Is this one different?

this makes me thankful that a bunch of racist bigots elected him instead of that evil grandmother who operated a pedophile ring out of the basement of a pizza parlor in Benghazi, Maryland.

Came across a comment after reading this Splinter post that I think is worth sharing.



I feel like that concisely articulates the GOP's modus operandi nowadays.

Cameron wrote:Came across a comment after reading this Splinter post that I think is worth sharing.



I feel like that concisely articulates the GOP's modus operandi nowadays.

That is how Trump has operated basically his entire life. Seems exhausting to me, but I guess when you're a sociopath you probably get off on shit like this. I dunno, I'm no psychiatrist.

Speaking right now. Honestly he sounds very solemn and beaten down. Sounds like he knows he’s on a sinking ship.

Actually he looks like he’s ready to fall asleep.

Currently an incoherent ramble on how a wall is built, taking the one out of California and moving it, jobs, minorities, how he doesn’t get credit, religious freedom, not getting credit, so called whistle optimist, mot getting credit, joe Biden, not getting credit, prosperity, not getting credit, Hillary, not getting credit.

You get the picture.

You guys.

This one is different

kingstonlake wrote:Currently an incoherent ramble on how a wall is built, taking the one out of California and moving it, jobs, minorities, how he doesn’t get credit, religious freedom, not getting credit, so called whistle optimist, mot getting credit, joe Biden, not getting credit, prosperity, not getting credit, Hillary, not getting credit.

You get the picture.

kingstonlake wrote:Acting Intel director has threatened to resign if the white house pressures him that he is not allowed to speak freely.

Saying he has sworn allegiance to the Constitution 11 times and that is not changing without a legal precedent for him to do so.

This is the acting intel director that is acting because the two people in charge of the directorate both stepped down at about the same time (one of whom, the former DDNI, actually may have been fired, and at the very least was royally dicked over by Trump).

The only thing, however, is that this acting intel director tried to get the investigator to not pass on the whistle optimist stuff to Congress. So I'm not sure how to read this.

Either way, Trump has shat on the intelligence community for 3 years. Now he's involved in a scandal that involves a conversation with a foreign head of state....i.e., this is their turf now. Intelligence officers, State department officials, and others are going to learn what was really said through their contacts in the Ukraine. He can't lock this down like he can most of his nonsense that is just within the inner circle.

Sounds like his prescription drug addiction is showing again.

Travis of the Cosmos wrote:You guys.

This one is different

It may be. They got their hands on the whistle optimist complaint. Not just the white washed memo version.

Now. Let’s get this in line to where even republicans cannot deny its severity.

On a side note I love how blanch still runs this board even in banhood.

MiamiSpartan wrote:

kingstonlake wrote:Acting Intel director has threatened to resign if the white house pressures him that he is not allowed to speak freely.

Saying he has sworn allegiance to the Constitution 11 times and that is not changing without a legal precedent for him to do so.

This is the acting intel director that is acting because the two people in charge of the directorate both stepped down at about the same time (one of whom, the former DDNI, actually may have been fired, and at the very least was royally dicked over by Trump).

The only thing, however, is that this acting intel director tried to get the investigator to not pass on the whistle optimist stuff to Congress. So I'm not sure how to read this.

Either way, Trump has shat on the intelligence community for 3 years. Now he's involved in a scandal that involves a conversation with a foreign head of state....i.e., this is their turf now. Intelligence officers, State department officials, and others are going to learn what was really said through their contacts in the Ukraine. He can't lock this down like he can most of his nonsense that is just within the inner circle.

Yup, exactly.

Oh and fuck William Barr. That fucker need to be hung by his toe nails.

kingstonlake wrote:On a side note I love how blanch still runs this board even in banhood.

The Dowager Lady Margret, Countess and Prefict of Northumbria!!!!!

