Cheap labor v. free trade: why do automakers really do business in Mexico?
5 posters
Page 1 of 1
Cheap labor v. free trade: why do automakers really do business in Mexico?
We all know the argument: labor is cheap in Mexico, American companies relocate to take advantage of the cheap labor, American workers suffer. What if that argument was flawed? What if it is not cheap labor but instead Mexico's free trade agreements with other countries? According to this Bloomberg article:
While labor is cheaper in Mexico, the article claims shipping from Mexico is so difficult - underdeveloped infrastructure to get the cars from the plant to transport - it negates much of the advantage provided by labor costs. Overall, the article claims companies save $4300 per vehicle made in Mexico. The biggest savings come in the form of tariff free trade with foreign countries.
Unless we can match those trade deals, what incentive do automakers have to relocate to the U.S.? As noted in the other thread, it's possible the more technical jobs will remain in the U.S. because of the more skilled labor force. The article says as much, but overall makes a very interesting point: what makes Mexico more attractive is not labor costs but instead its free trade agreements.
Cheaper labor is only one reason Mexico has seen a surge in new-car production. While the country’s low wages have been the big attraction, one of its key advantages is that it has trade agreements with 44 countries, giving automakers access to half the global car market tariff-free. The U.S. has similar trade deals with just 20 countries, which make up 9 percent of global car sales, according to the Center for Automotive Research in Ann Arbor, Michigan.
While labor is cheaper in Mexico, the article claims shipping from Mexico is so difficult - underdeveloped infrastructure to get the cars from the plant to transport - it negates much of the advantage provided by labor costs. Overall, the article claims companies save $4300 per vehicle made in Mexico. The biggest savings come in the form of tariff free trade with foreign countries.
Unless we can match those trade deals, what incentive do automakers have to relocate to the U.S.? As noted in the other thread, it's possible the more technical jobs will remain in the U.S. because of the more skilled labor force. The article says as much, but overall makes a very interesting point: what makes Mexico more attractive is not labor costs but instead its free trade agreements.
Make no mistake, the majority of Mexico’s auto exports are still sent tariff-free to the U.S. and Canada under Nafta. Mexico sends 2 million cars a year to the U.S., more than half its total production. But those shipments are making up less of Mexico’s total exports. By 2018, 28 percent of Mexico’s production will be exported to countries besides the U.S. and Canada, up from about 18 percent in 2015.
Less than 10 percent of U.S. production is sent offshore because American plants tend to make more expensive vehicles that car buyers in emerging markets can’t afford, and because Mexico’s trade deals have increasingly made the country a center for export.
Last edited by Turtleneck on Thu Jan 05, 2017 11:16 am; edited 1 time in total
Turtleneck- Geronte
- Posts : 42807
Join date : 2014-04-22
Re: Cheap labor v. free trade: why do automakers really do business in Mexico?
Add in the crony capitalism that the current administration is embracing. With Trumps threats to any company that is considering relocating out of the country it can discourage a company from locating back in the US.
steveschneider- Spartiate
- Posts : 34268
Join date : 2014-05-02
Re: Cheap labor v. free trade: why do automakers really do business in Mexico?
Really solid post Turtleneck. Many people oversimplify globalization trends as corporate exploitation of cheap labor markets in developing countries, it certainly makes for a good story, fits the anti-corporation narrative and in some cases it is true.
However there are other factors at play as your post shows, there are distinct business advantages in terms of trade agreements, access to more global markets, tax advantages etc that drive globalization efforts as well. Labor is just one piece of the puzzle, and in this case not even the largest piece.
However there are other factors at play as your post shows, there are distinct business advantages in terms of trade agreements, access to more global markets, tax advantages etc that drive globalization efforts as well. Labor is just one piece of the puzzle, and in this case not even the largest piece.
AnomanderRake- Spartiate
- Posts : 1085
Join date : 2015-07-21
Re: Cheap labor v. free trade: why do automakers really do business in Mexico?
Part of the $4300 savings in Mexico's national healthcare system.
GRR Spartan- Geronte
- Posts : 11148
Join date : 2014-04-25
Re: Cheap labor v. free trade: why do automakers really do business in Mexico?
Ooops...
http://foreignpolicy.com/2017/11/14/the-new-tpp-may-sink-trumps-other-trade-dreams-nafta-asia-mexico-canada/?utm_source=Sailthru&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=New%20Campaign&utm_term=%2AEditors%20Picks
In particular, Canada and Mexico now have a new way to push back against U.S. demands that more auto components be built in the United States. Under current NAFTA rules, 62.5 percent of vehicle parts for cars sold under the pact have to come from one of the three countries in the trade pact. The Trump administration, which blames NAFTA for U.S. job losses, wants to rewrite the deal so that fully half of all automotive components come from the United States alone, to the disadvantage of Canada and Mexico. (Even the U.S. auto industry opposes Trump’s plan because it would upend existing supply chains.)
