Is this one different?

The Pantry wrote:

Watch Out Pylon! wrote:

I thought you steered clear of this board. Another lie. So sad.

Not as sad as you still being allowed to mod this forum

So now that this is apparently where you're posting the most, what do you think of Trump's rampant treason?

Jake from State Farm wrote:Dems have been yelling "impeach him" ever since he was elected. The public isn't listening any longer. Maybe it'll all get sorted out in the next election, provided the dems can figure out how to get the right people to vote.

This. Also, your avatar pic is hilarious.

Watch Out Pylon! wrote:

The Pantry wrote:Not as sad as you still being allowed to mod this forum

So now that this is apparently where you're posting the most, what do you think of Trump's rampant treason?

Treason? Just like you knee-jerks to hold him already guilty without the facts and due process. If I were one of you, I'd be more concerned with Biden possibly being your 2020 candidate.

Whiny republicans are whining.

The Pantry wrote:

Watch Out Pylon! wrote:

So now that this is apparently where you're posting the most, what do you think of Trump's rampant treason?

Treason? Just like you knee-jerks to hold him already guilty without the facts and due process. If I were one of you, I'd be more concerned with Biden possibly being your 2020 candidate.

Two birds one stone.

The Pantry wrote:I love all you whiny bitches. As if the Dems are squeaky clean and never committed major fuckery

Of course neither party is clean, but neither party is above the law. This isn't an exercise in whataboutism.

beyond the right wing "whataboutism"... ya know "what about the colored boy"..."what about the evil grandmother with the email account"....(neither of which are president) -  

but... as predicted, the GOP and mainstream media have already found their next talking point:

A senior Trump administration official told Fox News late Tuesday that the administration will release a document showing the intelligence community inspector general found the whistleblower who leveled an explosive accusation against President Trump concerning his talks with Ukraine had “political bias” in favor of “a rival candidate” of the president.

     

Caution: Mainstream Media Link

so far we have:

1. I did nothing wrong.
2. You can't prove it.
3. What about the colored boy.
4. What about the evil grandmother with the email account.
5. The whistleblower is a democrat with an agenda.

don't worry.. the list will get longer.

The Pantry wrote:

Watch Out Pylon! wrote:

So now that this is apparently where you're posting the most, what do you think of Trump's rampant treason?

Treason? Just like you knee-jerks to hold him already guilty without the facts and due process. If I were one of you, I'd be more concerned with Biden possibly being your 2020 candidate.

Cool, maybe they can share a cell. I don't give a fuck about Biden. Honestly I hope John Kasich primaries Trump (assuming he's not booted out of office by then). I know your brain doesn't function properly when it comes to politics so you won't understand this or call me a liar, but I'm an independent. That means I vote for the candidate I like best regardless of party affiliation.

not to be outdone by Fox News, The Washington Post is busy with their "whataboutism" and implicating Biden. Their headline:

Scrutiny over Trump’s Ukraine scandal may also complicate Biden’s campaign.

Caution: Mainstream Media Link

Politico adopts the GOP/mainstream media narrative. Their headline:

Mike Pompeo puts onus in Ukraine squabble on Biden

Caution: Mainstream Media Link

CNN makes sure their viewers are on board with the Administration's agenda. Their headline:

Trump sets out to undercut Pelosi's impeachment gamble.

Caution: Mainstream Media Link

I'm sure every "news" outlet is running the same story.. but I have to walk to get coffee.

America is a stupid country.

It's funny to see Rudy talk the country into sending him to jail.

Floyd Robertson wrote:It's funny to see Rudy talk the country into sending him to jail.

I was home from running this morning and flipped the TV over to some station (kinda like wanting to look at a car wreck but knowing you shouldn't?).. and he was screaming at someone.. calling them names.

oh - and call me crazy, but I don't think the guy who drew in a hurricane with a sharpie is going to be completely forthright with documents as it relates to impeachment inquiries (transcripts, notes, etc).

lol of course they're going to release a sanitized/spun version.

[tw]1176845813915561984[/tw]

Robert J Sakimano wrote:CNN makes sure their viewers are on board with the Administration's agenda. Their headline:

Trump sets out to undercut Pelosi's impeachment gamble.

Caution: Mainstream Media Link

Bob, if I could offer a little advice, read the articles you link. To suggest CNN is trying to make sure the general public is on board the administrations agenda comes across as sane and coherent as 99% of trumps tweets.

No disrespect bud, but cmon.

Floyd Robertson wrote:lol of course they're going to release a sanitized/spun version.

[tw]1176845813915561984[/tw]

I mean, did anyone really expect the White House would release anything that would implicate Trump in a crime?

kingstonlake wrote:

Robert J Sakimano wrote:CNN makes sure their viewers are on board with the Administration's agenda. Their headline:



Caution: Mainstream Media Link

Bob, if I could offer a little advice, read the articles you link. To suggest CNN is trying to make sure the general public is on board the administrations agenda comes across as sane and coherent as 99% of trumps tweets.

No disrespect bud, but cmon.

You are welcome to your opinion.

kingstonlake wrote:

Robert J Sakimano wrote:CNN makes sure their viewers are on board with the Administration's agenda. Their headline:



Caution: Mainstream Media Link

Bob, if I could offer a little advice, read the articles you link. To suggest CNN is trying to make sure the general public is on board the administrations agenda comes across as sane and coherent as 99% of trumps tweets.

No disrespect bud, but cmon.

I think you assume that Americans read.

they look at headlines.. then they go off to Wal-Mart. It's bullet point journalism.. bumpersticker politics.

Other Teams Pursuing That wrote:

kingstonlake wrote:

Bob, if I could offer a little advice, read the articles you link. To suggest CNN is trying to make sure the general public is on board the administrations agenda comes across as sane and coherent as 99% of trumps tweets.

No disrespect bud, but cmon.

You are welcome to your opinion.

this.

Question for Pantry. If this phone call takes down Biden, his kid, and Trump do you think that would be a bad thing?

I don’t.

kingstonlake wrote:

Robert J Sakimano wrote:CNN makes sure their viewers are on board with the Administration's agenda. Their headline:



Caution: Mainstream Media Link

Bob, if I could offer a little advice, read the articles you link. To suggest CNN is trying to make sure the general public is on board the administrations agenda comes across as sane and coherent as 99% of trumps tweets.

No disrespect bud, but cmon.

It is always very disingenuous of Bob when he does his "mainstream media are pro-Trump" schtick. Especually in a case like this where 95% of the articles are bashing Trump, but because they report on what he or his aides are saying/planning (which IS, after all, news). That's like saying that Comp is anti-MSU because he spends tens of thousands of words every week breaking down the opponents.

I'd be far more concerned for the future of this country if the media didn't report on what Trump's side is saying or doing.

MiamiSpartan wrote:

kingstonlake wrote:

Bob, if I could offer a little advice, read the articles you link. To suggest CNN is trying to make sure the general public is on board the administrations agenda comes across as sane and coherent as 99% of trumps tweets.

No disrespect bud, but cmon.

It is always very disingenuous of Bob when he does his "mainstream media are pro-Trump" schtick. Especually in a case like this where 95% of the articles are bashing Trump, but because they report on what he or his aides are saying/planning (which IS, after all, news). That's like saying that Comp is anti-MSU because he spends tens of thousands of words every week breaking down the opponents.

I'd be far more concerned for the future of this country if the media didn't report on what Trump's side is saying or doing.

I agree. I think sometimes Bob forgets his audience, lol. Most of us are fairly sane people who aren’t naive. It’s ok to interject some real thought. No offense bob. Love you!

Other Teams Pursuing That wrote:

kingstonlake wrote:

Bob, if I could offer a little advice, read the articles you link. To suggest CNN is trying to make sure the general public is on board the administrations agenda comes across as sane and coherent as 99% of trumps tweets.

No disrespect bud, but cmon.

You are welcome to your opinion.

LOL

kingstonlake wrote:

MiamiSpartan wrote:
It is always very disingenuous of Bob when he does his "mainstream media are pro-Trump" schtick.  Especually in a case like this where 95% of the articles are bashing Trump, but because they report on what he or his aides are saying/planning (which IS, after all, news).  That's like saying that Comp is anti-MSU because he spends tens of thousands of words every week breaking down the opponents.

I'd  be far more concerned for the future of this country if the media didn't report on what Trump's side is saying or doing.

I agree. I think sometimes Bob forgets his audience, lol. Most of us are fairly sane people who aren’t naive. It’s ok to interject some real thought. No offense bob. Love you!

wait.. I have an audience??

love you, too, brah!!

Robert J Sakimano wrote:

kingstonlake wrote:

I agree. I think sometimes Bob forgets his audience, lol. Most of us are fairly sane people who aren’t naive. It’s ok to interject some real thought. No offense bob. Love you!

wait.. I have an audience??

love you, too, brah!!

We are each other’s audience.

kingstonlake wrote:

Robert J Sakimano wrote:wait.. I have an audience??

love you, too, brah!!

We are each other’s audience.

"we are our only savior"....

The White House-released transcript says it is "not a verbatim transcript of a discussion".

Caution: Mainstream Media Link

So as of now, no mention of withholding money in lieu of an investigation....

[tw]1176864243867619334[/tw]

Once again Democrats are gonna fuck this up and lose another election. The phone call wasn’t recorded. No mention of money. Trump asked a foreign government to investigate a rival. Not illegal. No different than the Clinton campaign hiring a group with their channels to the British government and intelligence to investigate trump. No different than the federal government to investigate put surveillance on carter page.

Congrats. Big fucking fail. But go ahead, start impeachment hearings. Dipshit Pelosi finally caved. Enjoy Trumps re-election.

kingstonlake wrote:Once again Democrats are gonna fuck this up and lose another election. The phone call wasn’t recorded. No mention of money. Trump asked a foreign government to investigate a rival. Not illegal. No different than the Clinton campaign hiring a group with their channels to the British government and intelligence to investigate trump. No different than the federal government to investigate put surveillance on carter page.

Congrats. Big fucking fail. But go ahead, start impeachment hearings. Dipshit Pelosi finally caved. Enjoy Trumps re-election.

I think the whistleblower report is and has always been more significant than any 'transcript' of the call the White House may see fit to release. Pump the brakes.

kingstonlake wrote:Once again Democrats are gonna fuck this up and lose another election. The phone call wasn’t recorded. No mention of money. Trump asked a foreign government to investigate a rival. Not illegal. No different than the Clinton campaign hiring a group with their channels to the British government and intelligence to investigate trump. No different than the federal government to investigate put surveillance on carter page.

Congrats. Big fucking fail. But go ahead, start impeachment hearings. Dipshit Pelosi finally caved. Enjoy Trumps re-election.

I hate to be 'that guy' but I tried to warn folks not to get too excited for a return to traditional American values.

great news..

Mitt Romney finds the racist, bigoted sexual predator's treason "troubling"...

"My reaction was the same as I had a few days ago, which is this remains deeply troubling and we'll see where it leads. But the first reaction is troubling," Romney said.

stay tuned to see him do absolutely nothing about these "troubling" events!

Caution: Mainstream Media Link

kingstonlake wrote:Once again Democrats are gonna fuck this up and lose another election. The phone call wasn’t recorded. No mention of money. Trump asked a foreign government to investigate a rival. Not illegal. No different than the Clinton campaign hiring a group with their channels to the British government and intelligence to investigate trump. No different than the federal government to investigate put surveillance on carter page.

Congrats. Big fucking fail. But go ahead, start impeachment hearings. Dipshit Pelosi finally caved. Enjoy Trumps re-election.

If Pelosi doesn't impeach you have everyone crying she's a coward and is awful leadership, when she moves to impeach you have people screaming she just got Trump elected. Can't win.

Robert J Sakimano wrote:great news..

Mitt Romney finds the racist, bigoted sexual predator's treason "troubling"...

"My reaction was the same as I had a few days ago, which is this remains deeply troubling and we'll see where it leads. But the first reaction is troubling," Romney said.

stay tuned to see him do absolutely nothing about these "troubling" events!

Caution: Mainstream Media Link

I bet more GOP representatives retire to 'spend more time with their family' pretty soon.