The sharps are on Denver

by **tGreenWay** Fri 5 Feb 2016 - 12:42

Bookmarking this thread.

by **Giant Moose** Fri 5 Feb 2016 - 12:44

The NFL only matters in January.

by **NigelUno** Fri 5 Feb 2016 - 12:46

tGreenWay wrote:Bookmarking this thread.

Bump

by **tGreenWay** Fri 5 Feb 2016 - 12:56

by **Tim Wakefield** Fri 5 Feb 2016 - 14:08

Convinced a few people to give me Denver +7. This line is already higher than it should be

by **Rocinante** Fri 5 Feb 2016 - 14:10

The "sharps" is just another way to get people betting on one side or the other. The actual "sharps" picks are not published anywhere on the internet.

by **kingstonlake** Fri 5 Feb 2016 - 14:36

No way. Dumb money is on Denver right now.

by **NigelUno** Fri 5 Feb 2016 - 14:42

The sharps are taking Denver and the under.

by **tGreenWay** Fri 5 Feb 2016 - 15:10

Bump.

by **WhiteBoyHatcher** Fri 5 Feb 2016 - 15:10

I don't know anything about the seedy underworld of sports gambling so I wouldn't be able to comment either way.

by **tGreenWay** Fri 5 Feb 2016 - 15:12

WhiteBoyHatcher wrote:I don't know anything about the seedy underworld of sports gambling so I wouldn't be able to comment either way.

Neither does Nigel. He likes to pretend.

by **Other Teams Pursuing That** Fri 5 Feb 2016 - 15:51

WhiteBoyHatcher wrote:I don't know anything about the seedy underworld of sports gambling so I wouldn't be able to comment either way.

Take Denver. Take OTPT.

by **kingstonlake** Fri 5 Feb 2016 - 16:07

There's alot of "white" money and hearts on Manning v Newton. Line artificially low.

by **kingstonlake** Sat 6 Feb 2016 - 18:59

Late money is smart money +5.5

by **Nordic** Sat 6 Feb 2016 - 19:03

WhiteBoyHatcher wrote:I don't know anything about the seedy underworld of sports gambling so I wouldn't be able to comment either way.

I wish I could bet this

by **Dr. Strangelove** Sun 7 Feb 2016 - 0:38

I got Carolina -4.5 (er if such a thing were legal) and I think panthers win by at least 2 tds.

Also I took the under on the anthem for the first time ever. Got it at even money at under 136.5 seconds

by **WhiteBoyHatcher** Sun 7 Feb 2016 - 0:48

I have no opinion on the outcome. I'd like Denver to win it. I've always liked 18 and it'd be cool to see him go out on top. Plus Bennie Fowler. If I were a betting man I'd probably bet on Denver if I could get 6, maybe buy it to 7. Mostly because that's who I would like to cheer for.

Regarding the Anthem, I've never bet on it but I have been aware of the posted time and timed it at home just for funsies. Both times I did it, it was literally within a second and I had no idea if over or under would have won because I wasn't sure if I started it at the right time.

by **Nordic** Sun 7 Feb 2016 - 0:48

Dr. Strangelove wrote:I got Carolina -4.5 (er if such a thing were legal) and I think panthers win by at least 2 tds.

Also I took the under on the anthem for the first time ever. Got it at even money at under 136.5 seconds

by **Nordic** Sun 7 Feb 2016 - 0:49

WhiteBoyHatcher wrote:I have no opinion on the outcome. I'd like Denver to win it. I've always liked 18 and it'd be cool to see him go out on top. Plus Bennie Fowler. If I were a betting man I'd probably bet on Denver if I could get 6, maybe buy it to 7. Mostly because that's who I would like to cheer for.

Regarding the Anthem, I've never bet on it but I have been aware of the posted time and timed it at home just for funsies. Both times I did it, it was literally within a second and I had no idea if over or under would have won because I wasn't sure if I started it at the right time.

Foot race between you and #18... who wins (serious question)?

by **WhiteBoyHatcher** Sun 7 Feb 2016 - 0:53

Nordic wrote:
WhiteBoyHatcher wrote:I have no opinion on the outcome. I'd like Denver to win it. I've always liked 18 and it'd be cool to see him go out on top. Plus Bennie Fowler. If I were a betting man I'd probably bet on Denver if I could get 6, maybe buy it to 7. Mostly because that's who I would like to cheer for.

Regarding the Anthem, I've never bet on it but I have been aware of the posted time and timed it at home just for funsies. Both times I did it, it was literally within a second and I had no idea if over or under would have won because I wasn't sure if I started it at the right time.

Foot race between you and #18... who wins (serious question)?

Need more info.

Right now, with current condition of my knee? 18.

Assuming one/both of my knees don't dislocate within the first ten yards? (which they would) - probably me

by **Dr. Strangelove** Sun 7 Feb 2016 - 1:02

WhiteBoyHatcher wrote:I have no opinion on the outcome. I'd like Denver to win it. I've always liked 18 and it'd be cool to see him go out on top. Plus Bennie Fowler. If I were a betting man I'd probably bet on Denver if I could get 6, maybe buy it to 7. Mostly because that's who I would like to cheer for.

Regarding the Anthem, I've never bet on it but I have been aware of the posted time and timed it at home just for funsies. Both times I did it, it was literally within a second and I had no idea if over or under would have won because I wasn't sure if I started it at the right time.

