got milk?

I had this poster.

I'd go in raw...

By the way, i Like milk. I just remember this add on a billboard from back in the day.  I drink milk. Won't ever stop

Love the ads/commercials, but doubt any quality dairy farmers make a cent from them

The Pantry wrote:Love the ads/commercials, but doubt any quality dairy farmers make a cent from them

That did not stop be from objectifying Tyra Banks...

Turtleneck wrote:

The Pantry wrote:Love the ads/commercials, but doubt any quality dairy farmers make a cent from them

That did not stop be from objectifying Tyra Banks...

Get the fuck out of this thread and go start a 2018 football recruiting thread the way you want it done.

xsanguine wrote:I'd go in raw...

yep... this set of data has convinced me

NigelUno wrote:

Speaking of Salma Hyek

http://www.newsobserver.com/news/politics-government/state-politics/article212589549.html

RALEIGH 
If a drink doesn't come from an animal with hooves, North Carolina legislators don't want you to call it "milk."
Part of the General Assembly's 2018 Farm Billwould ban the marketing of milks made from plants, including almond, coconut and soy, from being labeled "milk" in North Carolina after Jan. 1.
The products could still be sold, they just couldn't legally be labeled "milk" under the proposed law. That distinction would be reserved for dairy products like milk from animals, including cows and goats.

Makes perfect sense.

Big Milk trying to shut down the healthier options. It's sad to see government get involved with things they should stay out of.

You guys sound like a bunch of libs.

More government regulations and trying to control my free speech.

Don’t tread on my drink

Other Teams Pursuing That wrote:Don’t tread on my drink

Well played!

Dr. Strangelove wrote:http://www.newsobserver.com/news/politics-government/state-politics/article212589549.html

RALEIGH 
If a drink doesn't come from an animal with hooves, North Carolina legislators don't want you to call it "milk."
Part of the General Assembly's 2018 Farm Billwould ban the marketing of milks made from plants, including almond, coconut and soy, from being labeled "milk" in North Carolina after Jan. 1.
The products could still be sold, they just couldn't legally be labeled "milk" under the proposed law. That distinction would be reserved for dairy products like milk from animals, including cows and goats.

Not sure why it would be hooved animals, shouldn't it be it has to come from teats or udders?
As noted in the ads above, those objectified models have teats & milk, but I don't think they have hooves - though I'd be willing to check their feet/hooves and udder.

I've often wondered how almonds and soy can make "milk" - milk is best unpasteurized, straight from the teat