Mainstream Media Outlet Suggests Putting the Racist, Bigoted Christian Sexual Predator on Mt. Rushmore..

Presidents Day is an important holiday for us to reflect upon those who we have elected to the highest office in our land.

We are lucky to currently have a leader in President Trump, whose term so far has been, I would argue, one of the most successful in our history.

If this keeps up, much to the chagrin of many Democrats, the presidents on Mount Rushmore may have to make room for a new addition.

oh, and if you ever wonder the type of people that the mainstream media employees, these astute observations were taken by and articulated from:

EDITOR'S NOTE: Boris Epshteyn formerly served as a Senior Advisor to the Trump Campaign and served in the White House as Special Assistant to The President and Assistant Communications Director for Surrogate Operations.  

     

Caution: Mainstream Media Link

That’s the guy that Sinclair media forces local news broadcasts to air on the stations they own. It’s pretty fucked bob.

Travis of the Cosmos wrote:That’s the guy that Sinclair media forces local news broadcasts to air on the stations they own. It’s pretty fucked bob.

it's the mainstream media for ya.

hard to believe that a) people watch/listen to/read that stuff and b) they actually believe it.

America is a stupid country.

You did see the word "Opinion" at the beginning of the headline, right? And did I miss somewhere where this is the position of the TV station?

Also, what is your point that he was an advisor to Trump? Should he not be hired by by the station as a political commentator because of that?

Opinion: President Trump's term so far is one of the most successful in our history

Can't get much bolder than that statement.

MiamiSpartan wrote:You did see the word "Opinion" at the beginning of the headline, right? And did I miss somewhere where this is the position of the TV station?

Also, what is your point that he was an advisor to Trump? Should he not be hired by by the station as a political commentator because of that?

I just like pointing out how unethical and immoral the mainstream media is as it relates to their support for the racist, bigoted christian sexual predator.

Watch Out Pylon! wrote:

Opinion: President Trump's term so far is one of the most successful in our history

Can't get much bolder than that statement.

and, just think.. some people wonder how folks like Goose get their "information"...

Robert J Sakimano wrote:

MiamiSpartan wrote:You did see the word "Opinion" at the beginning of the headline, right? And did I miss somewhere where this is the position of the TV station?

Also, what is your point that he was an advisor to Trump? Should he not be hired by by the station as a political commentator because of that?

I just like pointing out how unethical and immoral the mainstream media is as it relates to their support for the racist, bigoted christian sexual predator.

And how is the media outlet supporting him? Because they had an opinion piece by a former aide? They have opinion pieces by people against him, as well.

MiamiSpartan wrote:

Robert J Sakimano wrote: I just like pointing out how unethical and immoral the mainstream media is as it relates to their support for the racist, bigoted christian sexual predator.

And how is the media outlet supporting him? Because they had an opinion piece by a former aide? They have opinion pieces by people against him, as well.

Do they? I’m not gonna go verify so I don’t really know. What I do know is that they are Sinclair owned. So the answer is very possibly “no, no they do not.”

https://www.washingtonpost.com/lifestyle/style/heres-what-happened-the-last-time-sinclair-bought-a-big-city-station/2017/05/08/92433126-33f7-11e7-b4ee-434b6d506b37_story.html

MiamiSpartan wrote:

Robert J Sakimano wrote: I just like pointing out how unethical and immoral the mainstream media is as it relates to their support for the racist, bigoted christian sexual predator.

And how is the media outlet supporting him? Because they had an opinion piece by a former aide? They have opinion pieces by people against him, as well.

that.. and the entire 2016 campaign.

They're beholden to him.. and his racist, bigoted, christian rants are good for ratings. They rely on a stupid populace for ratings.. see professional wrestling and NASCAR.

Travis of the Cosmos wrote:

MiamiSpartan wrote:
And how is the media outlet supporting him? Because they had an opinion piece by a former aide? They have opinion pieces by people against him, as well.

Do they? I’m not gonna go verify so I don’t really know. What I do know is that they are Sinclair owned. So the answer is very possibly “no, no they do not.”

https://www.washingtonpost.com/lifestyle/style/heres-what-happened-the-last-time-sinclair-bought-a-big-city-station/2017/05/08/92433126-33f7-11e7-b4ee-434b6d506b37_story.html

don't start introducing facts into the discussion.