Committe member said whistleblower complaint names numerous individuals who heard an seen the actions of the violations.
Alarming that nothing was done when witnessing the actions.
Acting director interviewed the witnesses and deemed it alarming to the point of congress needed to be notified.
He was blocked by the justice department
Now that congress has the complaint (not the investigation) no legal way it can be blocked from interviewing the witnesses.
Rep. Stillwell was adamant that Trump says hes heard "things" about the politics of the whistleblower. Said if the name of the whistleblower has been made known to the President we are entering a whole new level of critical concern. The intelligence community needs to be protected and remain anonymous,

Travis of the Cosmos wrote:You guys.

This one is different

of course it's different.

But are the immoral, anti-America Republicans willing to hold him accountable? They have yet to do it relative to every other scandal and incident of corruption that has clearly been "different".

So, the question is.. do they think it's different?

kingstonlake wrote:Committe member said whistleblower complaint names numerous individuals who heard an seen the actions of the violations.
Alarming that nothing was done when witnessing the actions.
Acting director interviewed the witnesses and deemed it alarming to the point of congress needed to be notified.
He was blocked by the justice department
Now that congress has the complaint (not the investigation) no legal way it can be blocked from interviewing the witnesses.
Rep. Stillwell was adamant that Trump says hes heard "things" about the politics of the whistleblower. Said if the name of the whistleblower has been made known to the President we are entering a whole new level of critical concern. The intelligence community needs to be protected and remain anonymous,

Whistleblower has contributed to Biden according to at least one report.

Jake from State Farm wrote:

kingstonlake wrote:Committe member said whistleblower complaint names numerous individuals who heard an seen the actions of the violations.
Alarming that nothing was done when witnessing the actions.
Acting director interviewed the witnesses and deemed it alarming to the point of congress needed to be notified.
He was blocked by the justice department
Now that congress has the complaint (not the investigation) no legal way it can be blocked from interviewing the witnesses.
Rep. Stillwell was adamant that Trump says hes heard "things" about the politics of the whistleblower. Said if the name of the whistleblower has been made known to the President we are entering a whole new level of critical concern. The intelligence community needs to be protected and remain anonymous,

Whistleblower has contributed to Biden according to at least one report.

The only thing I can find is that a fringe source reporting the whistleblowers lead attorney contributed $100 to the Biden campaign. Stunning a lawyer would support a democrat.....lol

Looks like Pelosi is saying she can’t comment on the complaint because it’s now classified meaning the public cannot see it.

Loving how excited Dems are by this latest turd hunt

Pelosi needs a new beautician. She always looks like a perfectly cooked piece of bacon...nice and greasy.

The Pantry wrote:Loving how excited Dems are by this latest turd hunt

Pelosi needs a new beautician. She always looks like a perfectly cooked piece of bacon...nice and greasy.

A Trump sycophant making fun of how another politician looks.

What exactly is your boy on Pantry? There was an extra helping of gibberish in his emergency press conference today. Maybe he'll do the world a favor and stroke out.

Watch Out Pylon! wrote:

The Pantry wrote:Loving how excited Dems are by this latest turd hunt

Pelosi needs a new beautician. She always looks like a perfectly cooked piece of bacon...nice and greasy.

A Trump sycophant making fun of how another politician looks.

What exactly is your boy on Pantry? There was an extra helping of gibberish in his emergency press conference today. Maybe he'll do the world a favor and stroke out.

Probably tired of 3-4 years of witch hunts. You'll, again, get what you deserve. Nothing.

I'll keep the drug-addicted racist bigoted christian sexual predator in my thoughts and prayers.

Robert J Sakimano wrote:I'll keep the drug-addicted racist bigoted christian sexual predator in my thoughts and prayers.

Nice, adding a new tag to your personal crusade. What's next in your rage?

The Pantry wrote:Loving how excited Dems are by this latest turd hunt

Pelosi needs a new beautician. She always looks like a perfectly cooked piece of bacon...nice and greasy.

You don’t sound angry at all.

kingstonlake wrote:

The Pantry wrote:Loving how excited Dems are by this latest turd hunt

Pelosi needs a new beautician. She always looks like a perfectly cooked piece of bacon...nice and greasy.

