Abortion - Societal accepted Eugenics

Zurn wrote:

Trapper Gus wrote:[tw]1778012809390964780[/tw]

Do you suppose that Zurn is in the 5%

He isn't.

Still waiting, somewhat less patiently now.

DWags wrote:


Still waiting, somewhat less patiently now.

My apologies sir for trying your patience.

But I am waiting for some moral clarity on your part on this issue of late term abortions. Is it morally wrong or not to abort a normal and viable infant the day before the EDC? Whether this happens once a year or 10,000 per year doesn't change the morality of it.

Zurn wrote:

DWags wrote:


Still waiting, somewhat less patiently now.  

My apologies sir for trying your patience.

But I am waiting for some moral clarity on your part on this issue of late term abortions.   Is it morally wrong or not to abort a normal and viable infant the day before the EDC?   Whether this happens once a year or 10,000 per year doesn't change the morality of it.  

Tonight At Mac's Bar:

"Viable Infant"
- with special guest "Moral Clarity"

doors at 8:00

Zurn wrote:

DWags wrote:


Still waiting, somewhat less patiently now.  

My apologies sir for trying your patience.

But I am waiting for some moral clarity on your part on this issue of late term abortions.   Is it morally wrong or not to abort a normal and viable infant the day before the EDC?   Whether this happens once a year or 10,000 per year doesn't change the morality of it.  

Please provide one example of this happening.

Did some quick research and found it is illegal in the US, and, interesting enough, the rate of infantcide dropped after abortion became legal nation wide in the US.

United States

In the United States the infanticide rate during the first hour of life outside the womb dropped from 1.41 per 100,000 during 1963 to 1972 to 0.44 per 100,000 for 1974 to 1983; the rates during the first month after birth also declined, whereas those for older infants rose during this time. The legalization of abortion, which was completed in 1973, was the most important factor in the decline in neonatal mortality during the period from 1964 to 1977, according to a study by economists associated with the National Bureau of Economic Research.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Infanticide

The only people who say things like that either a) don’t have kids or b) were absent when it comes to helping their spouse through pregnancy.

There is not a single woman out there, anywhere, who is going through 9 months of hell just to say “eh fuck it. Abort.” To the extent that that kind of thing ever happens it would be a there’s no other available option scenario where the child surviving is not possible.

But it’s really not a surprise that rqa has never had sex.

Travis of the Cosmos wrote:The only people who say things like that either a) don’t have kids or b) were absent when it comes to helping their spouse through pregnancy.

There is not a single woman out there, anywhere, who is going through 9 months of hell just to say “eh fuck it. Abort.” To the extent that that kind of thing ever happens it would be a there’s no other available option scenario where the child surviving is not possible.

But it’s really not a surprise that rqa has never had sex.

yep.

religion is poison and it poisons the minds of the intellectually and emotionally vulnerable.

when it comes to their opinions on gun violence, the death penalty and the genocide in Gaza, they suddenly aren't quite as concerned about the sanctity of human life.

Zurn wrote:

DWags wrote:


Still waiting, somewhat less patiently now.

My apologies sir for trying your patience.

But I am waiting for some moral clarity on your part on this issue of late term abortions. Is it morally wrong or not to abort a normal and viable infant the day before the EDC? Whether this happens once a year or 10,000 per year doesn't change the morality of it.

I’ll need the numbers RQA. Is it morally ok to sell a gun to an 18 year old with mental health problems? Is it morally wrong to allow a rapist to choose the mother of his child? Is it morally wrong to grab a woman by the pussy? Pay a porn star to shut up about you having sex with her? Is it moral to try to post on a board you e been banned from? Where is your moral scale?

I don’t know where your moral compass is. Nor you mine. If you’re asking me if it’s legal, that’s a different question.

So I’ll answer whether it’s legal or not when you provide a link and numbers to how many abortion happen one day before birth.


I think we ve been more than generous with you.

Robert J Sakimano wrote:

Tonight At Mac's Bar:

"Viable Infant"
- with special guest "Moral Clarity"

doors at 8:00

Hit me up when Appalachian Smoke is on the schedule.

Zurn wrote:

Robert J Sakimano wrote:

Tonight At Mac's Bar:

"Viable Infant"
- with special guest "Moral Clarity"

doors at 8:00

Hit me up when Appalachian Smoke is on the schedule.

Still being patient for the numbers. But rapidly decreasing.

DWags, Zurn is a political operative assigned to this board. A professional pot stirrer.

If you believe he'd fight a late term abortion for his spouse or daughter if continuing the pregnancy would result in him selling the baby furniture and having a funeral, Ill sell you some campus bridges that cross The Red Cedar River so you can set up toll booths.

GRR Spartan wrote:DWags, Zurn is a political operative assigned to this board. A professional pot stirrer.

If you believe he'd fight a late term abortion for his spouse or daughter if continuing the pregnancy would result in him selling the baby furniture and having a funeral, Ill sell you some campus bridges that cross The Red Cedar River so you can set up toll booths.

We know what RQA’s character is. Who he is and what he is. I wanted to be fair. He’s a perfect Trump cult member, phony, try’s to stir the pot with no facts, tries to change the narrative. I think some of us have told him this is t wells but he seems to have a need to slip back into that. Let’s see where everyone is on Monday.

As we all know, when it comes to the RQA types, the thing that drives them most crazy is to mock them, not take them seriously.

I suspect I'm much more "pro-life" than RQA - after all, he mocks genocide and bombings in Gaza - so I just chuckle at his christian beliefs.

Saves a lot of energy.

it's almost like 'pro-life' republican/libertarians want to lose the House, the Senate and the White House.

Arizona Republicans on Wednesday again blocked a Democratic-led effort to repeal a controversial 19th-century ban on almost all abortions in the state, which the Arizona Supreme Court has ruled is enforceable.

Caution: Mainstream Media Link

They are caught between the support in the anti-abortion Republician base and the 70% of the population which liked Roe v Wade. Doing nothing is their best political choice.

Trapper Gus wrote:They are caught between the support in the anti-abortion Republician base and the 70% of the population which liked Roe v Wade. Doing nothing is their best political choice.

it's what happens when the dog finally catches the car.

"pro-life" republicans/libertarians haven't won a meaningful election since Roe was overturned. It turns out that their hatred and contempt for women and the decent folks who love and respect our mothers, wives, sisters, daughters, et al., hasn't been well received by voters.

who would've known.

back from an early morning bike ride.... I got to thinking.

(I do that from time to time).

Remember when reproductive rights were on the ballot in Michigan a couple of years back and the "pro-life" folks refused to promote themselves and their opposition to it as "pro-life". Instead, their wording in response to the initiative was "too confusing, too extreme".

that should show you exactly how "pro-life' they are (not much) - instead of proudly fighting for the unborn and saying that they were unabashedly "pro-life", they chose to say that a movement in Michigan that would butcher babies was "too confusing, too extreme".

as if to say "ya know, folks.. if it was so confusing and so extreme, we'd be okay with butchering babies".

seems to sort of perfectly describe how committed they are to the "sanctity of life".

Seems like they should have taken the moral high ground that they claim to believe, that is that an egg and spem the moment they merge are a person.

If only, for most of them, that was the point, but from their actions it appears their real goal is the subjugation of fertile female humans to slave status.