Signs At a Florida High School Today..

NigelUno wrote:I was asking what the correlation was, and you've dodged the question. Not a made up correlation. Not some general idea.

The correlation is that they oppose anyone that group likes.

NigelUno wrote:Would it only be fair to assume you voted for Trump then?

No, it would be asinine. So I fully expect you to jump to that assumption.

Death Roe wrote:

LooseGoose wrote:Arguing with Nigel is fruitless....I have no idea what question I'm "dodging".

He doesn't want to accept that his gal lost. And why she did. That's pretty normal it seems for the Dems. They've convinced themselves that the party which now will hold the US House, the US Senate, the Presidency and a large majority of Statewide offices in the nation is a "rump" party and soon to be a minority party. They've been peddling that snake oil for 15 years and people still buy it.

Nigel is a moronic internet police officer. He never backs up an argument, just posts smilies and subtle quotes.

Calling me a city snob would have been a better burn.

LooseGoose wrote:

NigelUno wrote:I was asking what the correlation was, and you've dodged the question.  Not a made up correlation.  Not some general idea.

The correlation is that they oppose anyone that group likes.

NigelUno wrote:Would it only be fair to assume you voted for Trump then?

No, it would be asinine.  So I fully expect you to jump to that assumption.

Kind of weird how you avoided some parts of my post, but anyway...

No direct correlation.  Got it.  (I said that already)  

And you agree it's asinine to assume someone voted for a particular candidate?  (Insert laughing smiley here)

I love how Trump supporters show faux concern for the Democratic party in an attempt to deflect attention away from the KKK Donald Trump Victory Parade, his new white nationalist advisor and the series of racist attacks in the US the last 6 days.

Robert J Sakimano wrote:I love how Trump supporters show faux concern for the Democratic party in an attempt to deflect attention away from the KKK Donald Trump Victory Parade, his new white nationalist advisor and the series of racist attacks in the US the last 6 days.

I hope you're not lumping Goose into that group. He thinks Trump is an asshole. He's clearly not supporting Trump.

NigelUno wrote:

Robert J Sakimano wrote:I love how Trump supporters show faux concern for the Democratic party in an attempt to deflect attention away from the KKK Donald Trump Victory Parade, his new white nationalist advisor and the series of racist attacks in the US the last 6 days.

I hope you're not lumping Goose into that group. He thinks Trump is an asshole. He's clearly not supporting Trump.

I'll leave Nigel and Bob to rub one out together.

LooseGoose wrote:

NigelUno wrote:Would it only be fair to assume you voted for Trump then?

No, it would be asinine. So I fully expect you to jump to that assumption.

Then who did you vote for?

Cameron wrote:

LooseGoose wrote:


No, it would be asinine. So I fully expect you to jump to that assumption.

Then who did you vote for?

As I've stated many many times in this forum I voted for Darrell Castle, one of 17 votes he got in my county.

Second Cross Keys teacher removed for post-election tirade

"A second teacher was removed from her Cross Keys High School classroom after making disparaging statements against undocumented residents.

District officials confirmed both teachers were removed from their classrooms Thursday pending investigations into the respective incidents. The first teacher allegedly said in front of others she was glad Trump won because he would get rid of undocumented residents.

District officials said Friday that “threatening, abusive behavior will not be tolerated in any way and such behavior will be dealt with without delay.”

NigelUno wrote:Second Cross Keys teacher removed for post-election tirade

"A second teacher was removed from her Cross Keys High School classroom after making disparaging statements against undocumented residents.

District officials confirmed both teachers were removed from their classrooms Thursday pending investigations into the respective incidents. The first teacher allegedly said in front of others she was glad Trump won because he would get rid of undocumented residents.

District officials said Friday that “threatening, abusive behavior will not be tolerated in any way and such behavior will be dealt with without delay.”

"The first teacher allegedly said in front of others she was glad Trump won because he would get rid of undocumented residents."

This is the racist statement. (undocumented Mexican immigrants are now a race, apparently)

xsanguine wrote:

NigelUno wrote:Second Cross Keys teacher removed for post-election tirade

"A second teacher was removed from her Cross Keys High School classroom after making disparaging statements against undocumented residents.

District officials confirmed both teachers were removed from their classrooms Thursday pending investigations into the respective incidents. The first teacher allegedly said in front of others she was glad Trump won because he would get rid of undocumented residents.

District officials said Friday that “threatening, abusive behavior will not be tolerated in any way and such behavior will be dealt with without delay.”

"The first teacher allegedly said in front of others she was glad Trump won because he would get rid of undocumented residents."

This is the racist statement. (undocumented Mexican immigrants are now a race, apparently)

I'm not sure that was the racist "statement" given that it's not in quotes in the article.

Much ado about nothing...I'm sure the investigation will prove the little wetbacks were out to get their teacher(s) anyway.

NigelUno wrote:

xsanguine wrote:

"The first teacher allegedly said in front of others she was glad Trump won because he would get rid of undocumented residents."

This is the racist statement. (undocumented Mexican immigrants are now a race, apparently)

I'm not sure that was the racist "statement" given that it's not in quotes in the article.

Much ado about nothing...I'm sure the investigation will prove the little wetbacks were out to get their teacher(s) anyway.    

That's the only indication of what was said. You're assuming the teacher said something along the lines of what you just said... which I find hard to believe. It's possible, but hard to believe.

My issue is the lazy "journalism", which seems to be the norm. Don't characterize the statements without giving us a quote of what was allegedly said so that we can make up our own minds. Not only that, but assuming she did say something along those lines... how is that racist when Mexican isn't a race?

xsanguine wrote:

NigelUno wrote:

I'm not sure that was the racist "statement" given that it's not in quotes in the article.

Much ado about nothing...I'm sure the investigation will prove the little wetbacks were out to get their teacher(s) anyway.    

That's the only indication of what was said. You're assuming the teacher said something along the lines of what you just said... which I find hard to believe. It's possible, but hard to believe.

My issue is the lazy "journalism", which seems to be the norm. Don't characterize the statements without giving us a quote of what was allegedly said so that we can make up our own minds. Not only that, but assuming she did say something along those lines... how is that racist when Mexican isn't a race?

The only thing I'm assuming is that the teacher said something and got suspended. And then another teacher said something and got suspended.

Whether it was "racist" or not kind of misses the point.

NigelUno wrote:

xsanguine wrote:

That's the only indication of what was said. You're assuming the teacher said something along the lines of what you just said... which I find hard to believe. It's possible, but hard to believe.

My issue is the lazy "journalism", which seems to be the norm. Don't characterize the statements without giving us a quote of what was allegedly said so that we can make up our own minds. Not only that, but assuming she did say something along those lines... how is that racist when Mexican isn't a race?

The only thing I'm assuming is that the teacher said something and got suspended.  And then another teacher said something and got suspended.

Whether it was "racist" or not kind of misses the point.  

Why use the language, then? What is the point?

xsanguine wrote:

NigelUno wrote:

The only thing I'm assuming is that the teacher said something and got suspended.  And then another teacher said something and got suspended.

Whether it was "racist" or not kind of misses the point.  

Why use the language, then? What is the point?

I guess that's a question for the headline writer at the paper.

xsanguine wrote:

NigelUno wrote:

The only thing I'm assuming is that the teacher said something and got suspended.  And then another teacher said something and got suspended.

Whether it was "racist" or not kind of misses the point.  

Why use the language, then? What is the point?

Because this shit sells for $500, Alex.

Other Teams Pursuing That wrote:

xsanguine wrote:

Why use the language, then? What is the point?

Because this shit sells for $500, Alex.

Hypothetically...is it racist to call a Mexican, "wetback"?

NigelUno wrote:

Other Teams Pursuing That wrote:

Because this shit sells for $500, Alex.

Hypothetically...is it racist to call a Mexican, "wetback"?

Only if his or her back is in fact dry.

NigelUno wrote:

Other Teams Pursuing That wrote:

Because this shit sells for $500, Alex.

Hypothetically...is it racist to call a Mexican, "wetback"?

Yes. (I did not read the article Nigel, I just was responding to x).

But x knew the answer to this anyway, not sure why he takes the media's bait.

NigelUno wrote:

Other Teams Pursuing That wrote:

Because this shit sells for $500, Alex.

Hypothetically...is it racist to call a Mexican, "wetback"?

If the individual being called a wetback is Peruvian and the caller is not hispanic, probably yes.

Other Teams Pursuing That wrote:

NigelUno wrote:

Hypothetically...is it racist to call a Mexican, "wetback"?

Yes. (I did not read the article Nigel, I just was responding to x).

But x knew the answer to this anyway, not sure why he takes the media's bait.

I'm right here, OTPT.

xsanguine wrote:

Other Teams Pursuing That wrote:

Yes. (I did not read the article Nigel, I just was responding to x).

But x knew the answer to this anyway, not sure why he takes the media's bait.

I'm right here, OTPT.

So why do you always take the "SJW" media's bait? You are so above this shit but eat it right up.

Other Teams Pursuing That wrote:

xsanguine wrote:

I'm right here, OTPT.

So why do you always take the "SJW" media's bait? You are so above this shit but eat it right up.

What bait? You do realize their views are becoming more and more mainstream.

Racism has a definition and it's being used to describe everything non-left whether it's actually racist or not (most often not). Using a strong word to describe things that aren't actually that word simply for effect is a problem.