Ranked Choice voting.
+2
AvgMSUJoe
DWags
6 posters
Page 1 of 1
Ranked Choice voting.
What do you think? I don't have a problem with it. Maine does it.
Ranked Choice voiting? w
Ranked Choice voiting? w
DWags- Geronte
- Posts : 52048
Join date : 2014-04-21
Age : 62
Location : Right here
Re: Ranked Choice voting.
Sure.
Especially for the primaries. Defeats the purpose when you only have 2 choices though.
Especially for the primaries. Defeats the purpose when you only have 2 choices though.
AvgMSUJoe- Geronte
- Posts : 11831
Join date : 2014-04-22
Location : As stupid and vicious as men are, this is a lovely day.
Re: Ranked Choice voting.
I am for it.
Cameron- Geronte
- Posts : 11871
Join date : 2014-04-16
Age : 36
Location : Michigan
Re: Ranked Choice voting.
I am for it. Also, this business where Iowa and New Hampshire goes first? Lets just have every state vote the same day.
steveschneider- Spartiate
- Posts : 34268
Join date : 2014-05-02
Re: Ranked Choice voting.
steveschneider wrote:I am for it. Also, this business where Iowa and New Hampshire goes first? Lets just have every state vote the same day.
That would only get you presidential candidates Steyer and Bloomberg. You’d already have to have hundreds of millions saved up to be able to run a national campaign in a primary like that. Couldn’t work.
That said, I’m all for rotating the order of primary elections every 4 years. No reason why it always needs to be Iowa as far as I can see.
Travis of the Cosmos- Geronte
- Posts : 32739
Join date : 2014-04-15
Age : 40
Location : Please cease horny posting
Re: Ranked Choice voting.
Travis of the Cosmos wrote:steveschneider wrote:I am for it. Also, this business where Iowa and New Hampshire goes first? Lets just have every state vote the same day.
That would only get you presidential candidates Steyer and Bloomberg. You’d already have to have hundreds of millions saved up to be able to run a national campaign in a primary like that. Couldn’t work.
That said, I’m all for rotating the order of primary elections every 4 years. No reason why it always needs to be Iowa as far as I can see.
I didn't consider that but not sure a top candidate like Bernie or Biden couldn't compete with those two. Both are polling way behind and at this point I just see Bloomberg giving away his cash to TV networks.
steveschneider- Spartiate
- Posts : 34268
Join date : 2014-05-02
Re: Ranked Choice voting.
Bernie never would have been able to be a top candidate in the first place if all of the voting in 2016 happened all at once. It took him surprising in a few states early on to get momentum etc etc. If it was all at once everyone would have expected Hillary to have won, Hillary would have won, and that’d be the end of it
Travis of the Cosmos- Geronte
- Posts : 32739
Join date : 2014-04-15
Age : 40
Location : Please cease horny posting
Re: Ranked Choice voting.
Travis of the Cosmos wrote:Bernie never would have been able to be a top candidate in the first place if all of the voting in 2016 happened all at once. It took him surprising in a few states early on to get momentum etc etc. If it was all at once everyone would have expected Hillary to have won, Hillary would have won, and that’d be the end of it
Alright, I'm convinced. Your idea of rotation is a good one.
steveschneider- Spartiate
- Posts : 34268
Join date : 2014-05-02
Similar topics
» Israel war
» Poll on Ranked Voting Amendment for Michigan Constitution
» So, liberals of the Swill, Who is your choice if Biden drops out?
» Snyder vetoes anti-Choice license plate
» Summer beverage of choice?
» Poll on Ranked Voting Amendment for Michigan Constitution
» So, liberals of the Swill, Who is your choice if Biden drops out?
» Snyder vetoes anti-Choice license plate
» Summer beverage of choice?
Page 1 of 1
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum