Re: ESPN: Sources: Michigan St.'s Tucker subject of sexual harassment investigation

by **kingstonlake** Fri Oct 20, 2023 10:40 pm

duffy munn wrote:
Trapper Gus wrote:

Generally wearing a suit & tie is more acceptable for a funeral.

Wearing anything with the word "fuck" on it says something negative about the person wearing it to some other people, and anyone who does that should be aware of it.

You don't get it, at all. While people can wear whatever, prople who are trying to send a message, if they don't consider what it might be interpreted as in the worst case, and decide if they want to send that message, they are not being professional in their messaging, or unless they find that the worst case message is fine with them.

I had to double check to be sure, but I did, and as I said, "I wouldn't wear that tee shirt" if I was her.

Take the L Trapper

Please make sure you spell out specifically what “L” means.

by **steveschneider** Sat Oct 21, 2023 7:04 am

kingstonlake wrote:
duffy munn wrote:

Take the L Trapper

Please make sure you spell out specifically what “L” means.

1.
the twelfth letter of the alphabet.
2.
a shape like that of a capital L.
"a four-story L-shaped building"

by **Jake from State Farm** Sat Oct 21, 2023 8:58 am

Am I supposed to read this whole effing thread? Because it's too early in the morning to read this whole effing thread.

by **Turtleneck** Sat Oct 21, 2023 9:27 am

No, in fact post something interesting so it starts a new branch and we aren’t stuck on this one.

by **steveschneider** Sat Oct 21, 2023 9:30 am

Jake from State Farm wrote:Am I supposed to read this whole effing thread? Because it's too early in the morning to read this whole effing thread.

There was a big time DSF and it even got Miami off the Jim Comparoni site to join in.

by **Cameron** Sat Oct 21, 2023 10:38 am

MiamiSpartan wrote:
Trapper Gus wrote:

Sorry.

I forgot how simple minded people on here can be and tried to have a rational discussion.
Trapper Gus wrote:

Sorry.

I forgot how simple minded people on here can be and tried to have a rational discussion.

Simple minded because our brains don't make up some innuendo that your brain makes up? Seriously, this has been an awful take. You compared a shirt saying Set The Expextation to one pointing to someone's crotch with the words fun machine. I don't know what innuendo you're reading into that shirt that leads to that comparison. Just absolutely a bizarre take.

Set the EXpectation.

See, it's clear as day, she's a slut.

/s for the engineers who think others are simple minded.

But I think that literally might be what he means.

by **Motown Spartan** Sat Oct 21, 2023 10:52 am

A woman’s clothing does not equal consent to anything, nor an invitation.

by **Trapper Gus** Sat Oct 21, 2023 11:28 am

You guys are still going on about this?

by **Travis of the Cosmos** Sat Oct 21, 2023 11:51 am

Trapper Gus wrote:You guys are still going on about this?

Please stop dropping innuendos like this one, it’s creepy

by **Trapper Gus** Sat Oct 21, 2023 11:56 am

Travis of the Cosmos wrote:
Trapper Gus wrote:You guys are still going on about this?
Please stop dropping innuendos like this one, it’s creepy

Okay, just funny you twurps started it and can't let go.

by **Travis of the Cosmos** Sat Oct 21, 2023 12:06 pm

Trapper Gus wrote:
Travis of the Cosmos wrote:
Please stop dropping innuendos like this one, it’s creepy

Okay, just funny you twurps started it and can't let go.

Please stop hitting on me sicko

by **Trapper Gus** Sat Oct 21, 2023 12:12 pm

Travis of the Cosmos wrote:
Trapper Gus wrote:

Okay, just funny you twurps started it and can't let go.
Please stop hitting on me sicko

by **Motown Spartan** Wed Oct 25, 2023 6:48 pm

by **GRR Spartan** Wed Oct 25, 2023 7:08 pm

Shh

Listen.

That sound isn’t the leaves blowing off the trees. It’s millions of what Mel thought were his dollars blowing back to MSU

by **Trapper Gus** Thu Oct 26, 2023 9:13 am

GRR Spartan wrote:Shh

Listen.

