$1.69 a gallon

That's right suckers. 14 mile between Hayes and Van Dyke.

Thanks Obama.

if only I had a car..  

of course, the America-hatin' libruls are gonna ban them soon enough, anyway...

Robert J Sakimano wrote:if only I had a car..  

of course, the America-hatin' libruls are gonna ban them soon enough, anyway...

Doesn't someone want to ban sugar? Or attack it like they did cigarettes?

Robert J Sakimano wrote:if only I had a car..  

of course, the America-hatin' libruls are gonna ban them soon enough, anyway...

Dumb ass, gas prices are a buck sixty nine....BUY A TRUCK!

Merica.

Robert J Sakimano wrote:if only I had a car..  

of course, the America-hatin' libruls are gonna ban them soon enough, anyway...

Imma gunna go get me one of them gas-swillin V8 Expeburbans!

InTenSity wrote:

Robert J Sakimano wrote:if only I had a car..  

of course, the America-hatin' libruls are gonna ban them soon enough, anyway...

Doesn't someone want to ban sugar? Or attack it like they did cigarettes?

probably.. don't let anyone lie to ya - we're all equally interested in limiting freedoms. Just depends on our political/social/religious/economic agenda..

Robert J Sakimano wrote:

InTenSity wrote:
Doesn't someone want to ban sugar? Or attack it like they did cigarettes?

probably.. don't let anyone lie to ya - we're all equally interested in limiting freedoms. Just depends on our political/social/religious/economic agenda..

You're free to believe that.

DWags wrote:

Robert J Sakimano wrote:
probably.. don't let anyone lie to ya - we're all equally interested in limiting freedoms. Just depends on our political/social/religious/economic agenda..

You're free to believe that.

you just invaded my safe space. I demand an apology.

The_Dude wrote:

It's the fucking liberals, man. Gas would be under $1/gal if it weren't for them.

DWags wrote:That's right suckers. 14 mile between Hayes and Van Dyke.

Thanks Obama.

I'd forgotten the leadership he showed regarding that shale oil in North Dakota and Canada, thanks for the reminder!

The president has about as much to do with oil prices as weibs does with msu football recruiting.

At first I just wanted to make a weibs joke. Then I realized that this is actually a pretty accurate comparison.

Travis of the Cosmos wrote:The president has about as much to do with oil prices as weibs does with msu football recruiting.

At first I just wanted to make a weibs joke. Then I realized that this is actually a pretty accurate comparison.

Well, which ever magic genie is making it happen, thanks!!

DWags wrote:

Travis of the Cosmos wrote:The president has about as much to do with oil prices as weibs does with msu football recruiting.

At first I just wanted to make a weibs joke. Then I realized that this is actually a pretty accurate comparison.

Well, which ever magic genie is making it happen, thanks!!

I'm totally kidding. It's Obama. Fuck yeah. Liberals!

Travis of the Cosmos wrote:

DWags wrote:

Well, which ever magic genie is making it happen, thanks!!

I'm totally kidding. It's Obama. Fuck yeah. Liberals!

That fucker better start making beer and meat prices come down too.

Travis of the Cosmos wrote:The president has about as much to do with oil prices as weibs does with msu football recruiting.

At first I just wanted to make a weibs joke. Then I realized that this is actually a pretty accurate comparison.

Everyone knows the Bush is still controlling the price of gas.

This is not exactly a win-win. As a consumer living in the now, we think it is a win-win. Step outside the consumer mindset and think long-term, and maybe it is not a good thing. First, when oil was selling at higher prices, the energy sector was a reliable source of capital investment. At a time of economic uncertainty, other sectors were less reliable. That economic uncertainty remains,  but low oil prices also mean the energy sector becomes less reliable in terms of capital investment. Second, given the current political climate in the Middle East, this might not be good. The obvious point is that oil dependent Middle Eastern and Gulf states will have few resources to fight ISIS and other radical groups. However, it also opens the door for increased instability. As oil revenues dry up, authoritarian states will have to play nice with domestic populations, which creates the space for more political protest. No guarantee that goes well.  Lastly, this is not good for state revenues here in the US, especially oil producing states.

Turtleneck wrote:This is not exactly a win-win. As a consumer living in the now, we think it is a win-win. Step outside the consumer mindset and think long-term, and maybe it is not a good thing. First, when oil was selling at higher prices, the energy sector was a reliable source of capital investment. At a time of economic uncertainty, other sectors were less reliable. That economic uncertainty remains,  but low oil prices also mean the energy sector becomes less reliable in terms of capital investment. Second, given the current political climate in the Middle East, this might not be good. The obvious point is that oil dependent Middle Eastern and Gulf states will have few resources to fight ISIS and other radical groups. However, it also opens the door for increased instability. As oil revenues dry up, authoritarian states will have to play nice with domestic populations, which creates the space for more political protest. No guarantee that goes well.  Lastly, this is not good for state revenues here in the US, especially oil producing states.

