Mike Valenti 2020

Cameron wrote:It's telling that you never considered that they might be making fun of you.

I think it was just a hint to get this thread going. Also there's others here that listen to his show so feel free to discuss among your selves.

steve is calling it a mention never change steve, i love you.

Other Teams Pursuing That wrote:steve is calling it a mention never change steve, i love you.

Yeah people keep mentioning him to me. I thought it was weird too but then I realized it must be on the subconscious level they are asking for something. I’m just trying to be helpful.

My takeaway is Steve and kingston are posting on the cock? What the fuck guys.

WhiteBoyHatcher wrote:My takeaway is Steve and kingston are posting on the cock? What the fuck guys.

What is the cock? Is that the rcmb?

WhiteBoyHatcher wrote:My takeaway is Steve and kingston are posting on the cock? What the fuck guys.

This. First, finding out Steve thinks mentioning his mancrush on Valenti is his authorization to bump the thread and talk about his other mancrush, then learning Steve is stepping out on us by posting on another board. It’s so much to absorb.

kingstonlake wrote:

WhiteBoyHatcher wrote:My takeaway is Steve and kingston are posting on the cock? What the fuck guys.

What is the cock? Is that the rcmb?

And you, too, cheating on us. No surprise.

It’s not me and you’ll have to take my word for it haven’t been to that site in a long time. Haven’t even scrolled through it. I’m 100% swill.

tGreenWay wrote:

WhiteBoyHatcher wrote:My takeaway is Steve and kingston are posting on the cock? What the fuck guys.

This. First, finding out Steve thinks mentioning his mancrush on Valenti is his authorization to bump the thread and talk about his other mancrush, then learning Steve is stepping out on us by posting on another board. It’s so much to absorb.

Can't we just be objective and acknowledge that Juwan Howard was a homerun hire? He learned from Eric Spoelstra who's a really good coach. This is the type of analysis that Mike V should have been providing from day one.

tGreenWay wrote:

kingstonlake wrote:

What is the cock? Is that the rcmb?

And you, too, cheating on us. No surprise.

Sorry bro. Not me. I can get updates on whose dating who on that board right here.

kingstonlake wrote:

tGreenWay wrote:



And you, too, cheating on us. No surprise.

Sorry bro. Not me. I can get updates on whose dating who on that board right here.

I believe you Kingston.

kingstonlake wrote:
#teamstevevalenti

steveschneider wrote:

tGreenWay wrote:



This. First, finding out Steve thinks mentioning his mancrush on Valenti is his authorization to bump the thread and talk about his other mancrush, then learning Steve is stepping out on us by posting on another board. It’s so much to absorb.

Can't we just be objective and acknowledge that Juwan Howard was a homerun hire? He learned from Eric Spoelstra who's a really good coach. This is the type of analysis that Mike V should have been providing from day one.

Blue confirmed.

Fucking steve...

steveschneider wrote:

tGreenWay wrote:



This. First, finding out Steve thinks mentioning his mancrush on Valenti is his authorization to bump the thread and talk about his other mancrush, then learning Steve is stepping out on us by posting on another board. It’s so much to absorb.

Can't we just be objective and acknowledge that Juwan Howard was a homerun hire? He learned from Eric Spoelstra who's a really good coach. This is the type of analysis that Mike V should have been providing from day one.

What exactly about his coaching style do you like so much that makes him a home run hire steve? Do you like the modernized sets that he runs? His defensive philosophy? His substitution patterns? Does he play to foul up 3 late or defend? What does he run on his SLOBS and BLOBS that work so well? Does he switch or send his guys under ball screens?

My understanding is that the entire offense and defensive schemes that UM runs are installed and managed by Phil Martelli but I don't really pay too much attention to UM.

WhiteBoyHatcher wrote:

steveschneider wrote:

Can't we just be objective and acknowledge that Juwan Howard was a homerun hire? He learned from Eric Spoelstra who's a really good coach. This is the type of analysis that Mike V should have been providing from day one.

What exactly about his coaching style do you like so much that makes him a home run hire steve? Do you like the modernized sets that he runs? His defensive philosophy? His substitution patterns? Does he play to foul up 3 late or defend? What does he run on his SLOBS and BLOBS that work so well? Does he switch or send his guys under ball screens?

