Trump will donate "all profits from his foreign hotels" from his fake blind trust

by **GRR Spartan** Wed Jan 11, 2017 8:49 pm

It doesn't get more dodgy than this.

He's sure his accountants make certain there will be zero or minimal profits for as long as he's President.

by CheesySpartan Wed Jan 11, 2017 9:32 pm

GRR Spartan wrote:It doesn't get more dodgy than this.

He's sure his accountants make certain there will be zero or minimal profits for as long as he's President.

Oh my God, he might do something for the betterment of this country VS his own gain first!!! Thats crazy!!! LMFAO!

by **InTenSity** Wed Jan 11, 2017 10:57 pm

CheesySpartan wrote:
GRR Spartan wrote:It doesn't get more dodgy than this.

He's sure his accountants make certain there will be zero or minimal profits for as long as he's President.

Oh my God, he might do something for the betterment of this country VS his own gain first!!! Thats crazy!!! LMFAO!

Did you just learn about trump this year? His only loyalty is to himself first, Russia second and the U.S.comes in a distant third...if we're lucky. But continue to believe he's going to fight for you.

by **GRR Spartan** Thu Jan 12, 2017 9:36 am

Cheesy is typical of Trump supporters. Nothng he says or does is off limits.

PS
Cheesy either never took a general business course or doesn't understand too many nuances of accounting. It doesn't take a lot of expertise to know how to make expendatures to offset reveue to minimze profit or show an annual loss while adding to overall value to be realzed at a later date.

I understand. I like democracy.
Cheesy prefers kleptocracy.

by Guest Thu Jan 12, 2017 9:41 am

GRR Spartan wrote:Cheesy prefers kleptocracy.

It's amazing that anyone that supported Clinton could even type that.

by **Watch Out Pylon!** Thu Jan 12, 2017 9:43 am

I for one trust the Gaslighter in Chief.

by **DWags** Thu Jan 12, 2017 9:51 am

The bigger picture with what kind of takes me back with trump supporters, and there are 30 million, is that almost daily there is something that used to be politically dangerous to do/say/espouse that Trump does or, we're finding out, lives. How they'll square that in future elections vs candidates that have done far less who, in the past these very people, were outraged by , will be very interesting.

by TheReal_LWS Thu Jan 12, 2017 10:02 am

by **Watch Out Pylon!** Thu Jan 12, 2017 10:03 am

TheReal_LWS wrote:

Trump will donate "all profits from his foreign hotels" from his fake blind trust Unhinged-the-mental-and-emotional-breakdown-of-the-american-liberal-9468824

by **Other Teams Pursuing That** Thu Jan 12, 2017 10:13 am

Watch Out Pylon! wrote:
TheReal_LWS wrote:

Bumper sticker or a meme. Trump will donate "all profits from his foreign hotels" from his fake blind trust 502811600

by **DWags** Thu Jan 12, 2017 10:15 am

Book by a photoshoper

by **GRR Spartan** Thu Jan 12, 2017 10:15 am

LooseGoose wrote:
GRR Spartan wrote:Cheesy prefers kleptocracy.

It's amazing that anyone that supported Clinton could even type that.

You are a decent guy who's sold his soul to get rid of abortion. Doesn't mean you are a bad guy but you typed that pithy response?

Pray tell how many billions do the Clintons control?
How many times did you go through their 25 plus years of tax filings to see where they made illegal transactions?
How many businesses did they personally direct that went bankrupt?
How many creditors did they defraud and force into bankruptcy?
Is Hillary Clinton the President elect?

Last I checked Donald Trump was elected to be our next President and folks like you have decded he doesn't have to meet any of the accepted ways to set up his finances and businesses in blind trusts. Maybe I'm the only person here who finds it strange that a guy worth billions can't have monies set aside for his struggling millionaire children to get along without having them directly involved with his businesses.

But don't dare be critical of Trump's refusals to ever give up his tax information or set up a blind trust.

Expect nothing less from Kelly Ann Goose

by **Robert J Sakimano** Thu Jan 12, 2017 10:18 am

DWags wrote:The bigger picture with what kind of takes me back with trump supporters, and there are 30 million, is that almost daily there is something that used to be politically dangerous to do/say/espouse that Trump does or, we're finding out, lives. How they'll square that in future elections vs candidates that have done far less who, in the past these very people, were outraged by , will be very interesting.

you remember when the deplorables were upset because the colored boy didn't wear an American flag lapel pin?

yeah.. I can't imagine why they were upset by that.. hmmm.. Trump will donate "all profits from his foreign hotels" from his fake blind trust 502811600

(I'm sorry if this post hurts the snowflake feelings of a deplorable).

by TheReal_LWS Thu Jan 12, 2017 10:19 am

GRR Spartan wrote:
LooseGoose wrote:

It's amazing that anyone that supported Clinton could even type that.

