Abortion - Societal accepted Eugenics

tGreenWay wrote:

Cameron wrote:

How many sex-selective abortions in the US during that period?

This.
Plus, by Goose’s rules, it’s okay to compare the statistics of other countries when it comes to abortions, but not guns and gun-related deaths.

West Elsdon, Ill. — In a little neighborhood near Midway airport — with “Proud Union Home” signs scattered across tiny front yards — canvassers spread out to talk to voters about Dan Lipinski, a pro-life, Democratic congressman running in a close primary against progressive challenger Marie Newman.

The race, which will be settled at the ballot box on Tuesday, has captured the attention of the nation largely because Newman’s campaign has been fueled primarily by prominent abortion-rights groups such as NARAL and Planned Parenthood, both of which have long opposed Lipinski for his consistently pro-life voting record. Newman, in contrast, supports taxpayer funding for abortion and opposes placing any restrictions on abortion procedures.

In the final push to turn out voters, Lipinski has gained somewhat unexpected allies: volunteers from the Susan B. Anthony List, a pro-life organization that played a crucial role in turning out swing-state voters for Donald Trump in the 2016 presidential election. Lipinski’s race is the first time that SBA List has canvassed for a Democratic candidate, though the group has supported pro-life Democrats in the past.

Seventy canvassers — nearly all of whom are undergraduate students from the University of Notre Dame, Franciscan University in Steubenville, and Cedarville University — have knocked on about 23,000 doors in the district since Thursday, and they hope to reach another 5,000 before the weekend’s over.

LooseGoose wrote:I'm very proud of these kids and I know Bob is too.

Student Canvassers Get out the Vote for Pro-Life Democrat Lipinski in Illinois

West Elsdon, Ill. — In a little neighborhood near Midway airport — with “Proud Union Home” signs scattered across tiny front yards — canvassers spread out to talk to voters about Dan Lipinski, a pro-life, Democratic congressman running in a close primary against progressive challenger Marie Newman.

The race, which will be settled at the ballot box on Tuesday, has captured the attention of the nation largely because Newman’s campaign has been fueled primarily by prominent abortion-rights groups such as NARAL and Planned Parenthood, both of which have long opposed Lipinski for his consistently pro-life voting record. Newman, in contrast, supports taxpayer funding for abortion and opposes placing any restrictions on abortion procedures.

In the final push to turn out voters, Lipinski has gained somewhat unexpected allies: volunteers from the Susan B. Anthony List, a pro-life organization that played a crucial role in turning out swing-state voters for Donald Trump in the 2016 presidential election. Lipinski’s race is the first time that SBA List has canvassed for a Democratic candidate, though the group has supported pro-life Democrats in the past.

Seventy canvassers — nearly all of whom are undergraduate students from the University of Notre Dame, Franciscan University in Steubenville, and Cedarville University — have knocked on about 23,000 doors in the district since Thursday, and they hope to reach another 5,000 before the weekend’s over.

Robert J Sakimano wrote:as someone who is consistently pro-life (which, as you know, is very rare), I'm very proud of these kids.

Oh - and nice mainstream media link.

LooseGoose wrote:

Robert J Sakimano wrote:as someone who is consistently pro-life (which, as you know, is very rare), I'm very proud of these kids.

Oh - and nice mainstream media link.

So you agree with the Sun Sentinel here?

The case for life for Nikolas Cruz | Editorial

Robert J Sakimano wrote:

LooseGoose wrote:

So you agree with the Sun Sentinel here?

The case for life for Nikolas Cruz | Editorial

I don't click on mainstream media articles but I'm consistently pro-life. In no way would I ever support or advocate for the death of anyone.

LooseGoose wrote:

Robert J Sakimano wrote: I don't click on mainstream media articles but I'm consistently pro-life. In no way would I ever support or advocate for the death of anyone.

That's the most cold blooded statement I've ever read.

Travis of the Cosmos wrote:I do not think the government should be able to execute Nicholas Cruz.

DWags wrote:Those kids were on 60 minutes tonight. They won’t endorse any politician, they won’t accept money if there is any attachment to it, they have a headquarters that they keep secret because everyone of them have got death threats, and four out of five of them don’t want the kid put to death.

Pretty cool kids.

The abortion-rights lobby’s campaign in favor of this law has been particularly revealing. Leading up to today’s arguments, Planned Parenthood, NARAL, and EMILY’s List have boosted the law by conducting an all-out assault against CPCs, calling them “fake women’s health centers” and accusing them of luring women in with “deceptive” information.

In reality, pregnancy-resource centers are extremely clear about what they do. They’re operated by pro-life individuals, of course, but nearly all of them have doctors and other medical professionals on staff, and they offer a variety of resources largely free of charge, including ultrasounds and other medical care. And these centers are upfront about the fact that they don’t offer abortions, because to do so would conflict with their mission, which is to enable women to choose life for their babies.

Primarily, these centers exist to counsel and assist women facing crisis pregnancies, whether they aren’t sure what choice to make or feel unable to choose life. Often, a woman will specifically seek out a CPC because she wishes to keep her child but feels unable to do so, whether because the child’s father or her own family wants her to abort, or because she doesn’t have enough income to support herself and her child.

The resources at CPCs enable women to choose life. And they support pregnant women every step of the way, referring them elsewhere for medical care as needed and usually offering extensive support after the child has been born, too. Abortion groups have made it very clear that they disapprove of this type of assistance.

For all of their talk about the ultimate importance of the “right to choose” and “female autonomy,” Planned Parenthood and NARAL can’t stand the idea that women might freely choose to keep a pregnancy — and that they might be aided in that choice by groups that tell them they don’t need to abort their children in order to be free.

LooseGoose wrote:And your "pro-choice" groups don't want women to have a choice at all...

The abortion-rights lobby’s campaign in favor of this law has been particularly revealing. Leading up to today’s arguments, Planned Parenthood, NARAL, and EMILY’s List have boosted the law by conducting an all-out assault against CPCs, calling them “fake women’s health centers” and accusing them of luring women in with “deceptive” information.

In reality, pregnancy-resource centers are extremely clear about what they do. They’re operated by pro-life individuals, of course, but nearly all of them have doctors and other medical professionals on staff, and they offer a variety of resources largely free of charge, including ultrasounds and other medical care. And these centers are upfront about the fact that they don’t offer abortions, because to do so would conflict with their mission, which is to enable women to choose life for their babies.

Primarily, these centers exist to counsel and assist women facing crisis pregnancies, whether they aren’t sure what choice to make or feel unable to choose life. Often, a woman will specifically seek out a CPC because she wishes to keep her child but feels unable to do so, whether because the child’s father or her own family wants her to abort, or because she doesn’t have enough income to support herself and her child.

The resources at CPCs enable women to choose life. And they support pregnant women every step of the way, referring them elsewhere for medical care as needed and usually offering extensive support after the child has been born, too. Abortion groups have made it very clear that they disapprove of this type of assistance.

For all of their talk about the ultimate importance of the “right to choose” and “female autonomy,” Planned Parenthood and NARAL can’t stand the idea that women might freely choose to keep a pregnancy — and that they might be aided in that choice by groups that tell them they don’t need to abort their children in order to be free.

NIFLA Supreme Court Case Exposes Abortion Groups’ Opposition to Choice

Rocinante wrote:what about the choice that baby doesnt get to live, grr?

GRR Spartan wrote:

Rocinante wrote:what about the choice that baby doesnt get to live, grr?

According to US law there is no "child" until birth.  
Don't believe me?  Check with the IRS.

You want to call using an IUD an abortion?
How about a "morning after pill" that's taken within 24-48 hours of a sexual encounter, with or without the female cooperating?
What about the girl or mother who is a rape victim?

I am pro-choice or pro-abrtion as zealots would like to label me because I trust a woman's decision to know what she should do.

No one is forced into getting an abortion.

Also don't want the death penalty

“I believe that all innocent life is precious and sacred,” Reynolds said from her formal office before signing a bill that will outlaw nearly all abortions in the state. “And as governor, I have pledged to do everything in my power to protect it. And that’s what I’m doing today.”

Senate File 359 will take effect July 1, though Planned Parenthood of the Heartland and the American Civil Liberties Union of Iowa said they plan to quickly challenge the law.

Under the legislation, physicians will be barred from performing most abortions after a fetal heartbeat is detected. Experts said that heartbeat can be heard about six weeks into a pregnancy — often before a woman realizes she’s pregnant.

So the researchers, using data from 2009 (the latest year for which all the relevant information is available), considered abortion among other causes of death. They found that induced abortion was by far the leading cause of death (1.152 million deaths), easily surpassing heart disease (599,413 deaths) and cancer (567,628 deaths) and accounting for 32.1 percent of all deaths that year. Disturbingly, among African Americans, abortions made up 61.1 percent of total deaths; among Hispanics, they accounted for 64 percent.

LooseGoose wrote:Tell me again how the Democrats that support Abortion on demand aren't racists?

So the researchers, using data from 2009 (the latest year for which all the relevant information is available), considered abortion among other causes of death. They found that induced abortion was by far the leading cause of death (1.152 million deaths), easily surpassing heart disease (599,413 deaths) and cancer (567,628 deaths) and accounting for 32.1 percent of all deaths that year. Disturbingly, among African Americans, abortions made up 61.1 percent of total deaths; among Hispanics, they accounted for 64 percent.

Researchers Find Abortion is the Leading Cause of Death, Surpassing Heart Disease and Cancer

tGreenWay wrote:Imagine if our government supported and fully funded sex education classes along with contraception options. Unwanted pregnancies would drop.

As for the source of that article, I’d be able to take pro-lifers as a whole seriously if they would channel some of their energy to ending childhood hunger and doing away with the death penalty. Until then, they’re just being complete hypocrites. And then there’s folks like Goose who make themselves feel better about the lie they’re living by portraying the pro-choice crowd as folks who love killing fetuses and now, apparently, adding a racial element to it.
Whatever helps you sleep at night, hypocrite.

LooseGoose wrote:Tell me again how the Democrats that support Abortion on demand aren't racists?

So the researchers, using data from 2009 (the latest year for which all the relevant information is available), considered abortion among other causes of death. They found that induced abortion was by far the leading cause of death (1.152 million deaths), easily surpassing heart disease (599,413 deaths) and cancer (567,628 deaths) and accounting for 32.1 percent of all deaths that year. Disturbingly, among African Americans, abortions made up 61.1 percent of total deaths; among Hispanics, they accounted for 64 percent.

Researchers Find Abortion is the Leading Cause of Death, Surpassing Heart Disease and Cancer

LooseGoose wrote:Tell me again how the Democrats that support Abortion on demand aren't racists?

So the researchers, using data from 2009 (the latest year for which all the relevant information is available), considered abortion among other causes of death. They found that induced abortion was by far the leading cause of death (1.152 million deaths), easily surpassing heart disease (599,413 deaths) and cancer (567,628 deaths) and accounting for 32.1 percent of all deaths that year. Disturbingly, among African Americans, abortions made up 61.1 percent of total deaths; among Hispanics, they accounted for 64 percent.

Researchers Find Abortion is the Leading Cause of Death, Surpassing Heart Disease and Cancer

Watch Out Pylon! wrote:

LooseGoose wrote:Tell me again how the Democrats that support Abortion on demand aren't racists?





Researchers Find Abortion is the Leading Cause of Death, Surpassing Heart Disease and Cancer

Your link is sourcing a Breitbart article.

"NAF's federal lawsuit was one of the first in federal court sought a federal gag order against the remaining undercover videos," Daleiden told reporters on the call. "This undercover footage has not seen the light of day. It includes some of the most damning and incriminating tapes that we ever recorded" about "the sale of aborted baby parts."

Furthermore, recent events have underscored the truth behind the sting videos. Last December, DaVinci Biosciences and DV Biologics admitted guilt in a $7.8 million settlement with the Orange County District Attorney for selling aborted baby body parts from Planned Parenthood of Orange & San Bernardino Counties for profit. Planned Parenthood affiliates are also under criminal investigation by the U.S. Department of Justice.

LooseGoose wrote: Can't fight the facts, smear the source - an old trick.

LooseGoose wrote:Yeah, I usually laugh ^^ when I read about millions of deaths. Can't fight the facts, smear the source - an old trick.

Keep supporting the ghouls at Planned PArenthood...Oh and tell me again about how they don't sell the body parts of aborted children?

'Most Damning' Planned Parenthood Videos Yet Set for Release if Judge Lifts Gag Order

"NAF's federal lawsuit was one of the first in federal court sought a federal gag order against the remaining undercover videos," Daleiden told reporters on the call. "This undercover footage has not seen the light of day. It includes some of the most damning and incriminating tapes that we ever recorded" about "the sale of aborted baby parts."

Furthermore, recent events have underscored the truth behind the sting videos. Last December, DaVinci Biosciences and DV Biologics admitted guilt in a $7.8 million settlement with the Orange County District Attorney for selling aborted baby body parts from Planned Parenthood of Orange & San Bernardino Counties for profit. Planned Parenthood affiliates are also under criminal investigation by the U.S. Department of Justice.

And keep in mind that the "party of inclusion" just wiped out language welcoming pro-life people to the party. That was in Missouri but applies nationwide, toe the line or you're out.

LooseGoose wrote:Yeah, I usually laugh ^^ when I read about millions of deaths. Can't fight the facts, smear the source - an old trick.

Keep supporting the ghouls at Planned PArenthood...Oh and tell me again about how they don't sell the body parts of aborted children?

'Most Damning' Planned Parenthood Videos Yet Set for Release if Judge Lifts Gag Order

"NAF's federal lawsuit was one of the first in federal court sought a federal gag order against the remaining undercover videos," Daleiden told reporters on the call. "This undercover footage has not seen the light of day. It includes some of the most damning and incriminating tapes that we ever recorded" about "the sale of aborted baby parts."

Furthermore, recent events have underscored the truth behind the sting videos. Last December, DaVinci Biosciences and DV Biologics admitted guilt in a $7.8 million settlement with the Orange County District Attorney for selling aborted baby body parts from Planned Parenthood of Orange & San Bernardino Counties for profit. Planned Parenthood affiliates are also under criminal investigation by the U.S. Department of Justice.

And keep in mind that the "party of inclusion" just wiped out language welcoming pro-life people to the party. That was in Missouri but applies nationwide, toe the line or you're out.