Temple beat Vandy 37-7?

SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC

NigelUno wrote:SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC

But Vandy didn't have James Frankin any more and now he's in the B1G

Ole miss looked like shit tonight too.

I pray Wisconsin fucks lsu up tomorrow night

Ass Dan wrote:Ole miss looked like shit tonight too.

I pray Wisconsin fucks lsu up tomorrow night

I think aTm pantsing S Carolina was pretty funny too, but I bet that just proves how good the SEC is top to bottom.

Cue ranting from SEC slappies that Vanderbilt "doesn't count"

Chitown_Badger wrote:



I think aTm pantsing S Carolina was pretty funny too, but I bet that just proves how good the SEC is top to bottom.

Yup after all those were sec speed defenses!

Chick town, what's your take on the LSU game?

Franklin left the cupboard bare.

Blanch32 wrote:Chitown,  what's your take on the LSU game?

31-24 LSU

I've been spending some time on tiger droppings this week, and I'm seeing all the cliches. Their team speed is something we can't handle (we'll see), our O linemen are big but not as athletic as their o linemen (which is bullshit), our guys won't be able to handle the heat (the roof is going to be closed), Melvin Gordon would be second string if he had to play in the SEC (bullshit), Gurley is far and away a better back (impossible to say with certainty)...it goes on.

In their defense, a number of their fans tell those people above they're ridiculous and many expect a good game.

Hey, the SEC was 1-2 last night, but they'll gain overall in the polls.

aTm will move up to the top ten, South Carolina will only drop a couple spots because well, "They lost to an SEC team" and remain top 15 and Ol Miss will skyrocket up after their ass whipping of Boise. So, two more teams in the top 15 for the SEC even though they went 1-2 last night. Now that's good football!

DWags wrote:Hey, the SEC was 1-2 last night, but they'll gain overall in the polls.  

aTm will move up to the top ten, South Carolina will only drop a couple spots because well, "They lost to an SEC team" and remain top 15 and Ol Miss will skyrocket up after their ass whipping of Boise.  So, two more teams in the top 15 for the SEC even though they went 1-2 last night.  Now that's good football!

Technically, 2-2.

NigelUno wrote:

Technically, 2-2.

Point still stands, by SC getting their ass beat it will help the overall rankings in the SEC. Go figure.

DWags wrote:

Point still stands, by SC getting their ass beat it will help the overall rankings in the SEC.  Go figure.  

A&M's not coming out of the West. The loss hurts the East. If SC beats Georgia, that won't be good for the conference as a whole.

Chitown_Badger wrote:

31-24 LSU



I've been spending some time on tiger droppings this week, and I'm seeing all the cliches. Their team speed is something we can't handle (we'll see), our O linemen are big but not as athletic as their o linemen (which is bullshit), our guys won't be able to handle the heat (the roof is going to be closed), Melvin Gordon would be second string if he had to play in the SEC (bullshit), Gurley is far and away a better back (impossible to say with certainty)...it goes on.

In their defense, a number of their fans tell those people above they're ridiculous and many expect a good game.

I get some of those. But telling Wisconsin that they have better o line is just plain morAnic

Chitown_Badger wrote:

31-24 LSU

I've been spending some time on tiger droppings this week, and I'm seeing all the cliches. Their team speed is something we can't handle (we'll see), our O linemen are big but not as athletic as their o linemen (which is bullshit), our guys won't be able to handle the heat (the roof is going to be closed), Melvin Gordon would be second string if he had to play in the SEC (bullshit), Gurley is far and away a better back (impossible to say with certainty)...it goes on.

In their defense, a number of their fans tell those people above they're ridiculous and many expect a good game.

They're bragging about Gurley, a UGA back, while talking about Wisconsin?

The SEC circlejerk among opposing teams is unbelievable.

NigelUno wrote:

A&M's not coming out of the West.  The loss hurts the East.  If SC beats Georgia, that won't be good for the conference as a whole.  

while I agree with all of the above, I'd bet if you take the overall rankings of SC/ol Miss/aTm right now and divide by three, that number will be greater then if you take those three schools and their rankings on monday and divide by three.

DWags wrote:

while I agree with all of the above, I'd bet if you take the overall rankings of SC/ol Miss/aTm right now and divide by three, that number will be greater then if you take those three schools and their rankings on monday and divide by three.  

Gotta factor in Vandy's loss somehow though. Don't try and cook the books.

NigelUno wrote:

Gotta factor in Vandy's loss somehow though.  Don't try and cook the books.

Vandy stopped counting for the SEC when they started kicking kids who raped girls out of school. Schools a bunch of egg heads with morals. How are they even in the SEC.

It's mind boggling that two also rans in the Big 12 have walked into the SEC and been more than just competitive, yet we still hear how great the SEC is.

South Carolina getting assraped by A&M is hilarious considering how arrogant Steve Spurrier was at SEC media days. Couldn't happen to a better douchebag. Dude gets talent galore and still finds a way to shit the bed every year.

Oscar Taveras wrote:

They're bragging about Gurley, a UGA back, while talking about Wisconsin?

The SEC circlejerk among opposing teams is unbelievable.

They are indeed.