You are a decent guy who's sold his soul to get rid of abortion. Doesn't mean you are a bad guy but you typed that pithy response?

Pray tell how many billions do the Clintons control?
How many times did you go through their 25 plus years of tax filings to see where they made illegal transactions?
How many businesses did they personally direct that went bankrupt?
How many creditors did they defraud and force into bankruptcy?

Expect nothing less from Kelly Ann Goose

Way to stay classy GRR. LOL After 8 years of getting upset about others namecalling 0bama and his admin, you immediately start making up (non)clever names for Trump and his admininstration. :loll:

by **steveschneider** Thu Jan 12, 2017 12:06 pm

Watched News Hour last night, two ethics lawyers one that was w Bush's attorney on ethics and the other for Obama.

Both confirm there is no way Trump will be compliant on day one. Well worth watching, I'm sure there's a clip available of the segment.

by **Travis of the Cosmos** Thu Jan 12, 2017 12:14 pm

TheReal_LWS wrote:
GRR Spartan wrote:

You are a decent guy who's sold his soul to get rid of abortion. Doesn't mean you are a bad guy but you typed that pithy response?

Pray tell how many billions do the Clintons control?
How many times did you go through their 25 plus years of tax filings to see where they made illegal transactions?
How many businesses did they personally direct that went bankrupt?
How many creditors did they defraud and force into bankruptcy?

Expect nothing less from Kelly Ann Goose

Way to stay classy GRR. LOL After 8 years of getting upset about others namecalling 0bama and his admin, you immediately start making up (non)clever names for Trump and his admininstration. :loll:

Goose is either trump or in his administration? Neat.

Good job not copying off of a bumper sticker or meme. Bad job not making any sense. Net grade- C-

by Guest Thu Jan 12, 2017 12:19 pm

steveschneider wrote:Watched News Hour last night, two ethics lawyers one that was w Bush's attorney on ethics and the other for Obama.

Both confirm there is no way Trump will be compliant on day one. Well worth watching, I'm sure there's a clip available of the segment.

What these people are ignoring is that people that voted for Trump knew all about his businesses and voted for him either "anyway" or "because of them". In my opinion as long as they don't do anything completely stupid then they're OK with this arrangement. In other words it was all baked in during the election.

Just as a question - do you feel that any business person that runs for President should be required to fire sale their assets if they win? Are they going to be required to take a 40-70% hit to be President? Keep in mind I'm not talking about someone that owns stocks that have a ready, liquid market - I'm talking about someone at least similar to Trump.

IF that's really your requirement then in the future you eliminate another entire class of people from running for President. Is that what's best for the country?

by **DWags** Thu Jan 12, 2017 12:29 pm

LooseGoose wrote:
steveschneider wrote:Watched News Hour last night, two ethics lawyers one that was w Bush's attorney on ethics and the other for Obama.

Both confirm there is no way Trump will be compliant on day one. Well worth watching, I'm sure there's a clip available of the segment.

What these people are ignoring is that people that voted for Trump knew all about his businesses and voted for him either "anyway" or "because of them". In my opinion as long as they don't do anything completely stupid then they're OK with this arrangement. In other words it was all baked in during the election.

Just as a question - do you feel that any business person that runs for President should be required to fire sale their assets if they win? Are they going to be required to take a 40-70% hit to be President? Keep in mind I'm not talking about someone that owns stocks that have a ready, liquid market - I'm talking about someone at least similar to Trump.

IF that's really your requirement then in the future you eliminate another entire class of people from running for President. Is that what's best for the country?

Do you think any government official should use their position to get wealthy? I thought we hated the clintons for it. Is it ok now that we are calling the guy a republican?

Fuck both your sides and your hypocritical bendable philosophy. Quick tell me how his sons running it will have no influence on any foreign government doing business with his often bankrupt corporation.

Fuck the Clintons and fuck this guy. Oh and fuck the pieces of shit who change their stripes o this ethical deviant because it says republican.

by **Robert J Sakimano** Thu Jan 12, 2017 12:30 pm

LooseGoose wrote:
steveschneider wrote:Watched News Hour last night, two ethics lawyers one that was w Bush's attorney on ethics and the other for Obama.

