The OJ Thing - Made in America (NOT related to Le'Veon Bell's terrible rap game)

This is really thorough and well done. The 4 letter with the one up on whoever did the last stupid one. This is solid.

WhiteBoyHatcher wrote:This is really thorough and well done. The 4 letter with the one up on whoever did the last stupid one. This is solid.

????

The drama was good, abeit, too Hollywood sometimes, but I get it when trying to rope in millenial
S.

This one is painting Nicole as some kind of saint, and we know that's just not true. Oj was an abuser, but don't pretend that Nicole wasn't about the life either. Then again, Im sure she's a great photographer and artist. Lol

NigelUno wrote:

Blanch32 wrote:

????

The drama was good, abeit, too Hollywood sometimes, but I get it when trying to rope in millenial
S.

This one is painting Nicole as some kind of saint, and we know that's just not true. Oj was an abuser, but don't pretend that Nicole wasn't about the life either. Then again, Im sure she's a great photographer and artist. Lol

What in the fuck is wrong with you?

Seriously.

Simple, I'm not delusional.

Blanch32 wrote:

NigelUno wrote:

What in the fuck is wrong with you?

Seriously.

Simple, I'm not delusional.

But I am pretty sure you're some kind of felon in progress.

NigelUno wrote:

Blanch32 wrote:

Simple, I'm not delusional.

No. That's not it.

Seriously. What in the fuck is wrong with you?

I'm employed, living on my own, and self sufficient?

Not all of us can live in mommy's basement nigel

I seriously think he really doesn't get it. After the stanford thread and now this, I honestly think he doesn't get it. Kind of scary really. I hope it's just an act to get a rise out of posters, but who knows. It's not funny, it's creepy. I know, I'm old, I don't get that humor I guess.

NigelUno wrote:

Blanch32 wrote:

I'm employed, living on my own, and self sufficient?

Not all of us can live in mommy's basement nigel

No. That's not it.

I am seriously asking. What in the fuck is wrong with you?

While the most famous poster, I don't even have enough posts to Crack the top 10 here?

NigelUno wrote:

Blanch32 wrote:

While the most famous poster, I don't even have enough posts to Crack the top 10 here?

No. That's not it.

I am seriously asking...what in the fuck is wrong with you?

My responses arent lazy, repetive, and completely not funny? I'm not sucking the teeth of the The Dowager Lady Margret, Countess and Prefict of Northumbria?

NigelUno wrote:

Blanch32 wrote:

My responses arent lazy, repetive, and completely not funny? I'm not sucking the teeth of the The Dowager Lady Margret, Countess and Prefict of Northumbria?

Actually, most of them are.

But, I'm seriously asking...what in the fuck is wrong with you?

Literally. Not figuratively. Literally. What in the fuck is wrong with you?

I engage you instead of ignoring you like I did on 247 for at least 10 years. Year 11 and tswill was your big break

NigelUno wrote:

Blanch32 wrote:

I engage you instead of ignoring you like I did on 247 for at least 10 years. Year 11 and tswill was your big break

Spelling. Check. Tilt.

(But, that's not it.)

Seriously. What in the fuck is wrong with you?

Specifically, in this case (since maybe this will help you answer the bigger question of what the fuck is wrong with you)...why bring up Nicole? What the fuck is wrong with you, that you would take that angle? Do you think you're funny? Seriously. I am asking. What in the fuck is wrong with you?

Probably because I don't repeat myself over and over again and have some pathetic need to have the last word?

NigelUno wrote:

Blanch32 wrote:

I engage you instead of ignoring you like I did on 247 for at least 10 years. Year 11 and tswill was your big break

Spelling. Check. Tilt.

(But, that's not it.)

Seriously. What in the fuck is wrong with you?

Specifically, in this case (since maybe this will help you answer the bigger question of what the fuck is wrong with you)...why bring up Nicole? What the fuck is wrong with you, that you would take that angle? Do you think you're funny? Seriously. I am asking. What in the fuck is wrong with you?

