NCAA seeding show

DWags wrote:

Turtleneck wrote:Are people upset MSU is in a play in game?

I think it’s one of those deals where they are comparing g us to some other non play in teams and using criteria established we’re above them.

It’s part of the deal with the selection process. Which I like. Nothing we complain about changes a thing, but it’s one step closer to “normal” like WBH pointed out.

I imagine you’re thinking this team might not even deserve a play in, which a case can be made for also.

Cameron wrote:

WhiteBoyHatcher wrote:Just change the name of the board already to "All Steve all the time".

If we were all a unanimous chorus of hate, steve could be defeated. But too many of you insist on encouraging him. OTPT and Turtleneck are two of the worst offenders.

WhiteBoyHatcher wrote:Just change the name of the board already to "All Steve all the time".

kingstonlake wrote:Syracuse non play in 11 resume? Meh.

steveschneider wrote:

WhiteBoyHatcher wrote:Just change the name of the board already to "All Steve all the time".

I make some potent posts.

Travis of the Cosmos wrote:

WhiteBoyHatcher wrote:Just change the name of the board already to "All Steve all the time".

It’s pretty tedious to bother reading posts here isn’t it

Turtleneck wrote:

steveschneider wrote:

I make some potent posts.

No, you just post everything that comes to mind. You throw every thought you have on the wall (tSwill), so some things are bound to stick. To counter this, all Cameron has to do is share every single thought he has at every moment. I encourage Cameron to do this, along with the rest of tSwill.

steveschneider wrote:

Travis of the Cosmos wrote:

It’s pretty tedious to bother reading posts here isn’t it

If it makes you unhappy just leave. It's that simple.

Travis of the Cosmos wrote:

steveschneider wrote:


If it makes you unhappy just leave. It's that simple.

Go fuck yourself asshole

Nordic wrote:

NigelUno wrote:

Selection committee guy kind of let the cat out of the bag a bit by saying UCLA/MSU would be a great way to open/start the Tournament (or whatever the hell he said).  

Sure seemed like they took that into consideration when seeding.  

No question. Great move putting two brand names on Thursday. Especially with the schedule change. 

Steve's prediction was MSU and Duke would get in. No caveats. Full stop. He went 50/50.

kingstonlake wrote:Travis is mad again, guys.

NigelUno wrote:

Nordic wrote:

No question. Great move putting two brand names on Thursday. Especially with the schedule change. 

Steve's prediction was MSU and Duke would get in. No caveats. Full stop. He went 50/50.

I'm going to need a link and date/time context on this before I allow it.

#teamsteve

steveschneider wrote:

kingstonlake wrote:Travis is mad again, guys.

I thought this was a place of thicker skin. I take more shit than anyone here and it's all good. If I'm actually causing someone that level of agitation I'm not good with that. Travis it's nothing personal just talking shit. If it really bothers you I'll leave this board.

kingstonlake wrote:

steveschneider wrote:

I thought this was a place of thicker skin. I take more shit than anyone here and it's all good. If I'm actually causing someone that level of agitation I'm not good with that. Travis it's nothing personal just talking shit. If it really bothers you I'll leave this board.

I wouldn't sweat it. Maybe he had a bad weekend?

steveschneider wrote:

NigelUno wrote:

I'm going to need a link and date/time context on this before I allow it.

#teamsteve

Fair is fair. I didn't think Duke would get ousted by Covid and it happened. I still believe a healthy Duke team gets in it would be great ratings for the pair of play in games. I'm also revising my Iona take they got the Pitino bump to 15 from 16. With no Pitino they are a 16 seed. Counterfactual argument disclaimer.

MiamiSpartan wrote:

Nordic wrote:

 Take what you can get.  Their draw is fair IMO. Gotta play an extra game, but it is against an equal level opponent on a Thur night time slot. Sets up the potential for some day drinking Saturday. Great opportunity. 

I like the new schedule overall.  Fri-Mon works and you keep some tradition moving the First Four games to Thur. For me, and I'm sure a lot of others, Thursday is the start of March Madness. I could never get into the Tue/Wed games. It brings some legitimacy and more eyeballs to those games as well. 

Looks like a win win to me.

This, especially the bolded part.  I didnt realize the First Four was on Thursday this year until I saw our game day/time this morning.  I'll take it this year because of MSU, but I like two full days of blowing off work for tourney games.

NigelUno wrote:

Nordic wrote:

No question. Great move putting two brand names on Thursday. Especially with the schedule change. 

Steve's prediction was MSU and Duke would get in. No caveats. Full stop. He went 50/50.

I'm going to need a link and date/time context on this before I allow it.

#teamsteve

steveschneider wrote:I'm of the mindset that Duke and MSU get in. I think at this point Duke will earn their way in they look like a sweet sixteen elite 8 team now. UNC is supposedly playing top tier ball right now as well.

It's a weird year and I think if the NCAA wants a good product next month they'd be stupid to keep MSU out of the tournament.

steveschneider wrote:I have a hot take for the listeners. I think Tom Izzo is going to fuck Juwan Howard’s shit up twice.

steveschneider wrote:

kingstonlake wrote:Travis is mad again, guys.

I thought this was a place of thicker skin. I take more shit than anyone here and it's all good. If I'm actually causing someone that level of agitation I'm not good with that. Travis it's nothing personal just talking shit. If it really bothers you I'll leave this board.

kingstonlake wrote:Travis is mad again, guys.

Nordic wrote:

NigelUno wrote:

I'm going to need a link and date/time context on this before I allow it.

#teamsteve

Here you go...

https://spartanswill.forumotion.com/t22918p40-bracketology-2021

Actually steve was 1 of 3 in that thread. Proficiency rating decreased to 33%.

steveschneider wrote:I'm of the mindset that Duke and MSU get in. I think at this point Duke will earn their way in they look like a sweet sixteen elite 8 team now. UNC is supposedly playing top tier ball right now as well.

It's a weird year and I think if the NCAA wants a good product next month they'd be stupid to keep MSU out of the tournament.

steveschneider wrote:I have a hot take for the listeners. I think Tom Izzo is going to fuck Juwan Howard’s shit up twice.

Travis of the Cosmos wrote:

steveschneider wrote:

I thought this was a place of thicker skin. I take more shit than anyone here and it's all good. If I'm actually causing someone that level of agitation I'm not good with that. Travis it's nothing personal just talking shit. If it really bothers you I'll leave this board.

You make every thread you post in completely unreadable. This one was only tolerable when you weren’t posting post after post after post all about you, usually without even so much as a reply before your next post. Just shut the fuck up already. No one comes here to read about you. No one cares.

Travis of the Cosmos wrote:

kingstonlake wrote:Travis is mad again, guys.

What do you think it says about you that you’ve made yourself the lapdog of the biggest fuckin weirdo here. You’re like the little hanger on to his trolling tanfan. Pathetic.

steveschneider wrote:

Nordic wrote:

Here you go...

https://spartanswill.forumotion.com/t22918p40-bracketology-2021

Actually steve was 1 of 3 in that thread. Proficiency rating decreased to 33%.

To be fair the last one could still happen in the tournament but really that one was just hyping and pumping. That was a for fun take on par with up there with Spartanrocky's 10 page break downs where in the conclusion he has Michigan State beating Alabama in the Capital One Bowl.

kingstonlake wrote:

Travis of the Cosmos wrote:

What do you think it says about you that you’ve made yourself the lapdog of the biggest fuckin weirdo here. You’re like the little hanger on to his trolling tanfan. Pathetic.

I haven’t gave it a second thought Travis. You ok Bro?

Turtleneck wrote:

steveschneider wrote:



To be fair the last one could still happen in the tournament but really that one was just hyping and pumping. That was a for fun take on par with up there with Spartanrocky's 10 page break downs where in the conclusion he has Michigan State beating Alabama in the Capital One Bowl.

.333 is a great battering average in baseball, Steve. But this is Internet sports message board posting and .333 doesn't cut it. .333 gets you released. Then you end up posting at Scout in total obscurity.

Turtleneck wrote:

kingstonlake wrote:


I haven’t gave it a second thought Travis. You ok Bro?

Are you ok, Kingston?

WhiteBoyHatcher wrote:So if I start a Welcome to MSU Mel Tucker thread that makes me better than Rogers Hornsby then?

steveschneider wrote:Lets see how I did on twitter.

I tweeted at David Mayo former professional sports writer (not blue check but a former blue check) about UCLA vs MSU 'It's an exciting matchup. Should generate some good ratings.'

He liked it.

I tweeted this at John Feinstein "MSU vs UCLA a matchup made for ratings." and he liked it. Official blue check twitter guy and writes about college ball for the Washington Post.

NigelUno wrote:

steveschneider wrote:Lets see how I did on twitter.

I tweeted at David Mayo former professional sports writer (not blue check but a former blue check) about UCLA vs MSU 'It's an exciting matchup. Should generate some good ratings.'

He liked it.

I tweeted this at John Feinstein "MSU vs UCLA a matchup made for ratings." and he liked it. Official blue check twitter guy and writes about college ball for the Washington Post.

Motion to give steve the keys to the Swill twitter.

Other Teams Pursuing That wrote:

Cameron wrote:
If we were all a unanimous chorus of hate, steve could be defeated. But too many of you insist on encouraging him. OTPT and Turtleneck are two of the worst offenders.

Wut

steveschneider wrote:Lets see how I did on twitter.

I tweeted at David Mayo former professional sports writer (not blue check but a former blue check) about UCLA vs MSU 'It's an exciting matchup. Should generate some good ratings.'

He liked it.

I tweeted this at John Feinstein "MSU vs UCLA a matchup made for ratings." and he liked it. Official blue check twitter guy and writes about sports for the Washington Post.

Turtleneck wrote:

steveschneider wrote:Lets see how I did on twitter.

I tweeted at David Mayo former professional sports writer (not blue check but a former blue check) about UCLA vs MSU 'It's an exciting matchup. Should generate some good ratings.'

He liked it.

I tweeted this at John Feinstein "MSU vs UCLA a matchup made for ratings." and he liked it. Official blue check twitter guy and writes about sports for the Washington Post.

You need to get out more, Steve.