That sound isn’t the leaves blowing off the trees. It’s millions of what Mel thought were his dollars blowing back to MSU

You know he is claiming that MSU's process was flawed...

by CaptainSlow33 Thu Oct 26, 2023 9:34 am

Trapper Gus wrote:
GRR Spartan wrote:Shh

Listen.

That sound isn’t the leaves blowing off the trees. It’s millions of what Mel thought were his dollars blowing back to MSU

You know he is claiming that MSU's process was flawed...

He'll have a hell of a time proving it.

by AvgMSUJoe Thu Oct 26, 2023 9:55 am

CaptainSlow33 wrote:
Trapper Gus wrote:

You know he is claiming that MSU's process was flawed...

He'll have a hell of a time proving it.

He wont if the chair of the BOT is the "leaker". There was a couple million in lost wage between the leak and the "hearing" and since he was canned before the "hearing" (based on public perception), he kind of has a point.

by **Trapper Gus** Thu Oct 26, 2023 10:00 am

A process where the accuser can disclose the accusation publicly, but the accused cannot is structurally flawed.

by **NigelUno** Thu Oct 26, 2023 10:07 am

AvgMSUJoe wrote:
CaptainSlow33 wrote:

He'll have a hell of a time proving it.

He wont if the chair of the BOT is the "leaker". There was a couple million in lost wage between the leak and the "hearing" and since he was canned before the "hearing" (based on public perception), he kind of has a point.

A point he (or his attorney) could have made at the hearing, if he showed up.

He seemed to argue that he should have been fired earlier (if MSU knew all along). If that's the case, then maybe we could sue him for back pay (or whatever it would be called).

by **Trapper Gus** Thu Oct 26, 2023 10:10 am

NigelUno wrote:
AvgMSUJoe wrote:

He wont if the chair of the BOT is the "leaker". There was a couple million in lost wage between the leak and the "hearing" and since he was canned before the "hearing" (based on public perception), he kind of has a point.

A point he (or his attorney) could have made at the hearing, if he showed up.

He seemed to argue that he should have been fired earlier (if MSU knew all along). If that's the case, then maybe we could sue him for back pay (or whatever it would be called).

Well except that the BoT mess wasn't known at that time...

Tucket et al had no upside to showing up to a hearing that they are basically calling a Kangaroo Court.

by **tGreenWay** Thu Oct 26, 2023 10:15 am

Motown Spartan wrote:A woman’s clothing does not equal consent to anything, nor an invitation.

Bump to underscore this for Trapper Gus. Read Motown’s post above. Then read it again.

by **Travis of the Cosmos** Thu Oct 26, 2023 10:17 am

Trapper Gus wrote:A process where the accuser can disclose the accusation publicly, but the accused cannot is structurally flawed.

What? Think about this for like 30 seconds.

Just kidding, don’t, your track record of getting why this is the case is not great at best. But I assure you, there are reasons.

by **Travis of the Cosmos** Thu Oct 26, 2023 10:18 am

Real shame that tucks didn’t mention the tee shirt that Tracy was wearing almost a full year prior to when he harassed her though. That defense would have been rock solid.

by **Trapper Gus** Thu Oct 26, 2023 10:34 am

tGreenWay wrote:
Motown Spartan wrote:A woman’s clothing does not equal consent to anything, nor an invitation.

Bump to underscore this for Trapper Gus. Read Motown’s post above. Then read it again.

Good Grief.

You guys have completely ignored my point and keep lying about what my point is, even after I have clarified it endlessly.

Grow up already.

by **Cameron** Thu Oct 26, 2023 10:36 am

We all understood your point just fine, I assure you.

by **Trapper Gus** Thu Oct 26, 2023 11:24 am

Cameron wrote:We all understood your point just fine, I assure you.

