Re: tOfficial Detroit Lions Thread: Sheila ain't fucking around

by aualum06 2018-12-02, 14:13

LooseGoose wrote:The Lions are dominating so far.

Not even trying on offense anymore

by **tGreenWay** 2018-12-02, 15:47

Stafford.

tOfficial Detroit Lions Thread: Sheila ain't fucking around - Page 2 1966794946

by **kingstonlake** 2018-12-02, 16:04

Gurley gonna fuck me on Rams -10

by **kingstonlake** 2018-12-02, 16:14

Stat Paddford fucking the spread. God I hate this team so much.

by **kingstonlake** 2018-12-02, 16:16

Sorry Paddford!

by **tGreenWay** 2018-12-02, 16:16

by **Death Roe** 2018-12-02, 17:09

NFC West Champs back to back

by Guest 2018-12-06, 20:55

kingstonlake wrote:Stat Paddford fucking the spread. God I hate this team so much.

Ten seasons in, what to make of Matthew Stafford and his future

In the Super Bowl era, only 44 quarterbacks including Stafford have played 10 seasons with one team -- some didn’t do so consecutively -- and started at least one game in each of those seasons. Some quarterbacks, such as Brett Favre, went to other teams as well. Of those 44, only nine had losing records -- something Stafford will have even if the Lions win their four remaining games -- in their tenures with the team. Stafford, with a 64-73 record, has the fourth-worst win percentage among quarterbacks who have played 10 seasons for one team. Only Archie Manning (35-91-3 with New Orleans), Mike Livingston (31-44-1 with Kansas City) and Steve Bartkowski (56-69 with Atlanta) have done worse.

None of those quarterbacks lasted more than 11 seasons with his club.

Of the 44, only nine either never made the Pro Bowl or appeared just once, including Stafford (and former Lions quarterback Greg Landry). Just seven -- Manning, Livingston, Landry, Brian Sipe, Jim Hart, Steve Grogan and Stafford -- have never won a playoff game. Stafford and Grogan are the 10-year guys with the most playoff losses without a win, with three.

by **kingstonlake** 2018-12-06, 21:01

Ouch.

by **Travis of the Cosmos** 2018-12-06, 21:16

LooseGoose wrote:
kingstonlake wrote:Stat Paddford fucking the spread. God I hate this team so much.

In the Super Bowl era, only 44 quarterbacks including Stafford have played 10 seasons with one team -- some didn’t do so consecutively -- and started at least one game in each of those seasons. Some quarterbacks, such as Brett Favre, went to other teams as well.

Can someone explain this rambling paragraph to me because it doesn’t make any sense.

Only 44 quarterbacks have started a game for one team over ten seasons. Got it
Not always consecutively. Got it.
Some quarterbacks went to other teams as well. What?

by **MiamiSpartan** 2018-12-06, 21:27

Has the English language passed you by, Travis? It seems clear enough to me.

44 guys have played at least 10 years with the same team (and actually started regularly, not career backups). Fewer than than that played 10 consecutive years, and even fewer played their whole career at the same place.

by **Travis of the Cosmos** 2018-12-06, 21:33

Oh so we’re just pointing out that some guys went to other teams after their 10 year run was over? Neat and totally irrelevant. It was confusing because it was stupid and useless.

by **kingstonlake** 2018-12-06, 21:41

Travis of the Cosmos wrote:Oh so we’re just pointing out that some guys went to other teams after their 10 year run was over? Neat and totally irrelevant. It was confusing because it was stupid and useless.

No its not. It's relevant to the statistics.

by **Travis of the Cosmos** 2018-12-06, 21:43

kingstonlake wrote:
Travis of the Cosmos wrote:Oh so we’re just pointing out that some guys went to other teams after their 10 year run was over? Neat and totally irrelevant. It was confusing because it was stupid and useless.

No its not. It's relevant to the statistics.

Which ones Kingston?

by **kingstonlake** 2018-12-06, 21:48

Travis of the Cosmos wrote:
kingstonlake wrote:

No its not. It's relevant to the statistics.
Which ones Kingston?

Figure it out Travis.

by **Travis of the Cosmos** 2018-12-06, 21:49

kingstonlake wrote:
Travis of the Cosmos wrote:
Which ones Kingston?

Figure it out Travis.

No. Please tell me

by **kingstonlake** 2018-12-06, 21:50

Travis of the Cosmos wrote:
kingstonlake wrote:

Figure it out Travis.
No. Please tell me

No, figure it out. It's not hard. Please don't ruin the best day ever on tSwill.

by **Travis of the Cosmos** 2018-12-06, 21:53

kingstonlake wrote:
Travis of the Cosmos wrote:
No. Please tell me

No, figure it out. It's not hard. Please don't ruin the best day ever on tSwill.

No no no. I want you to explain Kingston. How was that poorly worded paragraph, and specifically their time after the team they were on, relevant?

by **kingstonlake** 2018-12-06, 21:55

Travis of the Cosmos wrote:
kingstonlake wrote:

No, figure it out. It's not hard. Please don't ruin the best day ever on tSwill.
No no no. I want you to explain Kingston. How was that poorly worded paragraph, and specifically their time after the team they were on, relevant?

I want a new Jeep Travis.

by **Travis of the Cosmos** 2018-12-06, 21:56

kingstonlake wrote:
Travis of the Cosmos wrote:
No no no. I want you to explain Kingston. How was that poorly worded paragraph, and specifically their time after the team they were on, relevant?

I want a new Jeep Travis.

So you can’t. It was a shitty paragraph with no relevance. Cool.

by Guest 2018-12-06, 21:57

Until today I didn't know Travis was actually Kelly Stafford.

by **Other Teams Pursuing That** 2018-12-06, 21:59

by **Travis of the Cosmos** 2018-12-06, 21:59

LooseGoose wrote:Until today I didn't know Travis was actually Kelly Stafford.

I’m not even defending him. I’m saying that was a poorly worded paragraph. That’s all. Someone decided to say it was relevant somehow but it certainly wasn’t.

by **kingstonlake** 2018-12-06, 22:01

Travis of the Cosmos wrote:
kingstonlake wrote:

I want a new Jeep Travis.
So you can’t. It was a shitty paragraph with no relevance. Cool.

I'm sorry you struggle with multiple statistics in a single paragraph.

by **Travis of the Cosmos** 2018-12-06, 22:02

kingstonlake wrote:
Travis of the Cosmos wrote:
So you can’t. It was a shitty paragraph with no relevance. Cool.

I'm sorry you struggle with multiple statistics in a single paragraph.

I’m proud of you for stringing several posts together without a spelling error. We all have our struggles.

by **kingstonlake** 2018-12-06, 22:12

Travis of the Cosmos wrote:
kingstonlake wrote:

I'm sorry you struggle with multiple statistics in a single paragraph.
I’m proud of you for stringing several posts together without a spelling error. We all have our struggles.

Sensing your recent struggles I made sure to double check before hitting send. Didn't want to add to your confusion. You're welcome.

by **Travis of the Cosmos** 2018-12-06, 22:13

kingstonlake wrote:
Travis of the Cosmos wrote:
I’m proud of you for stringing several posts together without a spelling error. We all have our struggles.

Sensing your recent struggles I made sure to double check before hitting send. Didn't want to add to your confusion. You're welcome.

I’m so proud of you Kingston that’s like three in a row without confusing your and you’re!

by **kingstonlake** 2018-12-06, 22:19

Travis of the Cosmos wrote:
kingstonlake wrote:

Sensing your recent struggles I made sure to double check before hitting send. Didn't want to add to your confusion. You're welcome.
I’m so proud of you Kingston that’s like three in a row without confusing your and you’re!

