Do Conservatives Really Believe They Can Put Sexual Freedom Back in the Box???

Just thinking about how people will react to what the Rape Loving 5 (Conservative Supreme Court idiots) are trying to do.

Do they really think that with a majority of the population totally believing in the live and let live freedom rulings of the past 50 year that they can turn to clock back?

Trapper Gus wrote:Just thinking about how people will react to what the Rape Loving 5 (Conservative Supreme Court idiots) are trying to do.

Do they really think that with a majority of the population totally believing in the live and let live freedom rulings of the past 50 year that they can turn to clock back?

Yes. Their motto?

“If we can’t have sex, you can’t have sex”

Unless you’re a conservative congressman who sexually abused underage girls. Or MTG who has weird sex while her husband does too. (You cant tell me she isn’t a man. ).

DWags wrote:

Trapper Gus wrote:Just thinking about how people will react to what the Rape Loving 5 (Conservative Supreme Court idiots) are trying to do.

Do they really think that with a majority of the population totally believing in the live and let live freedom rulings of the past 50 year that they can turn to clock back?

Yes. Their motto?

“If we can’t have sex, you can’t have sex”

Unless you’re a conservative congressman who sexually abused underage girls. Or MTG who has weird sex while her husband does too. (You cant tell me she isn’t a man. ).

Playing with a basic motivation of life will not turn out well for them.

MiamiSpartan wrote:They dont want to "put it back in the box". They want to campaign in a need to do that, in order to appeal to the repressed prudes. In fact, more widespread openness is good for them, as it scares those prudes and therefore riles them up.

The "prudes" are the ones who are "into" some of the more bizarre sexual practices