reads comments...and then assigns them to posters from an Internet message board? I guess you do. Stop trying to get around the weirdo factor.

I'm not sure you're Co9 material anymore.

by Triple Sparty Tue 14 Jun 2016 - 18:18

This thread is terrible. You two need to get a room.

by **The Pantry** Tue 14 Jun 2016 - 18:57

Thread...

Guys, guys... you have to read the comments on this article. Truck210

Guys, guys... you have to read the comments on this article. You-su10

by **Rocinante** Tue 14 Jun 2016 - 18:59

The Pantry wrote:Thread...

I believe nothing that the drinker of fouled milk spews.

by **Turtleneck** Tue 14 Jun 2016 - 19:00

Rocinante wrote:
The Pantry wrote:Thread...

I believe nothing that the drinker of fouled milk spews.

How many more posts before you are back in the Co9

by **xsanguine** Tue 14 Jun 2016 - 19:03

Clearly, Roc is crazy. Time to take away some rights....

That's the type of country we all want to live in.

by **Other Teams Pursuing That** Tue 14 Jun 2016 - 19:15

xsanguine wrote:Clearly, Roc is crazy. Time to take away some rights....

That's the type of country we all want to live in.

You're like the political version of moose.

by **xsanguine** Tue 14 Jun 2016 - 19:20

Other Teams Pursuing That wrote:
xsanguine wrote:Clearly, Roc is crazy. Time to take away some rights....

That's the type of country we all want to live in.

You're like the political version of moose.

You're tSwill version of Jim Breuer.

by **The Pantry** Tue 14 Jun 2016 - 19:36

Rocinante wrote:
The Pantry wrote:Thread...

I believe nothing that the drinker of fouled milk spews.

The only fouled milk comes pasteurized and homogenized through hundreds of feet of pipe and hose, hoser.

by **Cameron** Tue 14 Jun 2016 - 22:24

Turtleneck is right, Roc, this is a fucking weird thread.

by **Rocinante** Tue 14 Jun 2016 - 22:24

Cameron wrote:Turtleneck is right, Roc, this is a fucking weird thread.

And?

by **Cameron** Tue 14 Jun 2016 - 22:28

Rocinante wrote:
Cameron wrote:Turtleneck is right, Roc, this is a fucking weird thread.

And?

And you're a weirdo for starting it?

I didn't have an "and" planned.

by **Turtleneck** Tue 14 Jun 2016 - 22:30

Can off season be over now?

by **WhiteBoyHatcher** Tue 14 Jun 2016 - 22:34

I got it Roc. Turtle is being an obtuse motherfucker.

by **Rocinante** Tue 14 Jun 2016 - 22:34

WhiteBoyHatcher wrote:I got it Roc. Turtle is being an obtuse motherfucker.

My boy.

by Sponsored content