Robert J Sakimano wrote:

Travis of the Cosmos wrote:

Do they? I’m not gonna go verify so I don’t really know. What I do know is that they are Sinclair owned. So the answer is very possibly “no, no they do not.”

https://www.washingtonpost.com/lifestyle/style/heres-what-happened-the-last-time-sinclair-bought-a-big-city-station/2017/05/08/92433126-33f7-11e7-b4ee-434b6d506b37_story.html

don't start introducing facts into the discussion.

You're right, we shouldn't introduce facts, such as the fact that the same station published this opinion piece on Presidents Day last year:

Opinion: Trump doesn't deserve Presidents' Day praise

I know that you have this belief that when the media bashes Trump, they're really promoting him, but that's not what you were doing in this case.  My point is just that it's an Opinion piece.  The very first word of the headline identifies it as such, in order to clearly differentiate this from a news story, and in order to tell the audience that this is the biased view of one person, and does not claim to be remotely unbiased.

Furthermore, every media outlet publishes/broadcasts their biases one way or the other.  Newspapers publish endorsements, TV stations often have owners/general managers that have little segments where they give their opinion, etc., and both sometimes have employees, guests, etc. publish/broadcast an OpEd.  As long as it's stated as an OpEd, and not news, why do you have an issue with it?  If you were complaining about a media outlet publishing this as news, fine, the criticism is warranted.  When you're complaining about something that is so clearly published as an OpEd, then your criticism of the station for publishing it is just ridiculous.  While I disagree entirely with pretty much every word of the piece in the OP, it's a great part of democracy and the free press that they do opinion pieces, as long as they're labeled as such.

Robert J Sakimano wrote:

Presidents Day is an important holiday for us to reflect upon those who we have elected to the highest office in our land.

We are lucky to currently have a leader in President Trump, whose term so far has been, I would argue, one of the most successful in our history.

If this keeps up, much to the chagrin of many Democrats, the presidents on Mount Rushmore may have to make room for a new addition.

oh, and if you ever wonder the type of people that the mainstream media employees, these astute observations were taken by and articulated from:

EDITOR'S NOTE: Boris Epshteyn formerly served as a Senior Advisor to the Trump Campaign and served in the White House as Special Assistant to The President and Assistant Communications Director for Surrogate Operations.  

     

Caution: Mainstream Media Link

Well the white men did steal that land from Native Americans, so I suppose it would be appropriate to put Trump's face on the side of a mountain there.

http://www.startribune.com/the-real-history-of-mount-rushmore/388715411/

MiamiSpartan wrote:

Robert J Sakimano wrote:
don't start introducing facts into the discussion.

You're right, we shouldn't introduce facts, such as the fact that the same station published this opinion piece on Presidents Day last year:

Opinion: Trump doesn't deserve Presidents' Day praise

I know that you have this belief that when the media bashes Trump, they're really promoting him, but that's not what you were doing in this case.  My point is just that it's an Opinion piece.  The very first word of the headline identifies it as such, in order to clearly differentiate this from a news story, and in order to tell the audience that this is the biased view of one person, and does not claim to be remotely unbiased.

Furthermore, every media outlet publishes/broadcasts their biases one way or the other.  Newspapers publish endorsements, TV stations often have owners/general managers that have little segments where they give their opinion, etc., and both sometimes have employees, guests, etc. publish/broadcast an OpEd.  As long as it's stated as an OpEd, and not news, why do you have an issue with it?  If you were complaining about a media outlet publishing this as news, fine, the criticism is warranted.  When you're complaining about something that is so clearly published as an OpEd, then your criticism of the station for publishing it is just ridiculous.  While I disagree entirely with pretty much every word of the piece in the OP, it's a great part of democracy and the free press that they do opinion pieces, as long as they're labeled as such.

MiamiSpartan wrote:

Robert J Sakimano wrote:
don't start introducing facts into the discussion.

You're right, we shouldn't introduce facts, such as the fact that the same station published this opinion piece on Presidents Day last year:

Opinion: Trump doesn't deserve Presidents' Day praise

I know that you have this belief that when the media bashes Trump, they're really promoting him, but that's not what you were doing in this case.  My point is just that it's an Opinion piece.  The very first word of the headline identifies it as such, in order to clearly differentiate this from a news story, and in order to tell the audience that this is the biased view of one person, and does not claim to be remotely unbiased.

Furthermore, every media outlet publishes/broadcasts their biases one way or the other.  Newspapers publish endorsements, TV stations often have owners/general managers that have little segments where they give their opinion, etc., and both sometimes have employees, guests, etc. publish/broadcast an OpEd.  As long as it's stated as an OpEd, and not news, why do you have an issue with it?  If you were complaining about a media outlet publishing this as news, fine, the criticism is warranted.  When you're complaining about something that is so clearly published as an OpEd, then your criticism of the station for publishing it is just ridiculous.  While I disagree entirely with pretty much every word of the piece in the OP, it's a great part of democracy and the free press that they do opinion pieces, as long as they're labeled as such.

Dog you really should dig in a little more on Sinclair and all the shit they’re doing. It’s not great.

MiamiSpartan wrote:

Robert J Sakimano wrote:
don't start introducing facts into the discussion.

You're right, we shouldn't introduce facts, such as the fact that the same station published this opinion piece on Presidents Day last year:

Opinion: Trump doesn't deserve Presidents' Day praise

I know that you have this belief that when the media bashes Trump, they're really promoting him, but that's not what you were doing in this case.  My point is just that it's an Opinion piece.  The very first word of the headline identifies it as such, in order to clearly differentiate this from a news story, and in order to tell the audience that this is the biased view of one person, and does not claim to be remotely unbiased.

Furthermore, every media outlet publishes/broadcasts their biases one way or the other.  Newspapers publish endorsements, TV stations often have owners/general managers that have little segments where they give their opinion, etc., and both sometimes have employees, guests, etc. publish/broadcast an OpEd.  As long as it's stated as an OpEd, and not news, why do you have an issue with it?  If you were complaining about a media outlet publishing this as news, fine, the criticism is warranted.  When you're complaining about something that is so clearly published as an OpEd, then your criticism of the station for publishing it is just ridiculous.  While I disagree entirely with pretty much every word of the piece in the OP, it's a great part of democracy and the free press that they do opinion pieces, as long as they're labeled as such.

I agree.

MiamiSpartan wrote:

Robert J Sakimano wrote:
don't start introducing facts into the discussion.

You're right, we shouldn't introduce facts, such as the fact that the same station published this opinion piece on Presidents Day last year:

Opinion: Trump doesn't deserve Presidents' Day praise

I know that you have this belief that when the media bashes Trump, they're really promoting him, but that's not what you were doing in this case.  My point is just that it's an Opinion piece.  The very first word of the headline identifies it as such, in order to clearly differentiate this from a news story, and in order to tell the audience that this is the biased view of one person, and does not claim to be remotely unbiased.

Furthermore, every media outlet publishes/broadcasts their biases one way or the other.  Newspapers publish endorsements, TV stations often have owners/general managers that have little segments where they give their opinion, etc., and both sometimes have employees, guests, etc. publish/broadcast an OpEd.  As long as it's stated as an OpEd, and not news, why do you have an issue with it?  If you were complaining about a media outlet publishing this as news, fine, the criticism is warranted.  When you're complaining about something that is so clearly published as an OpEd, then your criticism of the station for publishing it is just ridiculous.  While I disagree entirely with pretty much every word of the piece in the OP, it's a great part of democracy and the free press that they do opinion pieces, as long as they're labeled as such.

you're welcome to your opinion and to all the mainstream media links your heart desires.

see.. isn't that easy??

Travis of the Cosmos wrote:

MiamiSpartan wrote:
You're right, we shouldn't introduce facts, such as the fact that the same station published this opinion piece on Presidents Day last year:

Opinion: Trump doesn't deserve Presidents' Day praise

I know that you have this belief that when the media bashes Trump, they're really promoting him, but that's not what you were doing in this case.  My point is just that it's an Opinion piece.  The very first word of the headline identifies it as such, in order to clearly differentiate this from a news story, and in order to tell the audience that this is the biased view of one person, and does not claim to be remotely unbiased.

Furthermore, every media outlet publishes/broadcasts their biases one way or the other.  Newspapers publish endorsements, TV stations often have owners/general managers that have little segments where they give their opinion, etc., and both sometimes have employees, guests, etc. publish/broadcast an OpEd.  As long as it's stated as an OpEd, and not news, why do you have an issue with it?  If you were complaining about a media outlet publishing this as news, fine, the criticism is warranted.  When you're complaining about something that is so clearly published as an OpEd, then your criticism of the station for publishing it is just ridiculous.  While I disagree entirely with pretty much every word of the piece in the OP, it's a great part of democracy and the free press that they do opinion pieces, as long as they're labeled as such.

MiamiSpartan wrote:
You're right, we shouldn't introduce facts, such as the fact that the same station published this opinion piece on Presidents Day last year:

Opinion: Trump doesn't deserve Presidents' Day praise

I know that you have this belief that when the media bashes Trump, they're really promoting him, but that's not what you were doing in this case.  My point is just that it's an Opinion piece.  The very first word of the headline identifies it as such, in order to clearly differentiate this from a news story, and in order to tell the audience that this is the biased view of one person, and does not claim to be remotely unbiased.

Furthermore, every media outlet publishes/broadcasts their biases one way or the other.  Newspapers publish endorsements, TV stations often have owners/general managers that have little segments where they give their opinion, etc., and both sometimes have employees, guests, etc. publish/broadcast an OpEd.  As long as it's stated as an OpEd, and not news, why do you have an issue with it?  If you were complaining about a media outlet publishing this as news, fine, the criticism is warranted.  When you're complaining about something that is so clearly published as an OpEd, then your criticism of the station for publishing it is just ridiculous.  While I disagree entirely with pretty much every word of the piece in the OP, it's a great part of democracy and the free press that they do opinion pieces, as long as they're labeled as such.

Dog you really should dig in a little more on Sinclair and all the shit they’re doing. It’s not great.

Sinclair is awful. Nothing in Miami's post contradicts that or indicates that he is unaware of that fact.

Cameron wrote:

Travis of the Cosmos wrote:

Dog you really should dig in a little more on Sinclair and all the shit they’re doing. It’s not great.

Sinclair is awful. Nothing in Miami's post contradicts that or indicates that he is unaware of that fact.

I’m not disregarding the fact that bob probably didn’t realize that it was Sinclair when he posted it originally either. The problem with his post, as it relates to Sinclair, is that when 90% of their opinion pieces are “trump is our God King” you can’t really hide behind “oh it was just an opinion piece” anymore. It’s an opinion piece being published by a group with an extremely clear goal in mind, not just merely “showing their biases.” Pretending that Sinclair is some kind of fair actor that operates like other media outlets is not right.

Travis of the Cosmos wrote:

Cameron wrote:

Sinclair is awful. Nothing in Miami's post contradicts that or indicates that he is unaware of that fact.

I’m not disregarding the fact that bob probably didn’t realize that it was Sinclair when he posted it originally either. The problem with his post, as it relates to Sinclair, is that when 90% of their opinion pieces are “trump is our God King” you can’t really hide behind “oh it was just an opinion piece” anymore. It’s an opinion piece being published by a group with an extremely clear goal in mind, not just merely “showing their biases.” Pretending that Sinclair is some kind of fair actor that operates like other media outlets is not right.

I don't even know what "Sinclair" is.. the point is, the mainstream media is awful and relies on a very stupid electorate.. (and needs to make certain they remain stupid)... to make money.

Robert J Sakimano wrote:

Travis of the Cosmos wrote:

I’m not disregarding the fact that bob probably didn’t realize that it was Sinclair when he posted it originally either. The problem with his post, as it relates to Sinclair, is that when 90% of their opinion pieces are “trump is our God King” you can’t really hide behind “oh it was just an opinion piece” anymore. It’s an opinion piece being published by a group with an extremely clear goal in mind, not just merely “showing their biases.” Pretending that Sinclair is some kind of fair actor that operates like other media outlets is not right.

I don't even know what "Sinclair" is.. the point is, the mainstream media is awful and relies on a very stupid electorate.. (and needs to make certain they remain stupid)... to make money.

