Re: Question re: Swill poster R.P. Murphy

by Guest 2014-05-09, 12:12

Heat Miser wrote:

Why would I want you to leave? We're having fun aren't we?

You seem mad, but it's hard to tell through a MB.

by **NigelUno** 2014-05-09, 12:14

R.P. McMurphy wrote:

I didn't compile a list, I could see down votes appearing here and there. I just took the screenshot of ghost's post.

To be clear, you were not concerned about yourself being downvoted?

And you don't care about downvotes?

by Guest 2014-05-09, 12:21

NigelUno wrote:

To be clear, you were not concerned about yourself being downvoted?

And you don't care about downvotes?

To be clear, I was just trying to figure out what was happening, we were told that function had been turned off, but I could see people being downvoted, people other than me. I brought the issue to the board as advised by the Board Steward. I thought that was the right thing to do given my interpretation of the "spirit" or motivation behind the creation of tSwill. Maybe I was wrong.

by **NigelUno** 2014-05-09, 12:24

R.P. McMurphy wrote:

To be clear, I was just trying to figure out what was happening, we were told that function had been turned off, but I could see people being downvoted, people other than me. I brought the issue to the board as advised by the Board Steward. I thought that was the right thing to do given my interpretation of the "spirit" or motivation behind the creation of tSwill. Maybe I was wrong.

I'll number these in an attempt to get you to answer them:

1. Were you concerned that you were being downvoted?
2. Do you care about downvotes?

A simple yes or no for each will suffice.

by TrueGreenSpartan 2014-05-09, 12:24

R.P. McMurphy wrote:

To be clear, I was just trying to figure out what was happening, we were told that function had been turned off, but I could see people being downvoted, people other than me. I brought the issue to the board as advised by the Board Steward. I thought that was the right thing to do given my interpretation of the "spirit" or motivation behind the creation of tSwill. Maybe I was wrong.

That being the case, I'm not sure RPMcM did anything wrong. Got proof? Also, how'd you go from -8 or something to positive 4 in just this morning? scratch

by TrueGreenSpartan 2014-05-09, 12:25

NigelUno wrote:

I'll number these in an attempt to get you to answer them:

1. Were you concerned that you were being downvoted?
2. Do you care about downvotes?

A simple yes or no for each will suffice.

Nigel,

you just passed 1000 points Question re: Swill poster R.P. Murphy - Page 3 1550444538

by **NigelUno** 2014-05-09, 12:27

TrueGreenSpartan wrote:

Nigel,

you just passed 1000 points

I'm a scorer.

by Guest 2014-05-09, 12:35

NigelUno wrote:

I'll number these in an attempt to get you to answer them:

1. Were you concerned that you were being downvoted?
2. Do you care about downvotes?

A simple yes or no for each will suffice.

Sorry, Nigel. I know you're sec-general and all, but you don't dictate the terms of conversation.

I wasn't being downvoted when I brought the issue to SRC and Miser, nor when I brought it to the board. I guess I care about DVs to the degree that I thought someone was exploiting the system and I thought others might like to know.

by **WhiteBoyHatcher** 2014-05-09, 12:36

You guys are all so fucking weird. Question re: Swill poster R.P. Murphy - Page 3 1966794946

by Bizarro Fletch 2014-05-09, 12:36

by **MiamiSpartan** 2014-05-09, 12:38

R.P. McMurphy wrote:

To be clear, I was just trying to figure out what was happening, we were told that function had been turned off, but I could see people being downvoted, people other than me. I brought the issue to the board as advised by the Board Steward. I thought that was the right thing to do given my interpretation of the "spirit" or motivation behind the creation of tSwill. Maybe I was wrong.

There's no right or wrong. You can bring whatever you want to the board, and people can rip you for it. The fact that you're bothered by both what is the right or wrong thing to do here, and that you're butthurt over people giving you shit about it, just shows why you're failing here. No surprise, really, you always seemed to enjoy having over-active mods that you could go whining to.

by Guest 2014-05-09, 12:40

TrueGreenSpartan wrote:

That being the case, I'm not sure RPMcM did anything wrong. Got proof? Also, how'd you go from -8 or something to positive 4 in just this morning?