Let me see if I can help here. Nicole Brown-Simpson was nothing more than OJ's slam-piece. She liked to party and sleep around ( sound familiar Blanch ?). Because of this, she deserved to be abused.

Ultimately, the slam-piece tried to get away from the abuser and move on with her life. OJ then chopped her head off and the head of her friend who she was likely banging. The slam-piece got what she deserved.

And something, something Green Seat Mafia.

duffy munn wrote:

NigelUno wrote:

Spelling. Check. Tilt.

(But, that's not it.)

Seriously. What in the fuck is wrong with you?

Specifically, in this case (since maybe this will help you answer the bigger question of what the fuck is wrong with you)...why bring up Nicole? What the fuck is wrong with you, that you would take that angle? Do you think you're funny? Seriously. I am asking. What in the fuck is wrong with you?

Let me see if I can help here. Nicole Brown-Simpson was nothing more than OJ's slam-piece. She liked to party and sleep around ( sound familiar Blanch ?). Because of this, she deserved to be abused.

Ultimately, the slam-piece tried to get away from the abuser and move on with her life. OJ then chopped her head off and the head of her friend who she was likely banging. The slam-piece got what she deserved.

And something, something Green Seat Mafia.

Nope. You suck at speaking for others.

NigelUno wrote:

Blanch32 wrote:

Probably because I don't repeat myself over and over again and have some pathetic need to have the last word?

Spelling. Check. Tilt.

(And, no...that's still not it.)

Specific question asked (about your pathetic take on Nicole)...specific question avoided. I get that you recognize there is something the fuck wrong with you. I am asking you what it is. Do you know? Literally. Not made up blanch bullshit. Literally. Do you know what the fuck is wrong with you?

Maybe it's because I don't use the "i know you are, but what am I?" Childish retort when I'm tilting since I simply don't have the Brain capacity to think of anything else nor the common sense to just walk away?

In other words, Duffy nailed it.

Blanch32 wrote:

duffy munn wrote:

Let me see if I can help here. Nicole Brown-Simpson was nothing more than OJ's slam-piece. She liked to party and sleep around ( sound familiar Blanch ?). Because of this, she deserved to be abused.

Ultimately, the slam-piece tried to get away from the abuser and move on with her life. OJ then chopped her head off and the head of her friend who she was likely banging. The slam-piece got what she deserved.

And something, something Green Seat Mafia.

Nope. You suck at speaking for others.

Funny. I've never known anyone to use the term slam-piece except you.

duffy munn wrote:

Blanch32 wrote:

Nope. You suck at speaking for others.

Funny. I've never known anyone to use the term slam-piece except you.

Throwing around one of my signature terms, does not equal a complete thought. More linear simpleton behavior

NigelUno wrote:

Blanch32 wrote:

Maybe it's because I don't use the "i know you are, but what am I?" Childish retort when I'm tilting since I simply don't have the Brain capacity to think of anything else nor the common sense to just walk away?

o

Nope. That's clearly not it.

Or irony. Don't understand that either?

Blanch32 wrote:

duffy munn wrote:


Funny. I've never known anyone to use the term slam-piece except you.

Throwing around one of my signature terms, does not equal a complete thought. More linear simpleton behavior

No offense dude, but you exhibit linear simpleton behavior in spades. You are the very definition. I'm just hoping its all an act and the few occasion people have interacted with you, you just decided to continue the act in person. Otherwise it paints a really creepy picture with your mindset. One where you've probably walked a legal thin line in certain situations.

Just my 2 cents.

FiveThirtyEight ‏@FiveThirtyEight 1 minute ago

More Americans are too young to remember O.J. in the courtroom than are old enough to remember his best NFL years

Blanch32 wrote:

duffy munn wrote:


Funny. I've never known anyone to use the term slam-piece except you.

Throwing around one of my signature terms, does not equal a complete thought. More linear simpleton behavior

Yeah dude, you act super fucking creepy a lot. I've heard stories about you acting the same at gatherings too. You might do it for your own shits and giggles, or that might just be who you are.

