Re: Is shooting a goddamn unarmed black kid legal?

by Guest Fri 15 Aug 2014 - 12:19

Not saying the kid deserved to shot.....but maybe not as angelic as portrayed so far.

Is shooting a goddamn unarmed black kid legal? - Page 4 Brown-robbery-stroe

Is shooting a goddamn unarmed black kid legal? - Page 4 Brown-robbery-stroe

http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2014/08/breaking-photos-released-of-suspect-michael-brown-robbing-store-before-shooting/

by **The_Dude** Fri 15 Aug 2014 - 12:41

Ruh roh..all the liberals with their fake outrage are going to have a coronary. The main witness they believed was Browns' criminal accomplice!! LOL!!

Seriously, how fucked up are liberals today? Mother of God.

And we wonder why journalists are viewed as scumbags and liars.

by **The_Dude** Fri 15 Aug 2014 - 12:45

Robert J Sakimano wrote:
interesting how republicans are more outraged by cinder blocks being thrown off an overpass than they are about the murder of an unarmed black kid..

Whoops! LOL! Sorry Bob, you know better than to fall for the liberals media version of events.

Did you watch sharptons show? Apparently he knew every detail of the case and was 100% wrong! The start witness people were quoting was actually a criminal accomplice. He was lying...no way! LOL!

Sickening that liberals were hoping that this kid was murdered before any facts come out. And we wonder why our country is the laughingstock of the world and our economy is shit. You have people who are paralyzed by being 'pc' and it has ruined the country. And the best part about it is that they are proven wrong...constantly. Just like with this story.

You seriously couldn't have made this story up...black kids gets shot by police officer...liberals stroke out protesting without knowing facts, citing anonymous witness reports as 100% verified facts. Facts come out, they were 100% wrong the witness with the criminal accomplice who was lying.

scratch

by **The_Dude** Fri 15 Aug 2014 - 12:52

The_Dude wrote:race hustlers never let a tragedy go to waste

Bump for being right, again, and liberals having egg on their face. Never gets old laughing at loser liberals who get mad before facts get out because they live their lives in fear.

by **Turtleneck** Fri 15 Aug 2014 - 12:54

The_Dude wrote:

Apparently he knew every detail of the case and was 100% wrong!

Great use of data. You should submit your post to an academic conference and present it as an academic paper!! Look forward to seeing your regression tables.

by **Rocinante** Fri 15 Aug 2014 - 13:36

The_Dude wrote:

Bump for being right, again, and liberals having egg on their face. Never gets old laughing at loser liberals who get mad before facts get out because they live their lives in fear.

There are more people than the guy that was with him that have the same story, and regardless of whether he stole some cigars, since when is that grounds for shooting an unarmed person 8 times?

by **Robert J Sakimano** Fri 15 Aug 2014 - 13:36

The_Dude wrote:

Whoops! LOL! Sorry Bob, you know better than to fall for the liberals media version of events.

Did you watch sharptons show? Apparently he knew every detail of the case and was 100% wrong! The start witness people were quoting was actually a criminal accomplice. He was lying...no way! LOL!

Sickening that liberals were hoping that this kid was murdered before any facts come out. And we wonder why our country is the laughingstock of the world and our economy is shit. You have people who are paralyzed by being 'pc' and it has ruined the country. And the best part about it is that they are proven wrong...constantly. Just like with this story.

You seriously couldn't have made this story up...black kids gets shot by police officer...liberals stroke out protesting without knowing facts, citing anonymous witness reports as 100% verified facts. Facts come out, they were 100% wrong the witness with the criminal accomplice who was lying.

hell, I'm glad he's dead.. one less unarmed black kid on the street.

and I'd like to personally thank the white cop that murdered him. Is shooting a goddamn unarmed black kid legal? - Page 4 1486952199

Is shooting a goddamn unarmed black kid legal? - Page 4 1486952199

by **Robert J Sakimano** Fri 15 Aug 2014 - 13:37

Rocinante wrote:

There are more people than the guy that was with him that have the same story, and regardless of whether he stole some cigars, since when is that grounds for shooting an unarmed person 8 times?

wait a minute..

if you were smart, you'd listen to the republican white power sequence of events... I mean look at the pictures.. he deserved to be murdered.. just look at them. What more proof do you need?

by **Robert J Sakimano** Fri 15 Aug 2014 - 13:47

The_Dude wrote:

Whoops! LOL! Sorry Bob, you know better than to fall for the liberals media version of events.

Did you watch sharptons show? Apparently he knew every detail of the case and was 100% wrong! The start witness people were quoting was actually a criminal accomplice. He was lying...no way! LOL!

Sickening that liberals were hoping that this kid was murdered before any facts come out. And we wonder why our country is the laughingstock of the world and our economy is shit. You have people who are paralyzed by being 'pc' and it has ruined the country. And the best part about it is that they are proven wrong...constantly. Just like with this story.

You seriously couldn't have made this story up...black kids gets shot by police officer...liberals stroke out protesting without knowing facts, citing anonymous witness reports as 100% verified facts. Facts come out, they were 100% wrong the witness with the criminal accomplice who was lying.

I just listened to Rush Limbaugh for a bit - he's probably happier than you are that an unarmed black kid was murdered.. like you, he was talking about how the unarmed black kid was suspected of stealing cigars... and that this murder was justified..

so I join you and Rush Limbaugh in celebrating the murder of an unarmed black kid because, in America, that's the kind of thing that happens when you're black and accused of stealing cigars. Is shooting a goddamn unarmed black kid legal? - Page 4 1486952199

by CheesySpartan Fri 15 Aug 2014 - 14:04

Robert J Sakimano wrote:
hell, I'm glad he's dead.. one less unarmed black kid on the street.

and I'd like to personally thank the white cop that murdered him.

I can't find anything that says for certain the cop was white other then there are only 3 black cops on the force.

by **Robert J Sakimano** Fri 15 Aug 2014 - 14:09

CheesySpartan wrote:

I can't find anything that says for certain the cop was white other then there are only 3 black cops on the force.

if you can believe the liberal media..

Liberal media reporting that he's white

by tTito Fri 15 Aug 2014 - 16:22

He sure looked sweet and innocent when he was bullying that store clerk.

by **Rocinante** Fri 15 Aug 2014 - 16:24

tTito wrote:He sure looked sweet and innocent when he was bullying that store clerk.

Clearly an offense worthy of summary judgement and execution.

by tTito Fri 15 Aug 2014 - 16:29

Rocinante wrote:

Clearly an offense worthy of summary judgement and execution.

Clearly the type of thug who would be brazzen enough to attempt to disarm the cop who was about to arrest him for robbery. And why do you keep referring to an 18-year-old who is 6'4" and 292 lbs. as a "kid?"

by **Robert J Sakimano** Fri 15 Aug 2014 - 16:37

Rocinante wrote:

Clearly an offense worthy of summary judgement and execution.

republicans see it as one less black kid that will vote.. among other things.

by **Robert J Sakimano** Fri 15 Aug 2014 - 16:39

loving how pro-life republicans are now celebrating the murder of an unarmed black kid accused of stealing cigars..

it makes jesus happy, I'm sure.

by tTito Fri 15 Aug 2014 - 16:39

A simlar incident occurred in Muskegon a few years. Seems like friends of the thug have a propensity to lie.

http://www.mlive.com/news/muskegon/index.ssf/2012/06/tunisia_phillips_false_report.html

by **Robert J Sakimano** Fri 15 Aug 2014 - 16:40

tTito wrote:A simlar incident occurred in Muskegon a few years. Seems like friends of the thug have a propensity to lie.

http://www.mlive.com/news/muskegon/index.ssf/2012/06/tunisia_phillips_false_report.html

like you, I'm glad he's dead.

by **Robert J Sakimano** Fri 15 Aug 2014 - 16:41

tTito wrote:A simlar incident occurred in Muskegon a few years. Seems like friends of the thug have a propensity to lie.

http://www.mlive.com/news/muskegon/index.ssf/2012/06/tunisia_phillips_false_report.html

while police never do..

https://www.techdirt.com/articles/20140418/19545926965/five-illinois-cops-are-caught-lying-stand-when-defense-produces-recording-contradicting-their-testimony.shtml

by **Robert J Sakimano** Fri 15 Aug 2014 - 17:06

this is sad, unfortunate and pathetic on many levels:

1. a person is dead - a young black kid.
2. republicans are celebrating the fact that a young black kid is dead
3. republicans seem to think that rumors of him stealing cigars are reason enough to kill a young black kid
4. republicans - who like to thump their bible - should realize that killing someone is not promoted in their bible
5. the government - which republicans hate - is responsible for killing him.. and yet they don't dislike the government for that.
6. the government - which republicans hate - is militarizing a town in Missouri.. and yet they don't dislike the government for that

you guys are an odd bunch....

by **StylesGShmooth** Fri 15 Aug 2014 - 18:57

The cop who shot him said himself he didn't stop him as a robbery suspect but because he was walking in the middle of the street. So, exactly what lie does that video prove?

I will say it's pretty impressive how all the witnesses got together to corroborate their story about the shooting incident so quickly though.

by **Travis of the Cosmos** Sat 16 Aug 2014 - 1:47

Robert J Sakimano wrote:this is sad, unfortunate and pathetic on many levels:

1. a person is dead - a young black kid.
2. republicans are celebrating the fact that a young black kid is dead
3. republicans seem to think that rumors of him stealing cigars are reason enough to kill a young black kid
4. republicans - who like to thump their bible - should realize that killing someone is not promoted in their bible
5. the government - which republicans hate - is responsible for killing him.. and yet they don't dislike the government for that.
6. the government - which republicans hate - is militarizing a town in Missouri.. and yet they don't dislike the government for that

you guys are an odd bunch....

5 and 6 are what confound me so much. I truly don't understand how morons like the dude have turned this into a "conservative vs liberal" debate. Conservatives more than anyone should be upset about the police's reaction to the last several days, assuming that anything they preach is ever true. This has shown more than anything that it's all complete bullshit that they only believe when it's convenient for them. To be honest though, I'm not sure that they are aware that the bill of rights has more in it than the second amendment.

by **Robert J Sakimano** Mon 18 Aug 2014 - 8:49

Travis of the Cosmos wrote:
5 and 6 are what confound me so much. I truly don't understand how morons like the dude have turned this into a "conservative vs liberal" debate. Conservatives more than anyone should be upset about the police's reaction to the last several days, assuming that anything they preach is ever true. This has shown more than anything that it's all complete bullshit that they only believe when it's convenient for them. To be honest though, I'm not sure that they are aware that the bill of rights has more in it than the second amendment.

agree completely...

it's always worthwhile to point out their glowing hypocrisy - it's just unfortunate that I have to do it so often - and especially unfortunate that a young black kid had to get murdered to, once again, start the narrative.

by Guest Mon 18 Aug 2014 - 8:51

StylesGShmooth wrote:The cop who shot him said himself he didn't stop him as a robbery suspect but because he was walking in the middle of the street. So, exactly what lie does that video prove?

I will say it's pretty impressive how all the witnesses got together to corroborate their story about the shooting incident so quickly though.

Sounds like the "witnesses" that said he was shot in the back or with his hands up might be wrong.

Seems the officer shot him in the arm 4 times, then in the head so either he was a terrible shot or was trying to wound him first to stop him.

And if you think about it, it's difficult for entry wounds to be on the front of your arms if they're raised in surrender as the witnesses said they were.

FERGUSON, Mo. — Michael Brown, the unarmed black teenager who was killed by a police officer, sparking protests around the nation, was shot at least six times, including twice in the head, a preliminary private autopsy performed on Sunday found.

One of the bullets entered the top of Mr. Brown’s skull, suggesting his head was bent forward when it struck him and caused a fatal injury, according to Dr. Michael M. Baden, the former chief medical examiner for the City of New York, who flew to Missouri on Sunday at the family’s request to conduct the separate autopsy. It was likely the last of bullets to hit him, he said.

Mr. Brown, 18, was also shot four times in the right arm, he said, adding that all the bullets were fired into his front.

http://www.nytimes.com/2014/08/18/us/michael-brown-autopsy-shows-he-was-shot-at-least-6-times.html?smid=tw-bna&_r=2

by Guest Mon 18 Aug 2014 - 8:53

Robert J Sakimano wrote:it's always worthwhile to point out their glowing hypocrisy - it's just unfortunate that I have to do it so often - and especially unfortunate that a young black kid had to get murdered to, once again, start the narrative.