Thank you, TGS. The proof is in the screen shots that I posted.

As for the change in my "rep"? Dunno. Trust me, if I had schticks Miser would have booted me already. I guess I received a few "likes" or whatever.

by Guest 2014-05-09, 12:42

MiamiSpartan wrote:
There's no right or wrong. You can bring whatever you want to the board, and people can rip you for it. The fact that you're bothered by both what is the right or wrong thing to do here, and that you're butthurt over people giving you shit about it, just shows why you're failing here. No surprise, really, you always seemed to enjoy having over-active mods that you could go whining to.

Question re: Swill poster R.P. Murphy - Page 3 Article-2560646-1B8B060700000578-848_634x422

by **NigelUno** 2014-05-09, 12:42

R.P. McMurphy wrote:

Sorry, Nigel. I know you're sec-general and all, but you don't dictate the terms of conversation.

I wasn't being downvoted when I brought the issue to SRC and Miser, nor when I brought it to the board. I guess I care about DVs to the degree that I thought someone was exploiting the system and I thought others might like to know.

I'm not dictating the terms of conversation. I asked you some questions. You refuse to answer them. People can read into that what they want.

I appreciate that you are concerned with the well being of all posters who may (or may not) have been impacted by the (possible) exploitation of the voting system.

by CrazySparty 2014-05-09, 12:43

Someone will have to explain to me how this thread is any different than tRCMB

by Guest 2014-05-09, 12:45

NigelUno wrote:

I'm not dictating the terms of conversation. I asked you some questions. You refuse to answer them. People can read into that what they want.

I appreciate that you are concerned with the well being of all posters who may (or may not) have been impacted by the (possible) exploitation of the voting system.

So I still haven't answered the questions to your satisfaction? LOL

Objection your honor, sec-gen is obviously badgering the witness.

by Sparty11 2014-05-09, 12:45

Rashoman

by **NigelUno** 2014-05-09, 12:45

CrazySparty wrote:Someone will have to explain to me how this thread is any different than tRCMB

Other than RP would have been banned by now?

by TrueGreenSpartan 2014-05-09, 12:46

CrazySparty wrote:Someone will have to explain to me how this thread is any different than tRCMB

You think raising concerns about board performance (when apparently it was semi-purposeful) would be allowed on tRCMB? lol!

by **Heat Miser** 2014-05-09, 12:46

CrazySparty wrote:Someone will have to explain to me how this thread is any different than tRCMB

Like the entire board itself...no banning or censorship.

by CrazySparty 2014-05-09, 12:47

NigelUno wrote:

Other than RP would have been banned by now?

Nah, Tanfan would've been banned before RP.

I guess the thread also would've been locked by now, but the content of thread is still the same pissing and moaning about downvotes/upvotes that allegedly made tRCMB such a hell hole

by Guest 2014-05-09, 12:47

NigelUno wrote:

Other than RP would have been banned by now?

Maybe, or maybe the mods would show some appreciation to poster trying to help out. Hard to say.

by **NigelUno** 2014-05-09, 12:47

R.P. McMurphy wrote:

So I still haven't answered the questions to your satisfaction? LOL

Objection your honor, sec-gen is obviously badgering the witness.

You didn't answer the questions at all. I thought you might. I was wrong.

by Guest 2014-05-09, 12:50

NigelUno wrote:

You didn't answer the questions at all. I thought you might. I was wrong.

Of course I did, I just didn't use the "yes or no" format you dictated.

Objection sustained, sec-gen, please try to make a point. Or move on. Thank you.

by **NigelUno** 2014-05-09, 12:57

R.P. McMurphy wrote:

Of course I did, I just didn't use the "yes or no" format you dictated.

Objection sustained, sec-gen, please try to make a point. Or move on. Thank you.

You are the witness and the judge?

Interesting.

by TrueGreenSpartan 2014-05-09, 12:59

Yeah R.P., unless you are liking this torment, you'd be better off walking away. Nigel ALWAYS has to have the last word it's kinda part of his m.o. Question re: Swill poster R.P. Murphy - Page 3 2599972566

Question re: Swill poster R.P. Murphy - Page 3 2599972566

by Guest 2014-05-09, 13:00

NigelUno wrote:

You are the witness and the judge?