My understanding is that the entire offense and defensive schemes that UM runs are installed and managed by Phil Martelli but I don't really pay too much attention to UM.

I haven't caught anything more than a glimpse this year so I can't say. I'm just going off the most important stat line in sports which is the w/l record.

Cameron wrote:

steveschneider wrote:

Can't we just be objective and acknowledge that Juwan Howard was a homerun hire? He learned from Eric Spoelstra who's a really good coach. This is the type of analysis that Mike V should have been providing from day one.

Blue confirmed.

Fucking steve...

So you think he was a bad hire? Be objective.

steveschneider wrote:

Cameron wrote:
Blue confirmed.

Fucking steve...

So you think he was a bad hire? Be objective.

If you can't say something bad about UM, you shouldn't say anything at all.

Fucking steve...

Cameron wrote:

steveschneider wrote:

So you think he was a bad hire? Be objective.

If you can't say something bad about UM, you shouldn't say anything at all.

Fucking steve...

Juwan has herpes. He deserves herpes but not as much as herpes deserves Juwan. How's that?

Better.

steveschneider wrote:

tGreenWay wrote:



This. First, finding out Steve thinks mentioning his mancrush on Valenti is his authorization to bump the thread and talk about his other mancrush, then learning Steve is stepping out on us by posting on another board. It’s so much to absorb.

Can't we just be objective and acknowledge that Juwan Howard was a homerun hire? He learned from Eric Spoelstra who's a really good coach. This is the type of analysis that Mike V should have been providing from day one.

It’s u-m. I have no interest in being objective when it comes to them. I also have no interest in seeing multiple threads about u-m on tSwill. We have an all-encompassing thread for that school. If you want to write about their bball Coach, put it in that thread. If I want to read it, I can find it there.

Fucking Steve.

For the record its 2021. This thread needs no more entries.

kingstonlake wrote:For the record its 2021. This thread needs no more entries.

I stopped listening right before the Super Bowl. Just barely into 2021. Most of what I can speak to was before that. If you are looking for current takes on his show it will have to come from some where else.

steveschneider wrote:

kingstonlake wrote:For the record its 2021. This thread needs no more entries.

I stopped listening right before the Super Bowl. Just barely into 2021. Most of what I can speak to was before that. If you are looking for current takes on his show it will have to come from some where else.

You can’t quit Valenti.

Motown Spartan wrote:

steveschneider wrote:

I stopped listening right before the Super Bowl. Just barely into 2021. Most of what I can speak to was before that. If you are looking for current takes on his show it will have to come from some where else.

You can’t quit Valenti.

In Soviet Russia, Valenti quits you.

Motown Spartan wrote:

steveschneider wrote:

I stopped listening right before the Super Bowl. Just barely into 2021. Most of what I can speak to was before that. If you are looking for current takes on his show it will have to come from some where else.

You can’t quit Valenti.

Yep. Steve has claimed more than once to have stopped listening to Valenti, then he comes back with something else the guy said.

Steve is a noted mouthwash chugger. Addicts gonna addict.

In all fairness, we can't quit Steve.

Cameron wrote:Steve is a noted mouthwash chugger. Addicts gonna addict.

I don't even know why I'm the 'Valenti' guy. I bet if god is really watching us and keeping tabs if he'd release his data tables we'd see that there are others that have far more hours listening to his show than myself.

Looks like Sully is starting a golf business. Outside of his regional appeal (small) I can't picture why anyone would want to give him some money. Also, you can just use the internet find a golf course, show up and pay. Seems like a dumb business idea.

Steve, bruh, this is why people consider you the Valenti guy.

Cameron wrote:Steve, bruh, this is why people consider you the Valenti guy.

I’d love to move on but I saw a mention so I bumped this one. I aim to please. Unfortunately I can’t talk about the current shows but I can discuss the ones I listened to before the Super Bowl.

Fucking steve...

steveschneider wrote:

kingstonlake wrote:For the record its 2021. This thread needs no more entries.

