Asshole Republicans require me to have an ID to vote and their ****ing machines to check my ID don't work

lol

Don't worry man. Your vote won't count, anyway.

Did they at least give you a sticker to wear?

to minimize crowds, republicans have instituted a very simple process.. white people vote on Tuesdays and black people vote on Wednesdays..

spread the word..

I really prefer getting the sticker.

How will people know how patriotic I am if they don't give me a sticker?

xsanguine wrote:I really prefer getting the sticker.

How will people know how patriotic I am if they don't give me a sticker?

I want my "I Voted" sticker emblazoned with a bible verse..

not only will they now how patriotic I am then.. they'll also know that I really mean it.

gHost Spartan wrote:

I live in one of the very few Democrat leaning districts in Phoenix. Like I said, this shit doesn't happen in Scottsdale or Paradise Valley.

I hear ya...

on the upside, other acceptable forms of republican-sponsored voter ID's are as follows:

Chick-Fil-A receipt
NRA membership
one KKK hood (preferably worn)
autographed copy of any Ted Nugent album

gHost Spartan wrote:

I live in one of the very few Democrat leaning districts in Phoenix. Like I said, this shit doesn't happen in Scottsdale or Paradise Valley.

They're out to get you, man.



Now, about that sticker.....

Robert J Sakimano wrote:I want my "I Voted" sticker emblazoned with a bible verse..

not only will they now how patriotic I am then.. they'll also know that I really mean it.

God wills it!

gHost Spartan wrote:

****ing assholes. I plan my ****ing morning and get to the poles at 6 a.m. to ****ing vote and the equipment to check my ID doesn't work. Oh yeah, I wouldn't have to worry about that shit if there wasn't a law requiring me to bring a drivers' license to the ****ing poles. Fuck the GOP and fuck the Republicans, and Ken Bennet the SEcretary of Gayte

So were you able to vote?

CheesySpartan wrote:

So were you able to vote?

Dude... the Republicans are stonewalling him because they know he's not going to play ball. He can't. Hence this thrad!

Voter fraud is rare, at least relative to the concern that some show for voter fraud. If you look at the data versus the carefully crafted narrative, when voter fraud does happen it is usually through mail-in voting...which most voter ID laws have not bothered to address. So these laws are really about an attempt to disenfranchise rather than address a problem.

Turtleneck wrote:Voter fraud is rare, at least relative to the concern that some show for voter fraud. If you look at the data versus the carefully crafted narrative, when voter fraud does happen it is usually through mail-in voting...which most voter ID laws have not bothered to address. So these laws are really about an attempt to disenfranchise rather than address a problem.

HEY!!! That does not fit the narrative!!!

Turtleneck wrote:Voter fraud is rare, at least relative to the concern that some show for voter fraud. If you look at the data versus the carefully crafted narrative, when voter fraud does happen it is usually through mail-in voting...which most voter ID laws have not bothered to address. So these laws are really about an attempt to disenfranchise rather than address a problem.

That's a relief. I was under the impression voter fraud was at 100%.

Ya, know... cause in order to vote you have to vote for a politician. If that ain't fraud, I don't know what is.

Besides... when has gHost (3 of my top 10 posters, btw) ever told a tall tale?

http://www.mediaite.com/online/msnbc-broadcasts-19-segments-on-voter-i-d-this-week-ignores-poll-showing-74-support-for-i-d-laws/

Lol...the majority of Americans support voter ID regardless of race or political alignment

Robert J Sakimano wrote:to minimize crowds, republicans have instituted a very simple process.. white people vote on Tuesdays and black people vote on Wednesdays..

spread the word..

Lol because the Democrat party has done so much for blacks

gHost Spartan wrote:

****ing assholes. I plan my ****ing morning and get to the poles at 6 a.m. to ****ing vote and the equipment to check my ID doesn't work. Oh yeah, I wouldn't have to worry about that shit if there wasn't a law requiring me to bring a drivers' license to the ****ing poles. Fuck the GOP and fuck the Republicans, and Ken Bennet the SEcretary of Gayte

Next time try using the christian guy persona instead of the stoner dude persona.

CheesySpartan wrote:

Lol because the Democrat party has done so much for blacks

It's not about what your party can do for you... but what YOU can do for your party. Amirite?

Let's get them chad busters out, boys!

Turtleneck wrote:Voter fraud is rare, at least relative to the concern that some show for voter fraud. If you look at the data versus the carefully crafted narrative, when voter fraud does happen it is usually through mail-in voting...which most voter ID laws have not bothered to address. So these laws are really about an attempt to disenfranchise rather than address a problem.

it's not voter fraud I'm worried about..

it's black people who exercise their right to vote that concerns me.

Robert J Sakimano wrote:it's not voter fraud I'm worried about..

it's black people who exercise their right to vote that concerns me.

I more worried about DINKS and their postmodern bullshit about the environment, immigration, and same-sex marriage.

Turtleneck wrote:

I more worried about DINKS and their postmodern bullshit about the environment, immigration, and same-sex marriage.

I'm down with that..

I left my i.d. at home. Can someone by me a 40 at lunch?

Did this get moved over here, or was there actually an active discussion here?

Cym Jim wrote:Did this get moved over here, or was there actually an active discussion here?

it was moved..

apparently the other board is reserved for talk about UM and how schools that are better than us in football handle rape allegations.

Robert J Sakimano wrote:it was moved..

apparently the other board is reserved for talk about UM and how schools that are better than us in football handle rape allegations.

Better than....us?

Other Teams Pursuing That wrote:

Better than....us?

Good good let the butthurt flow right through you.

Liberals are an angry bunch these days. Hope and change baby! Lol!

The_Dude wrote:Good good let the butthurt flow right through you.

Liberals are an angry bunch these days. Hope and change baby! Lol!

It's not like anybody, Republican or Democrat, takes anything you post seriously. Need I remind you why?

http://michiganstate.247sports.com/Board/93/Contents/Izzos-big-man-recruiting-has-been-whiff-after-whiff-after-whiff-15458392

Stupid cop pulled me over this morning and demanded to see my driver's license! What a violation of my civil rights!!

Just opened a checking account, and the stupid idiot bankers demanded I produce photo ID! DISCRIMINATION!!!!!!!!!!

http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/24-things-that-require-a-photo-id/article/2534254

LWS melting down with the triple post. You are not stable.

I just made a $1500 purchase via credit card, and the idiot cashier demanded to see picture id! I immediately called the NAACP to voice my displeasure over this blatant bias.

LoneWolfSparty wrote:I just made a $1500 purchase via credit card, and the idiot cashier demanded to see picture id! I immediately called the NAACP to voice my displeasure over this blatant bias.

If you are against voter ID laws, I imagine you argue that all of your examples are meaningless because they do not disenfranchise citizens and do not represent constitutional questions. In other words, they are simply not analogous.

Most of the people arguing against voter ID laws argue that such laws have the impact of directly disenfranchising citizens. If one accepts this argument - that these laws disenfranchise - then it means that they see these laws as running up against the 14th and 15th amendments of the Constitution. Your examples simply do not have this kind of impact or otherwise bring about constitutional questions.

I'm not saying you're wrong, but simply pointing out what might be a counter argument.

Turtleneck wrote:

If you are against voter ID laws, I imagine you argue that all of your examples are meaningless because they do not disenfranchise citizens and do not represent constitutional questions. In other words, they are simply not analogous.

Most of the people arguing against voter ID laws argue that such laws have the impact of directly disenfranchising citizens. If one accepts this argument - that these laws disenfranchise - then it means that they see these laws as running up against the 14th and 15th amendments of the Constitution. Your examples simply do not have this kind of impact or otherwise bring about constitutional questions.

I'm not saying you're wrong, but simply pointing out what might be a counter argument.

Good point. I am disenfranchised because the precinct I live is is made up of 63% commie liberal morons. I think, therefore, that commie liberal morons should not be allowed to vote because I am disenfranchised by this.

Also, getting to the polling location is mover a mile from my house. Talk about disenfranchisement!! They should make poll workers come to voters homes, while not requiring ID to vote, to canvass votes.

Turtleneck wrote:

It's not like anybody, Republican or Democrat, takes anything you post seriously. Need I remind you why?

http://michiganstate.247sports.com/Board/93/Contents/Izzos-big-man-recruiting-has-been-whiff-after-whiff-after-whiff-15458392

I'd advise people to not take anyone's opinions here seriously..

Turtleneck wrote:

If you are against voter ID laws, I imagine you argue that all of your examples are meaningless because they do not disenfranchise citizens and do not represent constitutional questions. In other words, they are simply not analogous.

Most of the people arguing against voter ID laws argue that such laws have the impact of directly disenfranchising citizens. If one accepts this argument - that these laws disenfranchise - then it means that they see these laws as running up against the 14th and 15th amendments of the Constitution. Your examples simply do not have this kind of impact or otherwise bring about constitutional questions.

I'm not saying you're wrong, but simply pointing out what might be a counter argument.

I feel like every illegal vote that is cast disenfranchises legal citizens rights to vote and corrupts the process inconceivably.

Libs are just obsessed with race and racism. Its all they have left. 6 years under Obama, and blacks have median incomes down. DOWN in 6 years, and we are YEARS past the recession. Its almost impossible to achieve. But incompetence coupled with arrogance/radicalism is a dangerous combo, as all Americans have learned the hard way.

LoneWolfSparty wrote:

Good point. I am disenfranchised because the precinct I live is is made up of 63% commie liberal morons. I think, therefore, that commie liberal morons should not be allowed to vote because I am disenfranchised by this.

Also, getting to the polling location is mover a mile from my house. Talk about disenfranchisement!! They should make poll workers come to voters homes, while not requiring ID to vote, to canvass votes.

The political preference of others simply does not qualify as disenfranchisement. There is a difference between disenfranchisement and representation. Yes, because your Congressional District is largely "commie liberal morons," your vote is rendered moot. That plays into arguments about representation and even electoral systems. However, you still have the ability to vote. Your right to vote was not taken from you, and that is where the arguments about disenfranchisement come into play.

People will give you a ride to your polling place. Borrow that one guy's uncle's Obama-phone and call your preferred local party office and say you need a ride. They will pick you up in a van with other elderly people and take all of you to vote.

Turtleneck wrote:

The political preference of others simply does not qualify as disenfranchisement. There is a difference between disenfranchisement and representation. Yes, because your Congressional District is largely "commie liberal morons," your vote is rendered moot. That plays into arguments about representation and even electoral systems. However, you still have the ability to vote. Your right to vote was not taken from you, and that is where the arguments about disenfranchisement come into play.

People will give you a ride to your polling place. Borrow that one guy's uncle's Obama-phone and call your preferred local party office and say you need a ride. They will pick you up in a van with other elderly people and take all of you to vote.

Elderly people smell funny. That disenfranchises me.

LoneWolfSparty wrote:

Elderly people smell funny. That disenfranchises me.

Brady Hoke stole my lunch yesterday, and I missed my opportunity to vote because I needed to get food. Any chance I can sue Hoke for violating my constitutional rights?

Turtleneck wrote:

Brady Hoke stole my lunch yesterday, and I missed my opportunity to vote because I needed to get food. Any chance I can sue Hoke for violating my constitutional rights?

IDK, but this entire discussion has disenfranchised me, and Cym Jim needs to delete this thread.