Chlamydia Outbreak Hits Texas High School With No Sex Ed

Rocinante wrote:I've heard people say that the two things aren't related.  As if knowledge of how to protect yourself from STDs is divinely inspired.  THE REASON ITS COMMON KNOWLEDGE IS WE WERE ALL TAUGHT IT!!!

LooseGoose wrote:

Heat Miser wrote:

Chlamydia Outbreak Hits Texas High School With No Sex Ed

So sex ed provides immunity from STDs?   The things you learn on the interwebs.

Giant Moose wrote:

Travis of the Cosmos wrote:

That parent isn't going to have his head in the sand. His is going to have the immoral school districts balls in a sling about the fact that their precious is "being encouraged by the school go be a promiscuous sinner." So, the free condoms go away. We would be left with nothing.

As long as they keep the sex ed class taught by an underqualified gym teacher then it will all work out OK.

LooseGoose wrote:It's too bad we don't have theft ed and murder ed classes, we could stop those scourges too.

Watch Out Pylon! wrote:

Giant Moose wrote:
As long as they keep the sex ed class taught by an underqualified gym teacher then it will all work out OK.

Our sex ed was taught by local health care officials. You seem to be very anti-education. Why?

Watch Out Pylon! wrote:

Giant Moose wrote:
As long as they keep the sex ed class taught by an underqualified gym teacher then it will all work out OK.

Our sex ed was taught by local health care officials. You seem to be very anti-education. Why?

Travis of the Cosmos wrote:

Watch Out Pylon! wrote:

Our sex ed was taught by local health care officials. You seem to be very anti-education. Why?

Byrd had sex ed (Probably.) And then he kissed a court that could have had so much herpes on it from people kissing it the year before. See how much good it did him?!?!?

CORNER BLITZ wrote:All I remember from sex ed was that it was a Disney produced movie and kids laughing when they said penis out loud

Giant Moose wrote:

Watch Out Pylon! wrote:

Our sex ed was taught by local health care officials. You seem to be very anti-education. Why?

Not against it. Just don't think it is necessary for everyone.

Giant Moose wrote:

Travis of the Cosmos wrote:

Yeah. That whole thing is real weird.

I agree. It was very weird how MSU handled Byrd.

CORNER BLITZ wrote:All I remember from sex ed was that it was a Disney produced movie and kids laughing when they said penis out loud

Giant Moose wrote:

Watch Out Pylon! wrote:

Giant Moose wrote:
As long as they keep the sex ed class taught by an underqualified gym teacher then it will all work out OK.

Our sex ed was taught by local health care officials. You seem to be very anti-education. Why?

Not against it. Just don't think it is necessary for everyone.

Heat Miser wrote:

Giant Moose wrote:
Not against it. Just don't think it is necessary for everyone.

You could let parents opt their kids out. I really don't get the big deal.

OMG!!! Some kids were subjected to a couple hours of sex ed!
"Little Jimmy saw an illustration of an erect penis! The Devil's in him now!"

Watch Out Pylon! wrote:

Giant Moose wrote:
Not against it. Just don't think it is necessary for everyone.

How do you judge who doesn't need it? Is there a test you can administer that would show a proclivity towards raw dogging?

Giant Moose wrote:

Heat Miser wrote:

You could let parents opt their kids out. I really don't get the big deal.

OMG!!! Some kids were subjected to a couple hours of sex ed!
"Little Jimmy saw an illustration of an erect penis! The Devil's in him now!"

It's not a religious thing for me but rather more about a kid using that classtime to learn something else that would be more useful for them instead.

Giant Moose wrote:

Watch Out Pylon! wrote:

How do you judge who doesn't need it? Is there a test you can administer that would show a proclivity towards raw dogging?

Is there a test to determine who needs to take French class? I would treat it just like any other elective. If you think you need it or want to learn it, then it's there for you to take it.

Giant Moose wrote:

Watch Out Pylon! wrote:

How do you judge who doesn't need it? Is there a test you can administer that would show a proclivity towards raw dogging?

Is there a test to determine who needs to take French class? I would treat it just like any other elective. If you think you need it or want to learn it, then it's there for you to take it.

Travis of the Cosmos wrote:

Giant Moose wrote:
Is there a test to determine who needs to take French class? I would treat it just like any other elective. If you think you need it or want to learn it, then it's there for you to take it.

No one needs French class. Period. No one.

Rocinante wrote:

Giant Moose wrote:
Is there a test to determine who needs to take French class? I would treat it just like any other elective. If you think you need it or want to learn it, then it's there for you to take it.

You realize it's not a whole semester, right?  It's like a week.

InTenSity wrote:

Giant Moose wrote:
Some people do think they need it or want to take French to expand their horizons. I don't think forcing sex ed class on people who don't think it's useful is the way to go.

Those are probably the people who need it the most. Unless they post on tRCMB, then there is no need for sex ed.

Heat Miser wrote:

LooseGoose wrote:It's too bad we don't have theft ed and murder ed classes, we could stop those scourges too.

Or driver's ed...oh wait...

LooseGoose wrote:

Heat Miser wrote:

LooseGoose wrote:It's too bad we don't have theft ed and murder ed classes, we could stop those scourges too.

Or driver's ed...oh wait...

And since we started requiring Driver's Ed auto accidents have been eliminated.....oh...wait.

Heat Miser wrote:

LooseGoose wrote:

And since we started requiring Driver's Ed auto accidents have been eliminated.....oh...wait.

So then we should eliminate driver's ed? How about driver's licenses?