Fuck it- statues

Cameron wrote:

kingstonlake wrote:

Why did I visit statues, memorials, or monuments in the south? To honor them? Why did I visit battle fields? To honor the confederacy?The answer is no. It’s obvious why statues were built in the 1800’s. But it’s 2020.

I have no idea why you do the things you do. I don't know why you think Cake by the Ocean is the best song.

The battlefields, memorials, that stuff is mostly fine. Statues of traitorous cocksuckers like Robert E. Lee and Jefferson Davis should never have been built, and should have been demolished the second they were installed on public property. I don't know what you think society stands to gain by leaving them alone, but I'm quite sure you're wrong to think it.

kingstonlake wrote:

Cameron wrote:

I have no idea why you do the things you do. I don't know why you think Cake by the Ocean is the best song.

The battlefields, memorials, that stuff is mostly fine. Statues of traitorous cocksuckers like Robert E. Lee and Jefferson Davis should never have been built, and should have been demolished the second they were installed on public property. I don't know what you think society stands to gain by leaving them alone, but I'm quite sure you're wrong to think it.

Of course you think that. Because you think everyone should think the way you do. Seems kinda intolerant. I told you I didn’t visit those things to “honor” anything. But I guess you’re gonna think what you want. There’s a simple solution. If you don’t want to visit anything like that, then don’t. I’m not saying we need to have dance party’s every year to honor these people at the sites. But allow people to view history if they want. On their terms, not yours.

Cameron wrote:

kingstonlake wrote:

Of course you think that. Because you think everyone should think the way you do. Seems kinda intolerant. I told you I didn’t visit those things to “honor” anything. But I guess you’re gonna think what you want. There’s a simple solution. If you don’t want to visit anything like that, then don’t. I’m not saying we need to have dance party’s every year to honor these people at the sites. But allow people to view history if they want. On their terms, not yours.

So the benefit we get is "viewing history?" And that's worth maintaining statues built to honor traitors who tried to overthrow our nation on public lands at taxpayer expense, when many of those taxpayers feel oppressed by the very existence of those statues? But you think the statues are fine, and you think those people should just suck it up or feel like you do. Seems kinda intolerant.

If someone wants to commission a statue of Hitler fucking baby Jesus in the ear and house that statue on private property, fucking go nuts. These statues have no place on public land.

MiamiSpartan wrote:

Travis of the Cosmos wrote:

We should take down names of people guilty of war crimes if we know they are guilty of war crimes.

You're going to remove names of people that were never tried/convicted of war crimes?

And who decides who is guilty of war crimes? And then where do you draw the line? People in the South will then say no statues of Sherman, Grant, and others because they consider them guilty of war crimes. And then some will say no statues of Truman. Probably better remove any statues of George Washington and Thomas Jefferson, as well.

I'm not all that bothered either way. I see the argument with the Civil War figures, but people seem to be drawing lines at arbitrary places. If you want to say no statues for anyone who fought for the confederacy, then why not for anyone who owned slaves in the first place? Why not anyone who helped further/extend the existence of slavery?

Watch Out Pylon! wrote:https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/black-lives-matter-protests-uk-bristol-statue-edward-colston-slavery-a9553266.html?utm_medium=Social&utm_source=Twitter#Echobox=1591538752

What would Guest think?

Rocinante wrote:Slippery slope arguments are lazy and stupid. Just saying.

Argue the thing on its own merits, not on some future boogie man.

Travis of the Cosmos wrote:

MiamiSpartan wrote:


You're going to remove names of people that were never tried/convicted of war crimes?

And who decides who is guilty of war crimes? And then where do you draw the line? People in the South will then say no statues of Sherman, Grant, and others because they consider them guilty of war crimes. And then some will say no statues of Truman. Probably better remove any statues of George Washington and Thomas Jefferson, as well.

I'm not all that bothered either way. I see the argument with the Civil War figures, but people seem to be drawing lines at arbitrary places. If you want to say no statues for anyone who fought for the confederacy, then why not for anyone who owned slaves in the first place? Why not anyone who helped further/extend the existence of slavery?

It was a bit hyperbolic Miami but I think it’s fun that you wrote 400 words replying to it

Turtleneck wrote:[tw]1271534712423698434?s=21[/tw]

Turtleneck wrote:[tw]1271534712423698434?s=21[/tw]

MiamiSpartan wrote:It's somewhat reassuring to remember that the US doesn't have a monopoly on senseless, mind-boggling behavior.

While we have people painting the hammer & sickle while protesting police/government brutality, and people waving Nazi flags while protesting the "tyranny" of a lockdown, England has people giving the Nazi salute while marching to protect a Churchill statue.

Earth is a stupid planet.

NigelUno wrote:[tw]1273817220657938433[/tw]

Taking down Confederate monuments in Georgia. Not sure I ever thought that would happen.

NigelUno wrote:

This monument might be difficult to remove. Put a big blue tarp over it?

steveschneider wrote:Taking down Teddy Roosevelt? Seriously? There needs to be guidelines and some discussion about this statue thing.

DWags wrote:

Travis of the Cosmos wrote:

The statue is bad and his family wants it taken down. Google it, it will make more sense when you see it.

Maybe in this time of statue removal we can take the Morgan Freeman statue down and replace it with Ervin Johnson or some famous MSU basketball player.

DWags wrote:

Travis of the Cosmos wrote:

The statue is bad and his family wants it taken down. Google it, it will make more sense when you see it.

Maybe in this time of statue removal we can take the Morgan Freeman statue down and replace it with Ervin Johnson or some famous MSU basketball player.

Travis of the Cosmos wrote:Here-



It’s not good you guys.

Travis of the Cosmos wrote:

steveschneider wrote:Taking down Teddy Roosevelt? Seriously? There needs to be guidelines and some discussion about this statue thing.

The statue is bad and his family wants it taken down. Google it, it will make more sense when you see it.

tGreenWay wrote:I’ve always considered the statues of Confederates were meant as a tribute. Statues of those traitors belong in museums as lessons in American history, not scattered across the country in public spaces to be honored. As I mentioned the last time, imagine how statues of Lincoln would be greeted across the South, or a Sherman statue in downtown Atlanta.

steveschneider wrote:I think this statue thing has gotten completely out of hand. Enough with this mob rule going around and determining which statue stays and goes. I think there needs to be a discussion and a process around it.

Frank Ricard wrote:

steveschneider wrote:I think this statue thing has gotten completely out of hand. Enough with this mob rule going around and determining which statue stays and goes. I think there needs to be a discussion and a process around it.

You mean we should put as much thinking as we did when these statues were put up?  These were put up to intimidate Blacks.  That's all the thought process that was put into it - so these people in the South could hang onto their racist past.

You think the Germans should have statues honoring Hitler and Himmler?  You think there should be committees and focus groups to leave up our racist past?  Maybe the South didn't have gas chambers, but it's a fact they didn't see their slaves as human beings and bought and sold them like commodities, often splitting up families.  The Nazis didn't see Jewish people as humans either.  And I don't see statues in Germany romanticizing their defeat in a war.  You'd think we'd do better.  Fuck statues.