Stay Classy Kentucky

The_Dude wrote:

kingstonlake wrote:

Can't you just support him without disparaging others?  Is it that hard?

I support free speech.  I take that side everytime.  

EDIT: Even if I disagree with what people say. I don't support Ty and his rant here but he has the right to do it.

Fair enough.

kingstonlake wrote:

The_Dude wrote:

I support free speech.  I take that side everytime.  

EDIT: Even if I disagree with what people say. I don't support Ty and his rant here but he has the right to do it.

Fair enough.

All that means is that we can't throw him in jail. He's still a fucking douche.

The_Dude wrote:

kingstonlake wrote:

Can't you just support him without disparaging others?  Is it that hard?

I support free speech.  I take that side everytime.  

EDIT: Even if I disagree with what people say. I don't support Ty and his rant here but he has the right to do it.

Exactly. And we all have the right to pile on him by bumping this thread whenever we feel like it. I just want people to know that what they say will not be forgotten, you black animal.

Rocinante wrote:

The_Dude wrote:

I support free speech.  I take that side everytime.  

EDIT: Even if I disagree with what people say. I don't support Ty and his rant here but he has the right to do it.

Exactly. And we all have the right to pile on him by bumping this thread whenever we feel like it. I just want people to know that what they say will not be forgotten, you black animal.

For sure. A gang of people that go around beating people into a coma playing the knockout game are indeed animals.

How was he being racist? He was being an asshole, but racist? Are people confused as to what he meant?

StylesGShmooth wrote:How was he being racist? He was being an asshole, but racist? Are people confused as to what he meant?

Wasn't being racist, just dumb as fuck. Par for the course.

StylesGShmooth wrote:How was he being racist? He was being an asshole, but racist? Are people confused as to what he meant?

Styles, don't you get it anymore? White people define the racist line not people like you.

StylesGShmooth wrote:How was he being racist? He was being an asshole, but racist? Are people confused as to what he meant?

Yup.

StylesGShmooth wrote:How was he being racist? He was being an asshole, but racist? Are people confused as to what he meant?

I'm lost now, are you talking about the Kentucky kid or tTy?

Travis of the Cosmos wrote:

NigelUno wrote:

tDude?

I didn't think anyone could one up his comment from last year.... But there it is. Part of me wants this whole thread deleted. But not until everyone can see tTy for what he really is. Deleting it would give him the pass he will desperately want when he wakes up.

How do you remember an Internet post from a year ago

Man and I didn't think it could get much lamer than the Junior Partier counting beers on a spreadsheet routine.

DWags wrote:

StylesGShmooth wrote:How was he being racist? He was being an asshole, but racist? Are people confused as to what he meant?

I'm lost now, are you talking about the Kentucky kid or tTy?

Oh, I'm definitely talking about the Kentucky kid.

CORNER BLITZ wrote:

Travis of the Cosmos wrote:



I didn't think anyone could one up his comment from last year.... But there it is. Part of me wants this whole thread deleted. But not until everyone can see tTy for what he really is. Deleting it would give him the pass he will desperately want when he wakes up.

How do you remember an Internet post from a year ago

You mean the one that Nigel mentioned about the dude? I mean, since that one gets referenced at least once a week, I feel like I only need to remember to like a week ago.

Honestly, I think if rather work along side Harrison then Ty. I can work with a racist. Complete Idiots on the other hand ........

kingstonlake wrote:Honestly, I think if rather work along side Harrison then Ty. I can work with a racist. Complete Idiots on the other hand ........

Glad I'm not your only target and your an equal opportunity hater

He is not risen.

Whats up niggahs!!!!!!!????

Is "******" the only word we can't type, speak or even think about anymore because, by simply doing so, it offends erryone that much? It has surpassed "****", evidently. Nice work feminist womyn!!!!!!! Looks like you've made it, whores!!!!

tTy wrote:Is "******" the only word we can't type, speak or even think about anymore because, by simply doing so, it offends erryone that much? It has surpassed "****", evidently. Nice work feminist womyn!!!!!!! Looks like you've made it, whores!!!!

