Fucking Millennials - Another disappointment

Cameron wrote:

steveschneider wrote:

I like it because it's less filling.

Exactly what a woman would say.

steveschneider wrote:

Cameron wrote:

Exactly what a woman would say.

Heh, spoken like an amateur. You obviously have never been a serious session drinker. We all love the microbrews, but the real drinkers that are putting in the hours need a beer that is less filling.

steveschneider wrote:I love All Day IPA, but it is 50 more calories than light beer. I definitely prefer the All Day IPA but if you are in a serious drinking session a light beer is also a viable option.

Nordic wrote:I used to be a light beer and count the calories in beer guy. No longer. If I have to worry about how many calories a beer has, I probably shouldn't be drinking beer.  Fuck sessions and light beers. Including All Day IPA. It's not an IPA in my book. If I'm going to drink an IPA, I'm going to drink a gull bodied hoppy as fuck IPA (Dripa, Two Hearted, etc.). I'm not going to compromise taste for calories.

If I'm feeling a little chunky or haven't hit the gym, I just won't drink beer.

DWags wrote:Have we talked about these guys in here yet?   Scroll down to get an explanation

Jesus we categorize categories now.  
Xennials.  

Travis of the Cosmos wrote:

DWags wrote:Have we talked about these guys in here yet?   Scroll down to get an explanation

Jesus we categorize categories now.  
Xennials.  

That would be me dwags. And the people you classified at a party you were at as not millennials (but actually probably are.) We’ve kinda talked about this before though, as there is some bleeding effect when you try to categorize generations. What’s really the difference between a boomer born in 1963 and a gen xer born in 1964? (None really. They’re both worthless fucking asshole boomers.)

DWags wrote:

Travis of the Cosmos wrote:
That would be me dwags. And the people you classified at a party you were at as not millennials (but actually probably are.) We’ve kinda talked about this before though, as there is some bleeding effect when you try to categorize generations. What’s really the difference between a boomer born in 1963 and a gen xer born in 1964? (None really. They’re both worthless fucking asshole boomers.)

But I’m a 61 boomer so I’m cool.

DWags wrote:Fucking brilliant

Travis of the Cosmos wrote:That article is pretty disingenuous dwags. If you include the probablys in with the definitelys (like it does when it talks about the percentages that won’t vote) then you’re looking at 57%. 57% would not only greatly exceed traditional young people voting rates, which is around 20%, it would exceed the historical turnout rate for midterms for the entire country (40%) and approach the turnout rate for the entire country for presidential elections (60%)

The whole article is “record turnout, not so fast” without actually talking about historical turnout. Why? Because even just the “definitelys” would in fact be record turnout for a midterm, and significantly at that. I mean, look at these rates below then re read that article. Based on the numbers provided, is there a situation where you can imagine that young people turnout would be anything other then a record for a midterm,  and probably a record for even presidential years for young people?

That was a very bad take bro.

DWags wrote:

Travis of the Cosmos wrote:That article is pretty disingenuous dwags. If you include the probablys in with the definitelys (like it does when it talks about the percentages that won’t vote) then you’re looking at 57%. 57% would not only greatly exceed traditional young people voting rates, which is around 20%, it would exceed the historical turnout rate for midterms for the entire country (40%) and approach the turnout rate for the entire country for presidential elections (60%)

The whole article is “record turnout, not so fast” without actually talking about historical turnout. Why? Because even just the “definitelys” would in fact be record turnout for a midterm, and significantly at that. I mean, look at these rates below then re read that article. Based on the numbers provided, is there a situation where you can imagine that young people turnout would be anything other then a record for a midterm,  and probably a record for even presidential years for young people?

That was a very bad take bro.

I certainly hope you're right.   I'm sure there are a shit ton of people who won't vote from every age group, but will bitch about the results.   I have a feeling though, that these midterms will have record number of voters turning out.  From both sides and all ages.   Maybe, in the end, it's the best thing that Trump has ever done for us as a nation.  

Jake from State Farm wrote:Eligible milliennials managed to get 30% of their ilk to show up this past election day.

Rocinante wrote:You need to ban your child from ever seeing that kid again. Be a man.

Rocinante wrote:You need to ban your child from ever seeing that kid again. Be a man.

AvgMSUJoe wrote:

Rocinante wrote:You need to ban your child from ever seeing that kid again. Be a man.

This must be a failure of secondary public schools, right? Shouldn't they teach this basic shit to the kids?

Damn, we may not have the vomit inducing politics that we have today if these little idiots where taught what a fucking republican ACTUALLY is....

AvgMSUJoe wrote:

Rocinante wrote:You need to ban your child from ever seeing that kid again. Be a man.

This must be a failure of secondary public schools, right? Shouldn't they teach this basic shit to the kids?

Damn, we may not have the vomit inducing politics that we have today if these little idiots where taught what a fucking republican ACTUALLY is....

LooseGoose wrote:Probably a Millennial.

Someone at Hasbro apparently thought Monopoly for Millennials was a great idea

"Forget Real Estate.   You can't afford it anyway."

TheReal_LWS wrote:Someone should warn OTPT's parents:

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-6410835/More-millennials-moving-home-making-depressed-studies-find.html

Watch Out Pylon! wrote:One could easily replace boomers with conservatives in that article if one were so inclined.

LooseGoose wrote:

Watch Out Pylon! wrote:One could easily replace boomers with conservatives in that article if one were so inclined.

Or if one were an airhead.