Interesting.

Actually, witness, judge and defense attorney. I raised the initial objection.

This board truly is magical.

by Bizarro Fletch 2014-05-09, 13:03

Nigel and Rash - two posters physically incapable of conceding the final word in internet debates with absolutely no point. Glad to see this awesome aspect of tRCMB hasn't changed!

by Guest 2014-05-09, 13:04

TrueGreenSpartan wrote:Yeah R.P., unless you are liking this torment, you'd be better off walking away. Nigel ALWAYS has to have the last word it's kinda part of his m.o.

Dude, I know I didn't do anything wrong. If these guys want to argue we can have at it.

Ironic. This thread was started with a claim that nobody responds to my posts.

by **Heat Miser** 2014-05-09, 13:05

Heat Miser wrote:
CrazySparty wrote:Someone will have to explain to me how this thread is any different than tRCMB

Like the entire board itself...no banning or censorship.

And the pages here don't take 5 seconds to load. Question re: Swill poster R.P. Murphy - Page 3 328670334

by TrueGreenSpartan 2014-05-09, 13:05

Bizarro Fletch wrote:Nigel and Rash - two posters physically incapable of conceding the final word in internet debates with absolutely no point. Glad to see this awesome aspect of tRCMB hasn't changed!

and......around.......we.......go............. Question re: Swill poster R.P. Murphy - Page 3 1550444538

Question re: Swill poster R.P. Murphy - Page 3 1494614055

by **NigelUno** 2014-05-09, 13:06

TrueGreenSpartan wrote:Yeah R.P., unless you are liking this torment, you'd be better off walking away. Nigel ALWAYS has to have the last word it's kinda part of his m.o.

He already walked away by not answering 2 very specific questions.

by **NigelUno** 2014-05-09, 13:07

Bizarro Fletch wrote:Nigel and Rash - two posters physically incapable of conceding the final word in internet debates with absolutely no point. Glad to see this awesome aspect of tRCMB hasn't changed!

Debate is pretty much over, when one of the combatants won't answer specific questions.

by TrueGreenSpartan 2014-05-09, 13:08

NigelUno wrote:

He already walked away by not answering 2 very specific questions.

could you both keep your responses to something simple like

No I didn't

and

Yes you did

So we can all keep up with this stimulated debate? Question re: Swill poster R.P. Murphy - Page 3 1837840279

Question re: Swill poster R.P. Murphy - Page 3 1837840279

by Guest 2014-05-09, 13:08

Bizarro Fletch wrote:Nigel and Rash - two posters physically incapable of conceding the final word in internet debates with absolutely no point. Glad to see this awesome aspect of tRCMB hasn't changed!

Reminds me of you and bullwrinkle on wells. Big egos?

by **NigelUno** 2014-05-09, 13:08

TrueGreenSpartan wrote:

could you both keep your responses to something simple like

No I didn't

and

Yes you did

So we can all keep up with this stimulated debate?

I tried 2 simple yes or no questions. Maybe you missed that?

by Guest 2014-05-09, 13:11

TrueGreenSpartan wrote:Yeah R.P., unless you are liking this torment, you'd be better off walking away. Nigel ALWAYS has to have the last word it's kinda part of his m.o.

Dang, I guess I should have listened to you.

by **MiamiSpartan** 2014-05-09, 13:11

R.P. McMurphy wrote:

A lovely young lady. You going to pretend to put me on ignore over here, too, you traitor?

by Guest 2014-05-09, 13:13

MiamiSpartan wrote:
A lovely young lady. You going to pretend to put me on ignore over here, too, you traitor?

You maaaad.

Question re: Swill poster R.P. Murphy - Page 3 Online-sportsbooks-favor-brazil-world-cup-trophy-in-2014-thumb

by TrueGreenSpartan 2014-05-09, 13:14

NigelUno wrote:

I tried 2 simple yes or no questions. Maybe you missed that?

I have no bone in this chest thumping fight but just because a person doesn't answer in the fashion requested or give the answer desired does not, in fact, mean the question wasn't answered.

by Sponsored content