Terry and goal

Seriously WTF??? Dumbass decision along with that lame oliNE shift almost cost us the game. Stop being cute

There's a time and place to get Terry involved. Anytime in that game was not it.

Did OLine shift in first half but no comment by announcers. Seemed to work except for time after they noted it.

I like bringing in Terry but play call seemed predictable. But I was watching on TV so any play that doesn't work seems predictable.

Watch Out Pylon! wrote:There's a time and place to get Terry involved. Anytime in that game was not it.

Maybe at WR if Burbridge, Kings or Arnett is injured, but not anywhere near the backfield, that's for sure.

I forgot about that play. Was it just a snap to Terry and he ran it for -2 or 0 gain?

Yeah, I didn't care for those O-line shift plays, not sure what that was intended to accomplish. Maybe it was intended to make Oregon expose something they were trying to hide on D, I don't know. Whatever it was, it didn't work.

The Damion Terry play was also a head scratcher. It seems like putting him in signals a QB run play. Not sure if that's what was intended. Maybe coach D felt like Terry was more of a run/pass threat than Cook. I don't know, but it seemed like it was doomed from the start.

I think little giants and mouse trap were great because they were unexpected. However, or last several trick plays haven't worked at all because everyone was pretty much expecting them. I think the rest of the world is on to us now and it'll be much more difficult to make the trick plays work.

Technically...it wasn't an "and goal" play. It was 3rd and 4 from the 7.

NigelUno wrote:Technically...it wasn't an "and goal" play. It was 3rd and 4 from the 7.

I don't speak blanch but he did say Terry and Goal. Terry might mean something behind the 10 yard line.

steveschneider wrote:

NigelUno wrote:Technically...it wasn't an "and goal" play.  It was 3rd and 4 from the 7.

I don't speak blanch but he did say Terry and Goal. Terry might mean something behind the 10 yard line.

Hell, he might be talking about some dude he hooked up with.  I'm leaning that way.  There's no way after winning that game, and being 5-1 against top ten teams, that anybody would be stupid enough to pick on one or two plays and be critical.

Agree, bad time to being in Terry, and the play call was predictable.

I know MD likes to do this on occasion. I guess I like to disagree with him on those occasions.

NigelUno wrote:Technically...it wasn't an "and goal" play. It was 3rd and 4 from the 7.

Seriously besides you, who cares???

kingstonlake wrote:

steveschneider wrote:

I don't speak blanch but he did say Terry and Goal. Terry might mean something behind the 10 yard line.

Hell, he might be talking about some dude he hooked up with.  I'm leaning that way.  There's no way after winning that game, and being 5-1 against top ten teams, that anybody would be stupid enough to pick on one or two plays and be critical.

Giving Oregon the ball at the 50 with 2 mins left is luck....nothing more. Hell their qb missed a wide open TD on that drive!!! We surviveD nothing more at the end

Blanch32 wrote:

kingstonlake wrote:

Hell, he might be talking about some dude he hooked up with.  I'm leaning that way.  There's no way after winning that game, and being 5-1 against top ten teams, that anybody would be stupid enough to pick on one or two plays and be critical.

Giving Oregon the ball at the 50 with 2 mins left is luck....nothing more. Hell their qb missed a wide open TD on that drive!!! We surviveD nothing more at the end

For sure! We should score on every possession!

Blanch32 wrote:

NigelUno wrote:Technically...it wasn't an "and goal" play. It was 3rd and 4 from the 7.

Seriously besides you, who cares???

If it was an "and goal" play, it would have been a worse play call in my opinion. Sorry, if that doesn't match up with whatever misspelled inane comment you were trying to make.

Blanch32 wrote:

kingstonlake wrote:

Hell, he might be talking about some dude he hooked up with.  I'm leaning that way.  There's no way after winning that game, and being 5-1 against top ten teams, that anybody would be stupid enough to pick on one or two plays and be critical.

Giving Oregon the ball at the 50 with 2 mins left is luck....nothing more. Hell their qb missed a wide open TD on that drive!!! We surviveD nothing more at the end

Yep. Just dumb luck our D came up big on 3rd and 4th down.

NigelUno wrote:

Blanch32 wrote:

Seriously besides you, who cares???

If it was an "and goal" play, it would have been a worse play call in my opinion. Sorry, if that doesn't match up with whatever misspelled inane comment you were trying to make.

The 7 yard line isn't "and goal?" Yes ok dude. That's your problem you see tree I see forest

NigelUno wrote:

Blanch32 wrote:

Giving Oregon the ball at the 50 with 2 mins left is luck....nothing more. Hell their qb missed a wide open TD on that drive!!! We surviveD nothing more at the end

Yep. Just dumb luck our D came up big on 3rd and 4th down.

If Oregon qb had any accuracy on the deep ball, newsflash: that play don't happen

Blanch32 wrote:

NigelUno wrote:

Yep. Just dumb luck our D came up big on 3rd and 4th down.

If Oregon qb had any accuracy on the deep ball, newsflash: that play don't happen

If you had balls you'd be a guy.

Blanch32 wrote:

NigelUno wrote:

If it was an "and goal" play, it would have been a worse play call in my opinion. Sorry, if that doesn't match up with whatever misspelled inane comment you were trying to make.

The 7 yard line isn't "and goal?" Yes ok dude. That's your problem you see tree I see forest

I'm shocked you don't know what you're talking about.

Really. I am. No lie.

Blanch32 wrote:

NigelUno wrote:

Yep. Just dumb luck our D came up big on 3rd and 4th down.

If Oregon qb had any accuracy on the deep ball, newsflash: that play don't happen

For sure. Probably should have just stopped the game right there, since we knew we would win at that point.