I'm guilty of relying on what predictive text inserts. I made an exception for you since it was more than two sentences which seems to trigger your confusion meter. Again, you're welcome.

by **Travis of the Cosmos** 2018-12-06, 22:21

No I just think it’s hilarious how hard you’re going after defending espn journalism. It’s unconscionable to think that they would write a few sentences that don’t actually make any sense. Totally unthinkable. You’re right Kingston. Good job. You get a gold star.

by **Other Teams Pursuing That** 2018-12-06, 22:31

The day has been ruined.

by Guest 2018-12-06, 22:34

Other Teams Pursuing That wrote:The day has been ruined.

We can't have nice things.

by **kingstonlake** 2018-12-06, 22:35

Travis of the Cosmos wrote:No I just think it’s hilarious how hard you’re going after defending espn journalism. It’s unconscionable to think that they would write a few sentences that don’t actually make any sense. Totally unthinkable. You’re right Kingston. Good job. You get a gold star.

I'm not defending espn journalism Travis. You're confused. Again. Don't get your "Haynes" in a bunch....

by **kingstonlake** 2018-12-06, 22:37

LooseGoose wrote:
Other Teams Pursuing That wrote:The day has been ruined.
We can't have nice things.

As long as there aren't stats in multiples, we're good. Post accordingly.

by **Travis of the Cosmos** 2018-12-06, 22:38

kingstonlake wrote:
Travis of the Cosmos wrote:No I just think it’s hilarious how hard you’re going after defending espn journalism. It’s unconscionable to think that they would write a few sentences that don’t actually make any sense. Totally unthinkable. You’re right Kingston. Good job. You get a gold star.

I'm not defending espn journalism Travis. You're confused. Again. Don't get your "Haynes" in a bunch....

Actually you are.

Travis- “This sentence is bad and makes no sense”

Kingston- “actually it’s totally relevant even though I won’t explain why and it turns out I love espn and am dating paula Lavigne”

by Guest 2018-12-06, 22:45

Travis of the Cosmos wrote:
kingstonlake wrote:

I'm not defending espn journalism Travis. You're confused. Again. Don't get your "Haynes" in a bunch....
Actually you are.

Travis- “This sentence is bad and makes no sense”

Kingston- “actually it’s totally relevant even though I won’t explain why and it turns out I love espn and am dating paula Lavigne”

So after all this shit it turns out KL is giving Paula the pine?

by **Travis of the Cosmos** 2018-12-06, 22:47

LooseGoose wrote:
Travis of the Cosmos wrote:
Actually you are.

Travis- “This sentence is bad and makes no sense”

Kingston- “actually it’s totally relevant even though I won’t explain why and it turns out I love espn and am dating paula Lavigne”

So after all this shit it turns out KL is giving Paula the pine?

I guess man. It’s the only thing that explains everything.

by **kingstonlake** 2018-12-06, 22:48

Travis of the Cosmos wrote:
kingstonlake wrote:

I'm not defending espn journalism Travis. You're confused. Again. Don't get your "Haynes" in a bunch....
Actually you are.

Travis- “This sentence is bad and makes no sense”

Kingston- “actually it’s totally relevant even though I won’t explain why and it turns out I love espn and am dating paula Lavigne”

Even if it were all true, you still struggle. Sorry for that.

by **kingstonlake** 2018-12-06, 22:50

LooseGoose wrote:
Travis of the Cosmos wrote:
Actually you are.

Travis- “This sentence is bad and makes no sense”

Kingston- “actually it’s totally relevant even though I won’t explain why and it turns out I love espn and am dating paula Lavigne”

So after all this shit it turns out KL is giving Paula the pine?

It's Birch. Not Mahogany.

by **Other Teams Pursuing That** 2018-12-06, 22:52

Travis of the Cosmos wrote:
kingstonlake wrote:

I'm not defending espn journalism Travis. You're confused. Again. Don't get your "Haynes" in a bunch....

it turns out I love espn and am dating paula Lavigne”

by Guest 2018-12-12, 01:46

The amazing part is that this is entirely plausible.

Detroit Lions could still make playoffs. Like, this year. Here's how

by Sponsored content