Re: solution to anti Rcmb dillema

by **Heat Miser** Thu 24 Apr 2014 - 12:09

Other Teams Pursuing That wrote:
Heat Miser wrote:

Oops...that's not right.

EDIT: how did you manage to pull that off?

The hell...I think it has to do with something when someone posts during the time that you hit reply and were typing. And then after you hit submit, it gives you like a little warning where you either modify your post or just submit it. Pretty worthless, IMO. With this board getting more active, it'll probably get annoying.

Agreed, but that shouldn't allow a double post.

by **Other Teams Pursuing That** Thu 24 Apr 2014 - 12:16

Heat Miser wrote:

Agreed, but that shouldn't allow a double post.

Haha, I have no idea man. I'll pay a little closer attention next time that warning thing pops up and see what's up, let you know.

by LoneWolfSparty Thu 24 Apr 2014 - 12:17

Other Teams Pursuing That wrote:

Haha, I have no idea man. I'll pay a little closer attention next time that warning thing pops up and see what's up, let you know.

Stop double clicking the send button.

by **Heat Miser** Thu 24 Apr 2014 - 12:19

LoneWolfSparty wrote:
Other Teams Pursuing That wrote:

Haha, I have no idea man. I'll pay a little closer attention next time that warning thing pops up and see what's up, let you know.

Stop double clicking the send button.

Even if you double click the send button we've got a little thing called flood control here. Try it and see what happens.

by LoneWolfSparty Thu 24 Apr 2014 - 12:23

Heat Miser wrote:

Even if you double click the send button we've got a little thing called flood control here. Try it and see what happens.

Maybe Mods are exempt?

by **Blanch32** Thu 24 Apr 2014 - 12:26

LoneWolfSparty wrote:Why does it always have to be about you?

You mean I'm the only poster here who enjoys fresh trim??

by Minnie Thu 24 Apr 2014 - 12:26

Every time I read a thread started by blanch I want to beat him about the head and shoulders with a large stick - and not in a good, foreplay kinda way either.

by **Blanch32** Thu 24 Apr 2014 - 12:26

ROtown Sparty wrote:So that's how you measure a good sports talk message board? Chicks under 30?

Maybe if you bonars would stop scaring all of them away we'd have a few more.

Correct on both accounts

by **Blanch32** Thu 24 Apr 2014 - 12:28

tTito wrote:Ashley Dickensheets, Guage's Nightmare, Pistons Girl, MSUChick77, GoGreenGirl, SpartanDawg, SpartyDogRules (I think she was older though). I think they all were driven away by Blanch.

Your missing a few. Mainly the ones I've bedded and will keep nameless for their own sake

by **Blanch32** Thu 24 Apr 2014 - 12:30

LoneWolfSparty wrote:

Unfortunately I think I am partly to blame for MSUChick77. And I am still sick about it today. Her and I had a pretty good online friendship, then something I said was misconstrued and she was never the same towards me or the board. (Though she also got into a serious relationship shortly after all of this from what I heard so maybe I had less to do with it then I think.)

I apologized profusely to her, multiple times. I really did feel bad about the whole thing and still do to this day.

Fwiw the only chick poster that literally hated my guts. We definitely did not get along or mesh. Major personality clash there. Bee I would not worry. She does not tolerate bs of any shape or size.

by **Blanch32** Thu 24 Apr 2014 - 12:31

TrueGreenSpartan wrote:

1.) I'm all for more women on this board.
b.) I don't think blanch will help much with this endeavor.
3.) What does this have to do with the RCMB obsession this board has?

Disagree. Rcmb welcoming committee was a smashing success

by **Blanch32** Thu 24 Apr 2014 - 12:34

Floyd Robertson wrote:

Jenny Double D's

Wasn't that slick Nick's community college girlfriend?

by **Blanch32** Thu 24 Apr 2014 - 12:36

Other Teams Pursuing That wrote:Am I the only one who doesn't believe that hot girls would post on a Michigan State sports message board? Especially considering the crowd here?

Believe it or not that wasn't always the case.

by **Blanch32** Thu 24 Apr 2014 - 12:37

Bud Fox wrote:Going way back to 2004 or 2005 I think, who was it that GatorBill was caught stalking? MSUChick77?

I've never trusted that dude fwiw. Constantly posted about how hs age chicks wanted his middle age ass for practically no logically reason....

by Spartan Punk Thu 24 Apr 2014 - 12:46

blanch32 wrote:

I've never trusted that dude fwiw. Constantly posted about how hs age chicks wanted his middle age ass for practically no logically reason....

You do realize that's going to be you soon.

by **Blanch32** Thu 24 Apr 2014 - 12:48

Spartan Punk wrote:
You do realize that's going to be you soon.

Sure once I become irrelevant and cannot relate.

by **duffy munn** Thu 24 Apr 2014 - 13:04

blanch32 wrote:

Sure once I become irrelevant and cannot relate.

Kinda like now ?

by **Blanch32** Thu 24 Apr 2014 - 13:21

duffy munn wrote:

Kinda like now ?

I'm dating a 22 yo and her friends think I'm hot. So nope. Not today

by Ned Stark Thu 24 Apr 2014 - 13:23

blanch32 wrote:

I'm dating a 22 yo and her friends think I'm hot. So nope. Not today

I missed the memo that says tSwill is the message board equivalent of 'Nam.

by **Blanch32** Thu 24 Apr 2014 - 13:25

Ned Stark wrote:

I missed the memo that says tSwill is the message board equivalent of 'Nam.

I'll do one better and take her to the first swill tailgate. When and where will that be?

by **Snake Plissken** Thu 24 Apr 2014 - 17:32

blanch32 wrote:
I'm dating a 22 yo and her friends think I'm hot. So nope. Not today

by **Snake Plissken** Thu 24 Apr 2014 - 17:33

blanch32 wrote:
Fwiw the only chick poster that literally hated my guts. We definitely did not get along or mesh. Major personality clash there. Bee I would not worry. She does not tolerate bs of any shape or size.

It might have something to do with that creepy shoulder massage you tried to give her at Crunchy's. I'm just sayin' Rolling Eyes

by **Blanch32** Thu 24 Apr 2014 - 17:41

Snake Plissken wrote:It might have something to do with that creepy shoulder massage you tried to give her at Crunchy's. I'm just sayin'

Could be. Just snapped on me one day. Like gtfo of my car and find your own ride type. Which has only happened to me twice in my life.

by Trevor Barnes Fri 25 Apr 2014 - 10:06

blanch32 wrote:This seems to be a massive worry going forward. You can obviously tell Trevor isn't too happy with the competition.

Blanch, that's not at all true actually. Trust me, I'm doing just fine. Wink

by **Giant Moose** Fri 25 Apr 2014 - 10:10

Trevor Barnes wrote:
Blanch, that's not at all true actually. Trust me, I'm doing just fine.

You are lying. You have to be mad at the 247 hack developers.

by Trevor Barnes Fri 25 Apr 2014 - 10:13

Giant Moose wrote:
You are lying. You have to be mad at the 247 hack developers.

No Moose, I'm not lying. I'm not happy with the way the upgrade went, no. That said, I'm not having the negative reaction to forumotion that I think most of you are assuming. There's definitely some goodness in it from my standpoint. The way you look at things changes over the course of 20 years. I doubt I'll visit here much, but I'm glad that some have found a happy home.

by JEK Fri 25 Apr 2014 - 10:23

Trevor Barnes wrote:
No Moose, I'm not lying. I'm not happy with the way the upgrade went, no. That said, I'm not having the negative reaction to forumotion that I think most of you are assuming. There's definitely some goodness in it from my standpoint. The way you look at things changes over the course of 20 years. I doubt I'll visit here much, but I'm glad that some have found a happy home.

~cough cough~
BULLSHIT
~cough cough~

by LoneWolfSparty Fri 25 Apr 2014 - 10:25

Trevor Barnes wrote:
No Moose, I'm not lying. I'm not happy with the way the upgrade went, no. That said, I'm not having the negative reaction to forumotion that I think most of you are assuming. There's definitely some goodness in it from my standpoint. The way you look at things changes over the course of 20 years. I doubt I'll visit here much, but I'm glad that some have found a happy home.

solution to anti Rcmb dillema - Page 2 685334576

solution to anti Rcmb dillema - Page 2 3609021617

by Trevor Barnes Fri 25 Apr 2014 - 10:33

JEK wrote:
~cough cough~
BULLSHIT
~cough cough~

It has always been interesting for me to see what other people's assumptions are.

by **NigelUno** Fri 25 Apr 2014 - 10:35

Trevor Barnes wrote:
It has always been interesting for me to see what other people's assumptions are.

My assumption is that you are happy some of the posters are gone.

by LoneWolfSparty Fri 25 Apr 2014 - 10:36

Trevor Barnes wrote:
It has always been interesting for me to see what other people's assumptions are.

I try never to assume. Because it makes an.......you know the rest.

TBarne, I sincerely hope you become a regular over here. Pre-247 you were a very witty, fun poster at the Gate.

EDIT: Like the time you included a Hitler smiley because so many people referred to you as such. solution to anti Rcmb dillema - Page 2 502811600

solution to anti Rcmb dillema - Page 2 502811600

Great sense of humor about yourself.

by JEK Fri 25 Apr 2014 - 10:39

Trevor Barnes wrote:
It has always been interesting for me to see what other people's assumptions are.

In the history of the world, there are zero instances of business owners losing customers to competition and being "glad" about it.

by **Giant Moose** Fri 25 Apr 2014 - 10:41

We are making baby steps, people. Trevor finally said something negative about 247.

by **WhiteBoyHatcher** Fri 25 Apr 2014 - 10:41

NigelUno wrote:

My assumption is that you are happy some of the posters are gone.

Ding Ding Ding! solution to anti Rcmb dillema - Page 2 502811600

by TrueGreenSpartan Fri 25 Apr 2014 - 10:42

JEK wrote:

In the history of the world, there are zero instances of business owners losing customers to competition and being "glad" about it.

I'm not sure the definition of 'customer' is the same when talking about message boards solution to anti Rcmb dillema - Page 2 2599972566

by tVideoCat Fri 25 Apr 2014 - 10:42

Trevor Barnes wrote:
It has always been interesting for me to see what other people's assumptions are.

I wouldn't give up football even if my wife was killed by a football.

by JEK Fri 25 Apr 2014 - 10:43

TrueGreenSpartan wrote:

I'm not sure the definition of 'customer' is the same when talking about message boards

Many of us paid an annual fee to post there, and quantity of users also drives up advertising.

by **NigelUno** Fri 25 Apr 2014 - 10:47

Trevor Barnes wrote:
It has always been interesting for me to see what other people's assumptions are.

My assumption is that the success of the football team has generated an increase in paying subscriptions, and that the message board is a minor annoyance to you at this point...meaning relatively speaking, you get way too many complaints about something that isn't generating that much revenue.

by Trevor Barnes Fri 25 Apr 2014 - 10:48

JEK wrote:

In the history of the world, there are zero instances of business owners losing customers to competition and being "glad" about it.

Again, you're making assumptions about me or what motivates me. The RCMB has never been about profits to me. If it was, I would have sold it years ago or gone to the subscription-only model when so many other college sports site were.

I have no idea when you joined the RCMB, so maybe you don't know the history, and that's fine.

by tVideoCat Fri 25 Apr 2014 - 10:50

JEK wrote:

Many of us paid an annual fee to post there, and quantity of users also drives up advertising.

And if I were Trevor , I'd gladly trade that loss of advertising traffic to no longer deal with many of you.

by Sponsored content