Can we get a new kicker now please?

And even if that was true- he missed both by a hair. We’re not talking about a guy that missed by 10 yards. Any amount of calibration to that, any amount, and he makes those. Settle down Kingston.

Please don’t kick it to Barcley next week

DWags wrote:Please don’t kick it to Barcley next week

Agreed. Kick it to Barkley instead.

I'm fine Travis. You said he played fine. He didn't. It's ok to say it. He missed two of three field goals. You said he played fine. And you made that up. Because missing two of three field goals isn't "fine play". It's actually bad. Maybe you're confusing baseball and football where getting a hit once every three at bats is actually pretty good. If that's the case no worries.

Floyd Robertson wrote:Dude was 7/9 before hitting upright twice in a row.

Wally Pipp hit .295 and finished 14th in the MVP vote in 1924.

kingstonlake wrote:I'm fine Travis. You said he played fine. He didn't. It's ok to say it. He missed two of three field goals. You said he played fine. And you made that up. Because missing two of three field goals isn't "fine play". It's actually bad. Maybe you're confusing baseball and football where getting a hit once every three at bats is actually pretty good. If that's the case no worries.

He’s a freshman who going in we knew nothing about. He had solid kicks on both field goals that were missed. One was long, I don’t remember how far the second one was.

If the premise is “kickers are kickers and they don’t get any better” than I’d agree with you. But that’s utter idiocy so I don’t agree with you.

Still college and I will never be critical of missing a 51 yard kick when it was wide by inches but FG's at 32 yards are attempts coaches and fans expect to be made.

Travis of the Cosmos wrote:

kingstonlake wrote:I'm fine Travis. You said he played fine. He didn't. It's ok to say it. He missed two of three field goals. You said he played fine. And you made that up. Because missing two of three field goals isn't "fine play". It's actually bad. Maybe you're confusing baseball and football where getting a hit once every three at bats is actually pretty good. If that's the case no worries.

He’s a freshman who going in we knew nothing about. He had solid kicks on both field goals that were missed. One was long, I don’t remember how far the second one was.

If the premise is “kickers are kickers and they don’t get any better” than I’d agree with you. But that’s utter idiocy so I don’t agree with you.

Oh, good he hit the missed field goals hard. Are they giving points for that now. He didn't play fine. It's ok to say it.

look, I guess what I’m getting at is that lately we had Geiger missing them by 5 yards. Kids a freshman. Hit the post on one long kick and one he should have made. It’s not insane to think that he might turn out to be just fine. But you can’t be too reactionary to something like that, that’s how a kickers head gets all messed up. It’s kinda like hitting a golf drive, just don’t think about it and go out there and do it. (Except six inches the other way and we’re not even talking about it.)

Also note- I didn’t say “he had a good game” I said “omg our kicker succczzzzzz” is a really stupid take. Phenomenally stupid.

Travis of the Cosmos wrote:look, I guess what I’m getting at is that lately we had Geiger missing them by 5 yards. Kids a freshman. Hit the post on one long kick and one he should have made. It’s not insane to think that he might turn out to be just fine. But you can’t be too reactionary to something like that, that’s how a kickers head gets all messed up. It’s kinda like hitting a golf drive, just don’t think about it and go out there and do it. (Except six inches the other way and we’re not even talking about it.)

Also note- I didn’t say “he had a good game” I said “omg our kicker succczzzzzz” is a really stupid take. Phenomenally stupid.

Nobody is saying he won't be fine or sucks. You said he played fine. I don't feel he did. And I'd bet he'd tell you the same (yes I made that up)

kingstonlake wrote:

Travis of the Cosmos wrote:look, I guess what I’m getting at is that lately we had Geiger missing them by 5 yards. Kids a freshman. Hit the post on one long kick and one he should have made. It’s not insane to think that he might turn out to be just fine. But you can’t be too reactionary to something like that, that’s how a kickers head gets all messed up. It’s kinda like hitting a golf drive, just don’t think about it and go out there and do it. (Except six inches the other way and we’re not even talking about it.)

Also note- I didn’t say “he had a good game” I said “omg our kicker succczzzzzz” is a really stupid take. Phenomenally stupid.

Nobody is saying he won't be fine or sucks. You said he played fine. I don't feel he did. And I'd bet he'd tell you the same (yes I made that up)

The thread is called “can we get a new kicker please” and the post that I responded to says “he’s on watch.”

So. I mean. K.

Whatever man. We’ll know if we have a problem with the kicker soon enough cause basically shit ain’t gonna change for 3 more years anyway. But, I’m pretty confident that we’re all gonna look back and say “hey that kids pretty good” and you’re going to be like “grab my bad I’m an idiot who knows nothing about kickers.”

Travis of the Cosmos wrote:

kingstonlake wrote:

Nobody is saying he won't be fine or sucks. You said he played fine. I don't feel he did. And I'd bet he'd tell you the same (yes I made that up)

The thread is called “can we get a new kicker please” and the post that I responded to says “he’s on watch.”

So. I mean. K.