Both confirm there is no way Trump will be compliant on day one. Well worth watching, I'm sure there's a clip available of the segment.

What these people are ignoring is that people that voted for Trump knew all about his businesses and voted for him either "anyway" or "because of them". In my opinion as long as they don't do anything completely stupid then they're OK with this arrangement. In other words it was all baked in during the election.

Just as a question - do you feel that any business person that runs for President should be required to fire sale their assets if they win? Are they going to be required to take a 40-70% hit to be President? Keep in mind I'm not talking about someone that owns stocks that have a ready, liquid market - I'm talking about someone at least similar to Trump.

IF that's really your requirement then in the future you eliminate another entire class of people from running for President. Is that what's best for the country?

you guys voted for him because he's a racist, bigot and xenophobe...

you can dress it up all you want - but it's pretty clear from the vapid moral and ethical characteristics of the deplorables why they supported the sexual predator.

by **DWags** Thu Jan 12, 2017 12:34 pm

What did Jimmy carter do with his peanut farm?

by **GRR Spartan** Thu Jan 12, 2017 12:45 pm

DWags wrote:What did Jimmy carter do with his peanut farm?

Blind trust that was run by the bank that carried the paper on the farm loans.

Yesterday Trump summed up the next 4 years very succinctly. "I won"
"I won" / "We won" is going to be the justification for anything he wants to do from trashing US intelligence agencies to accusing them of being like Nazi's to cozying up to Putin.

We have numerous people on this board who are already using it as justification for what is and isn't being done. The GOP and isolationists don't care. They are willing to let soon to be President Trump turn the US into a oligarchy largely based on the premise they didn't want Clinton or they wanted to see Roe v Wade overturned.

by **DWags** Thu Jan 12, 2017 12:57 pm

GRR Spartan wrote:
DWags wrote:What did Jimmy carter do with his peanut farm?

Blind trust that was run by the bank that carried the paper on the farm loans.

Yesterday Trump summed up the next 4 years very succinctly. "I won"
"I won" / "We won" is going to be the justification for anything he wants to do from trashing US intelligence agencies to accusing them of being like Nazi's to cozying up to Putin.

We have numerous people on this board who are already using it as justification for what is and isn't being done. The GOP and isolationists don't care. They are willing to let soon to be President Trump turn the US into a oligarchy largely based on the premise they didn't want Clinton or they wanted to see Roe v Wade overturned.

You know the greatest thing about my wife? I'd put that tree hugging Obama loving women's choice advocate up against five of these anti abortion fucktards as far as actually doing things for people with unwanted pregnancies. When I see her work her ass off at night finding shelters getting resources for people to keep their babies coming home from our church often emotionally exhausted it's hard to not think what kind of scum these "activists" against choice are who never look to actually help with the problem. Fuck them.

by **The_Dude** Thu Jan 12, 2017 1:22 pm

A Hilary supporter bashing someone about business ethics while in public office?

Are you serious, Clark?

by **The_Dude** Thu Jan 12, 2017 1:24 pm

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-fix/wp/2013/10/17/president-obama-to-republicans-i-won-deal-with-it/?utm_term=.f529e840dfb7

http://www.politico.com/story/2009/01/obama-to-gop-i-won-017862

Does it ever get old being a complete sheep for your party?

by Guest Thu Jan 12, 2017 1:25 pm

DWags wrote:Do you think any government official should use their position to get wealthy? I thought we hated the clintons for it. Is it ok now that we are calling the guy a republican?

Fuck both your sides and your hypocritical bendable philosophy. Quick tell me how his sons running it will have no influence on any foreign government doing business with his often bankrupt corporation.

Fuck the Clintons and fuck this guy. Oh and fuck the pieces of shit who change their stripes o this ethical deviant because it says republican.

Nope. Wags? He's a FUCKING BILLIONAIRE. He may not be worth 10 billion but not many people dispute that he's worth 2-3 Billion. He doesn't need politics to GET wealthy.

You're completely missing my point, I don't know if on purpose or not. IF he uses his office to make money then I'll be all for prosecuting him. My point is that I don't think he has the need to do so, others have openly gotten wealthy in office with NONE of this outcry about them from Dems.

by Guest Thu Jan 12, 2017 1:27 pm

Robert J Sakimano wrote:you guys voted for him because he's a racist, bigot and xenophobe...you can dress it up all you want - but it's pretty clear from the vapid moral and ethical characteristics of the deplorables why they supported the sexual predator.

The longer you're around the stupider you sound.

by **The_Dude** Thu Jan 12, 2017 1:31 pm

LooseGoose wrote:
DWags wrote:Do you think any government official should use their position to get wealthy? I thought we hated the clintons for it. Is it ok now that we are calling the guy a republican?

Fuck both your sides and your hypocritical bendable philosophy. Quick tell me how his sons running it will have no influence on any foreign government doing business with his often bankrupt corporation.

Fuck the Clintons and fuck this guy. Oh and fuck the pieces of shit who change their stripes o this ethical deviant because it says republican.

Nope. Wags? He's a FUCKING BILLIONAIRE. He may not be worth 10 billion but not many people dispute that he's worth 2-3 Billion. He doesn't need politics to GET wealthy.

You're completely missing my point, I don't know if on purpose or not. IF he uses his office to make money then I'll be all for prosecuting him. My point is that I don't think he has the need to do so, others have openly gotten wealthy in office with NONE of this outcry about them from Dems.

No shjit.

Wags just had a stroke over something Trump hasnt even done. My God, Trump fucking owns these Democrats. Permanent residence in their head.

Clintons and Obamas had nothing before going into politics, now both have amassed small fortunes while in public office. Wags=head in sand, nothing to see here, its cool.

Trump, a multi billionaire, hasnt done anything to get rich yet while in office...and has in fact, killed deals already that would have benefited him, is working for free, and is distancing himself from his businesses which he isnt legally required to do...and Wags may not live to see the next day.

Do you see how fucking batshit crazy you sound to normal people Wags?

by **The_Dude** Thu Jan 12, 2017 1:33 pm

LooseGoose wrote:
Robert J Sakimano wrote:you guys voted for him because he's a racist, bigot and xenophobe...you can dress it up all you want - but it's pretty clear from the vapid moral and ethical characteristics of the deplorables why they supported the sexual predator.

The longer you're around the stupider you sound.

Meh, I think Bob mainly talks to himself now. Its a fascinating mental breakdown he's undergone.

by CheesySpartan Thu Jan 12, 2017 1:39 pm

The_Dude wrote:
LooseGoose wrote:

The longer you're around the stupider you sound.

Meh, I think Bob mainly talks to himself now. Its a fascinating mental breakdown he's undergone.

It is fun to watch. Trump will donate "all profits from his foreign hotels" from his fake blind trust 969504605

by **steveschneider** Thu Jan 12, 2017 1:46 pm

LooseGoose wrote:
steveschneider wrote:Watched News Hour last night, two ethics lawyers one that was w Bush's attorney on ethics and the other for Obama.

Both confirm there is no way Trump will be compliant on day one. Well worth watching, I'm sure there's a clip available of the segment.

What these people are ignoring is that people that voted for Trump knew all about his businesses and voted for him either "anyway" or "because of them". In my opinion as long as they don't do anything completely stupid then they're OK with this arrangement. In other words it was all baked in during the election.

Just as a question - do you feel that any business person that runs for President should be required to fire sale their assets if they win? Are they going to be required to take a 40-70% hit to be President? Keep in mind I'm not talking about someone that owns stocks that have a ready, liquid market - I'm talking about someone at least similar to Trump.

IF that's really your requirement then in the future you eliminate another entire class of people from running for President. Is that what's best for the country?

To answer your question, voting in a president is not a vote to change our laws or constitution. Even though he was elected he's supposed to obey our laws and constitution. So to answer your question, I don't believe Trump's narrow victory should give him any exceptions and I'm concerned that his business interests will greatly affect his ability to lead.

by **Robert J Sakimano** Thu Jan 12, 2017 1:49 pm

The longer you're around the stupider you sound.

I'm sorry that you need a safe space.

by **DWags** Thu Jan 12, 2017 1:52 pm

LooseGoose wrote:
DWags wrote:Do you think any government official should use their position to get wealthy? I thought we hated the clintons for it. Is it ok now that we are calling the guy a republican?

Fuck both your sides and your hypocritical bendable philosophy. Quick tell me how his sons running it will have no influence on any foreign government doing business with his often bankrupt corporation.

Fuck the Clintons and fuck this guy. Oh and fuck the pieces of shit who change their stripes o this ethical deviant because it says republican.

Nope. Wags? He's a FUCKING BILLIONAIRE. He may not be worth 10 billion but not many people dispute that he's worth 2-3 Billion. He doesn't need politics to GET wealthy.