Quit stealing my material.

Turtleneck wrote:This is not exactly a win-win. As a consumer living in the now, we think it is a win-win. Step outside the consumer mindset and think long-term, and maybe it is not a good thing. First, when oil was selling at higher prices, the energy sector was a reliable source of capital investment. At a time of economic uncertainty, other sectors were less reliable. That economic uncertainty remains,  but low oil prices also mean the energy sector becomes less reliable in terms of capital investment. Second, given the current political climate in the Middle East, this might not be good. The obvious point is that oil dependent Middle Eastern and Gulf states will have few resources to fight ISIS and other radical groups. However, it also opens the door for increased instability. As oil revenues dry up, authoritarian states will have to play nice with domestic populations, which creates the space for more political protest. No guarantee that goes well.  Lastly, this is not good for state revenues here in the US, especially oil producing states.

I filled my 25 gallon Silverado up for 40 bucks.

Merica.

I can finally get my $5 worth and actually drive farther than the next gas station.

How much is a gallon of milk?

Cider is $5.99.

Da Fuq?  I'm pretty sure I just paid $12/gallon (I get the friends and family plan) for beer at the Peanut Barrel.  This shit will not stand.  That muslim product of miscegenation in the White House needs to answer for this.

Turtleneck wrote:This is not exactly a win-win. As a consumer living in the now, we think it is a win-win. Step outside the consumer mindset and think long-term, and maybe it is not a good thing. First, when oil was selling at higher prices, the energy sector was a reliable source of capital investment. At a time of economic uncertainty, other sectors were less reliable. That economic uncertainty remains,  but low oil prices also mean the energy sector becomes less reliable in terms of capital investment. Second, given the current political climate in the Middle East, this might not be good. The obvious point is that oil dependent Middle Eastern and Gulf states will have few resources to fight ISIS and other radical groups. However, it also opens the door for increased instability. As oil revenues dry up, authoritarian states will have to play nice with domestic populations, which creates the space for more political protest. No guarantee that goes well.  Lastly, this is not good for state revenues here in the US, especially oil producing states.

Venezuela is pretty much f'ed at this point. The need oil at upwards of $80/barrel in order to keep a halfway functioning government.

DWags wrote:That's right suckers. 14 mile between Hayes and Van Dyke.

Thanks Obama.

I started this thread, just last week

https://spartanswill.forumotion.com/t8783-gasoline-price-psa

Travis of the Cosmos wrote:The president has about as much to do with oil prices as weibs does with msu football recruiting.

At first I just wanted to make a weibs joke. Then I realized that this is actually a pretty accurate comparison.

See my signature - games are won 1/3 on the Swill

Turtleneck wrote:This is not exactly a win-win. As a consumer living in the now, we think it is a win-win. Step outside the consumer mindset and think long-term, and maybe it is not a good thing. First, when oil was selling at higher prices, the energy sector was a reliable source of capital investment. At a time of economic uncertainty, other sectors were less reliable. That economic uncertainty remains,  but low oil prices also mean the energy sector becomes less reliable in terms of capital investment. Second, given the current political climate in the Middle East, this might not be good. The obvious point is that oil dependent Middle Eastern and Gulf states will have few resources to fight ISIS and other radical groups. However, it also opens the door for increased instability. As oil revenues dry up, authoritarian states will have to play nice with domestic populations, which creates the space for more political protest. No guarantee that goes well.  Lastly, this is not good for state revenues here in the US, especially oil producing states.

What an idiotic post - so we should have higher oil prices because it funds middle eastern fighting ISIS, I think that the middle eastern/gulf states are funding ISIS and other terrorist Anti-American organizations.

And that fuck Putin is cash strapped, he would be even worse with more oil monies

DWags wrote:I filled my 25 gallon Silverado up for 40 bucks.

Merica.

nothing more American than filling that big gas guzzler (sorry Bob, in this regard you are NOT a great American)

I remember when gas spiked to $4.00+, and I was driving my '99 Suburban that had a 44 gallon tank.....that's right I could put over $175 into that tank at one time (although I would typically stop at $100)

Giant Moose wrote:How much is a gallon of milk?

Triple Sparty wrote:Cider is $5.99.

Shit people buy a $1-16 oz bottle of water all the time - $4/gallon for water

someone go figure out what you are paying per gallon for refilling your inkjet printer, that will make you puke

Robert J Sakimano wrote:

InTenSity wrote:
Doesn't someone want to ban sugar? Or attack it like they did cigarettes?

probably.. don't let anyone lie to ya - we're all equally interested in limiting freedoms. Just depends on our political/social/religious/economic agenda..

Not all of us.

Robert J Sakimano wrote:if only I had a car..  

of course, the America-hatin' libruls are gonna ban them soon enough, anyway...

PERTEKT!