Your interpretation is not what I meant.

by **Trapper Gus** Fri Nov 03, 2023 12:32 pm

https://news.bloomberglaw.com/litigation/mel-tucker-tests-employers-ability-to-jettison-pr-liabilities

by **NigelUno** Tue Nov 21, 2023 2:43 pm

ESPN: Sources: Michigan St.'s Tucker subject of sexual harassment investigation - Page 21 276803595

Michigan State AD eyed Mel Tucker separation before season, sources say

by **DWags** Tue Nov 21, 2023 5:23 pm

NigelUno wrote:

Michigan State AD eyed Mel Tucker separation before season, sources say

Who are the administrators who told him not to fire Tucker? They should be walked off of our campus immediately followed by a wheelbarrow with their personal belongings.

by **NigelUno** Tue Nov 21, 2023 6:01 pm

DWags wrote:
NigelUno wrote:

Michigan State AD eyed Mel Tucker separation before season, sources say

Who are the administrators who told him not to fire Tucker? They should be walked off of our campus immediately followed by a wheelbarrow with their personal belongings.

Agreed. And just what we need...more infighting. Haller is getting ahead of something.

by AvgMSUJoe Tue Nov 21, 2023 7:21 pm

DWags wrote:
NigelUno wrote:

Michigan State AD eyed Mel Tucker separation before season, sources say

Who are the administrators who told him not to fire Tucker? They should be walked off of our campus immediately followed by a wheelbarrow with their personal belongings.

"This morning's news might sound like the MSU of old. It is not," Woodruff said. "It is not the MSU of old because we maintain the confidence of the claimant and respondent while respecting and valuing the claimant and respondent's right to share their story. And it's not [the MSU of old] because of the further action we take today."

Football suffered, but the "right" thing was done... until someone leaked the story.

(Did we find out if it was the board btw?)

by **Trapper Gus** Wed Nov 22, 2023 7:41 am

AvgMSUJoe wrote:
DWags wrote:

Who are the administrators who told him not to fire Tucker? They should be walked off of our campus immediately followed by a wheelbarrow with their personal belongings.

"This morning's news might sound like the MSU of old. It is not," Woodruff said. "It is not the MSU of old because we maintain the confidence of the claimant and respondent while respecting and valuing the claimant and respondent's right to share their story. And it's not [the MSU of old] because of the further action we take today."
Football suffered, but the "right" thing was done... until someone leaked the story.

(Did we find out if it was the board btw?)

We haven't been given any proof it was a board member, however there is a bunch of smoke there and given their history it's probably 50/50 that it was...

by **DWags** Wed Nov 22, 2023 10:24 am

Just think about the amount of information Haller had ging into the season. Think avbout Vegas. Think about the sharks that also had that information. We sat here and just talked football like good fans and excited fans.

It's crazy.

by **Motown Spartan** Wed Nov 22, 2023 10:37 am

DWags wrote:Just think about the amount of information Haller had ging into the season. Think avbout Vegas. Think about the sharks that also had that information. We sat here and just talked football like good fans and excited fans.

It's crazy.

And we

ESPN: Sources: Michigan St.'s Tucker subject of sexual harassment investigation - Page 21 3434560931

thinking about Tuck Comin (not cummin).

by CaptainSlow33 Wed Nov 22, 2023 10:45 am

Unrelated, but I'm pretty sure that I saw Mel at the Atlanta Airport a couple weeks ago. The person I saw had their dick in their pants, so it's very possible that it wasn't actually him, but if it was then the swagger hype is real. He was a very handsome man in person.

by **Turtleneck** Wed Nov 22, 2023 1:29 pm

[tw]1727052433673851184?s=20[/tw]

Ok. ESPN is on the case. They still have yet to say a word about any of the sex abuse scandals at big brand programs, but they will look to hold all others accountable.

by **Cameron** Wed Nov 22, 2023 3:28 pm

Fuck Dan Murphy.

by **steveschneider** Fri Nov 24, 2023 7:06 am

Cameron wrote:Fuck Dan Murphy.

Take that Dan Murphy. Feel the wrath of Cameron and thank you Dan Murphy for taking him off my plate!

by **Cameron** Fri Nov 24, 2023 9:37 am

Steve, shut the fuck up. When we want to know which over hyped coach's nutsack you're going to latch onto like a hungry leech next, we'll ask.

by **NigelUno** Fri Nov 24, 2023 10:57 am

Sounds to me like someone on the Board asked Haller why he didn't fire Tucker earlier, and Haller said he tried. Just some basic finger pointing.

Could be something as simple as they wanted to run it by some lawyers (so they could fire him for cause and avoid a big pay out).