Today's GOP/NRA-Inspired Mass Shooting Is At a Church in California

Travis of the Cosmos wrote:[ he must be an insane whackadoo who is definitely not doing this because republicans and Fox News have been telling him to feel this way for years

If you can find something from the Republican Party or Fox News that has been "telling" (your word) people to go to a grocery store and kill people, well then you would be onto something.

If not, well you're just making shit up.

https://www.cbsnews.com/video/whats-behind-the-unfounded-great-replacement-theory/

This tells stupid crazy white people to be afraid because they are being replaced. Lighting the fuse doesn't technically make the explosion... loading the gun doesn't pull the trigger.

AvgMSUJoe wrote:loading the gun doesn't pull the trigger.

Whoa whoa whoa! Careful with that logic. Guns are bad here, m'kay?

RQA wrote:

Travis of the Cosmos wrote:[ he must be an insane whackadoo who is definitely not doing this because republicans and Fox News have been telling him to feel this way for years

If you can find something from the Republican Party or Fox News that has been "telling" (your word) people to go to a grocery store and kill people, well then you would be onto something.

If not, well you're just making shit up.

That’s not what he said, idiot. You are making shit up.

PennSpartan wrote:

RQA wrote:

If you can find something from the Republican Party or Fox News that has been "telling" (your word) people to go to a grocery store and kill people, well then you would be onto something.

If not, well you're just making shit up.  

That’s not what he said, idiot.  You are making shit up.  

I directly quoted him.    If it wasn't to kill people what was meant by "feel this way"?

RQA wrote:

PennSpartan wrote:
That’s not what he said, idiot.  You are making shit up.  

I directly quoted him.    If it wasn't to kill people what was meant by "feel this way"?

No you didn’t. You said “telling” people to go to the grocery store and kill people.

RQA wrote:

Travis of the Cosmos wrote:[ he must be an insane whackadoo who is definitely not doing this because republicans and Fox News have been telling him to feel this way for years

If you can find something from the Republican Party or Fox News that has been "telling" (your word) people to go to a grocery store and kill people, well then you would be onto something.

If not, well you're just making shit up.  

If you can find something from the Chinese Communist Party that has been telling people to go to a church and kill people, well then you would be onto something.

If not, well you’re just making shit up.

The RussianQuislingAgent posts GOP talking points heard on FoxNews, OAN and “conservative” talk radio.

Travis of the Cosmos wrote:

Chinese guy who does bad thing that aligns with what Chinese political leaders say- he must be a sane part of that political persuasion

White guy who does bad thing that aligns with what Republican leaders say- he must be an insane whackadoo who is definitely not doing this because republicans and Fox News have been telling him to feel this way for years

Yeah sure that makes sense whatever who cares

Here's the quote from Travis.

I simply pointed out that the CA shooter was a left-wing Chicom to point out the OPs bigotry.

By "white guy" I take it Travis is talking about the Buffalo shooter.
"Who does a bad thing"   I take that means shooting up the store.
And that "bad thing" "that aligns with what Republican leaders say"

Travis isn't saying that Republican leaders said to go shoot some people?

RQA wrote:

Travis of the Cosmos wrote:

Chinese guy who does bad thing that aligns with what Chinese political leaders say- he must be a sane part of that political persuasion

White guy who does bad thing that aligns with what Republican leaders say- he must be an insane whackadoo who is definitely not doing this because republicans and Fox News have been telling him to feel this way for years

Yeah sure that makes sense whatever who cares

Here's the quote from Travis.

I simply pointed out that the CA shooter was a left-wing Chicom to point out the OPs bigotry.

By "white guy" I take it Travis is talking about the Buffalo shooter.
"Who does a bad thing"   I take that means shooting up the store.
And that "bad thing" "that aligns with what Republican leaders say"

Travis isn't saying that Republican leaders said to go shoot some people?

You have no idea if the shooter is left wing. And the common theme in these events is guns. You know, the right’s favorite toy.

RQA wrote:Trapper offended by my use of the term chicom?

Chou is an ethnic Chinese born in Taiwan and a person that hates Taiwan and is sympathetic to the CPC and it's effort to enslave Taiwan.

Bob has gone silent on this thread now that the killer has been exposed as a left-wing chicom.

You gave “sympathetic to CPC and it’s effort to enslave Taiwan” as a reason for this shooting (without getting into whether this is actually true or not- we can set that aside for the moment)

If I said the Buffalo shooter is “sympathetic to republican and Fox News efforts to prevent their fever dream that is replacement theory” you would certainly object to that. This is the problem prof, these aren’t different things.

Point is, a man who was upset at things out of his control and things out of the innocent people he killed and shot at the church, was able to get a gun while insane and angry and use it to kill and harm people.

Left wing, right wing, what’s the point? The point is a gun and a madman.

DWags wrote:Point is, a man who was upset at things out of his control and things out of the innocent people he killed and shot at the church, was able to get a gun while insane and angry and use it to kill and harm people.

Left wing, right wing, what’s the point? The point is a gun and a madman.

Right. Our existing laws couldn't prevent this tragedy. So let's pass more laws to prevent future tragedies.

Or…….

Don’t accept the existing law and change it.

kingstonlake wrote:Or…….

Don’t accept the existing law and change it.

But if you can't even enforce your existing laws, what's the point of adding more laws?

Bredo Morstoel wrote:

kingstonlake wrote:Or…….

Don’t accept the existing law and change it.

But if you can't even enforce your existing laws, what's the point of adding more laws?

Nobody said add laws. I said change them. Buy this is not worth discussing with people who couldn’t care less if kids “paint the ceiling with their brains”

So kindly fuck off.

Git your gun and protect yourself Frozen Man.

Bredo Morstoel wrote:

DWags wrote:Point is, a man who was upset at things out of his control and things out of the innocent people he killed and shot at the church, was able to get a gun while insane and angry and use it to kill and harm people.

Left wing, right wing, what’s the point?  The point is a gun and a madman.

Right.  Our existing laws couldn't prevent this tragedy.  So let's pass more laws to prevent future tragedies.

Let me give you a little legal lesson, son.  No law actually stops a person from breaking that law.  A stop sign on a road doesn’t actually stop you.  Shoplifting laws don’t stop you from shoplifting.  The laws provide a legal recourse for those that break them and those that enforce them. Now, are you in favor of doing away with laws since you feel they don’t work?

from looking at this thread, the 'pro-life' christian right has no problem with murder.

wow.. someone should've said something. I never noticed.

Robert J Sakimano wrote:from looking at this thread, the 'pro-life' christian right has no problem with murder.

wow.. someone should've said something. I never noticed.

Oh yeah, the only lives the right-to-lifers care about are unborn fetuses. Once you’re out of the womb, they don’t give a shit about you.

kingstonlake wrote:

Bredo Morstoel wrote:

But if you can't even enforce your existing laws, what's the point of adding more laws?

Nobody said add laws. I said change them. Buy this is not worth discussing with people who couldn’t care less if kids “paint the ceiling with their brains”

So kindly fuck off.

So easily offended. You people are soft.

PennSpartan wrote:

Bredo Morstoel wrote:

Right.  Our existing laws couldn't prevent this tragedy.  So let's pass more laws to prevent future tragedies.

Let me give you a little legal lesson, son.  No law actually stops a person from breaking that law.  A stop sign on a road doesn’t actually stop you.  Shoplifting laws don’t stop you from shoplifting.  The laws provide a legal recourse for those that break them and those that enforce them. Now, are you in favor of doing away with laws since you feel they don’t work?

So how will adding more, or changing our laws, prevent future tragedies as anti-gun rights people claim?

Bredo Morstoel wrote:

PennSpartan wrote:
Let me give you a little legal lesson, son.  No law actually stops a person from breaking that law.  A stop sign on a road doesn’t actually stop you.  Shoplifting laws don’t stop you from shoplifting.  The laws provide a legal recourse for those that break them and those that enforce them. Now, are you in favor of doing away with laws since you feel they don’t work?

So how will adding more, or changing our laws, prevent future tragedies as anti-gun rights people claim?

How do you think January 6th would have gone if there were no local gun laws?

Bredo Morstoel wrote:

kingstonlake wrote:

Nobody said add laws. I said change them. Buy this is not worth discussing with people who couldn’t care less if kids “paint the ceiling with their brains”

So kindly fuck off.

So easily offended. You people are soft.

Wait. Aren't you the guy that said he had guns, and then all of sudden didn't want to talk about how many (hypothetical) guns you had?

Because you're afraid of anonymous people on a message board?

NigelUno wrote:

Bredo Morstoel wrote:

So easily offended. You people are soft.

Wait. Aren't you the guy that said he had guns, and then all of sudden didn't want to talk about how many (hypothetical) guns you had?

Because you're afraid of anonymous people on a message board?

He’ seems to not be able to keep stories straight. Makes you wonder. You don’t think he’s just making shit up to suit the narrativ of a thread do you?

Bredo Morstoel wrote:

kingstonlake wrote:

Nobody said add laws. I said change them. Buy this is not worth discussing with people who couldn’t care less if kids “paint the ceiling with their brains”

So kindly fuck off.

So easily offended.  You people are soft.

It’s doesn’t offend me. I’m just telling you to go fuck yourself based on the opinion you made public as it relates to gun laws.

Bredo Morstoel wrote:

PennSpartan wrote:
Let me give you a little legal lesson, son.  No law actually stops a person from breaking that law.  A stop sign on a road doesn’t actually stop you.  Shoplifting laws don’t stop you from shoplifting.  The laws provide a legal recourse for those that break them and those that enforce them. Now, are you in favor of doing away with laws since you feel they don’t work?

So how will adding more, or changing our laws, prevent future tragedies as anti-gun rights people claim?

You’re just trolling now, you don’t really want an answer.  But for example, an 18 year old like the Buffalo shooter shouldn’t be allowed to have an assault rifle.  If you’re not old enough to drink, you’re not old enough to murder.

Pervis Muldoon wrote:

Bredo Morstoel wrote:

So how will adding more, or changing our laws, prevent future tragedies as anti-gun rights people claim?

How do you think January 6th would have gone if there were no local gun laws?

Who suggested having no guns laws? That would be stupid.

NigelUno wrote:

Bredo Morstoel wrote:

So easily offended. You people are soft.

Wait. Aren't you the guy that said he had guns, and then all of sudden didn't want to talk about how many (hypothetical) guns you had?

Because you're afraid of anonymous people on a message board?

You know what's funny? When you originally so rudely asked that question, I couldn't have honestly answered you.

Out of curiosity, I've gone and counted. Now I know the answer.

But I'm still not answering you.

PennSpartan wrote:

Bredo Morstoel wrote:

So how will adding more, or changing our laws, prevent future tragedies as anti-gun rights people claim?

You’re just trolling now, you don’t really want an answer.  But for example, an 18 year old like the Buffalo shooter shouldn’t be allowed to have an assault rifle.  If you’re not old enough to drink, you’re not old enough to murder.

Gonna be awkward telling all of the 18 year olds in the Army they have to fight with sporks.

Bredo Morstoel wrote:

PennSpartan wrote:
You’re just trolling now, you don’t really want an answer.  But for example, an 18 year old like the Buffalo shooter shouldn’t be allowed to have an assault rifle.  If you’re not old enough to drink, you’re not old enough to murder.

Gonna be awkward telling all of the 18 year olds in the Army they have to fight with sporks.

Those soldiers have adult leaders. They can’t piss without permission.

Bredo Morstoel wrote:

NigelUno wrote:

Wait. Aren't you the guy that said he had guns, and then all of sudden didn't want to talk about how many (hypothetical) guns you had?

Because you're afraid of anonymous people on a message board?

You know what's funny? When you originally so rudely asked that question, I couldn't have honestly answered you.

Out of curiosity, I've gone and counted. Now I know the answer.

But I'm still not answering you.

What's the funny part?

NigelUno wrote:

Bredo Morstoel wrote:

You know what's funny? When you originally so rudely asked that question, I couldn't have honestly answered you.

Out of curiosity, I've gone and counted. Now I know the answer.

But I'm still not answering you.

What's the funny part?

-

That you're so upset that I won't answer your rude question. That part is hee-larry-ous.

Bredo Morstoel wrote:

NigelUno wrote:

What's the funny part?

-

That you're so upset that I won't answer your rude question. That part is hee-larry-ous.

You being soft is the funny part.

Reminder that "pro-life" christian republicans are here whining about everything except murder.

Robert J Sakimano wrote:Reminder that "pro-life" christian republicans are here whining about everything except murder.

Don’t forget about Hunter Biden’s laptop that the trolls on this board carry on about as if that laptop killed dozens while they minimize racial violence resulting in death to minorities.

Oh, and they’re “Christians” too.

NigelUno wrote:

Bredo Morstoel wrote:-

That you're so upset that I won't answer your rude question. That part is hee-larry-ous.

You being soft is the funny part.

You dumb sonofabitch. You can't use the same insult I used earlier in the thread.

That's the internet equivalent of saying, "Nuh huh. You are."

Jesus Christ, try a little harder, will ya?

This thread is the best use of the internet I have ever seen.

.