Whatever man. We’ll know if we have a problem with the kicker soon enough cause basically shit ain’t gonna change for 3 more years anyway. But, I’m pretty confident that we’re all gonna look back and say “hey that kids pretty good” and you’re going to be like “grab my bad I’m an idiot who knows nothing about kickers.”

No, idiocy would be to conclude I think he sucks for saying he didn't play well today. And you made it up that I think he's going to be a bad kicker. Tighten up.

kingstonlake wrote:

Travis of the Cosmos wrote:

The thread is called “can we get a new kicker please” and the post that I responded to says “he’s on watch.”

So. I mean. K.

Whatever man. We’ll know if we have a problem with the kicker soon enough cause basically shit ain’t gonna change for 3 more years anyway. But, I’m pretty confident that we’re all gonna look back and say “hey that kids pretty good” and you’re going to be like “grab my bad I’m an idiot who knows nothing about kickers.”

No, idiocy would be to conclude I think he sucks for saying he didn't play well today. And you made it up that I think he's going to be a bad kicker. Tighten up.

The thread is literally called that Kingston. And the post literally suggested that he might need to be replaced. And that’s what I was responding to originally.

Would it make you feel better if I said he had a bad game? Would you feel soothed like a soft breeze upon your bosom?

kingstonlake wrote:

Travis of the Cosmos wrote:

That doesn’t make any sense. Tighten up Kingston.

For real though he was a hair off on those two, one of which was from what 47? We’re gonna be fine at kicker for three years, which is nice since I didn’t trust the guy at all until today oddly enough.

There were plenty of freshman that played "fine". He wasnt one of them. The kicker position is probably the one that requires the least amount of growth on the field. You're pretty much athletically ready when you step on campus. There's no coverage schemes to learn, routes to learn, plays to learn, etc. Kick ball straight. End of story. He didn't play well. It's ok to say it.

Also you posted this so yeah you sorta did say that he wasn’t going to be good if your take is that he isn’t good today (this post was insanely stupid. So you know, you can just say that. It was a bad post. It happens.)

Travis of the Cosmos wrote:

kingstonlake wrote:

No, idiocy would be to conclude I think he sucks for saying he didn't play well today. And you made it up that I think he's going to be a bad kicker. Tighten up.

The thread is literally called that Kingston. And the post literally suggested that he might need to be replaced. And that’s what I was responding to originally.

Would it make you feel better if I said he had a bad game? Would you feel soothed like a soft breeze upon your bosom?

I responded to you post saying he played fine today. I didn't respond to the title of the thread. Tighten up Travis. Messaging boarding isn't that hard. Above my original post shows a quote. They generally means I'm responding to that quote. It's not hard dude. He didn't play well today. It's ok to say it. Now please remember that I'm not saying, nor did I ever say, that good career will be sub par. It's ok to be wrong. Don't get wound up about it.

Your takes on kickers are very stupid Kingston.

Very very stupid.

But if all you’re suddenly looking for is “he didn’t play well today.” Then fine. He didn’t play well today. Neat. Glad we hashed that out. I’m out on this because we’re just going to go in circles. Love love.

Travis of the Cosmos wrote:

kingstonlake wrote:

There were plenty of freshman that played "fine". He wasnt one of them. The kicker position is probably the one that requires the least amount of growth on the field. You're pretty much athletically ready when you step on campus. There's no coverage schemes to learn, routes to learn, plays to learn, etc. Kick ball straight. End of story. He didn't play well. It's ok to say it.

Also you posted this so yeah you sorta did say that he wasn’t going to be good if your take is that he isn’t good today (this post was insanely stupid. So you know, you can just say that. It was a bad post. It happens.)

Only a complete slow boat thinks the above post somehow says he will have a bad career. Do you understand the difference between a bad game and a bad career? He didn't have a fine game. It's ok to say it. And even if he was the most prepared, gifted, and NFL ready kicker on the planet, he can still have a sub par game. It's ok to be wrong Blan.....errr Travis.

Travis of the Cosmos wrote:Your takes on kickers are very stupid Kingston.

Very very stupid.

But if all you’re suddenly looking for is “he didn’t play well today.” Then fine. He didn’t play well today. Neat. Glad we hashed that out. I’m out on this because we’re just going to go in circles. Love love.

I'm not looking for anything, lol. I just disagreed with your assertion that her played fine today.

kingstonlake wrote:

Travis of the Cosmos wrote:

Also you posted this so yeah you sorta did say that he wasn’t going to be good if your take is that he isn’t good today (this post was insanely stupid. So you know, you can just say that. It was a bad post. It happens.)

Only a complete slow boat thinks the above post somehow says he will have a bad career. Do you understand the difference between a bad game and a bad career? He didn't have a fine game. It's ok to say it. And even if he was the most prepared, gifted, and NFL ready kicker on the planet, he can still have a sub par game. It's ok to be wrong Blan.....errr Travis.

