2020 Congressional Elections

[tw]1346492589176971270[/tw]

steveschneider wrote:Food for thought.

[tw]1346485726020390913?s=21[/tw]

Yeah that’s deep steve. Thank you.

Rocinante wrote:

steveschneider wrote:Food for thought.

[tw]1346485726020390913?s=21[/tw]

Yeah that’s deep steve. Thank you.

That "editorial board" guy is on top of things.

Robert J Sakimano wrote:

Rocinante wrote:

Yeah that’s deep steve. Thank you.

That "editorial board" guy is on top of things.

Wow. He thinks they will do anything to corrupt democracy??? Not the republicans!!!!

Note to self start leave snarky responses to a few posters.

Rocinante wrote:

steveschneider wrote:Food for thought.

[tw]1346485726020390913?s=21[/tw]

Yeah that’s deep steve. Thank you.

You are so welcome. Let me know if there is anything else I can do to be of further assistance.

Turtleneck wrote:

steveschneider wrote:

Boebert is a radical nut that carries a gun to congress and believes in Qanon.

We can also read, Steve. But thank you for this information.

Sorry I'm not perfect like you.

Steve is a good sport..

AvgMSUJoe wrote:

Robert J Sakimano wrote: That "editorial board" guy is on top of things.

Wow. He thinks they will do anything to corrupt democracy??? Not the republicans!!!!

next thing you know, they'll demand "let voters decide" during impeachment.. then when voters decide on Election Day, they'll say "we meant the white voters"...

stick with me here, but I'm starting to think the republicans are corrupt.

steveschneider wrote:Food for thought.

[tw]1346485726020390913?s=21[/tw]

Who cares? Impeachment is meaningless.

MiamiSpartan wrote:

steveschneider wrote:Food for thought.

[tw]1346485726020390913?s=21[/tw]

Who cares? Impeachment is meaningless.

Not if the senate votes to remove.

MiamiSpartan wrote:

steveschneider wrote:Food for thought.

[tw]1346485726020390913?s=21[/tw]

Who cares? Impeachment is meaningless.

Pretty much. Plenty of Trumpsters think that since he wasn't convicted it never happened.

Jake from State Farm wrote:

MiamiSpartan wrote:

Who cares? Impeachment is meaningless.

Pretty much. Plenty of Trumpsters think that since he wasn't convicted it never happened.

And to a man they think OJ is guilty.

Jake from State Farm wrote:

MiamiSpartan wrote:

Who cares? Impeachment is meaningless.

Pretty much. Plenty of Trumpsters think that since he wasn't convicted it never happened.

The scenario John Stoehr is laying out is complete different, a republican controlled house would impeach and a republican controlled senate votes to remove. He's saying they'll do this without an impeachable offense. When you can make up anything and get your base to believe it anything is possible.

steveschneider wrote:

Turtleneck wrote:

We can also read, Steve. But thank you for this information.

Sorry I'm not perfect like you.

It's a curse to be as perfect as me.

[tw]1346519659005284353[/tw]

The fat lady is warming up her vocal chords. Democracy is on life support.

Turtleneck wrote:

steveschneider wrote:

Sorry I'm not perfect like you.

It's a curse to be as perfect as me.

Fixed it.

steveschneider wrote:

Jake from State Farm wrote:

Pretty much. Plenty of Trumpsters think that since he wasn't convicted it never happened.

The scenario John Stoehr is laying out is complete different, a republican controlled house would impeach and a republican controlled senate votes to remove. He's saying they'll do this without an impeachable offense. When you can make up anything and get your base to believe it anything is possible.

They’d need 67 in the senate steve

They wouldn't even get all republican votes.

Travis of the Cosmos wrote:

steveschneider wrote:

The scenario John Stoehr is laying out is complete different, a republican controlled house would impeach and a republican controlled senate votes to remove. He's saying they'll do this without an impeachable offense. When you can make up anything and get your base to believe it anything is possible.

They’d need 67 in the senate steve

I think Steve took his civics course at Trump University. Same class where they teach that a Vice President can reject electoral votes when he is counting them in front of Congress (not that steve said the latter, that's only our esteemed President that thinks that).

MiamiSpartan wrote:

Travis of the Cosmos wrote:

They’d need 67 in the senate steve

I think Steve took his civics course at Trump University. Same class where they teach that a Vice President can reject electoral votes when he is counting them in front of Congress (not that steve said the latter, that's only our esteemed President that thinks that).

I said it was food for thought. You can also take it with a grain of salt.

steveschneider wrote:

MiamiSpartan wrote:

I think Steve took his civics course at Trump University. Same class where they teach that a Vice President can reject electoral votes when he is counting them in front of Congress (not that steve said the latter, that's only our esteemed President that thinks that).

I said it was food for thought. You can also take it with a grain of salt.

See what happens you start listening to people without blue checkmarks, Steve?

Turnout doesn’t look great.

Rocinante wrote:Turnout doesn’t look great.

Thank you so much for sharing.

Rocinante wrote:Turnout doesn’t look great.

Over 3 million early votes.

What I’m saying is turnout will be lower than the election. What that means is not clear. I’m seeing some indications that it’s down in major Republican and Democratic areas. My stone cold prediction is republicans keep the seats. I want to be wrong.

[tw]1346576543783522304?s=21[/tw]

Please let me be wrong.

FWIW, the NYT "Needle" is saying Warnock likely to win and Ossof leading, based on projections/analysis of what is unreported.

MiamiSpartan wrote:FWIW, the NYT "Needle" is saying Warnock likely to win and Ossof leading, based on projections/analysis of what is unreported.

Good work by the needle. DeKalb county took a dump of 170K or so votes that was 85% Dem and Warnock is back in front and Ossof only down by 2,000.

Still a bit to go, plus potentially provisional and overseas ballots if it is close enough for that to matter.

I could never work in elections. It’s too stressful.

Turtle is in danger of losing power.

It’s happening!

Part of the deal Senator Graham

[tw]727604522156228608?s=21[/tw]

Stacey Abrams just wow. You hear about Tom Brady holding a grudge because he was drafted in the 7th round...ever since Stacey got screwed over by the gop in the governors race holy shit. She flipped Georgia blue.

[tw]1346635813229121537[/tw]

You reap what you sow bitches.

Ossoff is ahead of Perdue 50.2% - 49.8% with an estimated 98% of the votes counted, according to CNN

Isn't there a trump hate rally today in DC? Could get interesting. And by interesting I mean violent as fuck.

Watch Out Pylon! wrote:Isn't there a trump hate rally today in DC? Could get interesting. And by interesting I mean violent as fuck.

Yes, been discussed elsewhere, but I'm just hoping they are all talk with the threats and claims that have supposedly been made online. Otherwise today could be the new Ft Sumter.