Well, fuck, evidently cyouNt is banned too because feelins..... lord....

tTy wrote:Is "******" the only word we can't type, speak or even think about anymore because, by simply doing so, it offends erryone that much? It has surpassed "****", evidently. Nice work feminist womyn!!!!!!! Looks like you've made it, whores!!!!

I get the censorship angle, I do. But I also get the fact that having a website that permits that to show up in a post may deter people from visiting this site.

Triple Sparty wrote:

tTy wrote:Is "******" the only word we can't type, speak or even think about anymore because, by simply doing so, it offends erryone that much? It has surpassed "****", evidently. Nice work feminist womyn!!!!!!! Looks like you've made it, whores!!!!

I get the censorship angle, I do. But I also get the fact that having a website that permits that to show up in a post may deter people from visiting this site.

The real question is, do we want people here that can't handle seeing that in a message board forum?

xsanguine wrote:

Triple Sparty wrote:
I get the censorship angle, I do. But I also get the fact that having a website that permits that to show up in a post may deter people from visiting this site.

The real question is, do we want people here that can't handle seeing that in a message board forum?

We're already down to only 10 people being here. Are we willing to slowly move to 1 reply a day?

InTenSity wrote:

xsanguine wrote:

The real question is, do we want people here that can't handle seeing that in a message board forum?

We're already down to only 10 people being here. Are we willing to slowly move to 1 reply a day?

We've had 48 people here today, 70 in the last 24 hours.

Maybe not great #'s but far more than 10.

LooseGoose wrote:

InTenSity wrote:

We're already down to only 10 people being here. Are we willing to slowly move to 1 reply a day?

We've had 48 people here today, 70 in the last 24 hours.

Maybe not great #'s but far more than 10.

I've logged in and out about 7 times already hopefully I only count as 1.

LooseGoose wrote:

InTenSity wrote:

We're already down to only 10 people being here. Are we willing to slowly move to 1 reply a day?

We've had 48 people here today, 70 in the last 24 hours.

Maybe not great #'s but far more than 10.

Not sure why people harp on the whole idea of there being only 10 people here. There's a core that posts more than anyone, but there's a lot more than 10 people posting. And a lot more lurkers.

Other Teams Pursuing That wrote:

LooseGoose wrote:

We've had 48 people here today, 70 in the last 24 hours.  

Maybe not great #'s but far more than 10.

Not sure why people harp on the whole idea of there being only 10 people here. There's a core that posts more than anyone, but there's a lot more than 10 people posting. And a lot more lurkers.

You guys sure are taking that 10 number literally aren't you? I think he was just saying "not very many people..." which is true.

InTenSity wrote:

xsanguine wrote:

The real question is, do we want people here that can't handle seeing that in a message board forum?

We're already down to only 10 people being here. Are we willing to slowly move to 1 reply a day?

Nah, you're right.

Yes kids, there are two words (TWO!!!) that are censored here, and another that is up for consideration. They are pretty much universally considered to be offensive. Anything else is SRC jerking your chain.

Get over it & grow the fuck up.

How about having just a little class? Not a lot. Just some baseline, slightly out of the gutter class. I think we're all at least moderately educated here (except Blanch), & should be able to adequately express ourselves & insult each other with vocabularies (most adults have a vocabulary of 20k-35k words) that have been truncated by TWO mother fucking words.

xsanguine wrote:

Triple Sparty wrote:
I get the censorship angle, I do. But I also get the fact that having a website that permits that to show up in a post may deter people from visiting this site.

The real question is, do we want people here that can't handle seeing that in a message board forum?

I didn't mean they would be deterred because they couldn't handle seeing a word. I meant more along the lines of deterred from visiting a site where that word may be possibly displayed on a computer or device (or network) that is not necessarily entirely private. But I generally agree with your sentiment although I am not going to go there because I know tTy disapproves of politicizing threads.

Triple Sparty wrote:

xsanguine wrote:

The real question is, do we want people here that can't handle seeing that in a message board forum?

I didn't mean they would be deterred because they couldn't handle seeing a word. I meant more along the lines of deterred from visiting a site where that word may be possibly displayed on a computer or device (or network) that is not necessarily entirely private. But I generally agree with your sentiment although I am not going to go there because I know tTy disapproves of politicizing threads.

That's a good point. I hadn't considered that.

As long as minge never gets censored, I'm cool.