Sinclair is a media company that has been purchasing local media outlets and has been known to do things like force the local anchors to read somewhat outrageous pro trump propaganda while also putting guys like this Boris dude on air on those stations. The result is that when grandpa is watching his local news source his brain is getting filled with bullshit by people he trusts and has been watching for years who are being forced to read things under threat of their jobs. Everyone needs to know who Sinclair is and which station is their Sinclair affiliated station.

Travis of the Cosmos wrote:

Robert J Sakimano wrote: I don't even know what "Sinclair" is.. the point is, the mainstream media is awful and relies on a very stupid electorate.. (and needs to make certain they remain stupid)... to make money.

Sinclair is a media company that has been purchasing local media outlets and has been known to do things like force the local anchors to read somewhat outrageous pro trump propaganda while also putting guys like this Boris dude on air on those stations. The result is that when grandpa is watching his local news source his brain is getting filled with bullshit by people he trusts and has been watching for years who are being forced to read things under threat of their jobs. Everyone needs to know who Sinclair is and which station is their Sinclair affiliated station.

oh, I got ya.

I bet they don't like Hillary or her email account.

Travis of the Cosmos wrote:

Cameron wrote:

Sinclair is awful. Nothing in Miami's post contradicts that or indicates that he is unaware of that fact.

I’m not disregarding the fact that bob probably didn’t realize that it was Sinclair when he posted it originally either. The problem with his post, as it relates to Sinclair, is that when 90% of their opinion pieces are “trump is our God King” you can’t really hide behind “oh it was just an opinion piece” anymore. It’s an opinion piece being published by a group with an extremely clear goal in mind, not just merely “showing their biases.” Pretending that Sinclair is some kind of fair actor that operates like other media outlets is not right.

No one's hiding behind anything, and no one said anything about whether they're a "fair actor" or not. The article is still clearly labeled as an opinion piece. As such, any reader should be able to take it as such, not as a news story, regardless of whatever else they may present as news. While I know about Sinclair, I don't have a list of all of their stations memorized. 90% of the people who have read that probably didn't know that the station is owned by Sinclair and/or what Sinclair's political motives are. Therefore, it is very relevant that it's labeled as an opinion piece. In light of Sinclair, perhaps it's even more relevant, as even they labeled it a clear opinion piece.

MiamiSpartan wrote:

Travis of the Cosmos wrote:

I’m not disregarding the fact that bob probably didn’t realize that it was Sinclair when he posted it originally either. The problem with his post, as it relates to Sinclair, is that when 90% of their opinion pieces are “trump is our God King” you can’t really hide behind “oh it was just an opinion piece” anymore. It’s an opinion piece being published by a group with an extremely clear goal in mind, not just merely “showing their biases.” Pretending that Sinclair is some kind of fair actor that operates like other media outlets is not right.

No one's hiding behind anything, and no one said anything about whether they're a "fair actor" or not. The article is still clearly labeled as an opinion piece. As such, any reader should be able to take it as such, not as a news story, regardless of whatever else they may present as news. While I know about Sinclair, I don't have a list of all of their stations memorized. 90% of the people who have read that probably didn't know that the station is owned by Sinclair and/or what Sinclair's political motives are. Therefore, it is very relevant that it's labeled as an opinion piece. In light of Sinclair, perhaps it's even more relevant, as even they labeled it a clear opinion piece.

mainstream media is going to appeal to the lowest common denominator in America.

that's really the whole point.. and how we ended up with the racist, bigoted christian sexual predator.

It's always easier to blame some outside conspiracy, isn't it?

MiamiSpartan wrote:

Travis of the Cosmos wrote:

I’m not disregarding the fact that bob probably didn’t realize that it was Sinclair when he posted it originally either. The problem with his post, as it relates to Sinclair, is that when 90% of their opinion pieces are “trump is our God King” you can’t really hide behind “oh it was just an opinion piece” anymore. It’s an opinion piece being published by a group with an extremely clear goal in mind, not just merely “showing their biases.” Pretending that Sinclair is some kind of fair actor that operates like other media outlets is not right.

No one's hiding behind anything, and no one said anything about whether they're a "fair actor" or not. The article is still clearly labeled as an opinion piece. As such, any reader should be able to take it as such, not as a news story, regardless of whatever else they may present as news. While I know about Sinclair, I don't have a list of all of their stations memorized. 90% of the people who have read that probably didn't know that the station is owned by Sinclair and/or what Sinclair's political motives are. Therefore, it is very relevant that it's labeled as an opinion piece. In light of Sinclair, perhaps it's even more relevant, as even they labeled it a clear opinion piece.

