Two Federal Judges - One Bans a abortion pill - One unBans the same abortion pill on the same day.

Jake from State Farm wrote:How does this get solved? Duel at noon in the Capitol Rotunda?

Cameron wrote:This is perhaps the clearest example of judicial activism there ever was or will be. The judge who made the ruling should never hold a gavel again.

AvgMSUJoe wrote:

Cameron wrote:This is perhaps the clearest example of judicial activism there ever was or will be. The judge who made the ruling should never hold a gavel again.

Well, there's always the "well regulated militia" decision. So, "in the running" for judicial activism.

Cameron wrote:

AvgMSUJoe wrote:Well, there's always the "well regulated militia" decision. So, "in the running" for judicial activism.

The second amendment is worded poorly enough that some interpretation is warranted, even when stupid. This was an FDA decision made 23 years ago, and something the judge has no real or imagined authority over in the first place.

Cameron wrote:

AvgMSUJoe wrote:Well, there's always the "well regulated militia" decision. So, "in the running" for judicial activism.

The second amendment is worded poorly enough that some interpretation is warranted, even when stupid. This was an FDA decision made 23 years ago, and something the judge has no real or imagined authority over in the first place.

AvgMSUJoe wrote:

Cameron wrote:


The second amendment is worded poorly enough that some interpretation is warranted, even when stupid. This was an FDA decision made 23 years ago, and something the judge has no real or imagined authority over in the first place.

I get that. Yeah, this dude is a dbag. Actively reaching into a govt agency to reverse a decision held for decades is bad on every level. Amazing dude passed the bar frankly. He was proactively a dipshit.
The 2nd and Citizens United are both purely political.

WASHINGTON (AP) — The Supreme Court said Friday it was temporarily keeping in place federal rules for use of an abortion drug, while it takes time to more fully consider the issues raised in a court challenge.

In an order signed by Justice Samuel Alito, the court put a five-day pause on the fast-moving case so the justices can decide whether lower court rulings restricting the Food and Drug Administration’s approval of the drug, mifepristone, should be allowed to take effect in the short term.

The justices are being asked at this point only to determine what parts of an April 7 ruling by U.S. District Judge Matthew Kacsmaryk in Texas, as modified by an appellate ruling Wednesday, can be in force while the case continues. The order expires late Wednesday, suggesting the court will decide that issue by then.

Travis of the Cosmos wrote:She’s right of course. If they want to make their draconian laws then they can enforce them. Good luck fuck nuts

[tw]1644512080828026882[/tw]

msugolfguy wrote:

Travis of the Cosmos wrote:She’s right of course. If they want to make their draconian laws then they can enforce them. Good luck fuck nuts

[tw]1644512080828026882[/tw]

I kinda disagree with this. You can fight the ruling in court. Until then I still think you should follow the law.