Do you think you will see the repeal of the 2nd amendment in your lifetime?

LooseGoose wrote:

There's nothing quite as fun as mocking mass murder.

tTito wrote:Gun control advocates are pussies.

tTito wrote:

Yes I can. But that doesn't matter does it?
Can you seriously tell me you personally knew one single person who was killed by being shot with a gun? I have never personally met one single person in my life who was killed by being shot with a gun.

tTito wrote:

Can you seriously tell me you personally knew one single person who was killed by being shot with a gun? I have never personally met one single person in my life who was killed by being shot with a gun.

tTito wrote:

Can you seriously tell me you personally knew one single person who was killed by being shot with a gun? I have never personally met one single person in my life who was killed by being shot with a gun.

Pervis Muldoon wrote:

That proves it: nobody has been killed by being shot with a gun. Good work!

DWags wrote:

Yes I can, but that doesn't matter does it?  

tTito wrote:

And it was a suicide wasn't it?

tTito wrote:Maybe you paranoid gun-haters who are so afraid that someone is going to shoot you should grow a pair and go to the range?

Pervis Muldoon wrote:

Maybe...but how about crashing into them with an airplane that's coated in poison?

Pervis Muldoon wrote:

That proves it: nobody has been killed by being shot with a gun.  Good work!

Pervis Muldoon wrote:

Damn straight.  It's much more manly to spend thousands of dollars on guns and ammo because you're scared of bad guys.

DWags wrote:

Car jacking in front of his girlfriends house. But why does that matter?  

LooseGoose wrote:

I would wager you a large sum that you've spent more $$ on haircuts, pedicures and manicures than I have on guns and ammo.   And it may shock you but not one nickel of that $$ was spent because I was afraid of anyone.  They were purchased to hunt.   Would they serve if needed for self defense?  Of course they would and I'd rather have them here than not.

So you go ahead and make yourself feel good by mocking me, I'll not think worse of you because guns scare you and I'll hope you never need one to defend yourself or your family.

I'm really quite disappointed that none of you has broken out the penis jokes yet, those are usually very early in the script.

Rodeo Burger wrote:

I'm guessing that Eric Holder and Barack Obama know more about this topic than you do. There's a reason they sold guns to Mexican drug cartels (which were later used to kill Americans).

Why we are arming a violent cabal is not for me to say. And the guys who were proven to have done it aren't talking.

But guns do work, for good and bad. You just need to keep the bad guys from giving them to worse guys. Like they did. Otherwise good guys die. Like they did.

tTito wrote:

What makes you so important that you think someone is going to shoot you?

DWags wrote:

And this is the exact reason why we should never think about limiting guns in America. We need more not less. And armor piercing billets and handles that don't collect finger prints and automatic weapons.

What if a guy breaks into my house wearing a bullet proof vest? Don't limit my rights!

tTito wrote:

They seem to take the position that there is a realistic threat of violence out there, yet rather than taking measures to defend themselves and their families, they go to message boards and complain that the government isn't solving the problem for them.

LoneWolfSparty wrote:

But what if you shoot them in the face?

LooseGoose wrote:

I would wager you a large sum that you've spent more $$ on haircuts, pedicures and manicures than I have on guns and ammo. And it may shock you but not one nickel of that $$ was spent because I was afraid of anyone. They were purchased to hunt. Would they serve if needed for self defense? Of course they would and I'd rather have them here than not.

So you go ahead and make yourself feel good by mocking me, I'll not think worse of you because guns scare you and I'll hope you never need one to defend yourself or your family.

I'm really quite disappointed that none of you has broken out the penis jokes yet, those are usually very early in the script.

Pervis Muldoon wrote:

I don't have that fear. I'm not a very fearful guy, which is why I don't stock up on guns and ammo every time I hear scary stories about bad guys breaking into homes.

Pervis Muldoon wrote:

Damn straight.  It's much more manly to spend thousands of dollars on guns and ammo because you're scared of bad guys.

tTito wrote:

They seem to take the position that there is a realistic threat of violence out there, yet rather than taking measures to defend themselves and their families, they go to message boards and complain that the government isn't solving the problem for them.

DWags wrote:


And this is the exact reason why we should never think about limiting guns in America.  We need more not less. And armor piercing billets and handles that don't collect finger prints and automatic weapons.

What if a guy breaks into my house wearing a bullet proof vest?  Don't limit my rights!  

Pervis Muldoon wrote:

I don't have that fear.  I'm not a very fearful guy, which is why I don't stock up on guns and ammo every time I hear scary stories about bad guys breaking into homes.  

Pervis Muldoon wrote:

Or we realize that a gun is much more likely to cause death to someone we know than to save us from bad guys.  

Pervis Muldoon wrote:

Or we realize that a gun is much more likely to cause death to someone we know than to save us from bad guys.  

WCS wrote:

But you do fear...you are dogmatic in your approach to your politics, and you fear people being able to think for themselves and seeing flaws in your political beliefs...which is why you mock those that disagree with you and you create logical fallacies, that are founded in intellectual dishonesty, as a way to push your agenda.

tTito wrote:

If you're not afraid then why do you think all of us gun owners should forfeit our guns to the Federal Government? It appears you are not being honest.

Rodeo Burger wrote:

So, you voted for Obama. Twice. And he gives automatic weapons to drug cartels who then kill Americans.

And you blame the Americans who haven't been killed yet.

Sound logic.

Rodeo Burger wrote:

Obama's VA admin is more likely, MUCH more likely, to kill someone than a gun is.

Do the math.

Divert your outrage to where it is needed. It's not too late to admit your mistake. Lives hang in the balance, not that you care, those lives are veterans.

Pervis Muldoon wrote:Or we realize that a gun is much more likely to cause death to someone we know than to save us from bad guys.  

DWags wrote:

Logic?  Wtf?  All I want is to manufacture any type of gun we can and have no limits. Do you think those fucking Mexicans that Obama armed would ever think of breaking into our house?   Just try it.  

LooseGoose wrote:

You do realize that that old crap is based on one deeply flawed study? Sort of like the polar bear crap that's thrown around, the original "scientist" on that this week announced he'd just made those numbers up. Yet the "party of science" keeps throwing that flawed old shit around like it's true.

DWags wrote:

Logic?  Wtf?  All I want is to manufacture any type of gun we can and have no limits. Do you think those fucking Mexicans that Obama armed would ever think of breaking into our house?   Just try it.  

The Pantry wrote:

C'mon, Pervis.  2nd time I've asked you.   Lay out your gun plan   

LooseGoose wrote:

You obviously have no worries, they'd avoid a tough guy like you and go break into the house with the "gun free zone" sign in the yard. Criminals aren't all idiots you know.

DWags wrote:

Break into my house n let me show them a hollow tip study I was working on.  Murcia.