I stopped listening right before the Super Bowl. Just barely into 2021. Most of what I can speak to was before that. If you are looking for current takes on his show it will have to come from some where else.

Bump.

Valenti went off on the free press and news about the coverage of Anderson today. He did so because the Freep has a reporter asking tough questions about what Harbaugh said proclaiming Anderson’s innocence. The free press actually called the show and said it was the most read story of the day. That really set him off. He asked then why is it buried under 19 stories?

Yeah, I listened. He had valid points. He didn’t even want to compare the coverage between the schools but asked if the settlement was north of a billion where is the coverage.

Was interesting. Obviously the broader point was made that Anderson abuses strong wrestlers and football players so the public isn’t as sympathetic for some reaso compared to the young girls at MSU and the young boys at PSU.

I guess Jon Vaughn is going after Harbaugh for basically defending Anderson and Bo.

I only read this article, and to me, it was insane that it somehow transitioned from sex abuse to "let's look at all the great things going on in the program right now, Harbaugh is in a good mood, so much is great right now, UM will get all the wins." I can see it now. The writer turned in a full article about sex abuse, and then the editor said, "we have to cut half of this to make room for praising Harbaugh and naming UM June national champs."

https://www.freep.com/story/sports/college/university-michigan/wolverines/2021/06/03/michigan-footballs-jim-harbaugh-defends-bo-schembechler-legacy-robert-anderson/7535411002/

DWags wrote:Valenti went off on the free press and news about the coverage of Anderson today. He did so because the Freep has a reporter asking tough questions about what Harbaugh said proclaiming Anderson’s innocence.  The free press actually called the show and said it was the most read story of the day. That really set him off. He asked then why is it buried under 19 stories?  

Yeah, I listened. He had valid points.  He didn’t even want to compare the coverage between the schools but asked if the settlement was north of a billion where is the coverage.

Was interesting. Obviously the broader point was made that Anderson abuses strong wrestlers and football players so the public isn’t as sympathetic for some reaso compared to the young girls at MSU and the young boys at PSU.

I guess Jon Vaughn is going after Harbaugh for basically defending Anderson and Bo.

The reason is because toxic masculinity isn’t any better for men than it is for anyone else dwags. It’s just toxic.

Travis of the Cosmos wrote:

DWags wrote:Valenti went off on the free press and news about the coverage of Anderson today. He did so because the Freep has a reporter asking tough questions about what Harbaugh said proclaiming Anderson’s innocence.  The free press actually called the show and said it was the most read story of the day. That really set him off. He asked then why is it buried under 19 stories?  

Yeah, I listened. He had valid points.  He didn’t even want to compare the coverage between the schools but asked if the settlement was north of a billion where is the coverage.

Was interesting. Obviously the broader point was made that Anderson abuses strong wrestlers and football players so the public isn’t as sympathetic for some reaso compared to the young girls at MSU and the young boys at PSU.

I guess Jon Vaughn is going after Harbaugh for basically defending Anderson and Bo.

The reason is because toxic masculinity isn’t any better for men than it is for anyone else dwags. It’s just toxic.

I get it. And it leaves scars on the toughest of people.

Turtleneck wrote:I only read this article, and to me, it was insane that it somehow transitioned from sex abuse to "let's look at all the great things going on in the program right now, Harbaugh is a good mood, so much is great right now, UM will get all the wins." I can see it now. The writer turned in a full article about sex abuse, and then the editor said, "we have to cut half of this to make room for praising Harbaugh and naming UM June national champs."

If it’s that o err, and I have my suspicions, journalism isn’t only dead, it’s the walking dead doing more damage than any good.

DWags wrote:

Turtleneck wrote:I only read this article, and to me, it was insane that it somehow transitioned from sex abuse to "let's look at all the great things going on in the program right now, Harbaugh is a good mood, so much is great right now, UM will get all the wins." I can see it now. The writer turned in a full article about sex abuse, and then the editor said, "we have to cut half of this to make room for praising Harbaugh and naming UM June national champs."

If it’s that o err, and I have my suspicions, journalism isn’t only dead, it’s the walking dead doing more damage than any good.

I forgot the link. Just added it. Maybe I'm overreacting. I am probably overreacting.