I may or may not have bet and won the over on the anthem 5 years in a row. I also always bet yes on safety scored (hit 3 times) and yes on overtime (still waiting)

by **NigelUno** Sun 7 Feb 2016 - 1:07

tGreenWay wrote:
WhiteBoyHatcher wrote:I don't know anything about the seedy underworld of sports gambling so I wouldn't be able to comment either way.

Neither does Nigel. He likes to pretend.

Sharps are on Denver.

by **WhiteBoyHatcher** Sun 7 Feb 2016 - 1:16

I don't know shit about any of this but I was talking to my daughter earlier tonight and she's fairly versed on the subject. She told me that based on her understanding, some sharp bets were placed early on Carolina when the line was released at Carolina -4.5/5 and that a lot of sharps would probably take Denver at +6 if it gets there.

by **NigelUno** Sun 7 Feb 2016 - 11:11

http://espn.go.com/chalk/story/_/id/14727630/super-bowl-50-late-money-denver-broncos-not-carolina-panthers

http://www.vegasinsider.com/nfl/story.cfm/story/1743429

"Who is Billy Walters playing?

Sharp money means very little in the overall Super Bowl wagering pool because there’s just so many small wagers that can do more damage collectively, but you always like to know who the most publicized and successful sharp bettor in Las Vegas is taking. Word on the street is that it was Walters and his many associates that were scrambling at all the books to get as much +6 Broncos action as they could around town. If it were a regular season game the line would be -4.5 already with him on board, but the public’s money dictates the pace for this game. A few books were relieved that money came when it did because going to -6.5 was likely to happen within the next day or two."

by **Rocinante** Sun 7 Feb 2016 - 11:39

If I ever sang the anthem I would totally fix that shit and win some money from the mob.

by **WhiteBoyHatcher** Sun 7 Feb 2016 - 12:24

Rocinante wrote:If I ever sang the anthem I would totally fix that shit and win some money from the mob.

They limit those prop bets to avoid shit like that. In b&m books I think it's usually a $500 max. That's what my daughter told me anyway.

by **Tim Wakefield** Sun 7 Feb 2016 - 21:35

Bump. Don't blow it Peyton. 20 might be enough with that defense

by **Tim Wakefield** Sun 7 Feb 2016 - 22:42

13-7 Denver at the half.

2h line: Carolina -4

by **WhiteBoyHatcher** Sun 7 Feb 2016 - 22:45

Tim Wakefield wrote:13-7 Denver at the half.

2h line: Carolina -4

Went for the middle because why not.

by **Other Teams Pursuing That** Sun 7 Feb 2016 - 23:06

WhiteBoyHatcher wrote:
Tim Wakefield wrote:13-7 Denver at the half.

2h line: Carolina -4

Went for the middle because why not.

Love the double dip

by **Tim Wakefield** Mon 8 Feb 2016 - 1:16

$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$

by **NigelUno** Mon 8 Feb 2016 - 1:22

by **pulling69** Mon 8 Feb 2016 - 1:30

WhiteBoyHatcher wrote:
Rocinante wrote:If I ever sang the anthem I would totally fix that shit and win some money from the mob.

They limit those prop bets to avoid shit like that. In b&m books I think it's usually a $500 max. That's what my daughter told me anyway.

Some dude put in 54 tickets on that bet today

by **y2kMgrad** Mon 8 Feb 2016 - 1:31

Once again, I'm reminded why I'm not a gambler. I thought Carolina was going to win that game easily.

by **Other Teams Pursuing That** Mon 8 Feb 2016 - 1:32

WhiteBoyHatcher wrote:
Rocinante wrote:If I ever sang the anthem I would totally fix that shit and win some money from the mob.

That's what my daughter told me anyway.

by **Dr. Strangelove** Mon 8 Feb 2016 - 3:52

Wake me when August comes

by **NigelUno** Mon 8 Feb 2016 - 15:02

tGreenWay wrote:Bookmarking this thread.

by Sponsored content

The sharps are on Denver

The sharps are on Denver

Re: The sharps are on Denver

Re: The sharps are on Denver

Re: The sharps are on Denver

Re: The sharps are on Denver

Re: The sharps are on Denver

Re: The sharps are on Denver

Re: The sharps are on Denver

Re: The sharps are on Denver

Re: The sharps are on Denver

Re: The sharps are on Denver

Re: The sharps are on Denver

Re: The sharps are on Denver

Re: The sharps are on Denver

Re: The sharps are on Denver

Re: The sharps are on Denver

Re: The sharps are on Denver

Re: The sharps are on Denver

Re: The sharps are on Denver

Re: The sharps are on Denver

Re: The sharps are on Denver

Re: The sharps are on Denver

Re: The sharps are on Denver

Re: The sharps are on Denver

Re: The sharps are on Denver

Re: The sharps are on Denver

Re: The sharps are on Denver

Re: The sharps are on Denver

Re: The sharps are on Denver

Re: The sharps are on Denver

Re: The sharps are on Denver

Re: The sharps are on Denver

Re: The sharps are on Denver

Re: The sharps are on Denver

Re: The sharps are on Denver

Re: The sharps are on Denver

Re: The sharps are on Denver

Re: The sharps are on Denver

Re: The sharps are on Denver