Goddamn it Kingston fine I’m in for one last post. The question is, do you realize that one bad game doesn’t make a bad career? You seem to imply that they’re athletically ready when they arrive on campus (on account of that being verbatim) which is simply not the case. I never said any of that.

Don’t go throwing stones big guy.

Travis of the Cosmos wrote:

kingstonlake wrote:

Only a complete slow boat thinks the above post somehow says he will have a bad career. Do you understand the difference between a bad game and a bad career? He didn't have a fine game. It's ok to say it. And even if he was the most prepared, gifted, and NFL ready kicker on the planet, he can still have a sub par game. It's ok to be wrong Blan.....errr Travis.

Goddamn it Kingston fine I’m in for one last post. The question is, do you realize that one bad game doesn’t make a bad career? You seem to imply that they’re athletically ready when they arrive on campus (on account of that being verbatim) which is simply not the case. I never said any of that.

Don’t go throwing stones big guy.

Yeah, I've only said it like 10 times. I'm not throwing stones. Just because you're getting pummeled doesn't mean you're getting stones thrown at you, lol. You said he played fine, he didn't. It's ok to say it.

kingstonlake wrote:

Travis of the Cosmos wrote:

Goddamn it Kingston fine I’m in for one last post. The question is, do you realize that one bad game doesn’t make a bad career? You seem to imply that they’re athletically ready when they arrive on campus (on account of that being verbatim) which is simply not the case. I never said any of that.

Don’t go throwing stones big guy.

Yeah, I've only said it like 10 times. I'm not throwing stones. Just because you're getting pummeled doesn't mean you're getting stones thrown at you, lol. You said he played fine, he didn't. It's ok to say it.

You lost here Kingston. Sorry man. You know you did since “I won lol” is all you got left.

Travis of the Cosmos wrote:

kingstonlake wrote:

Yeah, I've only said it like 10 times. I'm not throwing stones. Just because you're getting pummeled doesn't mean you're getting stones thrown at you, lol. You said he played fine, he didn't. It's ok to say it.

You lost here Kingston. Sorry man. You know you did since “I won lol” is all you got left.

I didn't say I won. I said he didn't play fine when you said he did. It's ok. There's only one guy claiming victory here (it's in bold)

How many beers deep are you Kingston?

Travis of the Cosmos wrote:How many beers deep are you Kingston?

Whaght?

DEAR KINGSTON SUCK MY FUCKING COCK LOVE TRAVIS

Travis of the Cosmos wrote:DEAR KINGSTON SUCK MY FUCKING COCK LOVE TRAVIS

Coghlin had a good game today Travis, its ok to say it.

DEAR KINGSTON EAT MY SHIT WOOOOOOOOO

He played just fine, Travis.

KINGSTON WOOOOOOOOOOOOO

Travis of the Cosmos wrote:KINGSTON WOOOOOOOOOOOOO

Travis, its ok. Coghlin delivered in the clutch today, and played great. It however does not absolve you of your idiocy last week. Sadly bumping this thread only proves your desperation and inability to let it go. Just celebrate this fantastic win, its awesome! Let go man, let go.

kingstonlake wrote:

Travis of the Cosmos wrote:KINGSTON WOOOOOOOOOOOOO

Travis, its ok. Coghlin delivered in the clutch today, and played great. It however does not absolve you of your idiocy last week. Sadly bumping this thread only proves your desperation and inability to let it go. Just celebrate this fantastic win, its awesome! Let go man, let go.

You were silly wrong last week and that’s okay because I still forgive you for masturbating today

Travis of the Cosmos wrote:

kingstonlake wrote:

Travis, its ok. Coghlin delivered in the clutch today, and played great. It however does not absolve you of your idiocy last week. Sadly bumping this thread only proves your desperation and inability to let it go. Just celebrate this fantastic win, its awesome! Let go man, let go.

You were silly wrong last week and that’s okay because I still forgive you for masturbating today

Travis, you were wrong last week. It's ok, it happens. Just don't make the mistake of doubling down on stupidity. Thats not ok.

Hey Kingston, I want you to jerk off next week thinking about how you wish you could be as right as me

Travis of the Cosmos wrote:Hey Kingston, I want you to jerk off next week thinking about how you wish you could be as right as me

Yeah, anybody who thinks a kicker played fine missing two of three field goals including a 32 yarder is right. lol. It's ok to be wrong Travis. There's no fine or account suspension if you are. If you ask nicely I'll dump it on your face next Saturday morning while you study the art of kicking field goals.

I didn’t read your post Kingston cause I’m drunk and it’s prolly stupid but wwooooooooooooo!!!!!!

Travis of the Cosmos wrote:I didn’t read your post Kingston cause I’m drunk and it’s prolly stupid but wwooooooooooooo!!!!!!

How many beers deep are you?

Well Meeeenysoda is toast

Several Kingston woooooooooooo

Kingston lake I just want you to know that our kicker is 6-6 since you went on your insane shit fit.

Travis of the Cosmos wrote:Kingston lake I just want you to know that our kicker is 6-6 since you went on your insane shit fit.

This isn't the soccer thread Travis.