Luckily for the world there are no liberal hypocrites.

And murdered sounds like a a bit of hyperbole here but that's what makes you a great american.

by **Robert J Sakimano** Mon 18 Aug 2014 - 9:02

LooseGoose wrote:

And murdered sounds like a a bit of hyperbole here but that's what makes you a great american.

sorry that using the word "murdered" makes you uncomfortable.

by CheesySpartan Mon 18 Aug 2014 - 9:57

Robert J Sakimano wrote:
sorry that using the word "murdered" makes you uncomfortable.

We still don't have all the facts of the incident and yet everyone seems to know what happened...is it still "murder" if it was self-defense?

by **Robert J Sakimano** Mon 18 Aug 2014 - 9:58

CheesySpartan wrote:

We still don't have all the facts of the incident and yet everyone seems to know what happened...is it still "murder" if it was self-defense?

you can call it what you want.. I choose to call the shooting of an unarmed black kid "murder".

by Guest Mon 18 Aug 2014 - 9:59

Robert J Sakimano wrote:
sorry that using the word "murdered" makes you uncomfortable.

It's not the word, it's your jumping to a conclusion based on your blind hatred of the law enforcement officers of 'merica.

by **Robert J Sakimano** Mon 18 Aug 2014 - 10:00

LooseGoose wrote:

It's not the word, it's your jumping to a conclusion based on your blind hatred of the law enforcement officers of 'merica.

like I said, feel free to call it what you wish.

by CheesySpartan Mon 18 Aug 2014 - 10:09

Robert J Sakimano wrote:
like I said, feel free to call it what you wish.

How can you make up your mind on what happened without all the facts? SMH

by **Cym Jim** Mon 18 Aug 2014 - 10:29

Haven't really followed this story, but I'm going to go out in a limb and guess that conservatives are siding with the people who shot the black kid?

by **Robert J Sakimano** Mon 18 Aug 2014 - 10:29

CheesySpartan wrote:

How can you make up your mind on what happened without all the facts? SMH

isn't that what people do? Others in this thread are celebrating that he was murdered... apparently he deserved it since they believe he was guilty of shoplifting some cigars.

How can they make up their mind on what happened without all the facts?

by **Robert J Sakimano** Mon 18 Aug 2014 - 10:30

Cym Jim wrote:Haven't really followed this story, but I'm going to go out in a limb and guess that conservatives are siding with the people who shot the black kid?

in their defense, they do believe that he was guilty of shoplifting.

by **DWags** Mon 18 Aug 2014 - 10:42

Robert J Sakimano wrote:agree completely...

it's always worthwhile to point out their glowing hypocrisy - it's just unfortunate that I have to do it so often - and especially unfortunate that a young black kid had to get murdered to, once again, start the narrative.

Bobby pointing out others hypocrisy. Jesus.

by **Robert J Sakimano** Mon 18 Aug 2014 - 14:29

uh oh - looks like the little thug not only shoplifted but also had marijuana in his system..

he'd better be glad the cop only shot the unarmed black kid 6 times.. he probably should've shot him at least 10 or 12 times..

by Ted Brogan Mon 18 Aug 2014 - 21:53

Robert J Sakimano wrote:uh oh - looks like the little thug not only shoplifted but also had marijuana in his system..

he'd better be glad the cop only shot the unarmed black kid 6 times.. he probably should've shot him at least 10 or 12 times..

If it were Saginaw the police would have fired 47 shots.

by **DWags** Mon 18 Aug 2014 - 23:36

Ted Brogan wrote:

If it were Saginaw the police would have fired 47 shots.

Sheeeeeiittt. That ain't nothing, St Clair Shores cops shoot dogs 15 times cause "they don't do snares".

Mean streets.

by **Cameron** Tue 19 Aug 2014 - 0:43

It may be instructive for people to include their race with their opinions on this issue.

I'm white, and I think this is fucked up. I'm guessing that 100% of people who think this isn't fucked up aren't black. Prove me wrong.

by **Robert J Sakimano** Tue 19 Aug 2014 - 8:55

good news republicans.. the KKK is helping out with your cause..

KKK Raising Funds for "Hero" Cop

by Sponsored content