People need to be aware if they are reading/watching Sinclair though. Before even reading the article, I saw the authors name and googled the station name and Sinclair. That’s why I said earlier that everyone should be aware if they have a local Sinclair affiliate.

I agree with everyone in this thread. Am I in trouble?

The mountain's not big enough.

Travis of the Cosmos wrote:

MiamiSpartan wrote:
No one's hiding behind anything, and no one said anything about whether they're a "fair actor" or not.  The article is still clearly labeled as an opinion piece.  As such, any reader should be able to take it as such, not as a news story, regardless of whatever else they may present as news.  While I know about Sinclair, I don't have a list of all of their stations memorized.  90% of the people who have read that probably didn't know that the station is owned by Sinclair and/or what Sinclair's political motives are.  Therefore, it is very relevant that it's labeled as an opinion piece.  In light of Sinclair, perhaps it's even more relevant, as even they labeled it a clear opinion piece.

People need to be aware if they are reading/watching Sinclair though. Before even reading the article, I saw the authors name and googled the station name and Sinclair. That’s why I said earlier that everyone should be aware if they have a local Sinclair affiliate.

you're asking an awful lot of Americans..

ya know.. to be engaged.. isn't, like, Dancing With The Stars or that one Duck show with all of the jesus-lovin' bearded rednecks on??

Robert J Sakimano wrote:

Travis of the Cosmos wrote:

People need to be aware if they are reading/watching Sinclair though. Before even reading the article, I saw the authors name and googled the station name and Sinclair. That’s why I said earlier that everyone should be aware if they have a local Sinclair affiliate.

you're asking an awful lot of Americans..

ya know.. to be engaged.. isn't, like, Dancing With The Stars or that one Duck show with all of the jesus-lovin' bearded rednecks on??

Bob yesterday:  "I don't even know what "Sinclair" is"

Bob today:  "you're asking an awful lot of Americans" (to be engaged enough to be aware if they are reading/watching Sinclair).

Irony, thy name is Bob.

MiamiSpartan wrote:

Robert J Sakimano wrote:
you're asking an awful lot of Americans..

ya know.. to be engaged.. isn't, like, Dancing With The Stars or that one Duck show with all of the jesus-lovin' bearded rednecks on??

Bob yesterday:  "I don't even know what "Sinclair" is"

Bob today:  "you're asking an awful lot of Americans" (to be engaged enough to be aware if they are reading/watching Sinclair).

Irony, thy name is Bob.

if you're watching and getting "news" from the mainstream media, you're not engaged.

but that's my opinion. You're welcome to yours.. please keep me in your thoughts and prayers.

Robert J Sakimano wrote:

MiamiSpartan wrote:
Bob yesterday:  "I don't even know what "Sinclair" is"

Bob today:  "you're asking an awful lot of Americans" (to be engaged enough to be aware if they are reading/watching Sinclair).

Irony, thy name is Bob.

if you're watching and getting "news" from the mainstream media, you're not engaged.

but that's my opinion. You're welcome to yours.. please keep me in your thoughts and prayers.

You said "that's asking a lot of Americans" in direct response to Travis saying that people need to be informed about Sinclair. Yesterday you didn't know who Sinclair was. That's pretty rich irony, that's all. Just poking a little fun at you.

I wasn't poking fun at your media conspiracy theory (not in that post, anyway).

MiamiSpartan wrote:

Robert J Sakimano wrote:
if you're watching and getting "news" from the mainstream media, you're not engaged.

but that's my opinion. You're welcome to yours.. please keep me in your thoughts and prayers.

You said "that's asking a lot of Americans" in direct response to Travis saying that people need to be informed about Sinclair. Yesterday you didn't know who Sinclair was. That's pretty rich irony, that's all. Just poking a little fun at you.

I wasn't poking fun at your media conspiracy theory (not in that post, anyway).

cool - yeah, all I know about Sinclair is what Travis told me.. shocked to find out that a mainstream media company is distributing pro-racist, bigoted christian sexual predator propaganda..

I mean, who ever would've thought such a thing??