Do you guys think that Bob's real life job is being the Pure Michigan voiceover guy?

I was listening to be radio yesterday and I heard one of those lovely pure Michigan ads describing the beautiful waters of flint or something like that. After my massive erection subsided, I was like "hey, wait a minute. That's fucking Bob on the radio!" It all fit together in my head. It has to be. It makes so much sense.

I voted first just to see that 100 percent of the people voting agreed wtih me. I feel good about that.

Shit, now I'm down to 50% agreeing with me. That changed quickly

I thought Tim Allen was the voiceover guy. Tim Allen = Bob? 

DWags wrote:Shit, now I'm down to 50% agreeing with me. That changed quickly

I had to vote in my own poll. I'm sorry. :(

Up to 67% of the people agree with me. I rock.

DWags wrote:Up to 67% of the people agree with me.  I rock.

Technically it's up to 50% now. You can't include yourself.

Watch Out Pylon! wrote:I thought Tim Allen was the voiceover guy. Tim Allen = Bob? 

Is it really? Well. Then I guess that Bob is Tim Allen. Neat.

Nope, I"m including myself. You're not the boss of me.

DWags wrote:Nope, I"m including myself. You're not the boss of me.

You don't get to count yourself dwags. That's not how life works.

So, if I ran for president, and I voted for myself, it wouldn't count?

Travis of the Cosmos wrote:

Watch Out Pylon! wrote:I thought Tim Allen was the voiceover guy. Tim Allen = Bob? 

Is it really? Well. Then I guess that Bob is Tim Allen. Neat.

http://www.forbes.com/sites/dalebuss/2015/06/28/tim-allen-and-pure-michigan-ad-campaign-prosper-together/#321f124a3756

BTW, years ago I was looking at the final returns of votes in Michigan and someguy in the U.P. who was running for State rep had zero votes in the final count. Zero. The fucking dumb ass didn't even vote for himself.

DWags wrote:So, if I ran for president, and I voted for myself, it wouldn't count?

Yeah, but you couldn't say "31.236575% of people agree with me that I should be president." You'd have to say "31.236574% of people agree with me that I should be president"

Watch Out Pylon! wrote:

Travis of the Cosmos wrote:

Is it really? Well. Then I guess that Bob is Tim Allen. Neat.

http://www.forbes.com/sites/dalebuss/2015/06/28/tim-allen-and-pure-michigan-ad-campaign-prosper-together/#321f124a3756

Well shit. Bob can you do the whole barking thing from that show for us? That'd be neat.

Travis of the Cosmos wrote:

DWags wrote:So, if I ran for president, and I voted for myself, it wouldn't count?  

Yeah, but you couldn't say "31.236575% of people agree with me that I should be president." You'd have to say "31.236574% of people agree with me that I should be president"

I honestly don't think DWags could get 31% of the popular vote Travis.

67% of the votes cast in this poll have the exact same view on the subject as I do.

I figure he would get a minimum of that if he had some party's nomination. There are so many people that will just vote for whomever the party puts up and say "anything but that damn democrat" that it's embarrassing

Em, hey, I''m right here. You guys are talking like I'm in the other fucking room or something.

DWags wrote:Em, hey, I''m right here. You guys are talking like I'm in the other fucking room or something.

Getting 31% of the vote is still really good dwags.

:)

Travis of the Cosmos wrote:I figure he would get a minimum of that if he had some party's nomination. There are so many people that will just vote for whomever the party puts up and say "anything but that damn democrat" that it's embarrassing

So in this hypothetical is DWags running against Goose? Is Ty his running mate?

Watch Out Pylon! wrote:

Travis of the Cosmos wrote:I figure he would get a minimum of that if he had some party's nomination. There are so many people that will just vote for whomever the party puts up and say "anything but that damn democrat" that it's embarrassing

So in this hypothetical is DWags running against Goose? Is Ty his running mate?

Oh, no. No no no. Only the republicans would be dumb enough to nominate dwags. He's gonna have to be running against turtleneck or otpt or something.

Right here Pylon. Standing right here.

Travis of the Cosmos wrote:

Watch Out Pylon! wrote:

So in this hypothetical is DWags running against Goose? Is Ty his running mate?

Oh, no. No no no. Only the republicans would be dumb enough to nominate dwags. He's gonna have to be running against turtleneck or otpt or something.

This is getting confusing. Think I'll just vote for Trump instead. 

O.K., I'm leaving this thread for a few minutes, when I come back I want this shit cleaned up.

DWags wrote:Right here Pylon.  Standing right here.  

Hey buddy, I'm sure you tried your hardest in this hypothetical. That's all that matters. I'll see about getting you a participation ribbon.

Watch Out Pylon! wrote:

Travis of the Cosmos wrote:

Oh, no. No no no. Only the republicans would be dumb enough to nominate dwags. He's gonna have to be running against turtleneck or otpt or something.

This is getting confusing. Think I'll just vote for Trump instead. 

That is what confused people tend to do.

Polls do not work on mobile

Is the mobile redux ever getting finished? I can see the options for this poll, but the boxes to check off a choice don't appear.

Other Teams Pursuing That wrote:Polls do not work on mobile

What he said.

tGreenWay wrote:

Other Teams Pursuing That wrote:Polls do not work on mobile

What he said.  

Voter fraud confirmed.

Then switch to the goddamn desktop version like a grownup.

Watch Out Pylon! wrote:

tGreenWay wrote:


What he said.  

Voter fraud confirmed.

You mean like maybe 100% of people agree with me?

DWags wrote:

Watch Out Pylon! wrote:

Voter fraud confirmed.

You mean like maybe 100% of people agree with me?

You're down to 33% dwags.

DWags wrote:

Watch Out Pylon! wrote:

Voter fraud confirmed.

You mean like maybe 100% of people agree with me?

I need to check with the super-delegates 1st.

Travis, you've had me all atwitter since you've told me I can't count my vote as counting for people who agree with me. So, here's my question:

If I started a poll that asked "who wants MSU to win a NC in football?" and the one response that was given was "I do", but I voted in that poll, and we had 25 votes out of 25 voters that voted "I do", are you saying that 100 % of the people in the poll didn't agree with my vote? That's confusing as hell.

No. It would still be 100% agreed with you. The problem is if you factor in some dissent. You're over inflating it when you say "%of people agree with me" because you're counting yourself. It's like if I had a poll that said "otpt is sexy " and I voted yes but no one else voted at all. I couldn't claim that 100% of people agree with me because it's just me.

DWags wrote:Travis,  you've had me all atwitter since you've told me I can't count my vote as counting for people who agree with me.  So, here's my question:

If I started a poll that asked "who wants MSU to win a NC in football?"  and the one response that was given was "I do", but I voted in that poll, and we had 25 votes out of 25 voters that voted "I do", are you saying that 100 % of the people in the poll  didn't agree with my vote?  That's confusing as hell.  

Is a poll really a poll with only one answer?