The revived TPP includes less restrictive — not more restrictive — rules on where automotive components can be made. Since both Canada and Mexico are in that pact, they’d be hard-pressed to adopt different rules just to deal with the United States.
“The Trump administration has badly miscalculated the leverage it has in terms of rules of origin,” said Phil Levy“The Trump administration has badly miscalculated the leverage it has in terms of rules of origin,” said Phil Levy, a senior fellow at the Chicago Council on Global Affairs.
Joining the revived TPP means Mexico, heavily dependent on trade with the United States, now has other options, said Antonio Ortiz-Mena, the former head of economic affairs at the Mexican Embassy in Washington and now a senior vice president at Albright Stonebridge Group.
http://foreignpolicy.com/2017/11/14/the-new-tpp-may-sink-trumps-other-trade-dreams-nafta-asia-mexico-canada/?utm_source=Sailthru&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=New%20Campaign&utm_term=%2AEditors%20Picks
Turtleneck- Geronte
- Posts : 42807
Join date : 2014-04-22
Re: Cheap labor v. free trade: why do automakers really do business in Mexico?
Details Details
He’s the freakin deal making President.
He’s the freakin deal making President.
GRR Spartan- Geronte
- Posts : 11148
Join date : 2014-04-25
Re: Cheap labor v. free trade: why do automakers really do business in Mexico?
Turtleneck wrote:We all know the argument: labor is cheap in Mexico, American companies relocate to take advantage of the cheap labor, American workers suffer. What if that argument was flawed? What if it is not cheap labor but instead Mexico's free trade agreements with other countries? According to this Bloomberg article:Cheaper labor is only one reason Mexico has seen a surge in new-car production. While the country’s low wages have been the big attraction, one of its key advantages is that it has trade agreements with 44 countries, giving automakers access to half the global car market tariff-free. The U.S. has similar trade deals with just 20 countries, which make up 9 percent of global car sales, according to the Center for Automotive Research in Ann Arbor, Michigan.
While labor is cheaper in Mexico, the article claims shipping from Mexico is so difficult - underdeveloped infrastructure to get the cars from the plant to transport - it negates much of the advantage provided by labor costs. Overall, the article claims companies save $4300 per vehicle made in Mexico. The biggest savings come in the form of tariff free trade with foreign countries.
Unless we can match those trade deals, what incentive do automakers have to relocate to the U.S.? As noted in the other thread, it's possible the more technical jobs will remain in the U.S. because of the more skilled labor force. The article says as much, but overall makes a very interesting point: what makes Mexico more attractive is not labor costs but instead its free trade agreements.Make no mistake, the majority of Mexico’s auto exports are still sent tariff-free to the U.S. and Canada under Nafta. Mexico sends 2 million cars a year to the U.S., more than half its total production. But those shipments are making up less of Mexico’s total exports. By 2018, 28 percent of Mexico’s production will be exported to countries besides the U.S. and Canada, up from about 18 percent in 2015.
Less than 10 percent of U.S. production is sent offshore because American plants tend to make more expensive vehicles that car buyers in emerging markets can’t afford, and because Mexico’s trade deals have increasingly made the country a center for export.
Back in the day, about 2012 or so, all the products from my little part of the automotive supply chain were made in a plant in the US, where they had been made for 35 years and where I knew many people in the management chain. Our customers, Ford in particular, were always pushing our top management to move the plant to Mexico, however, every analysis of costs for running a plant in Mexico verses US showed the US plant was way more cost effective. It happened anyway, eventual. Quality went to hell, costs went thru the roof. However, the company poured money into it while the customers abandoned us in droves. There was a tax advantage which supposedly made up for all of the loss of business. The point of this is this is a power struggle between the conservatives and the liberals.
TrapperGus- Spartiate
- Posts : 717
Join date : 2021-08-23
Location : 40 Mile Point Lighthouse
Similar topics
» McDonalds busted for violating child labor laws. Two 10 year olds were working for free in Kentucky.
» Mexico scores. Mexico wins. 2-1.
» How costly is our cheap gas in the US?
» Andrew Puzder withdraws as a labor secretary nominee
» Labor Day Weekend '22 non-MSU CFB Game Thread...
» Mexico scores. Mexico wins. 2-1.
» How costly is our cheap gas in the US?
» Andrew Puzder withdraws as a labor secretary nominee
» Labor Day Weekend '22 non-MSU CFB Game Thread...
Page 1 of 1
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum