Hey GRR...tell me about the economy again

http://www.msn.com/en-us/money/markets/seven-years-later-recovery-remains-the-weakest-of-the-post-world-war-ii-era/ar-BBv1w8e

http://www.msn.com/en-us/money/markets/us-gdp-grew-a-weak-12-percent-in-second-quarter/ar-BBv1MlN

But, since you, like most Dems, dont really give a shit about the middle or lower class except for them to vote in politicians on 'your side' who cares, right? Because if you truly cares, you wouldnt support policies that hurt those classes, right?

I already know GRRs response...it will be the typical liberal rreponse when faced with facts. SIN--switch topics, ignore facts, namecall. LEts see how many of those 3 GRR does.

      

You're a fucking idiot.

Two responses so far from libs and they hit almost all 3.

We got namecall and ignore facts.

Hey dude, why didn't Republicans pass The American Jobs act?

I'll give you a hint, it's because they knew it would work and make Obama look good.

AnomanderRake wrote:Hey dude, why didn't Republicans pass The American Jobs act?

I'll give you a hint, it's because they knew it would work and make Obama look good.

Another liberal response--hits the S. Shift topics.

0-3 liberals. Can anyone muster of a response to the actual facts in the article?

YAFI

DWags wrote:YAFI

N--namecall.

0-4 liberals.

The_Dude wrote:

DWags wrote:YAFI

N--namecall.

0-4 liberals.

I'll explain this slowly...

You......
Are......
a.........
RACIST..........

I don't give a fuck about your politics. Could give a flying fuck. I know what your politics are. I know we could show charts for both sides, and go back and forth. You, however, are a fucking racist.

Now, I'm pissed I broke my rules for you.

Sorry to everyone. I had to do that. (in his mind that dumb fuck thinks I'm calling him a racist 'cause dwags is a lib'. He just doesn't get it. )

YAFI

The first article states it is the longest expansion period under any one President, so it's not all doom and gloom. Slow and Steady wins the race after all.

The_Dude?  

   

A Wells refugee who is stalking here.  No one else calls out a specific poster.

PS
YAFI

DWags wrote:

The_Dude wrote:

N--namecall.

0-4 liberals.

I'll explain this slowly...

You......
Are......
a.........
RACIST..........

I don't give a fuck about your politics. Could give a flying fuck. I know what your politics are. I know we could show charts for both sides, and go back and forth. You, however, are a fucking racist.

Now, I'm pissed I broke my rules for you.

Sorry to everyone. I had to do that. (in his mind that dumb fuck thinks I'm calling him a racist 'cause dwags is a lib'. He just doesn't get it. )

YAFI

0-5...

GRR Spartan wrote:The_Dude?  

   

A Wells refugee who is stalking here.  No one else calls out a specific poster.

PS
YAFI

0-6...

These are good first steps everyone. Do not engage.

AnomanderRake wrote:The first article states it is the longest expansion period under any one President, so it's not all doom and gloom. Slow and Steady wins the race after all.

Yep. And I will admit, middle class wage stagnation is not something that has just occurred under Obama its been a long time trend in the country.

The issue is the economy has never hit 'escape velocity' with a few years of 4% or near 4% growth which should have occurred especially after a huge recession.

FDR and Obama--both very liberal presidents, both resided in slow growth economies after huge recessions because of government interference in the markets.

Other Teams Pursuing That wrote:These are good first steps everyone. Do not engage.

Close to S--shift topics and I--ignore facts.

I guess part of both?

Y


A



F




I

The_Dude wrote:

AnomanderRake wrote:The first article states it is the longest expansion period under any one President, so it's not all doom and gloom. Slow and Steady wins the race after all.

Yep. And I will admit, middle class wage stagnation is not something that has just occurred under Obama its been a long time trend in the country.

The issue is the economy has never hit 'escape velocity' with a few years of 4% or near 4% growth which should have occurred especially after a huge recession.

FDR and Obama--both very liberal presidents, both resided in slow growth economies after huge recessions because of government interference in the markets.

That's the cause and effect you surmise from that, eh?

Interesting.

http://www.forbes.com/sites/adamhartung/2012/10/10/want-a-better-economy-history-says-vote-democrat/#ecbf7f067a16

Historically the economy does better under Democrats. Sorry dude but trickle down economics have been proven to be ineffective.

AnomanderRake wrote:http://www.forbes.com/sites/adamhartung/2012/10/10/want-a-better-economy-history-says-vote-democrat/#ecbf7f067a16

Historically the economy does better under Democrats. Sorry dude but trickle down economics have been proven to be ineffective.

The Dude is a Wells poster who regularly calls out specific posters and uses emoticon more than most Swill posters.

YAFI is the best response.

GRR Spartan wrote:

AnomanderRake wrote:http://www.forbes.com/sites/adamhartung/2012/10/10/want-a-better-economy-history-says-vote-democrat/#ecbf7f067a16

Historically the economy does better under Democrats. Sorry dude but trickle down economics have been proven to be ineffective.

The Dude is a Wells poster who regularly calls out specific posters and uses emoticon more than most Swill posters.

YAFI is the best response.

You might be right, I'm not really familiar with any of the history of the RCMB or this board as I joined both around the same time and just naturally gravitated here.

I commented on the article and The_Dude replied in a reasonable manner. Even if I don't agree with him I don't have a problem engaging in discussion.

Our economy would be much stronger and the country running all all cylinders if the Just Say No Congressional Republicans had allowed for the Dems' plan for rebuilding roads and bridges. But, that would have meant recovery and prosperity on Obama's watch, and there's no way Connies would ever have allowed that.

AnomanderRake wrote:

GRR Spartan wrote:

The Dude is a Wells poster who regularly calls out specific posters and uses emoticon more than most Swill posters.

YAFI is the best response.

You might be right, I'm not really familiar with any of the history of the RCMB or this board as I joined both around the same time and just naturally gravitated here.

I commented on the article and The_Dude replied in a reasonable manner. Even if I don't agree with him I don't have a problem engaging in discussion.

You had the first reasonable response and I replied to you with a reasonable response.

GRR is holding a 3 year grudge from rcmb lol and I posted his name in the title because he specifically said he wanted Hilary to continues obamas economy which by any objective measurement just hasn't been good.

─────────────────────────▄▀▄
─────────────────────────█─█
─────────────────────────█─█
─────────────────────────█─█
─────────────────────────█─█
─────────────────────────█─█
─────────────────────────█─▀█▀█▄
─────────────────────────█──█──█
─────────────────────────█▄▄█──▀█
────────────────────────▄█──▄█▄─▀█
────────────────────────█─▄█─█─█─█
────────────────────────█──█─█─█─█
────────────────────────█──█─█─█─█
────▄█▄──▄█▄────────────█──▀▀█─█─█
──▄█████████────────────▀█───█─█▄▀
─▄███████████────────────██──▀▀─█
▄█████████████────────────█─────█
██████████───▀▀█▄─────────▀█────█
████████───▀▀▀──█──────────█────█
██████───────██─▀█─────────█────█
████──▄──────────▀█────────█────█ Look son
███──█──────▀▀█───▀█───────█────█ a faggot!
███─▀─██──────█────▀█──────█────█
███─────────────────▀█─────█────█
███──────────────────█─────█────█
███─────────────▄▀───█─────█────█
████─────────▄▄██────█▄────█────█
████────────██████────█────█────█
█████────█──███████▀──█───▄█▄▄▄▄█
██▀▀██────▀─██▄──▄█───█───█─────█
██▄──────────██████───█───█─────█
─██▄────────────▄▄────█───█─────█
─███████─────────────▄█───█─────█
──██████─────────────█───█▀─────█
──▄███████▄─────────▄█──█▀──────█
─▄█─────▄▀▀▀█───────█───█───────█
▄█────────█──█────▄███▀▀▀▀──────█
█──▄▀▀────────█──▄▀──█──────────█
█────█─────────█─────█──────────█
█────────▀█────█─────█─────────██
█───────────────█──▄█▀─────────█
█──────────██───█▀▀▀───────────█
█───────────────█──────────────█
█▄─────────────██──────────────█
─█▄────────────█───────────────█
──██▄────────▄███▀▀▀▀▀▄────────█
─█▀─▀█▄────────▀█──────▀▄──────█
─█────▀▀▀▀▄─────█────────▀─────█

The economy has always been great if you're not relying on doing someone else's work for a set paycheck.

Some of you's guise could have used leaving the warm comfort of your parent's homes earlier than 17/18.

Or you could use a nice 5g shroom dose. Open up that narrow perspective you have on how to live a life.

It's cool, when trump runs all the pubes over to Hilary's side, she'll have a responsive congress to work with. You think the aca was foisted on you? You ain't seen nothing, bitches.

Home ownership at a 51 year low

Rocinante wrote:It's cool, when trump runs all the pubes over to Hilary's side, she'll have a responsive congress to work with. You think the aca was foisted on you? You ain't seen nothing, bitches.

Im in agreement with healthcare--the faster we get to a single payer system, the better.

I truly believe ACA was implemented to fuck up the system so bad, people will just throw their hands in the air and say fuck it, bring me single payer.

And saying pubs will work with Hilary or go to her side--you realize pubs=dems, right? Pubs and Dems have been one in the ame for quite some time now. Sell out American public grow the size of DC, and recklessly spend money.

Rocinante wrote:It's cool, when trump runs all the pubes over to Hilary's side, she'll have a responsive congress to work with. You think the aca was foisted on you? You ain't seen nothing, bitches.

Were you watching some old porn when you wrote this?! Weird shit