You're completely missing my point, I don't know if on purpose or not. IF he uses his office to make money then I'll be all for prosecuting him. My point is that I don't think he has the need to do so, others have openly gotten wealthy in office with NONE of this outcry about them from Dems.

Seriously. Simple question. As a foreign business exec do you think they might offer 2 billion dollar deals knowing his sons who talk to him daily are running the business or would you be happier doing business with it in a blind trust with no contact?

I can't believe how easy the right can lie to themselves. I'd do business in a second with that bankrupt corporation if I know the presidents sons were in charge. If I was in Dubai or Russia knowing the guys running it are a cell phone away from the most powerful man in the world. I'm done with this. It's beyond the pale.

by **Robert J Sakimano** Thu Jan 12, 2017 2:01 pm

LooseGoose wrote:
DWags wrote:Do you think any government official should use their position to get wealthy? I thought we hated the clintons for it. Is it ok now that we are calling the guy a republican?

Fuck both your sides and your hypocritical bendable philosophy. Quick tell me how his sons running it will have no influence on any foreign government doing business with his often bankrupt corporation.

Fuck the Clintons and fuck this guy. Oh and fuck the pieces of shit who change their stripes o this ethical deviant because it says republican.

Nope. Wags? He's a FUCKING BILLIONAIRE. He may not be worth 10 billion but not many people dispute that he's worth 2-3 Billion. He doesn't need politics to GET wealthy.

You're completely missing my point, I don't know if on purpose or not. IF he uses his office to make money then I'll be all for prosecuting him. My point is that I don't think he has the need to do so, others have openly gotten wealthy in office with NONE of this outcry about them from Dems.

you seem upset.

by TheReal_LWS Thu Jan 12, 2017 2:41 pm

DWags wrote:
LooseGoose wrote:

Nope. Wags? He's a FUCKING BILLIONAIRE. He may not be worth 10 billion but not many people dispute that he's worth 2-3 Billion. He doesn't need politics to GET wealthy.

You're completely missing my point, I don't know if on purpose or not. IF he uses his office to make money then I'll be all for prosecuting him. My point is that I don't think he has the need to do so, others have openly gotten wealthy in office with NONE of this outcry about them from Dems.

Seriously. Simple question. As a foreign business exec do you think they might offer 2 billion dollar deals knowing his sons who talk to him daily are running the business or would you be happier doing business with it in a blind trust with no contact?

I can't believe how easy the right can lie to themselves. I'd do business in a second with that bankrupt corporation if I know the presidents sons were in charge. If I was in Dubai or Russia knowing the guys running it are a cell phone away from the most powerful man in the world. I'm done with this. It's beyond the pale.

Says a guy that voted for Hillary "Make Me Even Richer Again" Clinton! ROFL

by **The_Dude** Thu Jan 12, 2017 2:52 pm

DWags wrote:
LooseGoose wrote:

Nope. Wags? He's a FUCKING BILLIONAIRE. He may not be worth 10 billion but not many people dispute that he's worth 2-3 Billion. He doesn't need politics to GET wealthy.

You're completely missing my point, I don't know if on purpose or not. IF he uses his office to make money then I'll be all for prosecuting him. My point is that I don't think he has the need to do so, others have openly gotten wealthy in office with NONE of this outcry about them from Dems.

Seriously. Simple question. As a foreign business exec do you think they might offer 2 billion dollar deals knowing his sons who talk to him daily are running the business or would you be happier doing business with it in a blind trust with no contact?

I can't believe how easy the right can lie to themselves. I'd do business in a second with that bankrupt corporation if I know the presidents sons were in charge. If I was in Dubai or Russia knowing the guys running it are a cell phone away from the most powerful man in the world. I'm done with this. It's beyond the pale.

You voted for Hilary, right?

Ok, just checking..

by **Cameron** Thu Jan 12, 2017 4:16 pm

The_Dude wrote:https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-fix/wp/2013/10/17/president-obama-to-republicans-i-won-deal-with-it/?utm_term=.f529e840dfb7

http://www.politico.com/story/2009/01/obama-to-gop-i-won-017862

Does it ever get old being a complete sheep for your party?

The_Dude wrote:
LooseGoose wrote:

Nope. Wags? He's a FUCKING BILLIONAIRE. He may not be worth 10 billion but not many people dispute that he's worth 2-3 Billion. He doesn't need politics to GET wealthy.