You don’t sound angry at all.

This is funny as farts.

The Pantry wrote:

kingstonlake wrote:

You don’t sound angry at all.

This is funny as farts.

He’s getting impeached Pantry.

The Pantry wrote:Loving how excited Dems are by this latest turd hunt

Pelosi needs a new beautician. She always looks like a perfectly cooked piece of bacon...nice and greasy.

Maybe Trump, Chris Crisiti, Sara Huckabee Sanders, Steve Bannon and Kelly Anne Conway can release some of their beauty secrets in next months Cosmopolitan?

steveschneider wrote:

The Pantry wrote:Loving how excited Dems are by this latest turd hunt

Pelosi needs a new beautician. She always looks like a perfectly cooked piece of bacon...nice and greasy.

Maybe Trump, Chris Crisiti, Sara Huckabee Sanders, Steve Bannon and Kelly Anne Conway can release some of their beauty secrets in next months Cosmopolitan?

Steve Miller.

kingstonlake wrote:

The Pantry wrote:This is funny as farts.

He’s getting impeached Pantry.

Dream on, with the rest of your fake news lovers.

steveschneider wrote:

The Pantry wrote:Loving how excited Dems are by this latest turd hunt

Pelosi needs a new beautician. She always looks like a perfectly cooked piece of bacon...nice and greasy.

Maybe Trump, Chris Crisiti, Sara Huckabee Sanders, Steve Bannon and Kelly Anne Conway can release some of their beauty secrets in next months Cosmopolitan?

The Pantry wrote:

kingstonlake wrote:

He’s getting impeached Pantry.

Dream on, with the rest of your fake news lovers.

So you don’t think the house will impeach?

The Pantry wrote:

kingstonlake wrote:

He’s getting impeached Pantry.

Dream on, with the rest of your fake news lovers.

You... you don't know what an impeachment is, do you?

Watch Out Pylon! wrote:

The Pantry wrote:Dream on, with the rest of your fake news lovers.

You... you don't know what an impeachment is, do you?

I do. Not gonna happen no matter how much you libs pray for it.

Again, you folks should be more focused on finding a viable candidate for 2020.

The Pantry wrote:

Watch Out Pylon! wrote:

You... you don't know what an impeachment is, do you?

I do. Not gonna happen no matter how much you libs pray for it.

Again, you folks should be more focused on finding a viable candidate for 2020.

Are you saying the Dems won’t impeach or the senate won’t convict? I think it’s better than 50% the House Dems rally enough votes to impeach. It’s 100% the senate doesn’t convict. So, like Clinton, he still will be president. However Clinton didn’t have to run for re-election.

The real bet will be whether this will rally his base even more, or it will just give people Trump fatigue with his constant scandals and tweets and bickering.

DWags wrote:

The Pantry wrote:I do. Not gonna happen no matter how much you libs pray for it.

Again, you folks should be more focused on finding a viable candidate for 2020.

Are you saying the Dems won’t impeach or the senate won’t convict? I think it’s better than 50% the House Dems rally enough votes to impeach. It’s 100% the senate doesn’t convict. So, like Clinton, he still will be president. However Clinton didn’t have to run for re-election.

The real bet will be whether this will rally his base even more, or it will just give people Trump fatigue with his constant scandals and tweets and bickering.

Depends on what is in the actual complaint. From the sounds of it, bad times are coming for Trump.

https://www.google.com/amp/s/thehill.com/homenews/senate/463100-gop-senator-on-whistleblower-complaint-theres-obviously-lots-thats-very%3famp

I guess somebody would have to run the numbers on who’s up for re-election in the senate if he were get acquitted or convicted in the senate. As much as these idiots enable him, their own careers will come first. They won’t go down with the ship.

I'm old enough to remember when republicans loved and defended America.

People are strange. It’s not like being a racist didn’t deliver him everything he wanted. But I guess it wasn’t enough.

kingstonlake wrote:People are strange. It’s not like being a racist didn’t deliver him everything he wanted. But I guess it wasn’t enough.

yep.