Foxconn at it again! 11 hour shifts for high schoolers to build iPhone X

Turtleneck wrote:Sounds like young people with a strong work ethic to me.

Floyd Robertson wrote:WTF is this shit?

Company will pull 7M gallons of water daily from Lake Michigan

Is that a lot?

Senior Dickfist wrote:

Floyd Robertson wrote:WTF is this shit?

Company will pull 7M gallons of water daily from Lake Michigan

Is that a lot?

Sure seems like a lot, even if they're returning water to the lake. I don't like the part in the story that this company has a poor environmental record, especially since Lake Michigan has a very fragile ecosystem right now due to invasive species. I hope they get rejected.

LooseGoose wrote:I want to go on record as "fuck anyone coming after our water".

For decades the hot dry states have made fun of the rust belt. I've always felt that our water was going to be king in the end and not the sob's are coming after that.

Floyd Robertson wrote:WTF is this shit?

Company will pull 7M gallons of water daily from Lake Michigan

Is that a lot?

NigelUno wrote:

Floyd Robertson wrote:WTF is this shit?

Company will pull 7M gallons of water daily from Lake Michigan

Is that a lot?

Compared to how much water that's already taken out...no.

Rocinante wrote:

NigelUno wrote:

Compared to how much water that's already taken out...no.

Really Nigel? Inform us. What are the uses that water is extracted from the Great Lakes for prior to this approval?

NigelUno wrote:

Rocinante wrote:

Really Nigel? Inform us. What are the uses that water is extracted from the Great Lakes for prior to this approval?

Floyd linked an article. Read it maybe?

Other Teams Pursuing That wrote:Ban Nigel!

LooseGoose wrote:I want to go on record as "fuck anyone coming after our water".

NigelUno wrote:

Other Teams Pursuing That wrote:Ban Nigel!

Ban links with information!

Other Teams Pursuing That wrote:

NigelUno wrote:

Ban links with information!

Dick move to refer to the article, man.

Rocinante wrote:

Other Teams Pursuing That wrote:

Dick move to refer to the article, man.

Which doesn’t have any information related to his claims in it.

NigelUno wrote:

Rocinante wrote:

Which doesn’t have any information related to his claims in it.

...unless you click on page 2 and read it.

Rocinante wrote:

NigelUno wrote:

...unless you click on page 2 and read it.

You really do suck. i read the whole fucking article and your stupid assertion that "compared to the amount already taken out, no" is not justified anywhere in it.

How about back up your statement instead of acting like the information should be obvious to anyone with your superior deductive skills? Oh I know. Because you're a shitheel.

The agency downplayed the impact of the withdrawal, saying it would amount to only a 0.07 percent increase in total surface water withdrawal from Lake Michigan.

Other Teams Pursuing That wrote:

Rocinante wrote:See, the GLC is about withdrawls from the Great Lakes for public uses.  The DNR can say "Oh, it's 0.07% increase" without saying what the other extractions are about.  And you just swallow it and act like you have all the information.  And OTPT is Nigel's cheerleader now.  How great for you.

Rocinante wrote:exactly.

LooseGoose wrote:I want to go on record as "fuck anyone coming after our water".

For decades the hot dry states have made fun of the rust belt. I've always felt that our water was going to be king in the end and not the sob's are coming after that.