I wish you would tone this shit down. You're lame enough as it is, but when you start acting misogynistic like you do way too often I wouldn't mind if I never heard from you again.

In short, shut the fuck up.

Just watched part 3 and have to say Carl Douglas disgusts me. 22 years later he knows god damn well his client brutally murdered two people. Yet he refuses to break character and continues to try a case that a 5 year old could see was open and shut.

When asked directly by Hannah Storm on ESPN if OJ was guilty he never answered directly. More spin.

The Brown and Goldman families deserve justice and closure that they will never get.

NigelUno wrote:

Blanch32 wrote:

Or irony. Don't understand that either?

I get that you don't have the brain capacity nor the common sense. Was that the irony?

No nigel that isn't irony. Instead, you should have replied with "tilt" like you love to do

kingstonlake wrote:

Blanch32 wrote:


Throwing around one of my signature terms, does not equal a complete thought. More linear simpleton behavior

No offense dude, but you exhibit linear simpleton behavior in spades. You are the very definition. I'm just hoping its all an act and the few occasion people have interacted with you, you just decided to continue the act in person. Otherwise it paints a really creepy picture with your mindset. One where you've probably walked a legal thin line in certain situations.

Just my 2 cents.

Classic post. Lol. Loved all the contradictions. At least Nigel should be proud.

Watch Out Pylon! wrote:

Blanch32 wrote:


Throwing around one of my signature terms, does not equal a complete thought. More linear simpleton behavior

Yeah dude, you act super fucking creepy a lot. I've heard stories about you acting the same at gatherings too. You might do it for your own shits and giggles, or that might just be who you are.

I wish you would tone this shit down. You're lame enough as it is, but when you start acting misogynistic like you do way too often I wouldn't mind if I never heard from you again.

In short, shut the fuck up.

Let me guess, you want to have me banned too?

I actually find you e

Blanch32 wrote:

Watch Out Pylon! wrote:

Yeah dude, you act super fucking creepy a lot. I've heard stories about you acting the same at gatherings too. You might do it for your own shits and giggles, or that might just be who you are.

I wish you would tone this shit down. You're lame enough as it is, but when you start acting misogynistic like you do way too often I wouldn't mind if I never heard from you again.

In short, shut the fuck up.

Let me guess, you want to have me banned too?

I actually find you entertaining. Why did you think we want you banned?

Blanch32 wrote:

kingstonlake wrote:

No offense dude, but you exhibit linear simpleton behavior in spades. You are the very definition. I'm just hoping its all an act and the few occasion people have interacted with you, you just decided to continue the act in person. Otherwise it paints a really creepy picture with your mindset. One where you've probably walked a legal thin line in certain situations.

Just my 2 cents.

Classic post. Lol. Loved all the contradictions. At least Nigel should be proud.

So when your use your signature term slam-piece, you don't mean it as an insult to women ? Just about every thing you post regarding females is demeaning. Just your schtick I guess, right ?

Kingstonlake regards Blanch: Hammer meet nail. Dead on.

duffy munn wrote:

Blanch32 wrote:

Classic post. Lol. Loved all the contradictions. At least Nigel should be proud.

So when your use your signature term slam-piece, you don't mean it as an insult to women ? Just about every thing you post regarding females is demeaning. Just your schtick I guess, right ?

DudeS can be slam pieces too. The term isn't locked into one sex or another. Sorry about your mypgnoistic ole tyme simpleton view

NigelUno wrote:blanch?

What in the fuck is wrong with you?

I'm seriously asking. Please stop deflecting.

That's another one. Perhaps I dont use the term deflecting enough?

DWags wrote:Kingstonlake regards Blanch: Hammer meet nail. Dead on.

Let the idiotfest commence! Fuck subjects, predicates, inferences, logically arguments. I hate you, so you always wrong! Facts no matter! Time for air guitar celebration with verbal noises!!