You're completely missing my point, I don't know if on purpose or not. IF he uses his office to make money then I'll be all for prosecuting him. My point is that I don't think he has the need to do so, others have openly gotten wealthy in office with NONE of this outcry about them from Dems.

No shjit.

Wags just had a stroke over something Trump hasnt even done. My God, Trump fucking owns these Democrats. Permanent residence in their head.

Clintons and Obamas had nothing before going into politics, now both have amassed small fortunes while in public office. Wags=head in sand, nothing to see here, its cool.

Trump, a multi billionaire, hasnt done anything to get rich yet while in office...and has in fact, killed deals already that would have benefited him, is working for free, and is distancing himself from his businesses which he isnt legally required to do...and Wags may not live to see the next day.

Do you see how fucking batshit crazy you sound to normal people Wags?

Normal people... like you?

by **The_Dude** Thu Jan 12, 2017 4:24 pm

Cameron wrote:
The_Dude wrote:https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-fix/wp/2013/10/17/president-obama-to-republicans-i-won-deal-with-it/?utm_term=.f529e840dfb7

http://www.politico.com/story/2009/01/obama-to-gop-i-won-017862

Does it ever get old being a complete sheep for your party?

The_Dude wrote:

No shjit.

Wags just had a stroke over something Trump hasnt even done. My God, Trump fucking owns these Democrats. Permanent residence in their head.

Clintons and Obamas had nothing before going into politics, now both have amassed small fortunes while in public office. Wags=head in sand, nothing to see here, its cool.

Trump, a multi billionaire, hasnt done anything to get rich yet while in office...and has in fact, killed deals already that would have benefited him, is working for free, and is distancing himself from his businesses which he isnt legally required to do...and Wags may not live to see the next day.

Do you see how fucking batshit crazy you sound to normal people Wags?
Normal people... like you?

Wags and GR just had heart attacks Trump might use the I win line when Obama said that multiple times.

And yeah normal like me. I'm not an R or D and think both parties are pathetic. The thing is there's s reason Democrats are at historic lows. Normal people see their party as the radical one one right now. You know, the people that decide elections. Not the party sheep. Trump literally won every swing state.

by **Cameron** Thu Jan 12, 2017 4:29 pm

The_Dude wrote:
Cameron wrote:

Normal people... like you?

Wags and GR just had heart attacks Trump might use the I win line when Obama said that multiple times.

And yeah normal like me. I'm not an R or D and think both parties are pathetic. The thing is there's s reason Democrats are at historic lows. Normal people see their party as the radical one one right now. You know, the people that decide elections. Not the party sheep. Trump literally won every swing state.

They eye rolling wasn't about your links, it was about your sheep comment, which struck me as deliciously ironic.

And I'll take you at your word that you're not an R (or D), but... I guess I'll put it like this: if you constitute "normal," I doubt very much that dwags would be at all bothered by sounding crazy to "normal" people.

by **Watch Out Pylon!** Thu Jan 12, 2017 4:31 pm

The_Dude wrote:
Cameron wrote:

Normal people... like you?

Wags and GR just had heart attacks Trump might use the I win line when Obama said that multiple times.

And yeah normal like me. I'm not an R or D and think both parties are pathetic. The thing is there's s reason Democrats are at historic lows. Normal people see their party as the radical one one right now. You know, the people that decide elections. Not the party sheep. Trump literally won every swing state.

by **DWags** Thu Jan 12, 2017 5:56 pm

Cameron wrote:
The_Dude wrote:

Wags and GR just had heart attacks Trump might use the I win line when Obama said that multiple times.

And yeah normal like me. I'm not an R or D and think both parties are pathetic. The thing is there's s reason Democrats are at historic lows. Normal people see their party as the radical one one right now. You know, the people that decide elections. Not the party sheep. Trump literally won every swing state.
They eye rolling wasn't about your links, it was about your sheep comment, which struck me as deliciously ironic.

And I'll take you at your word that you're not an R (or D), but... I guess I'll put it like this: if you constitute "normal," I doubt very much that dwags would be at all bothered by sounding crazy to "normal" people.

I just ignore him. On both boards. Seriously. I won't ban him unless he goes real racist again, but I just won waste my time. Few people on boards where you really wonder if they're touched mentally. He's one for me. I don't know that he is, but I can't tell you he's not. If the "dude" isn't just a made up persona, he's a real pos. JMO, but in both sports and politics there is nothing that would be worth corresponding to him for.

by Sponsored content